Loading…

Lisinopril Versus Hydrochlorothiazide in Obese Hypertensive Patients: A Multicenter Placebo-Controlled Trial

Because obesity-associated hypertension has unique hemodynamic and hormonal profiles, certain classes of antihypertensive agents may be more effective than others as monotherapy. Thus, we compared the efficacy and safety of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril and the diuretic hydr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979) Tex. 1979), 1997-07, Vol.30 (1), p.140-145
Main Authors: Reisin, Efrain, Weir, Matthew R, Falkner, Bonita, Hutchinson, Howard G, Anzalone, Deborah A, Tuck, Michael L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3352-2f64ceb93a3ddc6fcf8d41c0e83041c6921e6f3d192481b851763712b1b2e6f3
container_end_page 145
container_issue 1
container_start_page 140
container_title Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979)
container_volume 30
creator Reisin, Efrain
Weir, Matthew R
Falkner, Bonita
Hutchinson, Howard G
Anzalone, Deborah A
Tuck, Michael L
description Because obesity-associated hypertension has unique hemodynamic and hormonal profiles, certain classes of antihypertensive agents may be more effective than others as monotherapy. Thus, we compared the efficacy and safety of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril and the diuretic hydrochlorothiazide in a 12-week, multicenter, double-blind trial in 232 obese patients with hypertension. Patients with an office diastolic pressure between 90 and 109 mm Hg were randomized to treatment with daily doses of lisinopril (10, 20, or 40 mg), hydrochlorothiazide (12.5, 25, or 50 mg), or placebo. Mean body mass indexes were similar for all patients. At week 12, lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide effectively lowered office diastolic (-8.3 and -7.7 versus -3.3 mm Hg, respectively; P < .005) and systolic (-9.2 and -10.0 versus -4.6 mm Hg, respectively; P < .05) pressures compared with placebo. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring confirmed that lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide effectively lowered 24-hour blood pressure compared with placebo (P < .001). Significant dose-response differences were observed between treatments. Sixty percent of patients treated with lisinopril had an office diastolic pressure < 90 mm Hg compared with 43% of patients treated with hydrochlorothiazide (P < .05). Responses to therapies differed with both race and age. Neither treatment significantly affected insulin or lipid profiles; however, plasma glucose increased significantly after 12 weeks of hydrochlorothiazide therapy compared with lisinopril (+ 0.31 versus -0.21 mmol/L; P < .001). Hydrochlorothiazide also decreased serum potassium levels by 0.4 mmol/L from baseline. In conclusion, lisinopril was as effective as hydrochlorothiazide in treating obese patients with hypertension. Treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors may show greater efficacy as monotherapy at lower doses compared with thiazide diuretics, may have a more rapid rate of response, and may offer advantages in patients at high risk of metabolic disorders. (Hypertension. 1997;30[part 1]:140-145.)
doi_str_mv 10.1161/01.HYP.30.1.140
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_205272213</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18167177</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3352-2f64ceb93a3ddc6fcf8d41c0e83041c6921e6f3d192481b851763712b1b2e6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEFr3DAQhUVpIdu051xF6dUbjSTLdm9habuFLdnDUtqTkOUxq1S1tpLdkPz6TNjQgWF4zHsz8DF2BWINYOBawHr7a79WJNegxSu2glrqStdGvWYrAZ2uOoCfF-xtKXdCgNa6WbG4CyVM6ZRD5D8wl6Xw7cOQkz_GlNN8DO4xDMjDxG97LEjLE-YZpxL-Id-7OeA0l0_8hn9f4hw8Kcx8H53HPlWbNM05xYgDP-Tg4jv2ZnSx4PuXeckOXz4fNttqd_v12-ZmV3mlalnJ0WjKd8qpYfBm9GM7aPACWyVomk4CmlEN0EndQt_W0BjVgOyhl8-LS_bhfPaU098Fy2zv0pIn-milqGUjJSgyXZ9NPqdSMo6WGPxx-cGCsM9ArQBLQK0iaQkoJT6-nHXFuzhmN_lQ_sdkY7SsG7Lps-0-RYJRfsflHrM9oovz0QoqLU1bQdc1oiFVUUupngA50oZX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205272213</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lisinopril Versus Hydrochlorothiazide in Obese Hypertensive Patients: A Multicenter Placebo-Controlled Trial</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Reisin, Efrain ; Weir, Matthew R ; Falkner, Bonita ; Hutchinson, Howard G ; Anzalone, Deborah A ; Tuck, Michael L</creator><creatorcontrib>Reisin, Efrain ; Weir, Matthew R ; Falkner, Bonita ; Hutchinson, Howard G ; Anzalone, Deborah A ; Tuck, Michael L</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Because obesity-associated hypertension has unique hemodynamic and hormonal profiles, certain classes of antihypertensive agents may be more effective than others as monotherapy. Thus, we compared the efficacy and safety of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril and the diuretic hydrochlorothiazide in a 12-week, multicenter, double-blind trial in 232 obese patients with hypertension. Patients with an office diastolic pressure between 90 and 109 mm Hg were randomized to treatment with daily doses of lisinopril (10, 20, or 40 mg), hydrochlorothiazide (12.5, 25, or 50 mg), or placebo. Mean body mass indexes were similar for all patients. At week 12, lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide effectively lowered office diastolic (-8.3 and -7.7 versus -3.3 mm Hg, respectively; P < .005) and systolic (-9.2 and -10.0 versus -4.6 mm Hg, respectively; P < .05) pressures compared with placebo. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring confirmed that lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide effectively lowered 24-hour blood pressure compared with placebo (P < .001). Significant dose-response differences were observed between treatments. Sixty percent of patients treated with lisinopril had an office diastolic pressure < 90 mm Hg compared with 43% of patients treated with hydrochlorothiazide (P < .05). Responses to therapies differed with both race and age. Neither treatment significantly affected insulin or lipid profiles; however, plasma glucose increased significantly after 12 weeks of hydrochlorothiazide therapy compared with lisinopril (+ 0.31 versus -0.21 mmol/L; P < .001). Hydrochlorothiazide also decreased serum potassium levels by 0.4 mmol/L from baseline. In conclusion, lisinopril was as effective as hydrochlorothiazide in treating obese patients with hypertension. Treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors may show greater efficacy as monotherapy at lower doses compared with thiazide diuretics, may have a more rapid rate of response, and may offer advantages in patients at high risk of metabolic disorders. (Hypertension. 1997;30[part 1]:140-145.)]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0194-911X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4563</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.30.1.140</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HPRTDN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: American Heart Association, Inc</publisher><subject>Antihypertensive agents ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiovascular system ; Medical sciences ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><ispartof>Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979), 1997-07, Vol.30 (1), p.140-145</ispartof><rights>1997 American Heart Association, Inc.</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Heart Association, Inc. Jul 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3352-2f64ceb93a3ddc6fcf8d41c0e83041c6921e6f3d192481b851763712b1b2e6f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2764257$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reisin, Efrain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weir, Matthew R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falkner, Bonita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchinson, Howard G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anzalone, Deborah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuck, Michael L</creatorcontrib><title>Lisinopril Versus Hydrochlorothiazide in Obese Hypertensive Patients: A Multicenter Placebo-Controlled Trial</title><title>Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979)</title><description><![CDATA[Because obesity-associated hypertension has unique hemodynamic and hormonal profiles, certain classes of antihypertensive agents may be more effective than others as monotherapy. Thus, we compared the efficacy and safety of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril and the diuretic hydrochlorothiazide in a 12-week, multicenter, double-blind trial in 232 obese patients with hypertension. Patients with an office diastolic pressure between 90 and 109 mm Hg were randomized to treatment with daily doses of lisinopril (10, 20, or 40 mg), hydrochlorothiazide (12.5, 25, or 50 mg), or placebo. Mean body mass indexes were similar for all patients. At week 12, lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide effectively lowered office diastolic (-8.3 and -7.7 versus -3.3 mm Hg, respectively; P < .005) and systolic (-9.2 and -10.0 versus -4.6 mm Hg, respectively; P < .05) pressures compared with placebo. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring confirmed that lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide effectively lowered 24-hour blood pressure compared with placebo (P < .001). Significant dose-response differences were observed between treatments. Sixty percent of patients treated with lisinopril had an office diastolic pressure < 90 mm Hg compared with 43% of patients treated with hydrochlorothiazide (P < .05). Responses to therapies differed with both race and age. Neither treatment significantly affected insulin or lipid profiles; however, plasma glucose increased significantly after 12 weeks of hydrochlorothiazide therapy compared with lisinopril (+ 0.31 versus -0.21 mmol/L; P < .001). Hydrochlorothiazide also decreased serum potassium levels by 0.4 mmol/L from baseline. In conclusion, lisinopril was as effective as hydrochlorothiazide in treating obese patients with hypertension. Treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors may show greater efficacy as monotherapy at lower doses compared with thiazide diuretics, may have a more rapid rate of response, and may offer advantages in patients at high risk of metabolic disorders. (Hypertension. 1997;30[part 1]:140-145.)]]></description><subject>Antihypertensive agents</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiovascular system</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><issn>0194-911X</issn><issn>1524-4563</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEFr3DAQhUVpIdu051xF6dUbjSTLdm9habuFLdnDUtqTkOUxq1S1tpLdkPz6TNjQgWF4zHsz8DF2BWINYOBawHr7a79WJNegxSu2glrqStdGvWYrAZ2uOoCfF-xtKXdCgNa6WbG4CyVM6ZRD5D8wl6Xw7cOQkz_GlNN8DO4xDMjDxG97LEjLE-YZpxL-Id-7OeA0l0_8hn9f4hw8Kcx8H53HPlWbNM05xYgDP-Tg4jv2ZnSx4PuXeckOXz4fNttqd_v12-ZmV3mlalnJ0WjKd8qpYfBm9GM7aPACWyVomk4CmlEN0EndQt_W0BjVgOyhl8-LS_bhfPaU098Fy2zv0pIn-milqGUjJSgyXZ9NPqdSMo6WGPxx-cGCsM9ArQBLQK0iaQkoJT6-nHXFuzhmN_lQ_sdkY7SsG7Lps-0-RYJRfsflHrM9oovz0QoqLU1bQdc1oiFVUUupngA50oZX</recordid><startdate>199707</startdate><enddate>199707</enddate><creator>Reisin, Efrain</creator><creator>Weir, Matthew R</creator><creator>Falkner, Bonita</creator><creator>Hutchinson, Howard G</creator><creator>Anzalone, Deborah A</creator><creator>Tuck, Michael L</creator><general>American Heart Association, Inc</general><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199707</creationdate><title>Lisinopril Versus Hydrochlorothiazide in Obese Hypertensive Patients: A Multicenter Placebo-Controlled Trial</title><author>Reisin, Efrain ; Weir, Matthew R ; Falkner, Bonita ; Hutchinson, Howard G ; Anzalone, Deborah A ; Tuck, Michael L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3352-2f64ceb93a3ddc6fcf8d41c0e83041c6921e6f3d192481b851763712b1b2e6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Antihypertensive agents</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiovascular system</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reisin, Efrain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weir, Matthew R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falkner, Bonita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchinson, Howard G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anzalone, Deborah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuck, Michael L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reisin, Efrain</au><au>Weir, Matthew R</au><au>Falkner, Bonita</au><au>Hutchinson, Howard G</au><au>Anzalone, Deborah A</au><au>Tuck, Michael L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lisinopril Versus Hydrochlorothiazide in Obese Hypertensive Patients: A Multicenter Placebo-Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979)</jtitle><date>1997-07</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>140</spage><epage>145</epage><pages>140-145</pages><issn>0194-911X</issn><eissn>1524-4563</eissn><coden>HPRTDN</coden><abstract><![CDATA[Because obesity-associated hypertension has unique hemodynamic and hormonal profiles, certain classes of antihypertensive agents may be more effective than others as monotherapy. Thus, we compared the efficacy and safety of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril and the diuretic hydrochlorothiazide in a 12-week, multicenter, double-blind trial in 232 obese patients with hypertension. Patients with an office diastolic pressure between 90 and 109 mm Hg were randomized to treatment with daily doses of lisinopril (10, 20, or 40 mg), hydrochlorothiazide (12.5, 25, or 50 mg), or placebo. Mean body mass indexes were similar for all patients. At week 12, lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide effectively lowered office diastolic (-8.3 and -7.7 versus -3.3 mm Hg, respectively; P < .005) and systolic (-9.2 and -10.0 versus -4.6 mm Hg, respectively; P < .05) pressures compared with placebo. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring confirmed that lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide effectively lowered 24-hour blood pressure compared with placebo (P < .001). Significant dose-response differences were observed between treatments. Sixty percent of patients treated with lisinopril had an office diastolic pressure < 90 mm Hg compared with 43% of patients treated with hydrochlorothiazide (P < .05). Responses to therapies differed with both race and age. Neither treatment significantly affected insulin or lipid profiles; however, plasma glucose increased significantly after 12 weeks of hydrochlorothiazide therapy compared with lisinopril (+ 0.31 versus -0.21 mmol/L; P < .001). Hydrochlorothiazide also decreased serum potassium levels by 0.4 mmol/L from baseline. In conclusion, lisinopril was as effective as hydrochlorothiazide in treating obese patients with hypertension. Treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors may show greater efficacy as monotherapy at lower doses compared with thiazide diuretics, may have a more rapid rate of response, and may offer advantages in patients at high risk of metabolic disorders. (Hypertension. 1997;30[part 1]:140-145.)]]></abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>American Heart Association, Inc</pub><doi>10.1161/01.HYP.30.1.140</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0194-911X
ispartof Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. 1979), 1997-07, Vol.30 (1), p.140-145
issn 0194-911X
1524-4563
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_205272213
source EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Antihypertensive agents
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiovascular system
Medical sciences
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
title Lisinopril Versus Hydrochlorothiazide in Obese Hypertensive Patients: A Multicenter Placebo-Controlled Trial
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T20%3A38%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lisinopril%20Versus%20Hydrochlorothiazide%20in%20Obese%20Hypertensive%20Patients:%20A%20Multicenter%20Placebo-Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Hypertension%20(Dallas,%20Tex.%201979)&rft.au=Reisin,%20Efrain&rft.date=1997-07&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=140&rft.epage=145&rft.pages=140-145&rft.issn=0194-911X&rft.eissn=1524-4563&rft.coden=HPRTDN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/01.HYP.30.1.140&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18167177%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3352-2f64ceb93a3ddc6fcf8d41c0e83041c6921e6f3d192481b851763712b1b2e6f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205272213&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true