Loading…

Performance of Activated‐Carbon‐Supported Ni, Co, and Ni–Co Catalysts for Hydrogen Iodide Decomposition in a Thermochemical Water‐Splitting Sulfur–Iodine Cycle

Bimetallic Ni–Co/activated carbon (Ni–Co/AC) and monometallic Ni/AC and Co/AC catalysts were prepared to investigate their catalytic activity for hydrogen‐iodide decomposition in the sulfur–iodine (SI) cycle. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed an average size of approximately 3 nm parti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energy technology (Weinheim, Germany) Germany), 2018-06, Vol.6 (6), p.1104-1111
Main Authors: Singhania, Amit, Bhaskarwar, Ashok N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3352-56688acec49ca8ff601faf558e02335bbab17617ed6b98b1ceb4b88d58449ac33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3352-56688acec49ca8ff601faf558e02335bbab17617ed6b98b1ceb4b88d58449ac33
container_end_page 1111
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1104
container_title Energy technology (Weinheim, Germany)
container_volume 6
creator Singhania, Amit
Bhaskarwar, Ashok N.
description Bimetallic Ni–Co/activated carbon (Ni–Co/AC) and monometallic Ni/AC and Co/AC catalysts were prepared to investigate their catalytic activity for hydrogen‐iodide decomposition in the sulfur–iodine (SI) cycle. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed an average size of approximately 3 nm particles for Ni–Co/AC. Ni–Co/AC possesses a higher ID/IG intensity ratio in Raman spectroscopy than the monometallic catalysts and support, which is an indication of high degree of defects. Hydrogen‐iodide decomposition was performed on a fixed vertical bed quartz reactor at a weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) of 12.9 h−1 and different temperatures (400–550 °C). Bimetallic catalysts exhibited better activity and stability than the monometallic catalysts. The composition of Ni/Co in the bimetallic Ni–Co catalyst played the key role in dictating the activity of catalyst. It was observed that the loading ratio of 3:1 for Ni/Co achieved the maximal hydrogen‐iodide conversion value. Bimetallic Ni(3 %)–Co(1 %)/AC showed excellent time‐on‐stream stability of 70 h for the hydrogen‐iodide decomposition reaction. The post‐reaction characterization studies (X‐ray diffraction and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area measurements) confirmed that the bimetallic Ni–Co/AC catalyst has a stable structure and shows high corrosion resistance against the corrosive hydrogen iodide environment. Also, it was observed that the apparent activation energy of the bimetallic Ni–Co/AC catalyst was smaller than the monometallic Ni and Co catalysts. The effect of iodine on hydrogen‐iodide conversion was also studied. Doing the splits: The catalytic decomposition of hydrogen iodide is one of the reactions of the sulfur–iodine (SI) cycle, which is considered as a promising technology for generating hydrogen in large quantities. Hydrogen is needed in the future as a clean, cheap, light, and renewable energy carrier due to regular depletion of fossil fuels, which result in carbon dioxide emissions.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ente.201700752
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2055178859</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2055178859</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3352-56688acec49ca8ff601faf558e02335bbab17617ed6b98b1ceb4b88d58449ac33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1KxDAUhYsoKDpb1wG3zph0mjZdSh1_QEbBEZclTW800iY1SZXu5hEEn8LX8klMGdGlq3u4nPOdxYmiQ4JnBOP4BLSHWYxJhnFG461oLyZ5Mk3iPN3-1YztRhPnnjHGBNM5xfO96PMWrDS25VoAMhKdCq9euYf6a_1ecFsZHcRd33XGhidaqmNUmGPE9ai_1h-FQQX3vBmcdyiA0OVQW_MIGl2ZWtWAzkCYtjNOeWU0UhpxtHoC2xrxBK0SvEEPoc6OLV2jvFf6Ed31jezD62NkaEDFIBo4iHYkbxxMfu5-dH--WBWX0-ubi6vi9Hoq5nMaT2maMsYFiCQXnEmZYiK5pJQBjoOhqnhFspRkUKdVzioioEoqxmrKkiTngbEfHW24nTUvPThfPpve6lBZxphSkjFG8-CabVzCGucsyLKzquV2KAkux0XKcZHyd5EQyDeBN9XA8I-7XCxXi7_sN_o3ly0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2055178859</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance of Activated‐Carbon‐Supported Ni, Co, and Ni–Co Catalysts for Hydrogen Iodide Decomposition in a Thermochemical Water‐Splitting Sulfur–Iodine Cycle</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Singhania, Amit ; Bhaskarwar, Ashok N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Singhania, Amit ; Bhaskarwar, Ashok N.</creatorcontrib><description>Bimetallic Ni–Co/activated carbon (Ni–Co/AC) and monometallic Ni/AC and Co/AC catalysts were prepared to investigate their catalytic activity for hydrogen‐iodide decomposition in the sulfur–iodine (SI) cycle. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed an average size of approximately 3 nm particles for Ni–Co/AC. Ni–Co/AC possesses a higher ID/IG intensity ratio in Raman spectroscopy than the monometallic catalysts and support, which is an indication of high degree of defects. Hydrogen‐iodide decomposition was performed on a fixed vertical bed quartz reactor at a weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) of 12.9 h−1 and different temperatures (400–550 °C). Bimetallic catalysts exhibited better activity and stability than the monometallic catalysts. The composition of Ni/Co in the bimetallic Ni–Co catalyst played the key role in dictating the activity of catalyst. It was observed that the loading ratio of 3:1 for Ni/Co achieved the maximal hydrogen‐iodide conversion value. Bimetallic Ni(3 %)–Co(1 %)/AC showed excellent time‐on‐stream stability of 70 h for the hydrogen‐iodide decomposition reaction. The post‐reaction characterization studies (X‐ray diffraction and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area measurements) confirmed that the bimetallic Ni–Co/AC catalyst has a stable structure and shows high corrosion resistance against the corrosive hydrogen iodide environment. Also, it was observed that the apparent activation energy of the bimetallic Ni–Co/AC catalyst was smaller than the monometallic Ni and Co catalysts. The effect of iodine on hydrogen‐iodide conversion was also studied. Doing the splits: The catalytic decomposition of hydrogen iodide is one of the reactions of the sulfur–iodine (SI) cycle, which is considered as a promising technology for generating hydrogen in large quantities. Hydrogen is needed in the future as a clean, cheap, light, and renewable energy carrier due to regular depletion of fossil fuels, which result in carbon dioxide emissions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2194-4288</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2194-4296</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ente.201700752</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weinheim: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Activated carbon ; Bimetals ; Catalysis ; Catalysts ; Catalytic activity ; Conversion ; Corrosion resistance ; Decomposition ; Decomposition reactions ; electrochemistry ; Hydrogen ; hydrogen generation ; Iodides ; Iodine ; Stability ; Sulfur ; sulfur–iodine cycle ; Transmission electron microscopy ; water splitting ; X-ray diffraction</subject><ispartof>Energy technology (Weinheim, Germany), 2018-06, Vol.6 (6), p.1104-1111</ispartof><rights>2018 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3352-56688acec49ca8ff601faf558e02335bbab17617ed6b98b1ceb4b88d58449ac33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3352-56688acec49ca8ff601faf558e02335bbab17617ed6b98b1ceb4b88d58449ac33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Singhania, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhaskarwar, Ashok N.</creatorcontrib><title>Performance of Activated‐Carbon‐Supported Ni, Co, and Ni–Co Catalysts for Hydrogen Iodide Decomposition in a Thermochemical Water‐Splitting Sulfur–Iodine Cycle</title><title>Energy technology (Weinheim, Germany)</title><description>Bimetallic Ni–Co/activated carbon (Ni–Co/AC) and monometallic Ni/AC and Co/AC catalysts were prepared to investigate their catalytic activity for hydrogen‐iodide decomposition in the sulfur–iodine (SI) cycle. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed an average size of approximately 3 nm particles for Ni–Co/AC. Ni–Co/AC possesses a higher ID/IG intensity ratio in Raman spectroscopy than the monometallic catalysts and support, which is an indication of high degree of defects. Hydrogen‐iodide decomposition was performed on a fixed vertical bed quartz reactor at a weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) of 12.9 h−1 and different temperatures (400–550 °C). Bimetallic catalysts exhibited better activity and stability than the monometallic catalysts. The composition of Ni/Co in the bimetallic Ni–Co catalyst played the key role in dictating the activity of catalyst. It was observed that the loading ratio of 3:1 for Ni/Co achieved the maximal hydrogen‐iodide conversion value. Bimetallic Ni(3 %)–Co(1 %)/AC showed excellent time‐on‐stream stability of 70 h for the hydrogen‐iodide decomposition reaction. The post‐reaction characterization studies (X‐ray diffraction and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area measurements) confirmed that the bimetallic Ni–Co/AC catalyst has a stable structure and shows high corrosion resistance against the corrosive hydrogen iodide environment. Also, it was observed that the apparent activation energy of the bimetallic Ni–Co/AC catalyst was smaller than the monometallic Ni and Co catalysts. The effect of iodine on hydrogen‐iodide conversion was also studied. Doing the splits: The catalytic decomposition of hydrogen iodide is one of the reactions of the sulfur–iodine (SI) cycle, which is considered as a promising technology for generating hydrogen in large quantities. Hydrogen is needed in the future as a clean, cheap, light, and renewable energy carrier due to regular depletion of fossil fuels, which result in carbon dioxide emissions.</description><subject>Activated carbon</subject><subject>Bimetals</subject><subject>Catalysis</subject><subject>Catalysts</subject><subject>Catalytic activity</subject><subject>Conversion</subject><subject>Corrosion resistance</subject><subject>Decomposition</subject><subject>Decomposition reactions</subject><subject>electrochemistry</subject><subject>Hydrogen</subject><subject>hydrogen generation</subject><subject>Iodides</subject><subject>Iodine</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><subject>sulfur–iodine cycle</subject><subject>Transmission electron microscopy</subject><subject>water splitting</subject><subject>X-ray diffraction</subject><issn>2194-4288</issn><issn>2194-4296</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1KxDAUhYsoKDpb1wG3zph0mjZdSh1_QEbBEZclTW800iY1SZXu5hEEn8LX8klMGdGlq3u4nPOdxYmiQ4JnBOP4BLSHWYxJhnFG461oLyZ5Mk3iPN3-1YztRhPnnjHGBNM5xfO96PMWrDS25VoAMhKdCq9euYf6a_1ecFsZHcRd33XGhidaqmNUmGPE9ai_1h-FQQX3vBmcdyiA0OVQW_MIGl2ZWtWAzkCYtjNOeWU0UhpxtHoC2xrxBK0SvEEPoc6OLV2jvFf6Ed31jezD62NkaEDFIBo4iHYkbxxMfu5-dH--WBWX0-ubi6vi9Hoq5nMaT2maMsYFiCQXnEmZYiK5pJQBjoOhqnhFspRkUKdVzioioEoqxmrKkiTngbEfHW24nTUvPThfPpve6lBZxphSkjFG8-CabVzCGucsyLKzquV2KAkux0XKcZHyd5EQyDeBN9XA8I-7XCxXi7_sN_o3ly0</recordid><startdate>201806</startdate><enddate>201806</enddate><creator>Singhania, Amit</creator><creator>Bhaskarwar, Ashok N.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201806</creationdate><title>Performance of Activated‐Carbon‐Supported Ni, Co, and Ni–Co Catalysts for Hydrogen Iodide Decomposition in a Thermochemical Water‐Splitting Sulfur–Iodine Cycle</title><author>Singhania, Amit ; Bhaskarwar, Ashok N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3352-56688acec49ca8ff601faf558e02335bbab17617ed6b98b1ceb4b88d58449ac33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Activated carbon</topic><topic>Bimetals</topic><topic>Catalysis</topic><topic>Catalysts</topic><topic>Catalytic activity</topic><topic>Conversion</topic><topic>Corrosion resistance</topic><topic>Decomposition</topic><topic>Decomposition reactions</topic><topic>electrochemistry</topic><topic>Hydrogen</topic><topic>hydrogen generation</topic><topic>Iodides</topic><topic>Iodine</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><topic>sulfur–iodine cycle</topic><topic>Transmission electron microscopy</topic><topic>water splitting</topic><topic>X-ray diffraction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Singhania, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhaskarwar, Ashok N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Energy technology (Weinheim, Germany)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Singhania, Amit</au><au>Bhaskarwar, Ashok N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance of Activated‐Carbon‐Supported Ni, Co, and Ni–Co Catalysts for Hydrogen Iodide Decomposition in a Thermochemical Water‐Splitting Sulfur–Iodine Cycle</atitle><jtitle>Energy technology (Weinheim, Germany)</jtitle><date>2018-06</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1104</spage><epage>1111</epage><pages>1104-1111</pages><issn>2194-4288</issn><eissn>2194-4296</eissn><abstract>Bimetallic Ni–Co/activated carbon (Ni–Co/AC) and monometallic Ni/AC and Co/AC catalysts were prepared to investigate their catalytic activity for hydrogen‐iodide decomposition in the sulfur–iodine (SI) cycle. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed an average size of approximately 3 nm particles for Ni–Co/AC. Ni–Co/AC possesses a higher ID/IG intensity ratio in Raman spectroscopy than the monometallic catalysts and support, which is an indication of high degree of defects. Hydrogen‐iodide decomposition was performed on a fixed vertical bed quartz reactor at a weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) of 12.9 h−1 and different temperatures (400–550 °C). Bimetallic catalysts exhibited better activity and stability than the monometallic catalysts. The composition of Ni/Co in the bimetallic Ni–Co catalyst played the key role in dictating the activity of catalyst. It was observed that the loading ratio of 3:1 for Ni/Co achieved the maximal hydrogen‐iodide conversion value. Bimetallic Ni(3 %)–Co(1 %)/AC showed excellent time‐on‐stream stability of 70 h for the hydrogen‐iodide decomposition reaction. The post‐reaction characterization studies (X‐ray diffraction and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area measurements) confirmed that the bimetallic Ni–Co/AC catalyst has a stable structure and shows high corrosion resistance against the corrosive hydrogen iodide environment. Also, it was observed that the apparent activation energy of the bimetallic Ni–Co/AC catalyst was smaller than the monometallic Ni and Co catalysts. The effect of iodine on hydrogen‐iodide conversion was also studied. Doing the splits: The catalytic decomposition of hydrogen iodide is one of the reactions of the sulfur–iodine (SI) cycle, which is considered as a promising technology for generating hydrogen in large quantities. Hydrogen is needed in the future as a clean, cheap, light, and renewable energy carrier due to regular depletion of fossil fuels, which result in carbon dioxide emissions.</abstract><cop>Weinheim</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/ente.201700752</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2194-4288
ispartof Energy technology (Weinheim, Germany), 2018-06, Vol.6 (6), p.1104-1111
issn 2194-4288
2194-4296
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2055178859
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Activated carbon
Bimetals
Catalysis
Catalysts
Catalytic activity
Conversion
Corrosion resistance
Decomposition
Decomposition reactions
electrochemistry
Hydrogen
hydrogen generation
Iodides
Iodine
Stability
Sulfur
sulfur–iodine cycle
Transmission electron microscopy
water splitting
X-ray diffraction
title Performance of Activated‐Carbon‐Supported Ni, Co, and Ni–Co Catalysts for Hydrogen Iodide Decomposition in a Thermochemical Water‐Splitting Sulfur–Iodine Cycle
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T00%3A09%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20of%20Activated%E2%80%90Carbon%E2%80%90Supported%20Ni,%20Co,%20and%20Ni%E2%80%93Co%20Catalysts%20for%20Hydrogen%20Iodide%20Decomposition%20in%20a%20Thermochemical%20Water%E2%80%90Splitting%20Sulfur%E2%80%93Iodine%20Cycle&rft.jtitle=Energy%20technology%20(Weinheim,%20Germany)&rft.au=Singhania,%20Amit&rft.date=2018-06&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1104&rft.epage=1111&rft.pages=1104-1111&rft.issn=2194-4288&rft.eissn=2194-4296&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ente.201700752&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2055178859%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3352-56688acec49ca8ff601faf558e02335bbab17617ed6b98b1ceb4b88d58449ac33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2055178859&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true