Loading…

A cross-linguistic perspective on grammar and negative epistemics in talk-in-interaction

In this introduction to the special issue on ‘Grammar and negative epistemics in talk-in-interaction’ we discuss the current state of research on the use of negative mental verb constructions such as I don’t know, I don’t understand, I don’t remember in social interaction. We scrutinize, in a cross-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of pragmatics 2016-12, Vol.106, p.72-79
Main Authors: Lindström, Jan, Maschler, Yael, Pekarek Doehler, Simona
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-bfa10c07cc1b91862f09e331c144850682d9d38e54f8e88a8baf9f311136e9073
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-bfa10c07cc1b91862f09e331c144850682d9d38e54f8e88a8baf9f311136e9073
container_end_page 79
container_issue
container_start_page 72
container_title Journal of pragmatics
container_volume 106
creator Lindström, Jan
Maschler, Yael
Pekarek Doehler, Simona
description In this introduction to the special issue on ‘Grammar and negative epistemics in talk-in-interaction’ we discuss the current state of research on the use of negative mental verb constructions such as I don’t know, I don’t understand, I don’t remember in social interaction. We scrutinize, in a cross-linguistic perspective, the grammatical and interactional features that emerge from existing research in the field, and spell out the specific contribution of the studies collected in this issue. We discuss how the cumulative evidence provided by these studies across a set of different languages, several of which are typologically unrelated, contributes to studies of talk-in-interaction and to the newly emerging field of Pragmatic Typology. We argue that the findings point to universal interactional motivations for the grammatical properties and the grammaticization of the constructions studied, and suggest that these motivations arise out of the basic requirements for intersubjectivity in social interaction.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.003
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2056032768</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378216616304702</els_id><sourcerecordid>2056032768</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-bfa10c07cc1b91862f09e331c144850682d9d38e54f8e88a8baf9f311136e9073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-Aw8Bz62TppsmF2FZ_AcLXhS8hWw6Lam7aU26C357s1vPwsAww3szvB8htwxyBkzcd_kQTLszeZGmHFQOwM_IjMlKZYzL6pzMgFcyK5gQl-Qqxg4AWMlhRj6X1IY-xmzrfLt3cXSWDhjigHZ0B6S9p20wu50J1PiaemzNaY9D0uLO2Uidp6PZfmXOpxoxmOTs_TW5aMw24s1fn5OPp8f31Uu2fnt-XS3XmeUSxmzTGAYWKmvZRjEpigYUcs4sK0u5ACGLWtVc4qJsJEpp5MY0quGMMS5QQcXn5G66O4T-e49x1F2_Dz691AUsBPCiEjKpykl1Chuw0UNwKdSPZqCPDHWnJ4b6yFCD0olhsj1MNkwJDg6Djtaht1i7kADpunf_H_gFwbN8iA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2056032768</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A cross-linguistic perspective on grammar and negative epistemics in talk-in-interaction</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Lindström, Jan ; Maschler, Yael ; Pekarek Doehler, Simona</creator><creatorcontrib>Lindström, Jan ; Maschler, Yael ; Pekarek Doehler, Simona</creatorcontrib><description>In this introduction to the special issue on ‘Grammar and negative epistemics in talk-in-interaction’ we discuss the current state of research on the use of negative mental verb constructions such as I don’t know, I don’t understand, I don’t remember in social interaction. We scrutinize, in a cross-linguistic perspective, the grammatical and interactional features that emerge from existing research in the field, and spell out the specific contribution of the studies collected in this issue. We discuss how the cumulative evidence provided by these studies across a set of different languages, several of which are typologically unrelated, contributes to studies of talk-in-interaction and to the newly emerging field of Pragmatic Typology. We argue that the findings point to universal interactional motivations for the grammatical properties and the grammaticization of the constructions studied, and suggest that these motivations arise out of the basic requirements for intersubjectivity in social interaction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-2166</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1387</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Comparative linguistics ; Epistemics ; Epistemology ; Grammar ; Grammar-in-interaction ; Grammaticalization ; Grammaticization ; Intersubjectivity ; Language typology ; Linguistics ; Negative mental verb constructions ; Pragmatic typology ; Pragmatics ; Social interaction ; Syntactic structures ; Talk-in-interaction</subject><ispartof>Journal of pragmatics, 2016-12, Vol.106, p.72-79</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Dec 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-bfa10c07cc1b91862f09e331c144850682d9d38e54f8e88a8baf9f311136e9073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-bfa10c07cc1b91862f09e331c144850682d9d38e54f8e88a8baf9f311136e9073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,31246,33751</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lindström, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maschler, Yael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pekarek Doehler, Simona</creatorcontrib><title>A cross-linguistic perspective on grammar and negative epistemics in talk-in-interaction</title><title>Journal of pragmatics</title><description>In this introduction to the special issue on ‘Grammar and negative epistemics in talk-in-interaction’ we discuss the current state of research on the use of negative mental verb constructions such as I don’t know, I don’t understand, I don’t remember in social interaction. We scrutinize, in a cross-linguistic perspective, the grammatical and interactional features that emerge from existing research in the field, and spell out the specific contribution of the studies collected in this issue. We discuss how the cumulative evidence provided by these studies across a set of different languages, several of which are typologically unrelated, contributes to studies of talk-in-interaction and to the newly emerging field of Pragmatic Typology. We argue that the findings point to universal interactional motivations for the grammatical properties and the grammaticization of the constructions studied, and suggest that these motivations arise out of the basic requirements for intersubjectivity in social interaction.