Loading…
Predicting corporate bankruptcy: where we stand?
Purpose - The incidence of important bankruptcy cases has led to a growing interest in corporate bankruptcy prediction models since the 1960s. Several past reviews of this literature are now either out-of-date or too narrowly focused. They do not provide a complete comparison of the many different a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Corporate governance (Bradford) 2006-01, Vol.6 (1), p.18-33 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-8cf8f62917443d932c8a428995f9195d97b65f87d245ae10186220959a309d3f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-8cf8f62917443d932c8a428995f9195d97b65f87d245ae10186220959a309d3f3 |
container_end_page | 33 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 18 |
container_title | Corporate governance (Bradford) |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Adnan Aziz, M. Dar, Humayon A. |
description | Purpose - The incidence of important bankruptcy cases has led to a growing interest in corporate bankruptcy prediction models since the 1960s. Several past reviews of this literature are now either out-of-date or too narrowly focused. They do not provide a complete comparison of the many different approaches towards bankruptcy prediction and have also failed to provide a solution to the problem of model choice in empirical application. Seeks to address this issue.Design methodology approach - Through an extensive literature review, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of the methodologies and empirical findings from these models in their applications across ten different countries.Findings - The predictive accuracies of different models seem to be generally comparable, although artificially intelligent expert system models perform marginally better than statistical and theoretical models. Individually, the use of multiple discriminant analysis (MDA) and logit models dominates the research. Given that financial ratios have been dominant in most research to date, it may be worthwhile increasing the variety of explanatory variables to include corporate governance structures and management practices while developing the research model. Similarly, evidence from past research suggests that small sample size, in such studies, should not impede future research but it may lead researchers away from methodologies where large samples are critically necessary.Originality value - It is hoped that this study will be the most comprehensive to-date review of the literature in the field. The study also provides a unique ranking system, the first ever of its kind, to solve the problem of model choice in empirical application of bankruptcy prediction models. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/14720700610649436 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_205184309</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>31005897</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-8cf8f62917443d932c8a428995f9195d97b65f87d245ae10186220959a309d3f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1Lw0AQxRdRsFb_AG_BgyejM5v99CJS_IKCHvS8bDcbTU2TuJtQ-t-bUkGoFE8zML83j_cIOUW4RAR1hUxSkAACQTDNMrFHRii5SgVwtj_swz0dADwkRzHOASilMhsReAk-L11X1u-Ja0LbBNv5ZGbrz9C3nVtdJ8sPH3yy9EnsbJ3fHJODwlbRn_zMMXm7v3udPKbT54enye00dQxplypXqEJQjZKxLNcZdcoyqrTmhUbNcy1nghdK5pRx6xFQCUpBc20z0HlWZGNyvvnbhuar97EzizI6X1W29k0fTca5EFTi_yACcKXlAJ5tgfOmD_UQwlDgqNjgPEC4gVxoYgy-MG0oFzasDIJZN23-ND1oLjYav_DBVvmvZBs1bb5OBjvwnQ7fXIuIig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205184309</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting corporate bankruptcy: where we stand?</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><creator>Adnan Aziz, M. ; Dar, Humayon A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Adnan Aziz, M. ; Dar, Humayon A.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - The incidence of important bankruptcy cases has led to a growing interest in corporate bankruptcy prediction models since the 1960s. Several past reviews of this literature are now either out-of-date or too narrowly focused. They do not provide a complete comparison of the many different approaches towards bankruptcy prediction and have also failed to provide a solution to the problem of model choice in empirical application. Seeks to address this issue.Design methodology approach - Through an extensive literature review, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of the methodologies and empirical findings from these models in their applications across ten different countries.Findings - The predictive accuracies of different models seem to be generally comparable, although artificially intelligent expert system models perform marginally better than statistical and theoretical models. Individually, the use of multiple discriminant analysis (MDA) and logit models dominates the research. Given that financial ratios have been dominant in most research to date, it may be worthwhile increasing the variety of explanatory variables to include corporate governance structures and management practices while developing the research model. Similarly, evidence from past research suggests that small sample size, in such studies, should not impede future research but it may lead researchers away from methodologies where large samples are critically necessary.Originality value - It is hoped that this study will be the most comprehensive to-date review of the literature in the field. The study also provides a unique ranking system, the first ever of its kind, to solve the problem of model choice in empirical application of bankruptcy prediction models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-0701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-6054</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/14720700610649436</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Artificial intelligence ; Bankruptcy ; Corporate governance ; Credit risk ; Discriminant analysis ; Financial analysis ; International business ; Machine learning ; Predictions ; Problem solving ; Research methodology ; Sample size ; Statistical methods ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Corporate governance (Bradford), 2006-01, Vol.6 (1), p.18-33</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing, Limited 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-8cf8f62917443d932c8a428995f9195d97b65f87d245ae10186220959a309d3f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-8cf8f62917443d932c8a428995f9195d97b65f87d245ae10186220959a309d3f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/205184309?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,36061,44363</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adnan Aziz, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dar, Humayon A.</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting corporate bankruptcy: where we stand?</title><title>Corporate governance (Bradford)</title><description>Purpose - The incidence of important bankruptcy cases has led to a growing interest in corporate bankruptcy prediction models since the 1960s. Several past reviews of this literature are now either out-of-date or too narrowly focused. They do not provide a complete comparison of the many different approaches towards bankruptcy prediction and have also failed to provide a solution to the problem of model choice in empirical application. Seeks to address this issue.Design methodology approach - Through an extensive literature review, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of the methodologies and empirical findings from these models in their applications across ten different countries.Findings - The predictive accuracies of different models seem to be generally comparable, although artificially intelligent expert system models perform marginally better than statistical and theoretical models. Individually, the use of multiple discriminant analysis (MDA) and logit models dominates the research. Given that financial ratios have been dominant in most research to date, it may be worthwhile increasing the variety of explanatory variables to include corporate governance structures and management practices while developing the research model. Similarly, evidence from past research suggests that small sample size, in such studies, should not impede future research but it may lead researchers away from methodologies where large samples are critically necessary.Originality value - It is hoped that this study will be the most comprehensive to-date review of the literature in the field. The study also provides a unique ranking system, the first ever of its kind, to solve the problem of model choice in empirical application of bankruptcy prediction models.</description><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Bankruptcy</subject><subject>Corporate governance</subject><subject>Credit risk</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Financial analysis</subject><subject>International business</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Problem solving</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Sample size</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1472-0701</issn><issn>1758-6054</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1Lw0AQxRdRsFb_AG_BgyejM5v99CJS_IKCHvS8bDcbTU2TuJtQ-t-bUkGoFE8zML83j_cIOUW4RAR1hUxSkAACQTDNMrFHRii5SgVwtj_swz0dADwkRzHOASilMhsReAk-L11X1u-Ja0LbBNv5ZGbrz9C3nVtdJ8sPH3yy9EnsbJ3fHJODwlbRn_zMMXm7v3udPKbT54enye00dQxplypXqEJQjZKxLNcZdcoyqrTmhUbNcy1nghdK5pRx6xFQCUpBc20z0HlWZGNyvvnbhuar97EzizI6X1W29k0fTca5EFTi_yACcKXlAJ5tgfOmD_UQwlDgqNjgPEC4gVxoYgy-MG0oFzasDIJZN23-ND1oLjYav_DBVvmvZBs1bb5OBjvwnQ7fXIuIig</recordid><startdate>20060101</startdate><enddate>20060101</enddate><creator>Adnan Aziz, M.</creator><creator>Dar, Humayon A.</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060101</creationdate><title>Predicting corporate bankruptcy: where we stand?</title><author>Adnan Aziz, M. ; Dar, Humayon A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-8cf8f62917443d932c8a428995f9195d97b65f87d245ae10186220959a309d3f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Bankruptcy</topic><topic>Corporate governance</topic><topic>Credit risk</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Financial analysis</topic><topic>International business</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Problem solving</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Sample size</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adnan Aziz, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dar, Humayon A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Accounting & Tax</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Corporate governance (Bradford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adnan Aziz, M.</au><au>Dar, Humayon A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting corporate bankruptcy: where we stand?</atitle><jtitle>Corporate governance (Bradford)</jtitle><date>2006-01-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>18</spage><epage>33</epage><pages>18-33</pages><issn>1472-0701</issn><eissn>1758-6054</eissn><abstract>Purpose - The incidence of important bankruptcy cases has led to a growing interest in corporate bankruptcy prediction models since the 1960s. Several past reviews of this literature are now either out-of-date or too narrowly focused. They do not provide a complete comparison of the many different approaches towards bankruptcy prediction and have also failed to provide a solution to the problem of model choice in empirical application. Seeks to address this issue.Design methodology approach - Through an extensive literature review, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of the methodologies and empirical findings from these models in their applications across ten different countries.Findings - The predictive accuracies of different models seem to be generally comparable, although artificially intelligent expert system models perform marginally better than statistical and theoretical models. Individually, the use of multiple discriminant analysis (MDA) and logit models dominates the research. Given that financial ratios have been dominant in most research to date, it may be worthwhile increasing the variety of explanatory variables to include corporate governance structures and management practices while developing the research model. Similarly, evidence from past research suggests that small sample size, in such studies, should not impede future research but it may lead researchers away from methodologies where large samples are critically necessary.Originality value - It is hoped that this study will be the most comprehensive to-date review of the literature in the field. The study also provides a unique ranking system, the first ever of its kind, to solve the problem of model choice in empirical application of bankruptcy prediction models.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/14720700610649436</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1472-0701 |
ispartof | Corporate governance (Bradford), 2006-01, Vol.6 (1), p.18-33 |
issn | 1472-0701 1758-6054 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_205184309 |
source | ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list) |
subjects | Artificial intelligence Bankruptcy Corporate governance Credit risk Discriminant analysis Financial analysis International business Machine learning Predictions Problem solving Research methodology Sample size Statistical methods Studies |
title | Predicting corporate bankruptcy: where we stand? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T22%3A19%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20corporate%20bankruptcy:%20where%20we%20stand?&rft.jtitle=Corporate%20governance%20(Bradford)&rft.au=Adnan%20Aziz,%20M.&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=33&rft.pages=18-33&rft.issn=1472-0701&rft.eissn=1758-6054&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/14720700610649436&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E31005897%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-8cf8f62917443d932c8a428995f9195d97b65f87d245ae10186220959a309d3f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205184309&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |