Loading…
Head‐to‐head comparison of 18F‐FP‐CIT and 123I‐FP‐CIT for dopamine transporter imaging in patients with Parkinson's disease: A preliminary study
123I‐FP‐CIT and 18F‐FP‐CIT are radiotracers which are widely used to diagnose Parkinson's disease (PD). However, to our knowledge, no studies to date have made head‐to‐head comparisons between 123I‐FP‐CIT and 18F‐FP‐CIT. Therefore, in this study, 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT/CT was compared with 18F‐FP‐CI...
Saved in:
Published in: | Synapse (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2018-07, Vol.72 (7), p.n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Synapse (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Lee, Inki Kim, Jin Su Park, Joon Yeun Byun, Byung Hyun Park, Su Yeon Choi, Joon Ho Moon, Hansol Kim, Jung Young Lee, Kyo Chul Chi, Dae Yoon Kim, Kyeong Min Lim, Ilhan Kang, Joo Hyun Ahn, Soon Hyuk Kim, Byung Il Ha, Jeong Ho Lim, Sang Moo |
description | 123I‐FP‐CIT and 18F‐FP‐CIT are radiotracers which are widely used to diagnose Parkinson's disease (PD). However, to our knowledge, no studies to date have made head‐to‐head comparisons between 123I‐FP‐CIT and 18F‐FP‐CIT. Therefore, in this study, 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT/CT was compared with 18F‐FP‐CIT PET/CT in the same cohort of subjects. Patients with PD and essential tremor (ET) underwent 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT/CT and 18F‐FP‐CIT PET/CT. Visual and semiquantitative analyses were conducted. The specific binding ratio (SBR) and putamen to caudate ratio (PCR) were compared between subjects who underwent 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT/CT and 18F‐FP‐CIT PET/CT. Visual analysis showed that the striatal uptake of both radiotracers was decreased in the PD group, whereas striatal uptake was intact in the ET group. The SBR between 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT/CT and 18F‐FP‐CIT PET/CT showed a positive correlation (r = .78, p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/syn.22032 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2047436509</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2047436509</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1032-83e400d2b2b0d18c5b0362a6696b793b1824b5ee8cbc13d754898598d1ea86943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUEtOwzAUtBBIlMKCG1hiwSrt8yeJww5VFCpVgERZsIqc2G1dWjvYqarsOAIH4HScBFNYsJn39N5oRjMInRMYEAA6DJ0dUAqMHqAegUIklBXZIeqBEHnCeZ4do5MQVgDACPAe-rzTUn29f7QuwjLuuHabRnoTnMVujokYx8f4McJoMsPSKkwom_y_zZ3HyjVyY6zGrZc2NM632mOzkQtjF9hY3MjWaNsGvDPtEj9K_2psdLgMWJmgZdBX-Bo3Xq9NVJG-w6Hdqu4UHc3lOuizv9lHz-Ob2egumT7cTkbX06QhMWkimOYAila0AkVEnVbAMiqzrMiqvGAVEZRXqdairmrCVJ5yUYi0EIpoKbKCsz66-NVtvHvb6tCWK7f1NlqWFHjOWZZCEVnDX9bOrHVXNj7m811JoPxpvozNl_vmy6eX-_3CvgEJI32o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2047436509</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Head‐to‐head comparison of 18F‐FP‐CIT and 123I‐FP‐CIT for dopamine transporter imaging in patients with Parkinson's disease: A preliminary study</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Lee, Inki ; Kim, Jin Su ; Park, Joon Yeun ; Byun, Byung Hyun ; Park, Su Yeon ; Choi, Joon Ho ; Moon, Hansol ; Kim, Jung Young ; Lee, Kyo Chul ; Chi, Dae Yoon ; Kim, Kyeong Min ; Lim, Ilhan ; Kang, Joo Hyun ; Ahn, Soon Hyuk ; Kim, Byung Il ; Ha, Jeong Ho ; Lim, Sang Moo</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Inki ; Kim, Jin Su ; Park, Joon Yeun ; Byun, Byung Hyun ; Park, Su Yeon ; Choi, Joon Ho ; Moon, Hansol ; Kim, Jung Young ; Lee, Kyo Chul ; Chi, Dae Yoon ; Kim, Kyeong Min ; Lim, Ilhan ; Kang, Joo Hyun ; Ahn, Soon Hyuk ; Kim, Byung Il ; Ha, Jeong Ho ; Lim, Sang Moo</creatorcontrib><description>123I‐FP‐CIT and 18F‐FP‐CIT are radiotracers which are widely used to diagnose Parkinson's disease (PD). However, to our knowledge, no studies to date have made head‐to‐head comparisons between 123I‐FP‐CIT and 18F‐FP‐CIT. Therefore, in this study, 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT/CT was compared with 18F‐FP‐CIT PET/CT in the same cohort of subjects. Patients with PD and essential tremor (ET) underwent 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT/CT and 18F‐FP‐CIT PET/CT. Visual and semiquantitative analyses were conducted. The specific binding ratio (SBR) and putamen to caudate ratio (PCR) were compared between subjects who underwent 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT/CT and 18F‐FP‐CIT PET/CT. Visual analysis showed that the striatal uptake of both radiotracers was decreased in the PD group, whereas striatal uptake was intact in the ET group. The SBR between 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT/CT and 18F‐FP‐CIT PET/CT showed a positive correlation (r = .78, p < .01). However, the mean SBRs on 18F‐FP‐CIT PET/CT were higher than those on 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT/CT (2.19 ± .87 and 1.22 ± .49, respectively; p < .01). The PCRs in these two modalities were correlated with each other (r = .71, p < .01). The mean PCRs on 18F‐FP‐CIT PET/CT were not significantly higher than those on 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT/CT (1.31 ± .19 and 0.98 ± .06, respectively; p = .06). These preliminary results indicate that the uptake of both 123I‐FP‐CIT and 18F‐FP‐CIT was decreased in the PD group when compared with the ET controls. Visual analyses using both methods did not affect the diagnostic accuracy in this study. However, semiquantitative analysis indicated a better contrast of 18F‐FP‐CIT PET/CT relative to 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT/CT.
