Loading…
A cross-linguistic perspective on grammar and negative epistemics in talk-in-interaction
In this introduction to the special issue on ‘Grammar and negative epistemics in talk-in-interaction’ we discuss the current state of research on the use of negative mental verb constructions such as I don’t know, I don’t understand, I don’t remember in social interaction. We scrutinize, in a cross-...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of pragmatics 2016-12, Vol.106, p.72-79 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-bfa10c07cc1b91862f09e331c144850682d9d38e54f8e88a8baf9f311136e9073 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-bfa10c07cc1b91862f09e331c144850682d9d38e54f8e88a8baf9f311136e9073 |
container_end_page | 79 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 72 |
container_title | Journal of pragmatics |
container_volume | 106 |
creator | Lindström, Jan Maschler, Yael Pekarek Doehler, Simona |
description | In this introduction to the special issue on ‘Grammar and negative epistemics in talk-in-interaction’ we discuss the current state of research on the use of negative mental verb constructions such as I don’t know, I don’t understand, I don’t remember in social interaction. We scrutinize, in a cross-linguistic perspective, the grammatical and interactional features that emerge from existing research in the field, and spell out the specific contribution of the studies collected in this issue. We discuss how the cumulative evidence provided by these studies across a set of different languages, several of which are typologically unrelated, contributes to studies of talk-in-interaction and to the newly emerging field of Pragmatic Typology. We argue that the findings point to universal interactional motivations for the grammatical properties and the grammaticization of the constructions studied, and suggest that these motivations arise out of the basic requirements for intersubjectivity in social interaction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.003 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2056032768</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378216616304702</els_id><sourcerecordid>2056032768</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-bfa10c07cc1b91862f09e331c144850682d9d38e54f8e88a8baf9f311136e9073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-Aw8Bz62TppsmF2FZ_AcLXhS8hWw6Lam7aU26C357s1vPwsAww3szvB8htwxyBkzcd_kQTLszeZGmHFQOwM_IjMlKZYzL6pzMgFcyK5gQl-Qqxg4AWMlhRj6X1IY-xmzrfLt3cXSWDhjigHZ0B6S9p20wu50J1PiaemzNaY9D0uLO2Uidp6PZfmXOpxoxmOTs_TW5aMw24s1fn5OPp8f31Uu2fnt-XS3XmeUSxmzTGAYWKmvZRjEpigYUcs4sK0u5ACGLWtVc4qJsJEpp5MY0quGMMS5QQcXn5G66O4T-e49x1F2_Dz691AUsBPCiEjKpykl1Chuw0UNwKdSPZqCPDHWnJ4b6yFCD0olhsj1MNkwJDg6Djtaht1i7kADpunf_H_gFwbN8iA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2056032768</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A cross-linguistic perspective on grammar and negative epistemics in talk-in-interaction</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Lindström, Jan ; Maschler, Yael ; Pekarek Doehler, Simona</creator><creatorcontrib>Lindström, Jan ; Maschler, Yael ; Pekarek Doehler, Simona</creatorcontrib><description>In this introduction to the special issue on ‘Grammar and negative epistemics in talk-in-interaction’ we discuss the current state of research on the use of negative mental verb constructions such as I don’t know, I don’t understand, I don’t remember in social interaction. We scrutinize, in a cross-linguistic perspective, the grammatical and interactional features that emerge from existing research in the field, and spell out the specific contribution of the studies collected in this issue. We discuss how the cumulative evidence provided by these studies across a set of different languages, several of which are typologically unrelated, contributes to studies of talk-in-interaction and to the newly emerging field of Pragmatic Typology. We argue that the findings point to universal interactional motivations for the grammatical properties and the grammaticization of the constructions studied, and suggest that these motivations arise out of the basic requirements for intersubjectivity in social interaction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-2166</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1387</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Comparative linguistics ; Epistemics ; Epistemology ; Grammar ; Grammar-in-interaction ; Grammaticalization ; Grammaticization ; Intersubjectivity ; Language typology ; Linguistics ; Negative mental verb constructions ; Pragmatic typology ; Pragmatics ; Social interaction ; Syntactic structures ; Talk-in-interaction</subject><ispartof>Journal of pragmatics, 2016-12, Vol.106, p.72-79</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Dec 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-bfa10c07cc1b91862f09e331c144850682d9d38e54f8e88a8baf9f311136e9073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-bfa10c07cc1b91862f09e331c144850682d9d38e54f8e88a8baf9f311136e9073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,31246,33751</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lindström, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maschler, Yael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pekarek Doehler, Simona</creatorcontrib><title>A cross-linguistic perspective on grammar and negative epistemics in talk-in-interaction</title><title>Journal of pragmatics</title><description>In this introduction to the special issue on ‘Grammar and negative epistemics in talk-in-interaction’ we discuss the current state of research on the use of negative mental verb constructions such as I don’t know, I don’t understand, I don’t remember in social interaction. We scrutinize, in a cross-linguistic perspective, the grammatical and interactional features that emerge from existing research in the field, and spell out the specific contribution of the studies collected in this issue. We discuss how the cumulative evidence provided by these studies across a set of different languages, several of which are typologically unrelated, contributes to studies of talk-in-interaction and to the newly emerging field of Pragmatic Typology. We argue that the findings point to universal interactional motivations for the grammatical properties and the grammaticization of the constructions studied, and suggest that these motivations arise out of the basic requirements for intersubjectivity in social interaction.