Loading…

Gender Differences in Psychosocial and Medical Outcomes Stemming From Testing Positive for the BRCA1/2 Genetic Mutation for Breast Cancer: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Study

This quantitatively driven sequential mixed methods study articulates the role of theory in mixed methods research and assesses the contribution of a mixed methods design to examining gender differences in men and women’s genetic testing decisions and the psychosocial factors impacting health-seekin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of mixed methods research 2018-07, Vol.12 (3), p.280-304
Main Author: Hesse-Biber, Sharlene
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-ab024bd81193afd9bb88a7adf87559e187a8a6d5312529268efed945bd840f273
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-ab024bd81193afd9bb88a7adf87559e187a8a6d5312529268efed945bd840f273
container_end_page 304
container_issue 3
container_start_page 280
container_title Journal of mixed methods research
container_volume 12
creator Hesse-Biber, Sharlene
description This quantitatively driven sequential mixed methods study articulates the role of theory in mixed methods research and assesses the contribution of a mixed methods design to examining gender differences in men and women’s genetic testing decisions and the psychosocial factors impacting health-seeking behaviors post-testing. A quantitative online survey of BRCA-positive mutation men and women was followed by a qualitative component consisting of semi-structured telephone interviews regarding genetic testing and post-testing decision making. Findings reveal gender differences in testing motivations: women focus on health; men focus on their family’s needs. Gender differences also appeared in psychological states and surgical decisions, revealing women’s more negative psychosocial reactions to a positive BRCA test result and higher rate of selecting preventative surgery.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1558689816655257
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2058272087</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1183562</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_1558689816655257</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2058272087</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-ab024bd81193afd9bb88a7adf87559e187a8a6d5312529268efed945bd840f273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtPJCEUhSvGSXzM7N2YkLguBaopqNm1bfuKHc3orCs0XGxMF7RAGfuf-fOk7NFJJpkVF8537znhFsUBwceEcH5CGBO1aASpa8Yo41vF7vBU1g0m25911neKvRifMM4MFbvF2wU4DQGdWWMggFMQkXXoLq7VwkevrFwi6TSagbYq17d9Ur7L0H2CrrPuEZ0H36EHiGm43Plok30BZHxAaQHo9NdkTE4oyjaQrEKzPslkvfsATgPImNBEZtvwE40dmr6ultLJ5MMa3cNzDy4NCWb2FYYMaeH1YN3r9ffim5HLCD_-nPvF7_Ppw-SyvLm9uJqMb0pV8SqVco7paK4FIU0ljW7mcyEkl9oIzlgDRHApZK1ZRfJ_NLQWYEA3I5ZbRthQXu0XR5u5q-BznpjaJ98Hly1bipmgnGIxUHhDqeBjDGDaVbCdDOuW4HbYT_vvfnLL4aYFglVf-PSaEFGxmma93OhRPsJf0__Oewf3MJsJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2058272087</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gender Differences in Psychosocial and Medical Outcomes Stemming From Testing Positive for the BRCA1/2 Genetic Mutation for Breast Cancer: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Study</title><source>ERIC</source><source>SAGE Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Hesse-Biber, Sharlene</creator><creatorcontrib>Hesse-Biber, Sharlene</creatorcontrib><description>This quantitatively driven sequential mixed methods study articulates the role of theory in mixed methods research and assesses the contribution of a mixed methods design to examining gender differences in men and women’s genetic testing decisions and the psychosocial factors impacting health-seeking behaviors post-testing. A quantitative online survey of BRCA-positive mutation men and women was followed by a qualitative component consisting of semi-structured telephone interviews regarding genetic testing and post-testing decision making. Findings reveal gender differences in testing motivations: women focus on health; men focus on their family’s needs. Gender differences also appeared in psychological states and surgical decisions, revealing women’s more negative psychosocial reactions to a positive BRCA test result and higher rate of selecting preventative surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1558-6898</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-6901</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1558689816655257</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Breast cancer ; Cancer ; Decision Making ; Family Structure ; Gender Differences ; Genetic Disorders ; Genetic testing ; Health Behavior ; Help seeking behavior ; Hypothesis Testing ; Internet ; Medical decision making ; Medicine ; Mixed Methods Research ; Mutation ; Online Surveys ; Prevention ; Psychological Patterns ; Psychosocial factors ; Research methodology ; Screening Tests ; Semi Structured Interviews ; Surgery ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Journal of mixed methods research, 2018-07, Vol.12 (3), p.280-304</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-ab024bd81193afd9bb88a7adf87559e187a8a6d5312529268efed945bd840f273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-ab024bd81193afd9bb88a7adf87559e187a8a6d5312529268efed945bd840f273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33774,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1183562$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hesse-Biber, Sharlene</creatorcontrib><title>Gender Differences in Psychosocial and Medical Outcomes Stemming From Testing Positive for the BRCA1/2 Genetic Mutation for Breast Cancer: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Study</title><title>Journal of mixed methods research</title><description>This quantitatively driven sequential mixed methods study articulates the role of theory in mixed methods research and assesses the contribution of a mixed methods design to examining gender differences in men and women’s genetic testing decisions and the psychosocial factors impacting health-seeking behaviors post-testing. A quantitative online survey of BRCA-positive mutation men and women was followed by a qualitative component consisting of semi-structured telephone interviews regarding genetic testing and post-testing decision making. Findings reveal gender differences in testing motivations: women focus on health; men focus on their family’s needs. Gender differences also appeared in psychological states and surgical decisions, revealing women’s more negative psychosocial reactions to a positive BRCA test result and higher rate of selecting preventative surgery.</description><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Family Structure</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Genetic Disorders</subject><subject>Genetic testing</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Help seeking behavior</subject><subject>Hypothesis Testing</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Medical decision making</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Mixed Methods Research</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Online Surveys</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Psychological Patterns</subject><subject>Psychosocial factors</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Screening Tests</subject><subject>Semi Structured Interviews</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1558-6898</issn><issn>1558-6901</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtPJCEUhSvGSXzM7N2YkLguBaopqNm1bfuKHc3orCs0XGxMF7RAGfuf-fOk7NFJJpkVF8537znhFsUBwceEcH5CGBO1aASpa8Yo41vF7vBU1g0m25911neKvRifMM4MFbvF2wU4DQGdWWMggFMQkXXoLq7VwkevrFwi6TSagbYq17d9Ur7L0H2CrrPuEZ0H36EHiGm43Plok30BZHxAaQHo9NdkTE4oyjaQrEKzPslkvfsATgPImNBEZtvwE40dmr6ultLJ5MMa3cNzDy4NCWb2FYYMaeH1YN3r9ffim5HLCD_-nPvF7_Ppw-SyvLm9uJqMb0pV8SqVco7paK4FIU0ljW7mcyEkl9oIzlgDRHApZK1ZRfJ_NLQWYEA3I5ZbRthQXu0XR5u5q-BznpjaJ98Hly1bipmgnGIxUHhDqeBjDGDaVbCdDOuW4HbYT_vvfnLL4aYFglVf-PSaEFGxmma93OhRPsJf0__Oewf3MJsJ</recordid><startdate>201807</startdate><enddate>201807</enddate><creator>Hesse-Biber, Sharlene</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201807</creationdate><title>Gender Differences in Psychosocial and Medical Outcomes Stemming From Testing Positive for the BRCA1/2 Genetic Mutation for Breast Cancer: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Study</title><author>Hesse-Biber, Sharlene</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-ab024bd81193afd9bb88a7adf87559e187a8a6d5312529268efed945bd840f273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Family Structure</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Genetic Disorders</topic><topic>Genetic testing</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Help seeking behavior</topic><topic>Hypothesis Testing</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Medical decision making</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Mixed Methods Research</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Online Surveys</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Psychological Patterns</topic><topic>Psychosocial factors</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Screening Tests</topic><topic>Semi Structured Interviews</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hesse-Biber, Sharlene</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of mixed methods research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hesse-Biber, Sharlene</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1183562</ericid><atitle>Gender Differences in Psychosocial and Medical Outcomes Stemming From Testing Positive for the BRCA1/2 Genetic Mutation for Breast Cancer: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of mixed methods research</jtitle><date>2018-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>280</spage><epage>304</epage><pages>280-304</pages><issn>1558-6898</issn><eissn>1558-6901</eissn><abstract>This quantitatively driven sequential mixed methods study articulates the role of theory in mixed methods research and assesses the contribution of a mixed methods design to examining gender differences in men and women’s genetic testing decisions and the psychosocial factors impacting health-seeking behaviors post-testing. A quantitative online survey of BRCA-positive mutation men and women was followed by a qualitative component consisting of semi-structured telephone interviews regarding genetic testing and post-testing decision making. Findings reveal gender differences in testing motivations: women focus on health; men focus on their family’s needs. Gender differences also appeared in psychological states and surgical decisions, revealing women’s more negative psychosocial reactions to a positive BRCA test result and higher rate of selecting preventative surgery.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1558689816655257</doi><tpages>25</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1558-6898
ispartof Journal of mixed methods research, 2018-07, Vol.12 (3), p.280-304
issn 1558-6898
1558-6901
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2058272087
source ERIC; SAGE Journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Breast cancer
Cancer
Decision Making
Family Structure
Gender Differences
Genetic Disorders
Genetic testing
Health Behavior
Help seeking behavior
Hypothesis Testing
Internet
Medical decision making
Medicine
Mixed Methods Research
Mutation
Online Surveys
Prevention
Psychological Patterns
Psychosocial factors
Research methodology
Screening Tests
Semi Structured Interviews
Surgery
Womens health
title Gender Differences in Psychosocial and Medical Outcomes Stemming From Testing Positive for the BRCA1/2 Genetic Mutation for Breast Cancer: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T08%3A23%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gender%20Differences%20in%20Psychosocial%20and%20Medical%20Outcomes%20Stemming%20From%20Testing%20Positive%20for%20the%20BRCA1/2%20Genetic%20Mutation%20for%20Breast%20Cancer:%20An%20Explanatory%20Sequential%20Mixed%20Methods%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20mixed%20methods%20research&rft.au=Hesse-Biber,%20Sharlene&rft.date=2018-07&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=280&rft.epage=304&rft.pages=280-304&rft.issn=1558-6898&rft.eissn=1558-6901&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1558689816655257&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2058272087%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-ab024bd81193afd9bb88a7adf87559e187a8a6d5312529268efed945bd840f273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2058272087&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1183562&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1558689816655257&rfr_iscdi=true