The Specific binding ratio measured on 18F‐FP‐CIT PET and 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT presented a significant positive linear correlation with each other. However, the mean SBRs on 18F‐FP‐CIT PET were significantly higherthan those on 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT. The visual diagnostic performance for PD between 18F‐FP‐CIT PET and 123IFP‐CIT SPECT scans was not significantly different.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-4476</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2396</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/syn.22032</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>123I‐FP‐CIT ; 18F‐FP‐CIT ; Computed tomography ; Dopamine transporter ; Movement disorders ; Neostriatum ; Neurodegenerative diseases ; Parkinson's disease ; positron emission tomography ; Putamen ; Single photon emission computed tomography ; Tremor</subject><ispartof>Synapse (New York, N.Y.), 2018-07, Vol.72 (7), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-2051-3597</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Inki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jin Su</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Joon Yeun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byun, Byung Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Su Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Joon Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, Hansol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jung Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kyo Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chi, Dae Yoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Kyeong Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Ilhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Joo Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Soon Hyuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Byung Il</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ha, Jeong Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Sang Moo</creatorcontrib><title>Head‐to‐head comparison of 18F‐FP‐CIT and 123I‐FP‐CIT for dopamine transporter imaging in patients with Parkinson's disease: A preliminary study</title><title>Synapse (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>123I‐FP‐CIT and 18F‐FP‐CIT are radiotracers which are widely used to diagnose Parkinson's disease (PD). However, to our knowledge, no studies to date have made head‐to‐head comparisons between 123I‐FP‐CIT and 18F‐FP‐CIT. Therefore, in this study, 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT/CT was compared with 18F‐FP‐CIT PET/CT in the same cohort of subjects. Patients with PD and essential tremor (ET) underwent 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT/CT and 18F‐FP‐CIT PET/CT. Visual and semiquantitative analyses were conducted. The specific binding ratio (SBR) and putamen to caudate ratio (PCR) were compared between subjects who underwent 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT/CT and 18F‐FP‐CIT PET/CT. Visual analysis showed that the striatal uptake of both radiotracers was decreased in the PD group, whereas striatal uptake was intact in the ET group. The SBR between 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT/CT and 18F‐FP‐CIT PET/CT showed a positive correlation (r = .78, p < .01). However, the mean SBRs on 18F‐FP‐CIT PET/CT were higher than those on 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT/CT (2.19 ± .87 and 1.22 ± .49, respectively; p < .01). The PCRs in these two modalities were correlated with each other (r = .71, p < .01). The mean PCRs on 18F‐FP‐CIT PET/CT were not significantly higher than those on 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT/CT (1.31 ± .19 and 0.98 ± .06, respectively; p = .06). These preliminary results indicate that the uptake of both 123I‐FP‐CIT and 18F‐FP‐CIT was decreased in the PD group when compared with the ET controls. Visual analyses using both methods did not affect the diagnostic accuracy in this study. However, semiquantitative analysis indicated a better contrast of 18F‐FP‐CIT PET/CT relative to 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT/CT.
