Loading…

The Quality of Information in Electronic Groups

We examine some of the factors that might influence the quality of information produced in discussion groups on the internet, such as USENET and the WELL. In particular, we look at the impact of various different pricing structures, and compare regimes in which anonymity is enforced with regimes in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Netnomics 2002-05, Vol.4 (1), p.73
Main Authors: Bacharach, Michael, Board, Oliver
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 73
container_title Netnomics
container_volume 4
creator Bacharach, Michael
Board, Oliver
description We examine some of the factors that might influence the quality of information produced in discussion groups on the internet, such as USENET and the WELL. In particular, we look at the impact of various different pricing structures, and compare regimes in which anonymity is enforced with regimes in which all contributors must identify themselves. Our main finding is that the flow of quality-weighted information within the group is maximized by a regime which front loads the cost of sending messages, and identification is required. If there is a positive spillover from the intra-group transmission of good quality information, however, benefiting society at large, then the social value of the flow of quality-weighted information may be maximized by a different regime, in which all replying is anonymous. Reputation effects play a key role in our analysis: posters who have sent high quality messages in the past are considered more likely to send high quality messages in the future, and are thus more likely to be taken notice of. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_205709932</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>404783791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p582-6b88366d52cf76aad579c22f1e414f72e0ffdd8168e6a43e76fc9e8fa0daeee83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjctKAzEUQINYsFb_IbgP5jF5LaXUWiiIMPsSk3vplDEZk5mFf29BV-eszrkha6GtYpZbcXt15TTz2tk7ct_ahXMptPZr8tyfgX4sYRzmH1qQHjKW-hXmoWQ6ZLobIc615CHSfS3L1B7ICsPY4PGfG9K_7vrtGzu-7w_blyObtJPMfDqnjElaRrQmhKStj1KigE50aCVwxJScMA5M6BRYg9GDw8BTAACnNuTpLzvV8r1Am0-XstR8PZ4k15Z7r6T6BQ6lQBo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205709932</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Quality of Information in Electronic Groups</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><creator>Bacharach, Michael ; Board, Oliver</creator><creatorcontrib>Bacharach, Michael ; Board, Oliver</creatorcontrib><description>We examine some of the factors that might influence the quality of information produced in discussion groups on the internet, such as USENET and the WELL. In particular, we look at the impact of various different pricing structures, and compare regimes in which anonymity is enforced with regimes in which all contributors must identify themselves. Our main finding is that the flow of quality-weighted information within the group is maximized by a regime which front loads the cost of sending messages, and identification is required. If there is a positive spillover from the intra-group transmission of good quality information, however, benefiting society at large, then the social value of the flow of quality-weighted information may be maximized by a different regime, in which all replying is anonymous. Reputation effects play a key role in our analysis: posters who have sent high quality messages in the past are considered more likely to send high quality messages in the future, and are thus more likely to be taken notice of. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1385-9587</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7071</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Democracy ; Discussion groups ; Economics ; Information ; Information dissemination ; Information superhighway ; Internet ; Quality ; Reputations ; Social conditions &amp; trends ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Netnomics, 2002-05, Vol.4 (1), p.73</ispartof><rights>Copyright (c) 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/205709932/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/205709932?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11667,36037,44339,74638</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bacharach, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Board, Oliver</creatorcontrib><title>The Quality of Information in Electronic Groups</title><title>Netnomics</title><description>We examine some of the factors that might influence the quality of information produced in discussion groups on the internet, such as USENET and the WELL. In particular, we look at the impact of various different pricing structures, and compare regimes in which anonymity is enforced with regimes in which all contributors must identify themselves. Our main finding is that the flow of quality-weighted information within the group is maximized by a regime which front loads the cost of sending messages, and identification is required. If there is a positive spillover from the intra-group transmission of good quality information, however, benefiting society at large, then the social value of the flow of quality-weighted information may be maximized by a different regime, in which all replying is anonymous. Reputation effects play a key role in our analysis: posters who have sent high quality messages in the past are considered more likely to send high quality messages in the future, and are thus more likely to be taken notice of. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Discussion groups</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Information</subject><subject>Information dissemination</subject><subject>Information superhighway</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Reputations</subject><subject>Social conditions &amp; trends</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1385-9587</issn><issn>1573-7071</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNotjctKAzEUQINYsFb_IbgP5jF5LaXUWiiIMPsSk3vplDEZk5mFf29BV-eszrkha6GtYpZbcXt15TTz2tk7ct_ahXMptPZr8tyfgX4sYRzmH1qQHjKW-hXmoWQ6ZLobIc615CHSfS3L1B7ICsPY4PGfG9K_7vrtGzu-7w_blyObtJPMfDqnjElaRrQmhKStj1KigE50aCVwxJScMA5M6BRYg9GDw8BTAACnNuTpLzvV8r1Am0-XstR8PZ4k15Z7r6T6BQ6lQBo</recordid><startdate>20020501</startdate><enddate>20020501</enddate><creator>Bacharach, Michael</creator><creator>Board, Oliver</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020501</creationdate><title>The Quality of Information in Electronic Groups</title><author>Bacharach, Michael ; Board, Oliver</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p582-6b88366d52cf76aad579c22f1e414f72e0ffdd8168e6a43e76fc9e8fa0daeee83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Discussion groups</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Information</topic><topic>Information dissemination</topic><topic>Information superhighway</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Reputations</topic><topic>Social conditions &amp; trends</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bacharach, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Board, Oliver</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Netnomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bacharach, Michael</au><au>Board, Oliver</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Quality of Information in Electronic Groups</atitle><jtitle>Netnomics</jtitle><date>2002-05-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>73</spage><pages>73-</pages><issn>1385-9587</issn><eissn>1573-7071</eissn><abstract>We examine some of the factors that might influence the quality of information produced in discussion groups on the internet, such as USENET and the WELL. In particular, we look at the impact of various different pricing structures, and compare regimes in which anonymity is enforced with regimes in which all contributors must identify themselves. Our main finding is that the flow of quality-weighted information within the group is maximized by a regime which front loads the cost of sending messages, and identification is required. If there is a positive spillover from the intra-group transmission of good quality information, however, benefiting society at large, then the social value of the flow of quality-weighted information may be maximized by a different regime, in which all replying is anonymous. Reputation effects play a key role in our analysis: posters who have sent high quality messages in the past are considered more likely to send high quality messages in the future, and are thus more likely to be taken notice of. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1385-9587
ispartof Netnomics, 2002-05, Vol.4 (1), p.73
issn 1385-9587
1573-7071
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_205709932
source ABI/INFORM global
subjects Democracy
Discussion groups
Economics
Information
Information dissemination
Information superhighway
Internet
Quality
Reputations
Social conditions & trends
Studies
title The Quality of Information in Electronic Groups
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T08%3A04%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Quality%20of%20Information%20in%20Electronic%20Groups&rft.jtitle=Netnomics&rft.au=Bacharach,%20Michael&rft.date=2002-05-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=73&rft.pages=73-&rft.issn=1385-9587&rft.eissn=1573-7071&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E404783791%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p582-6b88366d52cf76aad579c22f1e414f72e0ffdd8168e6a43e76fc9e8fa0daeee83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205709932&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true