</description><subject>Comparative linguistics</subject><subject>Epistemics</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Grammar-in-interaction</subject><subject>Grammaticalization</subject><subject>Grammaticization</subject><subject>Intersubjectivity</subject><subject>Language typology</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Negative mental verb constructions</subject><subject>Pragmatic typology</subject><subject>Pragmatics</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Syntactic structures</subject><subject>Talk-in-interaction</subject><issn>0378-2166</issn><issn>1879-1387</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-Aw8Bz62TppsmF2FZ_AcLXhS8hWw6Lam7aU26C357s1vPwsAww3szvB8htwxyBkzcd_kQTLszeZGmHFQOwM_IjMlKZYzL6pzMgFcyK5gQl-Qqxg4AWMlhRj6X1IY-xmzrfLt3cXSWDhjigHZ0B6S9p20wu50J1PiaemzNaY9D0uLO2Uidp6PZfmXOpxoxmOTs_TW5aMw24s1fn5OPp8f31Uu2fnt-XS3XmeUSxmzTGAYWKmvZRjEpigYUcs4sK0u5ACGLWtVc4qJsJEpp5MY0quGMMS5QQcXn5G66O4T-e49x1F2_Dz691AUsBPCiEjKpykl1Chuw0UNwKdSPZqCPDHWnJ4b6yFCD0olhsj1MNkwJDg6Djtaht1i7kADpunf_H_gFwbN8iA</recordid><startdate>201612</startdate><enddate>201612</enddate><creator>Lindström, Jan</creator><creator>Maschler, Yael</creator><creator>Pekarek Doehler, Simona</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201612</creationdate><title>A cross-linguistic perspective on grammar and negative epistemics in talk-in-interaction</title><author>Lindström, Jan ; Maschler, Yael ; Pekarek Doehler, Simona</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-bfa10c07cc1b91862f09e331c144850682d9d38e54f8e88a8baf9f311136e9073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Comparative linguistics</topic><topic>Epistemics</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Grammar-in-interaction</topic><topic>Grammaticalization</topic><topic>Grammaticization</topic><topic>Intersubjectivity</topic><topic>Language typology</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Negative mental verb constructions</topic><topic>Pragmatic typology</topic><topic>Pragmatics</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Syntactic structures</topic><topic>Talk-in-interaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lindström, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maschler, Yael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pekarek Doehler, Simona</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of pragmatics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lindström, Jan</au><au>Maschler, Yael</au><au>Pekarek Doehler, Simona</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A cross-linguistic perspective on grammar and negative epistemics in talk-in-interaction</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pragmatics</jtitle><date>2016-12</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>106</volume><spage>72</spage><epage>79</epage><pages>72-79</pages><issn>0378-2166</issn><eissn>1879-1387</eissn><abstract>In this introduction to the special issue on ‘Grammar and negative epistemics in talk-in-interaction’ we discuss the current state of research on the use of negative mental verb constructions such as I don’t know, I don’t understand, I don’t remember in social interaction. We scrutinize, in a cross-linguistic perspective, the grammatical and interactional features that emerge from existing research in the field, and spell out the specific contribution of the studies collected in this issue. We discuss how the cumulative evidence provided by these studies across a set of different languages, several of which are typologically unrelated, contributes to studies of talk-in-interaction and to the newly emerging field of Pragmatic Typology. We argue that the findings point to universal interactional motivations for the grammatical properties and the grammaticization of the constructions studied, and suggest that these motivations arise out of the basic requirements for intersubjectivity in social interaction.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.003</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-2166
ispartof Journal of pragmatics, 2016-12, Vol.106, p.72-79
issn 0378-2166
1879-1387
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2056032768
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); Sociological Abstracts
subjects Comparative linguistics
Epistemics
Epistemology
Grammar
Grammar-in-interaction
Grammaticalization
Grammaticization
Intersubjectivity
Language typology
Linguistics
Negative mental verb constructions
Pragmatic typology
Pragmatics
Social interaction
Syntactic structures
Talk-in-interaction
title A cross-linguistic perspective on grammar and negative epistemics in talk-in-interaction
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T20%3A30%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20cross-linguistic%20perspective%20on%20grammar%20and%20negative%20epistemics%20in%20talk-in-interaction&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pragmatics&rft.au=Lindstr%C3%B6m,%20Jan&rft.date=2016-12&rft.volume=106&rft.spage=72&rft.epage=79&rft.pages=72-79&rft.issn=0378-2166&rft.eissn=1879-1387&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2056032768%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-bfa10c07cc1b91862f09e331c144850682d9d38e54f8e88a8baf9f311136e9073%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2056032768&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true