The Specific binding ratio measured on 18F‐FP‐CIT PET and 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT presented a significant positive linear correlation with each other. However, the mean SBRs on 18F‐FP‐CIT PET were significantly higherthan those on 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT. The visual diagnostic performance for PD between 18F‐FP‐CIT PET and 123IFP‐CIT SPECT scans was not significantly different.</description><subject>123I‐FP‐CIT</subject><subject>18F‐FP‐CIT</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Dopamine transporter</subject><subject>Movement disorders</subject><subject>Neostriatum</subject><subject>Neurodegenerative diseases</subject><subject>Parkinson's disease</subject><subject>positron emission tomography</subject><subject>Putamen</subject><subject>Single photon emission computed tomography</subject><subject>Tremor</subject><issn>0887-4476</issn><issn>1098-2396</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNUEtOwzAUtBBIlMKCG1hiwSrt8yeJww5VFCpVgERZsIqc2G1dWjvYqarsOAIH4HScBFNYsJn39N5oRjMInRMYEAA6DJ0dUAqMHqAegUIklBXZIeqBEHnCeZ4do5MQVgDACPAe-rzTUn29f7QuwjLuuHabRnoTnMVujokYx8f4McJoMsPSKkwom_y_zZ3HyjVyY6zGrZc2NM632mOzkQtjF9hY3MjWaNsGvDPtEj9K_2psdLgMWJmgZdBX-Bo3Xq9NVJG-w6Hdqu4UHc3lOuizv9lHz-Ob2egumT7cTkbX06QhMWkimOYAila0AkVEnVbAMiqzrMiqvGAVEZRXqdairmrCVJ5yUYi0EIpoKbKCsz66-NVtvHvb6tCWK7f1NlqWFHjOWZZCEVnDX9bOrHVXNj7m811JoPxpvozNl_vmy6eX-_3CvgEJI32o</recordid><startdate>201807</startdate><enddate>201807</enddate><creator>Lee, Inki</creator><creator>Kim, Jin Su</creator><creator>Park, Joon Yeun</creator><creator>Byun, Byung Hyun</creator><creator>Park, Su Yeon</creator><creator>Choi, Joon Ho</creator><creator>Moon, Hansol</creator><creator>Kim, Jung Young</creator><creator>Lee, Kyo Chul</creator><creator>Chi, Dae Yoon</creator><creator>Kim, Kyeong Min</creator><creator>Lim, Ilhan</creator><creator>Kang, Joo Hyun</creator><creator>Ahn, Soon Hyuk</creator><creator>Kim, Byung Il</creator><creator>Ha, Jeong Ho</creator><creator>Lim, Sang Moo</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2051-3597</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201807</creationdate><title>Head‐to‐head comparison of 18F‐FP‐CIT and 123I‐FP‐CIT for dopamine transporter imaging in patients with Parkinson's disease: A preliminary study</title><author>Lee, Inki ; Kim, Jin Su ; Park, Joon Yeun ; Byun, Byung Hyun ; Park, Su Yeon ; Choi, Joon Ho ; Moon, Hansol ; Kim, Jung Young ; Lee, Kyo Chul ; Chi, Dae Yoon ; Kim, Kyeong Min ; Lim, Ilhan ; Kang, Joo Hyun ; Ahn, Soon Hyuk ; Kim, Byung Il ; Ha, Jeong Ho ; Lim, Sang Moo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1032-83e400d2b2b0d18c5b0362a6696b793b1824b5ee8cbc13d754898598d1ea86943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>123I‐FP‐CIT</topic><topic>18F‐FP‐CIT</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Dopamine transporter</topic><topic>Movement disorders</topic><topic>Neostriatum</topic><topic>Neurodegenerative diseases</topic><topic>Parkinson's disease</topic><topic>positron emission tomography</topic><topic>Putamen</topic><topic>Single photon emission computed tomography</topic><topic>Tremor</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Inki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jin Su</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Joon Yeun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byun, Byung Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Su Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Joon Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, Hansol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jung Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kyo Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chi, Dae Yoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Kyeong Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Ilhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Joo Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Soon Hyuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Byung Il</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ha, Jeong Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Sang Moo</creatorcontrib><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Synapse (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Inki</au><au>Kim, Jin Su</au><au>Park, Joon Yeun</au><au>Byun, Byung Hyun</au><au>Park, Su Yeon</au><au>Choi, Joon Ho</au><au>Moon, Hansol</au><au>Kim, Jung Young</au><au>Lee, Kyo Chul</au><au>Chi, Dae Yoon</au><au>Kim, Kyeong Min</au><au>Lim, Ilhan</au><au>Kang, Joo Hyun</au><au>Ahn, Soon Hyuk</au><au>Kim, Byung Il</au><au>Ha, Jeong Ho</au><au>Lim, Sang Moo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Head‐to‐head comparison of 18F‐FP‐CIT and 123I‐FP‐CIT for dopamine transporter imaging in patients with Parkinson's disease: A preliminary study</atitle><jtitle>Synapse (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>2018-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>7</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0887-4476</issn><eissn>1098-2396</eissn><abstract>123I‐FP‐CIT and 18F‐FP‐CIT are radiotracers which are widely used to diagnose Parkinson's disease (PD). However, to our knowledge, no studies to date have made head‐to‐head comparisons between 123I‐FP‐CIT and 18F‐FP‐CIT. Therefore, in this study, 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT/CT was compared with 18F‐FP‐CIT PET/CT in the same cohort of subjects. Patients with PD and essential tremor (ET) underwent 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT/CT and 18F‐FP‐CIT PET/CT. Visual and semiquantitative analyses were conducted. The specific binding ratio (SBR) and putamen to caudate ratio (PCR) were compared between subjects who underwent 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT/CT and 18F‐FP‐CIT PET/CT. Visual analysis showed that the striatal uptake of both radiotracers was decreased in the PD group, whereas striatal uptake was intact in the ET group. The SBR between 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT/CT and 18F‐FP‐CIT PET/CT showed a positive correlation (r = .78, p < .01). However, the mean SBRs on 18F‐FP‐CIT PET/CT were higher than those on 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT/CT (2.19 ± .87 and 1.22 ± .49, respectively; p < .01). The PCRs in these two modalities were correlated with each other (r = .71, p < .01). The mean PCRs on 18F‐FP‐CIT PET/CT were not significantly higher than those on 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT/CT (1.31 ± .19 and 0.98 ± .06, respectively; p = .06). These preliminary results indicate that the uptake of both 123I‐FP‐CIT and 18F‐FP‐CIT was decreased in the PD group when compared with the ET controls. Visual analyses using both methods did not affect the diagnostic accuracy in this study. However, semiquantitative analysis indicated a better contrast of 18F‐FP‐CIT PET/CT relative to 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT/CT.
The Specific binding ratio measured on 18F‐FP‐CIT PET and 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT presented a significant positive linear correlation with each other. However, the mean SBRs on 18F‐FP‐CIT PET were significantly higherthan those on 123I‐FP‐CIT SPECT. The visual diagnostic performance for PD between 18F‐FP‐CIT PET and 123IFP‐CIT SPECT scans was not significantly different.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/syn.22032</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2051-3597</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0887-4476 |
ispartof | Synapse (New York, N.Y.), 2018-07, Vol.72 (7), p.n/a |
issn | 0887-4476 1098-2396 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2047436509 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | 123I‐FP‐CIT 18F‐FP‐CIT Computed tomography Dopamine transporter Movement disorders Neostriatum Neurodegenerative diseases Parkinson's disease positron emission tomography Putamen Single photon emission computed tomography Tremor |
title | Head‐to‐head comparison of 18F‐FP‐CIT and 123I‐FP‐CIT for dopamine transporter imaging in patients with Parkinson's disease: A preliminary study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T22%3A49%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Head%E2%80%90to%E2%80%90head%20comparison%20of%2018F%E2%80%90FP%E2%80%90CIT%20and%20123I%E2%80%90FP%E2%80%90CIT%20for%20dopamine%20transporter%20imaging%20in%20patients%20with%20Parkinson's%20disease:%20A%20preliminary%20study&rft.jtitle=Synapse%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Lee,%20Inki&rft.date=2018-07&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=7&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0887-4476&rft.eissn=1098-2396&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/syn.22032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2047436509%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1032-83e400d2b2b0d18c5b0362a6696b793b1824b5ee8cbc13d754898598d1ea86943%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2047436509&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |