Beliefs and trade union support for trade liberalisation in the US and the UK: the AFL-CIO and the TUC compared

This article applies an interpretive approach to behaviour to explain why the United States’ American Federation of Labor–Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) has opposed free trade agreements, whereas the British Trade Union Congress (TUC) has endorsed them and why the AFL-CIO shifted its...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of international relations and development 2018-07, Vol.21 (3), p.769-797
Main Author: Díez Medrano, Juan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Area Studies
Autonomy
Development Studies
Free trade
Imports
Industrial enterprises
Industrial organization
International Relations
Labor unions
Legislatures
Markets
Political integration
Political Science and International Relations
Political Science and International Studies
Poverty
Trade agreements
Trade liberalization
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article applies an interpretive approach to behaviour to explain why the United States’ American Federation of Labor–Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) has opposed free trade agreements, whereas the British Trade Union Congress (TUC) has endorsed them and why the AFL-CIO shifted its position on trade liberalisation around 1970. The AFL-CIO has opposed FTAs because it views past costs of trade liberalisation as excessive and believes that FTAs do not protect workers enough against surges in imports. The British TUC has accepted FTAs and the enlargement of the EU because it sees no economic alternative to open markets. On a substantive level, the article describes how the US and the British trade union confederations have approached trade liberalisation and FTAs. On an analytical level, the article emphasises the autonomy of individual and group beliefs with respect to structures and with respect to dominant ideas and therefore the need to examine these beliefs when explaining behaviour.
ISSN:1408-6980
1581-1980
DOI:10.1057/s41268-017-0084-2