Loading…
The Harris Design-2 Total Hip Replacement Fixed with So-Called Second-Generation Cementing Techniques. A Ten to Fifteen-Year Follow-up
We analyzed the clinical results of 195 Harris Design-2 total hip replacements performed with so-called second-generation cementing techniques in 166 consecutive patients who had osteoarthrosis. The mean age of the patients at the time of the replacement was sixty-seven years and nine months (range,...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 1998-12, Vol.80 (12), p.1775-80 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3807-27d7550b74e5f6ca75061fc668f599806d75bd31fabfb46b9358778bb05dc32a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3807-27d7550b74e5f6ca75061fc668f599806d75bd31fabfb46b9358778bb05dc32a3 |
container_end_page | 80 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1775 |
container_title | Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume |
container_volume | 80 |
creator | BOURNE, R B RORABECK, C H SKUTEK, M MIKKELSEN, S WINEMAKER, M ROBERTSON, D |
description | We analyzed the clinical results of 195 Harris Design-2 total hip replacements performed with so-called second-generation cementing techniques in 166 consecutive patients who had osteoarthrosis. The mean age of the patients at the time of the replacement was sixty-seven years and nine months (range, thirty-one to eighty-nine years). Forty-eight patients (fifty-four hips) died before the time of the latest follow-up, but the implants were apparently functioning well at the time of death. Three patients (four hips) were lost to follow-up. Five patients (five hips; 3 percent) had a revision because of aseptic loosening of the acetabular or femoral component, or both, that was related to wear-induced osteolysis. The mean Harris hip score for the 131 hips that were available at the latest follow-up examination at a mean of twelve years (range, ten to fifteen years) after the operation was 89 ± 10 points. On the basis of the Harris hip score, seventy-six hips had an excellent result, thirty-four had a good result, fifteen had a fair result, and six had a poor result at the latest follow-up examination. Radiographically, twelve (9 percent) of the 131 acetabular components and three (2 percent) of the 131 femoral components were probably or definitely loose. At a mean of twelve years, 186 (97 percent) of 191 Harris Design-2 implants were in situ or had been in situ at the time of the patientʼs death. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2106/00004623-199812000-00007 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_205178677</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38560948</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3807-27d7550b74e5f6ca75061fc668f599806d75bd31fabfb46b9358778bb05dc32a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Ud1uFCEYJUZTt9VHMCHGWyowA8xcNmu326SJiV0vvJowzDcdKgsjzGT1BXxume5ar-SGnJ_vAAeEMKOXnFH5keZVSl4QVtcV4xmRhVIv0IqJQhBWVPIlWlHKGakLIV6j85Qel6GSqjN0VldKZH6Ffu8GwFsdo034EyT74AnHuzBph7d2xF9gdNrAHvyEN_YndPhgpwHfB7LWzmV4Dyb4jtyAh6gnGzxeP7mtf8A7MIO3P2ZIl_gqI4-nkFP6CcCTb6Aj3gTnwoHM4xv0qtcuwdvTfoG-bq536y25-3xzu766I6aoqCJcdUoI2qoSRC-NVoJK1hspq17kIqjMctsVrNdt35ayzU-slKralorOFFwXF-j9MXeMYbnY1DyGOfp8ZMOpYKqSSmVTdTSZGFKK0DdjtHsdfzWMNkv9zd_6m-f6n6hl9N0pf2730D0PnvrO-oeTrpPRro_aG5v-5UvBa86yrTzaDsFNENN3Nx8gNgNoNw3N_z6_-AMcGpsn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205178677</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Harris Design-2 Total Hip Replacement Fixed with So-Called Second-Generation Cementing Techniques. A Ten to Fifteen-Year Follow-up</title><source>HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</source><creator>BOURNE, R B ; RORABECK, C H ; SKUTEK, M ; MIKKELSEN, S ; WINEMAKER, M ; ROBERTSON, D</creator><creatorcontrib>BOURNE, R B ; RORABECK, C H ; SKUTEK, M ; MIKKELSEN, S ; WINEMAKER, M ; ROBERTSON, D</creatorcontrib><description>We analyzed the clinical results of 195 Harris Design-2 total hip replacements performed with so-called second-generation cementing techniques in 166 consecutive patients who had osteoarthrosis. The mean age of the patients at the time of the replacement was sixty-seven years and nine months (range, thirty-one to eighty-nine years). Forty-eight patients (fifty-four hips) died before the time of the latest follow-up, but the implants were apparently functioning well at the time of death. Three patients (four hips) were lost to follow-up. Five patients (five hips; 3 percent) had a revision because of aseptic loosening of the acetabular or femoral component, or both, that was related to wear-induced osteolysis. The mean Harris hip score for the 131 hips that were available at the latest follow-up examination at a mean of twelve years (range, ten to fifteen years) after the operation was 89 ± 10 points. On the basis of the Harris hip score, seventy-six hips had an excellent result, thirty-four had a good result, fifteen had a fair result, and six had a poor result at the latest follow-up examination. Radiographically, twelve (9 percent) of the 131 acetabular components and three (2 percent) of the 131 femoral components were probably or definitely loose. At a mean of twelve years, 186 (97 percent) of 191 Harris Design-2 implants were in situ or had been in situ at the time of the patientʼs death.</description><edition>American volume</edition><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199812000-00007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9875935</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBJSA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</publisher><subject>Aged ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - statistics & numerical data ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Cements ; Cementation - methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hip Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Hip Prosthesis ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Orthopedic surgery ; Osteoarthritis, Hip - epidemiology ; Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery ; Prosthesis Design ; Radiography ; Reoperation - statistics & numerical data ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 1998-12, Vol.80 (12), p.1775-80</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1998 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. Dec 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3807-27d7550b74e5f6ca75061fc668f599806d75bd31fabfb46b9358778bb05dc32a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3807-27d7550b74e5f6ca75061fc668f599806d75bd31fabfb46b9358778bb05dc32a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1652921$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9875935$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BOURNE, R B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RORABECK, C H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SKUTEK, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MIKKELSEN, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WINEMAKER, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROBERTSON, D</creatorcontrib><title>The Harris Design-2 Total Hip Replacement Fixed with So-Called Second-Generation Cementing Techniques. A Ten to Fifteen-Year Follow-up</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</title><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><description>We analyzed the clinical results of 195 Harris Design-2 total hip replacements performed with so-called second-generation cementing techniques in 166 consecutive patients who had osteoarthrosis. The mean age of the patients at the time of the replacement was sixty-seven years and nine months (range, thirty-one to eighty-nine years). Forty-eight patients (fifty-four hips) died before the time of the latest follow-up, but the implants were apparently functioning well at the time of death. Three patients (four hips) were lost to follow-up. Five patients (five hips; 3 percent) had a revision because of aseptic loosening of the acetabular or femoral component, or both, that was related to wear-induced osteolysis. The mean Harris hip score for the 131 hips that were available at the latest follow-up examination at a mean of twelve years (range, ten to fifteen years) after the operation was 89 ± 10 points. On the basis of the Harris hip score, seventy-six hips had an excellent result, thirty-four had a good result, fifteen had a fair result, and six had a poor result at the latest follow-up examination. Radiographically, twelve (9 percent) of the 131 acetabular components and three (2 percent) of the 131 femoral components were probably or definitely loose. At a mean of twelve years, 186 (97 percent) of 191 Harris Design-2 implants were in situ or had been in situ at the time of the patientʼs death.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Cements</subject><subject>Cementation - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hip Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Hip Prosthesis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Hip - epidemiology</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Reoperation - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0021-9355</issn><issn>1535-1386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1Ud1uFCEYJUZTt9VHMCHGWyowA8xcNmu326SJiV0vvJowzDcdKgsjzGT1BXxume5ar-SGnJ_vAAeEMKOXnFH5keZVSl4QVtcV4xmRhVIv0IqJQhBWVPIlWlHKGakLIV6j85Qel6GSqjN0VldKZH6Ffu8GwFsdo034EyT74AnHuzBph7d2xF9gdNrAHvyEN_YndPhgpwHfB7LWzmV4Dyb4jtyAh6gnGzxeP7mtf8A7MIO3P2ZIl_gqI4-nkFP6CcCTb6Aj3gTnwoHM4xv0qtcuwdvTfoG-bq536y25-3xzu766I6aoqCJcdUoI2qoSRC-NVoJK1hspq17kIqjMctsVrNdt35ayzU-slKralorOFFwXF-j9MXeMYbnY1DyGOfp8ZMOpYKqSSmVTdTSZGFKK0DdjtHsdfzWMNkv9zd_6m-f6n6hl9N0pf2730D0PnvrO-oeTrpPRro_aG5v-5UvBa86yrTzaDsFNENN3Nx8gNgNoNw3N_z6_-AMcGpsn</recordid><startdate>199812</startdate><enddate>199812</enddate><creator>BOURNE, R B</creator><creator>RORABECK, C H</creator><creator>SKUTEK, M</creator><creator>MIKKELSEN, S</creator><creator>WINEMAKER, M</creator><creator>ROBERTSON, D</creator><general>Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</general><general>Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Incorporated</general><general>Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery AMERICAN VOLUME</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199812</creationdate><title>The Harris Design-2 Total Hip Replacement Fixed with So-Called Second-Generation Cementing Techniques. A Ten to Fifteen-Year Follow-up</title><author>BOURNE, R B ; RORABECK, C H ; SKUTEK, M ; MIKKELSEN, S ; WINEMAKER, M ; ROBERTSON, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3807-27d7550b74e5f6ca75061fc668f599806d75bd31fabfb46b9358778bb05dc32a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Cements</topic><topic>Cementation - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hip Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Hip Prosthesis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Hip - epidemiology</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Reoperation - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BOURNE, R B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RORABECK, C H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SKUTEK, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MIKKELSEN, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WINEMAKER, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROBERTSON, D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BOURNE, R B</au><au>RORABECK, C H</au><au>SKUTEK, M</au><au>MIKKELSEN, S</au><au>WINEMAKER, M</au><au>ROBERTSON, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Harris Design-2 Total Hip Replacement Fixed with So-Called Second-Generation Cementing Techniques. A Ten to Fifteen-Year Follow-up</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><date>1998-12</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1775</spage><epage>80</epage><pages>1775-80</pages><issn>0021-9355</issn><eissn>1535-1386</eissn><coden>JBJSA3</coden><abstract>We analyzed the clinical results of 195 Harris Design-2 total hip replacements performed with so-called second-generation cementing techniques in 166 consecutive patients who had osteoarthrosis. The mean age of the patients at the time of the replacement was sixty-seven years and nine months (range, thirty-one to eighty-nine years). Forty-eight patients (fifty-four hips) died before the time of the latest follow-up, but the implants were apparently functioning well at the time of death. Three patients (four hips) were lost to follow-up. Five patients (five hips; 3 percent) had a revision because of aseptic loosening of the acetabular or femoral component, or both, that was related to wear-induced osteolysis. The mean Harris hip score for the 131 hips that were available at the latest follow-up examination at a mean of twelve years (range, ten to fifteen years) after the operation was 89 ± 10 points. On the basis of the Harris hip score, seventy-six hips had an excellent result, thirty-four had a good result, fifteen had a fair result, and six had a poor result at the latest follow-up examination. Radiographically, twelve (9 percent) of the 131 acetabular components and three (2 percent) of the 131 femoral components were probably or definitely loose. At a mean of twelve years, 186 (97 percent) of 191 Harris Design-2 implants were in situ or had been in situ at the time of the patientʼs death.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>Copyright by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated</pub><pmid>9875935</pmid><doi>10.2106/00004623-199812000-00007</doi><tpages>-1694</tpages><edition>American volume</edition></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9355 |
ispartof | Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 1998-12, Vol.80 (12), p.1775-80 |
issn | 0021-9355 1535-1386 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_205178677 |
source | HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
subjects | Aged Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - statistics & numerical data Biological and medical sciences Bone Cements Cementation - methods Female Follow-Up Studies Hip Joint - diagnostic imaging Hip Prosthesis Humans Male Medical sciences Orthopedic surgery Osteoarthritis, Hip - epidemiology Osteoarthritis, Hip - surgery Prosthesis Design Radiography Reoperation - statistics & numerical data Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Time Factors |
title | The Harris Design-2 Total Hip Replacement Fixed with So-Called Second-Generation Cementing Techniques. A Ten to Fifteen-Year Follow-up |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T20%3A07%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Harris%20Design-2%20Total%20Hip%20Replacement%20Fixed%20with%20So-Called%20Second-Generation%20Cementing%20Techniques.%20A%20Ten%20to%20Fifteen-Year%20Follow-up&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20American%20volume&rft.au=BOURNE,%20R%20B&rft.date=1998-12&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1775&rft.epage=80&rft.pages=1775-80&rft.issn=0021-9355&rft.eissn=1535-1386&rft.coden=JBJSA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.2106/00004623-199812000-00007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38560948%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3807-27d7550b74e5f6ca75061fc668f599806d75bd31fabfb46b9358778bb05dc32a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205178677&rft_id=info:pmid/9875935&rfr_iscdi=true |