Loading…

Soil sealing and unsealing: State of the art and examples

Soil sealing for urban and infrastructure development constitutes the most intense form of land degradation and affects all ecosystem services. Researchers and policy makers have become aware of this fact and call for limiting development and compensating for new soil sealing with unsealing measures...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Land degradation & development 2018-06, Vol.29 (6), p.2015-2024
Main Authors: Tobias, Silvia, Conen, Franz, Duss, Adrian, Wenzel, Leonore M., Buser, Christine, Alewell, Christine
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3939-15fe752f49f1c44eb8228dfc63e07b1a110742d2fe9099c42a6a49b25677fa033
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3939-15fe752f49f1c44eb8228dfc63e07b1a110742d2fe9099c42a6a49b25677fa033
container_end_page 2024
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2015
container_title Land degradation & development
container_volume 29
creator Tobias, Silvia
Conen, Franz
Duss, Adrian
Wenzel, Leonore M.
Buser, Christine
Alewell, Christine
description Soil sealing for urban and infrastructure development constitutes the most intense form of land degradation and affects all ecosystem services. Researchers and policy makers have become aware of this fact and call for limiting development and compensating for new soil sealing with unsealing measures. In a literature review, we found that the state of research about the impacts of soil sealing is far more advanced than about the potential and prerequisites of unsealing. In practice, soil restoration after mining and construction activities as well as redevelopment or renaturation of abandoned industrial sites are increasingly important issues, but systematic research on the success of soil unsealing and restoration is rare. In particular, the development of soils and vegetation after unsealing and restoration measures as well as their potential to provide ecosystem services need more detailed investigation. In 3 case studies, we demonstrate that replacing a sealed surface with soil to restore ecosystem services is always beneficial for humans and nature. An indicator‐based mapping approach revealed the potential performance of different ecosystem services at former industrial sites in Switzerland. When unsealed sites are transformed to pioneer habitats, the intended vegetation may successfully be regained, but landscape connectivity is hardly enhanced due to increased overall landscape fragmentation. Our investigations show that with the techniques currently applied, the soil physical parameters in a restored agricultural soil developed favourably for crop growth within 15 years. However, unsealed soils are anthropogenic soils with reduced multifunctionality, and protecting natural soil against sealing is always the better option.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ldr.2919
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2055197246</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2055197246</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3939-15fe752f49f1c44eb8228dfc63e07b1a110742d2fe9099c42a6a49b25677fa033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK6CPyHgxUvXJE2axpus6wcUBFfBW0jbiXbJtjVp0f33ttu9epoZ5mHe4UHokpIFJYTduNIvmKLqCM0oUSqiXHwcj30qopjJ9BSdhbAhhFDJ5QypdVM5HMC4qv7Epi5xXx-mW7zuTAe4sbj7Amx8t9_Dr9m2DsI5OrHGBbg41Dl6f1i9LZ-i7OXxeXmXRUWs4iFfWJCCWa4sLTiHPGUsLW2RxEBkTg2lRHJWMgtqeLfgzCSGq5yJREprSBzP0dV0t_XNdw-h05um9_UQqRkRgirJeDJQ1xNV-CYED1a3vtoav9OU6FGMHsToUcyARhP6UznY_cvp7P51z_8B5HBiFg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2055197246</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Soil sealing and unsealing: State of the art and examples</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Tobias, Silvia ; Conen, Franz ; Duss, Adrian ; Wenzel, Leonore M. ; Buser, Christine ; Alewell, Christine</creator><creatorcontrib>Tobias, Silvia ; Conen, Franz ; Duss, Adrian ; Wenzel, Leonore M. ; Buser, Christine ; Alewell, Christine</creatorcontrib><description>Soil sealing for urban and infrastructure development constitutes the most intense form of land degradation and affects all ecosystem services. Researchers and policy makers have become aware of this fact and call for limiting development and compensating for new soil sealing with unsealing measures. In a literature review, we found that the state of research about the impacts of soil sealing is far more advanced than about the potential and prerequisites of unsealing. In practice, soil restoration after mining and construction activities as well as redevelopment or renaturation of abandoned industrial sites are increasingly important issues, but systematic research on the success of soil unsealing and restoration is rare. In particular, the development of soils and vegetation after unsealing and restoration measures as well as their potential to provide ecosystem services need more detailed investigation. In 3 case studies, we demonstrate that replacing a sealed surface with soil to restore ecosystem services is always beneficial for humans and nature. An indicator‐based mapping approach revealed the potential performance of different ecosystem services at former industrial sites in Switzerland. When unsealed sites are transformed to pioneer habitats, the intended vegetation may successfully be regained, but landscape connectivity is hardly enhanced due to increased overall landscape fragmentation. Our investigations show that with the techniques currently applied, the soil physical parameters in a restored agricultural soil developed favourably for crop growth within 15 years. However, unsealed soils are anthropogenic soils with reduced multifunctionality, and protecting natural soil against sealing is always the better option.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1085-3278</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-145X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ldr.2919</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Abandoned mines ; Agricultural development ; Agricultural land ; Agricultural practices ; Anthropogenic factors ; brownfield regeneration ; Case studies ; circular flow land use management ; Crop growth ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Human influences ; Industrial sites ; Land degradation ; land recycling ; Land use ; Landscape ; Literature reviews ; Physical properties ; Redevelopment ; Renaturation ; Sealing ; Service restoration ; Soil investigations ; soil restoration ; Soils ; SUITMA (soils of urban, industrial, traffic, mining and military areas) ; Vegetation ; Well construction</subject><ispartof>Land degradation &amp; development, 2018-06, Vol.29 (6), p.2015-2024</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3939-15fe752f49f1c44eb8228dfc63e07b1a110742d2fe9099c42a6a49b25677fa033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3939-15fe752f49f1c44eb8228dfc63e07b1a110742d2fe9099c42a6a49b25677fa033</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7865-005X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tobias, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conen, Franz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duss, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenzel, Leonore M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buser, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alewell, Christine</creatorcontrib><title>Soil sealing and unsealing: State of the art and examples</title><title>Land degradation &amp; development</title><description>Soil sealing for urban and infrastructure development constitutes the most intense form of land degradation and affects all ecosystem services. Researchers and policy makers have become aware of this fact and call for limiting development and compensating for new soil sealing with unsealing measures. In a literature review, we found that the state of research about the impacts of soil sealing is far more advanced than about the potential and prerequisites of unsealing. In practice, soil restoration after mining and construction activities as well as redevelopment or renaturation of abandoned industrial sites are increasingly important issues, but systematic research on the success of soil unsealing and restoration is rare. In particular, the development of soils and vegetation after unsealing and restoration measures as well as their potential to provide ecosystem services need more detailed investigation. In 3 case studies, we demonstrate that replacing a sealed surface with soil to restore ecosystem services is always beneficial for humans and nature. An indicator‐based mapping approach revealed the potential performance of different ecosystem services at former industrial sites in Switzerland. When unsealed sites are transformed to pioneer habitats, the intended vegetation may successfully be regained, but landscape connectivity is hardly enhanced due to increased overall landscape fragmentation. Our investigations show that with the techniques currently applied, the soil physical parameters in a restored agricultural soil developed favourably for crop growth within 15 years. However, unsealed soils are anthropogenic soils with reduced multifunctionality, and protecting natural soil against sealing is always the better option.</description><subject>Abandoned mines</subject><subject>Agricultural development</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>brownfield regeneration</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>circular flow land use management</subject><subject>Crop growth</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Industrial sites</subject><subject>Land degradation</subject><subject>land recycling</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Physical properties</subject><subject>Redevelopment</subject><subject>Renaturation</subject><subject>Sealing</subject><subject>Service restoration</subject><subject>Soil investigations</subject><subject>soil restoration</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>SUITMA (soils of urban, industrial, traffic, mining and military areas)</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Well construction</subject><issn>1085-3278</issn><issn>1099-145X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK6CPyHgxUvXJE2axpus6wcUBFfBW0jbiXbJtjVp0f33ttu9epoZ5mHe4UHokpIFJYTduNIvmKLqCM0oUSqiXHwcj30qopjJ9BSdhbAhhFDJ5QypdVM5HMC4qv7Epi5xXx-mW7zuTAe4sbj7Amx8t9_Dr9m2DsI5OrHGBbg41Dl6f1i9LZ-i7OXxeXmXRUWs4iFfWJCCWa4sLTiHPGUsLW2RxEBkTg2lRHJWMgtqeLfgzCSGq5yJREprSBzP0dV0t_XNdw-h05um9_UQqRkRgirJeDJQ1xNV-CYED1a3vtoav9OU6FGMHsToUcyARhP6UznY_cvp7P51z_8B5HBiFg</recordid><startdate>201806</startdate><enddate>201806</enddate><creator>Tobias, Silvia</creator><creator>Conen, Franz</creator><creator>Duss, Adrian</creator><creator>Wenzel, Leonore M.</creator><creator>Buser, Christine</creator><creator>Alewell, Christine</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7865-005X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201806</creationdate><title>Soil sealing and unsealing: State of the art and examples</title><author>Tobias, Silvia ; Conen, Franz ; Duss, Adrian ; Wenzel, Leonore M. ; Buser, Christine ; Alewell, Christine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3939-15fe752f49f1c44eb8228dfc63e07b1a110742d2fe9099c42a6a49b25677fa033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Abandoned mines</topic><topic>Agricultural development</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>brownfield regeneration</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>circular flow land use management</topic><topic>Crop growth</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Industrial sites</topic><topic>Land degradation</topic><topic>land recycling</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Physical properties</topic><topic>Redevelopment</topic><topic>Renaturation</topic><topic>Sealing</topic><topic>Service restoration</topic><topic>Soil investigations</topic><topic>soil restoration</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>SUITMA (soils of urban, industrial, traffic, mining and military areas)</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Well construction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tobias, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conen, Franz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duss, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenzel, Leonore M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buser, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alewell, Christine</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Land degradation &amp; development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tobias, Silvia</au><au>Conen, Franz</au><au>Duss, Adrian</au><au>Wenzel, Leonore M.</au><au>Buser, Christine</au><au>Alewell, Christine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Soil sealing and unsealing: State of the art and examples</atitle><jtitle>Land degradation &amp; development</jtitle><date>2018-06</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2015</spage><epage>2024</epage><pages>2015-2024</pages><issn>1085-3278</issn><eissn>1099-145X</eissn><abstract>Soil sealing for urban and infrastructure development constitutes the most intense form of land degradation and affects all ecosystem services. Researchers and policy makers have become aware of this fact and call for limiting development and compensating for new soil sealing with unsealing measures. In a literature review, we found that the state of research about the impacts of soil sealing is far more advanced than about the potential and prerequisites of unsealing. In practice, soil restoration after mining and construction activities as well as redevelopment or renaturation of abandoned industrial sites are increasingly important issues, but systematic research on the success of soil unsealing and restoration is rare. In particular, the development of soils and vegetation after unsealing and restoration measures as well as their potential to provide ecosystem services need more detailed investigation. In 3 case studies, we demonstrate that replacing a sealed surface with soil to restore ecosystem services is always beneficial for humans and nature. An indicator‐based mapping approach revealed the potential performance of different ecosystem services at former industrial sites in Switzerland. When unsealed sites are transformed to pioneer habitats, the intended vegetation may successfully be regained, but landscape connectivity is hardly enhanced due to increased overall landscape fragmentation. Our investigations show that with the techniques currently applied, the soil physical parameters in a restored agricultural soil developed favourably for crop growth within 15 years. However, unsealed soils are anthropogenic soils with reduced multifunctionality, and protecting natural soil against sealing is always the better option.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/ldr.2919</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7865-005X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1085-3278
ispartof Land degradation & development, 2018-06, Vol.29 (6), p.2015-2024
issn 1085-3278
1099-145X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2055197246
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Abandoned mines
Agricultural development
Agricultural land
Agricultural practices
Anthropogenic factors
brownfield regeneration
Case studies
circular flow land use management
Crop growth
Ecosystem services
Ecosystems
Human influences
Industrial sites
Land degradation
land recycling
Land use
Landscape
Literature reviews
Physical properties
Redevelopment
Renaturation
Sealing
Service restoration
Soil investigations
soil restoration
Soils
SUITMA (soils of urban, industrial, traffic, mining and military areas)
Vegetation
Well construction
title Soil sealing and unsealing: State of the art and examples
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T19%3A42%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Soil%20sealing%20and%20unsealing:%20State%20of%20the%20art%20and%20examples&rft.jtitle=Land%20degradation%20&%20development&rft.au=Tobias,%20Silvia&rft.date=2018-06&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2015&rft.epage=2024&rft.pages=2015-2024&rft.issn=1085-3278&rft.eissn=1099-145X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ldr.2919&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2055197246%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3939-15fe752f49f1c44eb8228dfc63e07b1a110742d2fe9099c42a6a49b25677fa033%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2055197246&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true