Loading…
Effect of Sodium Caseinate on Equine Hindgut Fermentation and Fiber Digestion
Supplementing protein to cattle consuming low quality forages has shown to increase DMI, DM digestibility, and VFA production. Given similarities between the rumen and cecum, it can be hypothesized the same would be true in the equine. Eight cecally cannulated Quarter Horses were used in replicated...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of animal science 2018-04, Vol.96, p.31-32 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 32 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 31 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 96 |
creator | Jordan, K V Drouillard, J S Douthit, T L Lattimer, J M |
description | Supplementing protein to cattle consuming low quality forages has shown to increase DMI, DM digestibility, and VFA production. Given similarities between the rumen and cecum, it can be hypothesized the same would be true in the equine. Eight cecally cannulated Quarter Horses were used in replicated 4 x 4 Latin square design conducted in 4, 14-d periods to determine effects of sodium caseinate on equine hindgut fermentation and fiber digestion. Horses were assigned to 1 of 4 treatments during each period, consisting of control (water; CON), 0.125 g casein/kg BW (LOW), 0.25 g casein/kg BW (MED), or 0.5 g casein/kg BW (HI). Casein was solubilized in 800 mL of water and dosed directly into the cecum at 0700 and 1900 each day using a metal dosing syringe. Smooth Bromegrass hay (CP 8.50%) and water were available ad libitum. New hay was fed at 0700 and 1900 and orts were recorded at 1900 each day. During the final 3 d of each period, cecal digesta were collected every 6 h. Digesta pH was measured immediately after sampling, and samples were then frozen for subsequent analyses of VFA and NH3 concentrations. Feed intake during the final 4-d of each period was recorded, and feces were collected over the 3-d sampling period, pooled, subsampled, and analyzed to determine pH, and digestibilities of DM, OM, NDF, and ADF. Digestibilities of DM, OM, NDF, and ADF were unaffected by treatment (P > 0.40). Cecal digesta pH was greater for horses dosed with CON and MED compared to horses receiving the LOW and HI treatments (P < 0.01). Cecal NH3 concentrations increased linearly in response to the amount of casein administered (P < 0.01), and decreased 6 h after dosing and addition of new hay regardless of treatment (P < 0.01). Concentrations of VFA were unaffected by treatment, but VFA concentrations did change over time with the greatest concentrations observed 6 h after treatment and introduction of new hay (P < 0.01). Treatment did not affect DMI (P ≥ 0.17). In this experiment, cecal infusions of sodium caseinate had no effect on fermentation parameters or fiber degradation. While a type II error may have occurred due to the small population size, it is more likely that the medium quality hay fed to these horses provided sufficient protein for microbial fermentation. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2048068277</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2048068277</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20480682773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNiksKwjAUAIMoWD93eOC6kKS2jeva4saV7ku0LyXFJjaf-1vBA7gamJkFSVjO8zRjRbYkCaWcpUIwviYb7wdKGc9PeUKutVL4DGAV3Gyn4wiV9KiNDAjWQD1FbRAu2nR9DNCgG9EEGfTcpOmg0Q90cNY9-q_bkZWSL4_7H7fk0NT36pK-nZ3i_LSDjc7MqeX0KGgheFlm_10fNAI-hA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2048068277</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Sodium Caseinate on Equine Hindgut Fermentation and Fiber Digestion</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Jordan, K V ; Drouillard, J S ; Douthit, T L ; Lattimer, J M</creator><creatorcontrib>Jordan, K V ; Drouillard, J S ; Douthit, T L ; Lattimer, J M</creatorcontrib><description>Supplementing protein to cattle consuming low quality forages has shown to increase DMI, DM digestibility, and VFA production. Given similarities between the rumen and cecum, it can be hypothesized the same would be true in the equine. Eight cecally cannulated Quarter Horses were used in replicated 4 x 4 Latin square design conducted in 4, 14-d periods to determine effects of sodium caseinate on equine hindgut fermentation and fiber digestion. Horses were assigned to 1 of 4 treatments during each period, consisting of control (water; CON), 0.125 g casein/kg BW (LOW), 0.25 g casein/kg BW (MED), or 0.5 g casein/kg BW (HI). Casein was solubilized in 800 mL of water and dosed directly into the cecum at 0700 and 1900 each day using a metal dosing syringe. Smooth Bromegrass hay (CP 8.50%) and water were available ad libitum. New hay was fed at 0700 and 1900 and orts were recorded at 1900 each day. During the final 3 d of each period, cecal digesta were collected every 6 h. Digesta pH was measured immediately after sampling, and samples were then frozen for subsequent analyses of VFA and NH3 concentrations. Feed intake during the final 4-d of each period was recorded, and feces were collected over the 3-d sampling period, pooled, subsampled, and analyzed to determine pH, and digestibilities of DM, OM, NDF, and ADF. Digestibilities of DM, OM, NDF, and ADF were unaffected by treatment (P > 0.40). Cecal digesta pH was greater for horses dosed with CON and MED compared to horses receiving the LOW and HI treatments (P < 0.01). Cecal NH3 concentrations increased linearly in response to the amount of casein administered (P < 0.01), and decreased 6 h after dosing and addition of new hay regardless of treatment (P < 0.01). Concentrations of VFA were unaffected by treatment, but VFA concentrations did change over time with the greatest concentrations observed 6 h after treatment and introduction of new hay (P < 0.01). Treatment did not affect DMI (P ≥ 0.17). In this experiment, cecal infusions of sodium caseinate had no effect on fermentation parameters or fiber degradation. While a type II error may have occurred due to the small population size, it is more likely that the medium quality hay fed to these horses provided sufficient protein for microbial fermentation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Ammonia ; Casein ; Cecum ; Dietary fiber ; Digestibility ; Digestion ; Fermentation ; Hay ; Hindgut ; Horses ; Microorganisms ; pH effects ; Population number ; Proteins ; Sampling ; Sodium</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2018-04, Vol.96, p.31-32</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press, UK Apr 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jordan, K V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drouillard, J S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douthit, T L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lattimer, J M</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Sodium Caseinate on Equine Hindgut Fermentation and Fiber Digestion</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Supplementing protein to cattle consuming low quality forages has shown to increase DMI, DM digestibility, and VFA production. Given similarities between the rumen and cecum, it can be hypothesized the same would be true in the equine. Eight cecally cannulated Quarter Horses were used in replicated 4 x 4 Latin square design conducted in 4, 14-d periods to determine effects of sodium caseinate on equine hindgut fermentation and fiber digestion. Horses were assigned to 1 of 4 treatments during each period, consisting of control (water; CON), 0.125 g casein/kg BW (LOW), 0.25 g casein/kg BW (MED), or 0.5 g casein/kg BW (HI). Casein was solubilized in 800 mL of water and dosed directly into the cecum at 0700 and 1900 each day using a metal dosing syringe. Smooth Bromegrass hay (CP 8.50%) and water were available ad libitum. New hay was fed at 0700 and 1900 and orts were recorded at 1900 each day. During the final 3 d of each period, cecal digesta were collected every 6 h. Digesta pH was measured immediately after sampling, and samples were then frozen for subsequent analyses of VFA and NH3 concentrations. Feed intake during the final 4-d of each period was recorded, and feces were collected over the 3-d sampling period, pooled, subsampled, and analyzed to determine pH, and digestibilities of DM, OM, NDF, and ADF. Digestibilities of DM, OM, NDF, and ADF were unaffected by treatment (P > 0.40). Cecal digesta pH was greater for horses dosed with CON and MED compared to horses receiving the LOW and HI treatments (P < 0.01). Cecal NH3 concentrations increased linearly in response to the amount of casein administered (P < 0.01), and decreased 6 h after dosing and addition of new hay regardless of treatment (P < 0.01). Concentrations of VFA were unaffected by treatment, but VFA concentrations did change over time with the greatest concentrations observed 6 h after treatment and introduction of new hay (P < 0.01). Treatment did not affect DMI (P ≥ 0.17). In this experiment, cecal infusions of sodium caseinate had no effect on fermentation parameters or fiber degradation. While a type II error may have occurred due to the small population size, it is more likely that the medium quality hay fed to these horses provided sufficient protein for microbial fermentation.</description><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Casein</subject><subject>Cecum</subject><subject>Dietary fiber</subject><subject>Digestibility</subject><subject>Digestion</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Hay</subject><subject>Hindgut</subject><subject>Horses</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>pH effects</subject><subject>Population number</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Sodium</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNiksKwjAUAIMoWD93eOC6kKS2jeva4saV7ku0LyXFJjaf-1vBA7gamJkFSVjO8zRjRbYkCaWcpUIwviYb7wdKGc9PeUKutVL4DGAV3Gyn4wiV9KiNDAjWQD1FbRAu2nR9DNCgG9EEGfTcpOmg0Q90cNY9-q_bkZWSL4_7H7fk0NT36pK-nZ3i_LSDjc7MqeX0KGgheFlm_10fNAI-hA</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Jordan, K V</creator><creator>Drouillard, J S</creator><creator>Douthit, T L</creator><creator>Lattimer, J M</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Effect of Sodium Caseinate on Equine Hindgut Fermentation and Fiber Digestion</title><author>Jordan, K V ; Drouillard, J S ; Douthit, T L ; Lattimer, J M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20480682773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Casein</topic><topic>Cecum</topic><topic>Dietary fiber</topic><topic>Digestibility</topic><topic>Digestion</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Hay</topic><topic>Hindgut</topic><topic>Horses</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>pH effects</topic><topic>Population number</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Sodium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jordan, K V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drouillard, J S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douthit, T L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lattimer, J M</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture & Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jordan, K V</au><au>Drouillard, J S</au><au>Douthit, T L</au><au>Lattimer, J M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Sodium Caseinate on Equine Hindgut Fermentation and Fiber Digestion</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>96</volume><spage>31</spage><epage>32</epage><pages>31-32</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Supplementing protein to cattle consuming low quality forages has shown to increase DMI, DM digestibility, and VFA production. Given similarities between the rumen and cecum, it can be hypothesized the same would be true in the equine. Eight cecally cannulated Quarter Horses were used in replicated 4 x 4 Latin square design conducted in 4, 14-d periods to determine effects of sodium caseinate on equine hindgut fermentation and fiber digestion. Horses were assigned to 1 of 4 treatments during each period, consisting of control (water; CON), 0.125 g casein/kg BW (LOW), 0.25 g casein/kg BW (MED), or 0.5 g casein/kg BW (HI). Casein was solubilized in 800 mL of water and dosed directly into the cecum at 0700 and 1900 each day using a metal dosing syringe. Smooth Bromegrass hay (CP 8.50%) and water were available ad libitum. New hay was fed at 0700 and 1900 and orts were recorded at 1900 each day. During the final 3 d of each period, cecal digesta were collected every 6 h. Digesta pH was measured immediately after sampling, and samples were then frozen for subsequent analyses of VFA and NH3 concentrations. Feed intake during the final 4-d of each period was recorded, and feces were collected over the 3-d sampling period, pooled, subsampled, and analyzed to determine pH, and digestibilities of DM, OM, NDF, and ADF. Digestibilities of DM, OM, NDF, and ADF were unaffected by treatment (P > 0.40). Cecal digesta pH was greater for horses dosed with CON and MED compared to horses receiving the LOW and HI treatments (P < 0.01). Cecal NH3 concentrations increased linearly in response to the amount of casein administered (P < 0.01), and decreased 6 h after dosing and addition of new hay regardless of treatment (P < 0.01). Concentrations of VFA were unaffected by treatment, but VFA concentrations did change over time with the greatest concentrations observed 6 h after treatment and introduction of new hay (P < 0.01). Treatment did not affect DMI (P ≥ 0.17). In this experiment, cecal infusions of sodium caseinate had no effect on fermentation parameters or fiber degradation. While a type II error may have occurred due to the small population size, it is more likely that the medium quality hay fed to these horses provided sufficient protein for microbial fermentation.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2018-04, Vol.96, p.31-32 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2048068277 |
source | Oxford Journals Online; PubMed Central |
subjects | Ammonia Casein Cecum Dietary fiber Digestibility Digestion Fermentation Hay Hindgut Horses Microorganisms pH effects Population number Proteins Sampling Sodium |
title | Effect of Sodium Caseinate on Equine Hindgut Fermentation and Fiber Digestion |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T06%3A39%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Sodium%20Caseinate%20on%20Equine%20Hindgut%20Fermentation%20and%20Fiber%20Digestion&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Jordan,%20K%20V&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=96&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=32&rft.pages=31-32&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2048068277%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20480682773%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2048068277&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |