Loading…

Iris Marion Young and “Intersecting Voices”

"12 Besides their own value as goods, self-development, or the achievement of equal capability with others, and self-determination, or participation in determining one's actions, are valorized because they too are conditions for a just process of collective problem-solving.11 Without these...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Philosophy today (Celina) 2008, Vol.52 (Supplement), p.10-18
Main Author: Evans, Fred
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 18
container_issue Supplement
container_start_page 10
container_title Philosophy today (Celina)
container_volume 52
creator Evans, Fred
description "12 Besides their own value as goods, self-development, or the achievement of equal capability with others, and self-determination, or participation in determining one's actions, are valorized because they too are conditions for a just process of collective problem-solving.11 Without these conditions and the other procedures she states, Young feels there would not be true inclusion in the decision-making process. Because just procedures can only be approximated, Young adds that "justice 'in itself is a limit concept at which we always aim as the moral horizon of our political dealings. Inclusion and Democracy, 109. [...]Young counsels that rather than debating which definition of "the good" should prevail, the polity is expected to concentrate on making specific judgments that ensure the just functioning of the multi-voiced collectivity: "The outcome of political discussion and decision-making is almost never some conception of justice, but rather ^particular judgement about what actions and policies this collective should adopt to address these circumstances" (28-29; Young's italics). The following quotes further reinforce the idea that conventional social institutions are the basis for social connections: "An agent stands in relations of justice with all those others whose actions that agent assumes in the background of his or her own action (Inclusion and Democracy, 223); "Obligations of justice arise among persons set in.. institutional relations and causal chains of effect and influence. [...]the members of cultural and other groups are con- cerned with identity and, as Charles Taylor and other thinkers have pointed out, have cause to cherish the affinity with other people that this identity provides and to seek its preservation and flourishing. [...]Young accepts that our cultural background plays a role in both motivating us toward justice and interpreting the meaning of social justice terms (see above).
doi_str_mv 10.5840/philtoday200852Supplement48
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_205356424</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1584557351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c164t-d9376e6de4e8c753383cc6283e490bb99480e059ec07b0b0265cd76324b0e6113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKw0AYhQdRsFbfIeg69p9rZnAlxUug4sILuArJ5K-mpJk4M1l01wfRl-uTGKlrVwcOH-ccDiEXFC6lFjDrP5o2urrcMAAt2dPQ9y2usYtCH5AJ48ykWhp1SCYAnKaaSXVMTkJYAVCmZDYhs9w3IXkofeO65M0N3XtSdnWy237lXUQf0MZm9F5dYzHstt-n5GhZtgHP_nRKXm5vnuf36eLxLp9fL1JLlYhpbXimUNUoUNtMcq65tYppjsJAVRkjNCBIgxayCioYx9g6U5yJClBRyqfkfJ_be_c5YIjFyg2-GysLBpJLJZgYoas9ZL0LweOy6H2zLv2moFD8HlT8cxD_AZ4fYGY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205356424</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Iris Marion Young and “Intersecting Voices”</title><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</source><creator>Evans, Fred</creator><creatorcontrib>Evans, Fred ; DePaul University</creatorcontrib><description>"12 Besides their own value as goods, self-development, or the achievement of equal capability with others, and self-determination, or participation in determining one's actions, are valorized because they too are conditions for a just process of collective problem-solving.11 Without these conditions and the other procedures she states, Young feels there would not be true inclusion in the decision-making process. Because just procedures can only be approximated, Young adds that "justice 'in itself is a limit concept at which we always aim as the moral horizon of our political dealings. Inclusion and Democracy, 109. [...]Young counsels that rather than debating which definition of "the good" should prevail, the polity is expected to concentrate on making specific judgments that ensure the just functioning of the multi-voiced collectivity: "The outcome of political discussion and decision-making is almost never some conception of justice, but rather ^particular judgement about what actions and policies this collective should adopt to address these circumstances" (28-29; Young's italics). The following quotes further reinforce the idea that conventional social institutions are the basis for social connections: "An agent stands in relations of justice with all those others whose actions that agent assumes in the background of his or her own action (Inclusion and Democracy, 223); "Obligations of justice arise among persons set in.. institutional relations and causal chains of effect and influence. [...]the members of cultural and other groups are con- cerned with identity and, as Charles Taylor and other thinkers have pointed out, have cause to cherish the affinity with other people that this identity provides and to seek its preservation and flourishing. [...]Young accepts that our cultural background plays a role in both motivating us toward justice and interpreting the meaning of social justice terms (see above).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-8256</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2329-8596</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5840/philtoday200852Supplement48</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHTDBF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Charlottesville: Philosophy Documentation Center</publisher><subject>Collectivity ; Critical theory ; Cultural background ; Cultural factors ; Cultural groups ; Cultural identity ; Identity politics ; Philosophy ; Politics ; Problem solving ; Self concept ; Social structure ; Terminology ; Theory</subject><ispartof>Philosophy today (Celina), 2008, Vol.52 (Supplement), p.10-18</ispartof><rights>Copyright DePaul University 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/205356424/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/205356424?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009,12841,27902,27903,27904,34754,44179,62638,62639,62654,73943,74475</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Evans, Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DePaul University</creatorcontrib><title>Iris Marion Young and “Intersecting Voices”</title><title>Philosophy today (Celina)</title><description>"12 Besides their own value as goods, self-development, or the achievement of equal capability with others, and self-determination, or participation in determining one's actions, are valorized because they too are conditions for a just process of collective problem-solving.11 Without these conditions and the other procedures she states, Young feels there would not be true inclusion in the decision-making process. Because just procedures can only be approximated, Young adds that "justice 'in itself is a limit concept at which we always aim as the moral horizon of our political dealings. Inclusion and Democracy, 109. [...]Young counsels that rather than debating which definition of "the good" should prevail, the polity is expected to concentrate on making specific judgments that ensure the just functioning of the multi-voiced collectivity: "The outcome of political discussion and decision-making is almost never some conception of justice, but rather ^particular judgement about what actions and policies this collective should adopt to address these circumstances" (28-29; Young's italics). The following quotes further reinforce the idea that conventional social institutions are the basis for social connections: "An agent stands in relations of justice with all those others whose actions that agent assumes in the background of his or her own action (Inclusion and Democracy, 223); "Obligations of justice arise among persons set in.. institutional relations and causal chains of effect and influence. [...]the members of cultural and other groups are con- cerned with identity and, as Charles Taylor and other thinkers have pointed out, have cause to cherish the affinity with other people that this identity provides and to seek its preservation and flourishing. [...]Young accepts that our cultural background plays a role in both motivating us toward justice and interpreting the meaning of social justice terms (see above).</description><subject>Collectivity</subject><subject>Critical theory</subject><subject>Cultural background</subject><subject>Cultural factors</subject><subject>Cultural groups</subject><subject>Cultural identity</subject><subject>Identity politics</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Problem solving</subject><subject>Self concept</subject><subject>Social structure</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><subject>Theory</subject><issn>0031-8256</issn><issn>2329-8596</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKw0AYhQdRsFbfIeg69p9rZnAlxUug4sILuArJ5K-mpJk4M1l01wfRl-uTGKlrVwcOH-ccDiEXFC6lFjDrP5o2urrcMAAt2dPQ9y2usYtCH5AJ48ykWhp1SCYAnKaaSXVMTkJYAVCmZDYhs9w3IXkofeO65M0N3XtSdnWy237lXUQf0MZm9F5dYzHstt-n5GhZtgHP_nRKXm5vnuf36eLxLp9fL1JLlYhpbXimUNUoUNtMcq65tYppjsJAVRkjNCBIgxayCioYx9g6U5yJClBRyqfkfJ_be_c5YIjFyg2-GysLBpJLJZgYoas9ZL0LweOy6H2zLv2moFD8HlT8cxD_AZ4fYGY</recordid><startdate>2008</startdate><enddate>2008</enddate><creator>Evans, Fred</creator><general>Philosophy Documentation Center</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2008</creationdate><title>Iris Marion Young and “Intersecting Voices”</title><author>Evans, Fred</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c164t-d9376e6de4e8c753383cc6283e490bb99480e059ec07b0b0265cd76324b0e6113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Collectivity</topic><topic>Critical theory</topic><topic>Cultural background</topic><topic>Cultural factors</topic><topic>Cultural groups</topic><topic>Cultural identity</topic><topic>Identity politics</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Problem solving</topic><topic>Self concept</topic><topic>Social structure</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><topic>Theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Evans, Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DePaul University</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences &amp; Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Philosophy today (Celina)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Evans, Fred</au><aucorp>DePaul University</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Iris Marion Young and “Intersecting Voices”</atitle><jtitle>Philosophy today (Celina)</jtitle><date>2008</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>Supplement</issue><spage>10</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>10-18</pages><issn>0031-8256</issn><eissn>2329-8596</eissn><coden>PHTDBF</coden><abstract>"12 Besides their own value as goods, self-development, or the achievement of equal capability with others, and self-determination, or participation in determining one's actions, are valorized because they too are conditions for a just process of collective problem-solving.11 Without these conditions and the other procedures she states, Young feels there would not be true inclusion in the decision-making process. Because just procedures can only be approximated, Young adds that "justice 'in itself is a limit concept at which we always aim as the moral horizon of our political dealings. Inclusion and Democracy, 109. [...]Young counsels that rather than debating which definition of "the good" should prevail, the polity is expected to concentrate on making specific judgments that ensure the just functioning of the multi-voiced collectivity: "The outcome of political discussion and decision-making is almost never some conception of justice, but rather ^particular judgement about what actions and policies this collective should adopt to address these circumstances" (28-29; Young's italics). The following quotes further reinforce the idea that conventional social institutions are the basis for social connections: "An agent stands in relations of justice with all those others whose actions that agent assumes in the background of his or her own action (Inclusion and Democracy, 223); "Obligations of justice arise among persons set in.. institutional relations and causal chains of effect and influence. [...]the members of cultural and other groups are con- cerned with identity and, as Charles Taylor and other thinkers have pointed out, have cause to cherish the affinity with other people that this identity provides and to seek its preservation and flourishing. [...]Young accepts that our cultural background plays a role in both motivating us toward justice and interpreting the meaning of social justice terms (see above).</abstract><cop>Charlottesville</cop><pub>Philosophy Documentation Center</pub><doi>10.5840/philtoday200852Supplement48</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-8256
ispartof Philosophy today (Celina), 2008, Vol.52 (Supplement), p.10-18
issn 0031-8256
2329-8596
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_205356424
source ProQuest One Literature; Art, Design & Architecture Collection
subjects Collectivity
Critical theory
Cultural background
Cultural factors
Cultural groups
Cultural identity
Identity politics
Philosophy
Politics
Problem solving
Self concept
Social structure
Terminology
Theory
title Iris Marion Young and “Intersecting Voices”
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T12%3A30%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Iris%20Marion%20Young%20and%20%E2%80%9CIntersecting%20Voices%E2%80%9D&rft.jtitle=Philosophy%20today%20(Celina)&rft.au=Evans,%20Fred&rft.aucorp=DePaul%20University&rft.date=2008&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=Supplement&rft.spage=10&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=10-18&rft.issn=0031-8256&rft.eissn=2329-8596&rft.coden=PHTDBF&rft_id=info:doi/10.5840/philtoday200852Supplement48&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1584557351%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c164t-d9376e6de4e8c753383cc6283e490bb99480e059ec07b0b0265cd76324b0e6113%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205356424&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true