</description><subject>Comparative linguistics</subject><subject>Epistemics</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Grammar-in-interaction</subject><subject>Grammaticalization</subject><subject>Grammaticization</subject><subject>Intersubjectivity</subject><subject>Language typology</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Negative mental verb constructions</subject><subject>Pragmatic typology</subject><subject>Pragmatics</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Syntactic structures</subject><subject>Talk-in-interaction</subject><issn>0378-2166</issn><issn>1879-1387</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-Aw8Bz62TppsmF2FZ_AcLXhS8hWw6Lam7aU26C357s1vPwsAww3szvB8htwxyBkzcd_kQTLszeZGmHFQOwM_IjMlKZYzL6pzMgFcyK5gQl-Qqxg4AWMlhRj6X1IY-xmzrfLt3cXSWDhjigHZ0B6S9p20wu50J1PiaemzNaY9D0uLO2Uidp6PZfmXOpxoxmOTs_TW5aMw24s1fn5OPp8f31Uu2fnt-XS3XmeUSxmzTGAYWKmvZRjEpigYUcs4sK0u5ACGLWtVc4qJsJEpp5MY0quGMMS5QQcXn5G66O4T-e49x1F2_Dz691AUsBPCiEjKpykl1Chuw0UNwKdSPZqCPDHWnJ4b6yFCD0olhsj1MNkwJDg6Djtaht1i7kADpunf_H_gFwbN8iA</recordid><startdate>201612</startdate><enddate>201612</enddate><creator>Lindström, Jan</creator><creator>Maschler, Yael</creator><creator>Pekarek Doehler, Simona</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201612</creationdate><title>A cross-linguistic perspective on grammar and negative epistemics in talk-in-interaction</title><author>Lindström, Jan ; Maschler, Yael ; Pekarek Doehler, Simona</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-bfa10c07cc1b91862f09e331c144850682d9d38e54f8e88a8baf9f311136e9073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Comparative linguistics</topic><topic>Epistemics</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Grammar-in-interaction</topic><topic>Grammaticalization</topic><topic>Grammaticization</topic><topic>Intersubjectivity</topic><topic>Language typology</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Negative mental verb constructions</topic><topic>Pragmatic typology</topic><topic>Pragmatics</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Syntactic structures</topic><topic>Talk-in-interaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lindström, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maschler, Yael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pekarek Doehler, Simona</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of pragmatics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lindström, Jan</au><au>Maschler, Yael</au><au>Pekarek Doehler, Simona</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A cross-linguistic perspective on grammar and negative epistemics in talk-in-interaction</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pragmatics</jtitle><date>2016-12</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>106</volume><spage>72</spage><epage>79</epage><pages>72-79</pages><issn>0378-2166</issn><eissn>1879-1387</eissn><abstract>In this introduction to the special issue on ‘Grammar and negative epistemics in talk-in-interaction’ we discuss the current state of research on the use of negative mental verb constructions such as I don’t know, I don’t understand, I don’t remember in social interaction. We scrutinize, in a cross-linguistic perspective, the grammatical and interactional features that emerge from existing research in the field, and spell out the specific contribution of the studies collected in this issue. We discuss how the cumulative evidence provided by these studies across a set of different languages, several of which are typologically unrelated, contributes to studies of talk-in-interaction and to the newly emerging field of Pragmatic Typology. We argue that the findings point to universal interactional motivations for the grammatical properties and the grammaticization of the constructions studied, and suggest that these motivations arise out of the basic requirements for intersubjectivity in social interaction.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.003</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-2166 |
ispartof | Journal of pragmatics, 2016-12, Vol.106, p.72-79 |
issn | 0378-2166 1879-1387 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2056032768 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Comparative linguistics Epistemics Epistemology Grammar Grammar-in-interaction Grammaticalization Grammaticization Intersubjectivity Language typology Linguistics Negative mental verb constructions Pragmatic typology Pragmatics Social interaction Syntactic structures Talk-in-interaction |
title | A cross-linguistic perspective on grammar and negative epistemics in talk-in-interaction |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T20%3A30%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20cross-linguistic%20perspective%20on%20grammar%20and%20negative%20epistemics%20in%20talk-in-interaction&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pragmatics&rft.au=Lindstr%C3%B6m,%20Jan&rft.date=2016-12&rft.volume=106&rft.spage=72&rft.epage=79&rft.pages=72-79&rft.issn=0378-2166&rft.eissn=1879-1387&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.09.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2056032768%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-bfa10c07cc1b91862f09e331c144850682d9d38e54f8e88a8baf9f311136e9073%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2056032768&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |