Loading…

Differences in Vertical Structure of the Madden‐Julian Oscillation Associated With the Quasi‐Biennial Oscillation

The Madden‐Julian Oscillation (MJO) during boreal winter is more active and propagates eastward farther into the western Pacific during the easterly phase of quasi‐biennial oscillation (QBO). Using atmospheric reanalyses for 1980–2012, we show that the MJO‐induced upper tropospheric positive tempera...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical research letters 2018-05, Vol.45 (9), p.4419-4428
Main Authors: Hendon, Harry H., Abhik, S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3446-534bb9a34b2c255562ec5b698eaa4cfc6559d4feefed78caddefe20628283fee3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3446-534bb9a34b2c255562ec5b698eaa4cfc6559d4feefed78caddefe20628283fee3
container_end_page 4428
container_issue 9
container_start_page 4419
container_title Geophysical research letters
container_volume 45
creator Hendon, Harry H.
Abhik, S.
description The Madden‐Julian Oscillation (MJO) during boreal winter is more active and propagates eastward farther into the western Pacific during the easterly phase of quasi‐biennial oscillation (QBO). Using atmospheric reanalyses for 1980–2012, we show that the MJO‐induced upper tropospheric positive temperature anomaly and overriding cold cap anomaly are stronger and more in‐phase with the equatorial MJO‐convective anomaly during the easterly phase of the QBO. These temperature anomalies combine to destabilize the upper troposphere more in‐phase with MJO convection, thus acting to promote stronger MJO convection during the easterly phase of the QBO especially eastward of the Maritime Continent. This enhanced destabilization is promoted by the negative temperature anomaly at the tropopause resulting from the QBO during its easterly phase. These findings can account for the enhanced strength and farther eastward propagation of the MJO during the easterly phase of the QBO, but await confirmation by theoretical and modeling studies that can isolate these effects. Plain Language Summary The tropical Madden‐Julian Oscillation (MJO) is observed to be more active and predictable during boreal winter when the stratospheric quasi‐biennial oscillation (QBO) is in its easterly phase in the lower stratosphere. However, the mechanism by which the QBO affects the MJO has yet to be elucidated. We show using reanalyses for the period 1980–2012 that the vertical structure of the MJO near the equator is different during QBO easterly and westerly phases and that these differences are consistent with stronger MJO convection during easterly phases of the QBO. The proposed mechanism is via a combination of MJO‐induced and QBO‐induced reduction in stability at the tropopause during easterly phases of the QBO, which act to destabilize and strengthen MJO convection. These findings provide further insight into the mechanism of the MJO and can be used to guide improved representation and prediction of the MJO with forecast models. Key Points The vertical structure of the MJO in boreal winter is different during QBO easterly and westerly phases Tropopause static stability is more reduced in‐phase with MJO convection during easterly phase of QBO, consistent with stronger MJO amplitude Anomalously cold tropopause during the QBO easterly phase promotes the destabilization
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2018GL077207
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2047421767</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2047421767</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3446-534bb9a34b2c255562ec5b698eaa4cfc6559d4feefed78caddefe20628283fee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEqWw4wCW2BJwbMdOlqVAAQUh_peR64xVVyEptiPUHUfgjJwEl7Lois3MaPTNe6OH0GFKTlJCi1NK0nxSEikpkVtokBacJzkhchsNCCniTKXYRXvezwkhjLB0gPpzaww4aDV4bFv8Ai5YrRr8GFyvQ-8AdwaHGeBbVdfQfn9-3fSNVS2-89o2jQq2a_HI-05bFaDGrzbMfvn7Xnkb8TMLbWuj4sbBPtoxqvFw8NeH6Pny4ml8lZR3k-vxqEw041wkGePTaaFipZpmWSYo6GwqihyU4tpokWVFzQ2AgVrmevWgAUoEzWnO4poN0dFad-G69x58qOZd79poWVHCJaepFDJSx2tKu857B6ZaOPum3LJKSbUKttoMNuJ0jX_YBpb_stXkocwkE4L9AKQXfXs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2047421767</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in Vertical Structure of the Madden‐Julian Oscillation Associated With the Quasi‐Biennial Oscillation</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><creator>Hendon, Harry H. ; Abhik, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hendon, Harry H. ; Abhik, S.</creatorcontrib><description>The Madden‐Julian Oscillation (MJO) during boreal winter is more active and propagates eastward farther into the western Pacific during the easterly phase of quasi‐biennial oscillation (QBO). Using atmospheric reanalyses for 1980–2012, we show that the MJO‐induced upper tropospheric positive temperature anomaly and overriding cold cap anomaly are stronger and more in‐phase with the equatorial MJO‐convective anomaly during the easterly phase of the QBO. These temperature anomalies combine to destabilize the upper troposphere more in‐phase with MJO convection, thus acting to promote stronger MJO convection during the easterly phase of the QBO especially eastward of the Maritime Continent. This enhanced destabilization is promoted by the negative temperature anomaly at the tropopause resulting from the QBO during its easterly phase. These findings can account for the enhanced strength and farther eastward propagation of the MJO during the easterly phase of the QBO, but await confirmation by theoretical and modeling studies that can isolate these effects. Plain Language Summary The tropical Madden‐Julian Oscillation (MJO) is observed to be more active and predictable during boreal winter when the stratospheric quasi‐biennial oscillation (QBO) is in its easterly phase in the lower stratosphere. However, the mechanism by which the QBO affects the MJO has yet to be elucidated. We show using reanalyses for the period 1980–2012 that the vertical structure of the MJO near the equator is different during QBO easterly and westerly phases and that these differences are consistent with stronger MJO convection during easterly phases of the QBO. The proposed mechanism is via a combination of MJO‐induced and QBO‐induced reduction in stability at the tropopause during easterly phases of the QBO, which act to destabilize and strengthen MJO convection. These findings provide further insight into the mechanism of the MJO and can be used to guide improved representation and prediction of the MJO with forecast models. Key Points The vertical structure of the MJO in boreal winter is different during QBO easterly and westerly phases Tropopause static stability is more reduced in‐phase with MJO convection during easterly phase of QBO, consistent with stronger MJO amplitude Anomalously cold tropopause during the QBO easterly phase promotes the destabilization</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8007</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2018GL077207</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Anomalies ; Atmospheric models ; Biennial ; Convection ; Destabilization ; Equator ; Lower stratosphere ; Madden-Julian oscillation ; MJO ; Modelling ; Phases ; QBO ; Quasi-biennial oscillation ; Stability ; Stratosphere ; Temperature anomalies ; Temperature effects ; Tropical climate ; Tropopause ; Troposphere ; Upper troposphere ; Vertical profiles ; Winter</subject><ispartof>Geophysical research letters, 2018-05, Vol.45 (9), p.4419-4428</ispartof><rights>2018. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3446-534bb9a34b2c255562ec5b698eaa4cfc6559d4feefed78caddefe20628283fee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3446-534bb9a34b2c255562ec5b698eaa4cfc6559d4feefed78caddefe20628283fee3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6533-367X ; 0000-0002-4378-2263</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2018GL077207$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2018GL077207$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11514,27924,27925,46468,46892</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hendon, Harry H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abhik, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in Vertical Structure of the Madden‐Julian Oscillation Associated With the Quasi‐Biennial Oscillation</title><title>Geophysical research letters</title><description>The Madden‐Julian Oscillation (MJO) during boreal winter is more active and propagates eastward farther into the western Pacific during the easterly phase of quasi‐biennial oscillation (QBO). Using atmospheric reanalyses for 1980–2012, we show that the MJO‐induced upper tropospheric positive temperature anomaly and overriding cold cap anomaly are stronger and more in‐phase with the equatorial MJO‐convective anomaly during the easterly phase of the QBO. These temperature anomalies combine to destabilize the upper troposphere more in‐phase with MJO convection, thus acting to promote stronger MJO convection during the easterly phase of the QBO especially eastward of the Maritime Continent. This enhanced destabilization is promoted by the negative temperature anomaly at the tropopause resulting from the QBO during its easterly phase. These findings can account for the enhanced strength and farther eastward propagation of the MJO during the easterly phase of the QBO, but await confirmation by theoretical and modeling studies that can isolate these effects. Plain Language Summary The tropical Madden‐Julian Oscillation (MJO) is observed to be more active and predictable during boreal winter when the stratospheric quasi‐biennial oscillation (QBO) is in its easterly phase in the lower stratosphere. However, the mechanism by which the QBO affects the MJO has yet to be elucidated. We show using reanalyses for the period 1980–2012 that the vertical structure of the MJO near the equator is different during QBO easterly and westerly phases and that these differences are consistent with stronger MJO convection during easterly phases of the QBO. The proposed mechanism is via a combination of MJO‐induced and QBO‐induced reduction in stability at the tropopause during easterly phases of the QBO, which act to destabilize and strengthen MJO convection. These findings provide further insight into the mechanism of the MJO and can be used to guide improved representation and prediction of the MJO with forecast models. Key Points The vertical structure of the MJO in boreal winter is different during QBO easterly and westerly phases Tropopause static stability is more reduced in‐phase with MJO convection during easterly phase of QBO, consistent with stronger MJO amplitude Anomalously cold tropopause during the QBO easterly phase promotes the destabilization</description><subject>Anomalies</subject><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Biennial</subject><subject>Convection</subject><subject>Destabilization</subject><subject>Equator</subject><subject>Lower stratosphere</subject><subject>Madden-Julian oscillation</subject><subject>MJO</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Phases</subject><subject>QBO</subject><subject>Quasi-biennial oscillation</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Stratosphere</subject><subject>Temperature anomalies</subject><subject>Temperature effects</subject><subject>Tropical climate</subject><subject>Tropopause</subject><subject>Troposphere</subject><subject>Upper troposphere</subject><subject>Vertical profiles</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>0094-8276</issn><issn>1944-8007</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEqWw4wCW2BJwbMdOlqVAAQUh_peR64xVVyEptiPUHUfgjJwEl7Lois3MaPTNe6OH0GFKTlJCi1NK0nxSEikpkVtokBacJzkhchsNCCniTKXYRXvezwkhjLB0gPpzaww4aDV4bFv8Ai5YrRr8GFyvQ-8AdwaHGeBbVdfQfn9-3fSNVS2-89o2jQq2a_HI-05bFaDGrzbMfvn7Xnkb8TMLbWuj4sbBPtoxqvFw8NeH6Pny4ml8lZR3k-vxqEw041wkGePTaaFipZpmWSYo6GwqihyU4tpokWVFzQ2AgVrmevWgAUoEzWnO4poN0dFad-G69x58qOZd79poWVHCJaepFDJSx2tKu857B6ZaOPum3LJKSbUKttoMNuJ0jX_YBpb_stXkocwkE4L9AKQXfXs</recordid><startdate>20180516</startdate><enddate>20180516</enddate><creator>Hendon, Harry H.</creator><creator>Abhik, S.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6533-367X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4378-2263</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180516</creationdate><title>Differences in Vertical Structure of the Madden‐Julian Oscillation Associated With the Quasi‐Biennial Oscillation</title><author>Hendon, Harry H. ; Abhik, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3446-534bb9a34b2c255562ec5b698eaa4cfc6559d4feefed78caddefe20628283fee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Anomalies</topic><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Biennial</topic><topic>Convection</topic><topic>Destabilization</topic><topic>Equator</topic><topic>Lower stratosphere</topic><topic>Madden-Julian oscillation</topic><topic>MJO</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Phases</topic><topic>QBO</topic><topic>Quasi-biennial oscillation</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Stratosphere</topic><topic>Temperature anomalies</topic><topic>Temperature effects</topic><topic>Tropical climate</topic><topic>Tropopause</topic><topic>Troposphere</topic><topic>Upper troposphere</topic><topic>Vertical profiles</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hendon, Harry H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abhik, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hendon, Harry H.</au><au>Abhik, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in Vertical Structure of the Madden‐Julian Oscillation Associated With the Quasi‐Biennial Oscillation</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle><date>2018-05-16</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>4419</spage><epage>4428</epage><pages>4419-4428</pages><issn>0094-8276</issn><eissn>1944-8007</eissn><abstract>The Madden‐Julian Oscillation (MJO) during boreal winter is more active and propagates eastward farther into the western Pacific during the easterly phase of quasi‐biennial oscillation (QBO). Using atmospheric reanalyses for 1980–2012, we show that the MJO‐induced upper tropospheric positive temperature anomaly and overriding cold cap anomaly are stronger and more in‐phase with the equatorial MJO‐convective anomaly during the easterly phase of the QBO. These temperature anomalies combine to destabilize the upper troposphere more in‐phase with MJO convection, thus acting to promote stronger MJO convection during the easterly phase of the QBO especially eastward of the Maritime Continent. This enhanced destabilization is promoted by the negative temperature anomaly at the tropopause resulting from the QBO during its easterly phase. These findings can account for the enhanced strength and farther eastward propagation of the MJO during the easterly phase of the QBO, but await confirmation by theoretical and modeling studies that can isolate these effects. Plain Language Summary The tropical Madden‐Julian Oscillation (MJO) is observed to be more active and predictable during boreal winter when the stratospheric quasi‐biennial oscillation (QBO) is in its easterly phase in the lower stratosphere. However, the mechanism by which the QBO affects the MJO has yet to be elucidated. We show using reanalyses for the period 1980–2012 that the vertical structure of the MJO near the equator is different during QBO easterly and westerly phases and that these differences are consistent with stronger MJO convection during easterly phases of the QBO. The proposed mechanism is via a combination of MJO‐induced and QBO‐induced reduction in stability at the tropopause during easterly phases of the QBO, which act to destabilize and strengthen MJO convection. These findings provide further insight into the mechanism of the MJO and can be used to guide improved representation and prediction of the MJO with forecast models. Key Points The vertical structure of the MJO in boreal winter is different during QBO easterly and westerly phases Tropopause static stability is more reduced in‐phase with MJO convection during easterly phase of QBO, consistent with stronger MJO amplitude Anomalously cold tropopause during the QBO easterly phase promotes the destabilization</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2018GL077207</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6533-367X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4378-2263</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-8276
ispartof Geophysical research letters, 2018-05, Vol.45 (9), p.4419-4428
issn 0094-8276
1944-8007
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2047421767
source Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library
subjects Anomalies
Atmospheric models
Biennial
Convection
Destabilization
Equator
Lower stratosphere
Madden-Julian oscillation
MJO
Modelling
Phases
QBO
Quasi-biennial oscillation
Stability
Stratosphere
Temperature anomalies
Temperature effects
Tropical climate
Tropopause
Troposphere
Upper troposphere
Vertical profiles
Winter
title Differences in Vertical Structure of the Madden‐Julian Oscillation Associated With the Quasi‐Biennial Oscillation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T00%3A22%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20Vertical%20Structure%20of%20the%20Madden%E2%80%90Julian%20Oscillation%20Associated%20With%20the%20Quasi%E2%80%90Biennial%20Oscillation&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20research%20letters&rft.au=Hendon,%20Harry%20H.&rft.date=2018-05-16&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=4419&rft.epage=4428&rft.pages=4419-4428&rft.issn=0094-8276&rft.eissn=1944-8007&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2018GL077207&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2047421767%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3446-534bb9a34b2c255562ec5b698eaa4cfc6559d4feefed78caddefe20628283fee3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2047421767&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true