Loading…

Liderazgos políticos y democracia en América latina

Based on an ideal definition of democracy, the article discusses the workings of a low institutionalization pattern as seen in several Latin American countries, which it describes as “pendular democracy”. This kind of democracy is so called as it oscillates between periods of ungovernability and per...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:SocietàMutamentoPolitica (Firenze) 2018-01, Vol.9 (17), p.87
Main Author: Ollier, María Matilde
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 17
container_start_page 87
container_title SocietàMutamentoPolitica (Firenze)
container_volume 9
creator Ollier, María Matilde
description Based on an ideal definition of democracy, the article discusses the workings of a low institutionalization pattern as seen in several Latin American countries, which it describes as “pendular democracy”. This kind of democracy is so called as it oscillates between periods of ungovernability and periods of reversal of the rules, each resulting from an extreme style for presidential leadership, either unstable or dominant, respectively. The cases of several South American countries serve the article to show that differences in the workings of said pattern arise from the head of state’s capacity for agency and their governmental resources. Thus, it argues that each kind of leadership is a cause for low democratic institutionalization patterns rather than a consequence of them, as the literature usually states.
doi_str_mv 10.13128/SMP-23430
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2060792129</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2060792129</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20607921293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYBAyNNAzNDY0stAP9g3QNTI2MTZgYuA0MjC20DU2NDXgYOAtLs4yMDAwNLawMDQ04mQw9clMSS1KrErPL1YoyM85vLYkMxnIrFRISc3NTy5KTM5MVEjNU3DMPbyyKDM5USEnsSQzL5GHgTUtMac4lRdKczMou7mGOHvoFhTlF5amFpfEZ-WXFuUBpeKNDMwMzC2NDI0sjYlTBQABfzoc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2060792129</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Liderazgos políticos y democracia en América latina</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Ollier, María Matilde</creator><creatorcontrib>Ollier, María Matilde</creatorcontrib><description>Based on an ideal definition of democracy, the article discusses the workings of a low institutionalization pattern as seen in several Latin American countries, which it describes as “pendular democracy”. This kind of democracy is so called as it oscillates between periods of ungovernability and periods of reversal of the rules, each resulting from an extreme style for presidential leadership, either unstable or dominant, respectively. The cases of several South American countries serve the article to show that differences in the workings of said pattern arise from the head of state’s capacity for agency and their governmental resources. Thus, it argues that each kind of leadership is a cause for low democratic institutionalization patterns rather than a consequence of them, as the literature usually states.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2038-3150</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.13128/SMP-23430</identifier><language>spa</language><publisher>Florence: Firenze University Press Università degli Studi di Firenze</publisher><subject>Democracy ; Institutionalization ; Latin American cultural groups ; Leadership</subject><ispartof>SocietàMutamentoPolitica (Firenze), 2018-01, Vol.9 (17), p.87</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2060792129?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21394,21395,25753,27344,27924,27925,33611,33774,34530,37012,43733,44115,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ollier, María Matilde</creatorcontrib><title>Liderazgos políticos y democracia en América latina</title><title>SocietàMutamentoPolitica (Firenze)</title><description>Based on an ideal definition of democracy, the article discusses the workings of a low institutionalization pattern as seen in several Latin American countries, which it describes as “pendular democracy”. This kind of democracy is so called as it oscillates between periods of ungovernability and periods of reversal of the rules, each resulting from an extreme style for presidential leadership, either unstable or dominant, respectively. The cases of several South American countries serve the article to show that differences in the workings of said pattern arise from the head of state’s capacity for agency and their governmental resources. Thus, it argues that each kind of leadership is a cause for low democratic institutionalization patterns rather than a consequence of them, as the literature usually states.</description><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Institutionalization</subject><subject>Latin American cultural groups</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><issn>2038-3150</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYBAyNNAzNDY0stAP9g3QNTI2MTZgYuA0MjC20DU2NDXgYOAtLs4yMDAwNLawMDQ04mQw9clMSS1KrErPL1YoyM85vLYkMxnIrFRISc3NTy5KTM5MVEjNU3DMPbyyKDM5USEnsSQzL5GHgTUtMac4lRdKczMou7mGOHvoFhTlF5amFpfEZ-WXFuUBpeKNDMwMzC2NDI0sjYlTBQABfzoc</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Ollier, María Matilde</creator><general>Firenze University Press Università degli Studi di Firenze</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Liderazgos políticos y democracia en América latina</title><author>Ollier, María Matilde</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20607921293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>spa</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Institutionalization</topic><topic>Latin American cultural groups</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ollier, María Matilde</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>SocietàMutamentoPolitica (Firenze)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ollier, María Matilde</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Liderazgos políticos y democracia en América latina</atitle><jtitle>SocietàMutamentoPolitica (Firenze)</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>87</spage><pages>87-</pages><eissn>2038-3150</eissn><abstract>Based on an ideal definition of democracy, the article discusses the workings of a low institutionalization pattern as seen in several Latin American countries, which it describes as “pendular democracy”. This kind of democracy is so called as it oscillates between periods of ungovernability and periods of reversal of the rules, each resulting from an extreme style for presidential leadership, either unstable or dominant, respectively. The cases of several South American countries serve the article to show that differences in the workings of said pattern arise from the head of state’s capacity for agency and their governmental resources. Thus, it argues that each kind of leadership is a cause for low democratic institutionalization patterns rather than a consequence of them, as the literature usually states.</abstract><cop>Florence</cop><pub>Firenze University Press Università degli Studi di Firenze</pub><doi>10.13128/SMP-23430</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2038-3150
ispartof SocietàMutamentoPolitica (Firenze), 2018-01, Vol.9 (17), p.87
issn 2038-3150
language spa
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2060792129
source Publicly Available Content Database; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Sociology Collection; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Democracy
Institutionalization
Latin American cultural groups
Leadership
title Liderazgos políticos y democracia en América latina
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A41%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Liderazgos%20pol%C3%ADticos%20y%20democracia%20en%20Am%C3%A9rica%20latina&rft.jtitle=Societ%C3%A0MutamentoPolitica%20(Firenze)&rft.au=Ollier,%20Mar%C3%ADa%20Matilde&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=87&rft.pages=87-&rft.eissn=2038-3150&rft_id=info:doi/10.13128/SMP-23430&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2060792129%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20607921293%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2060792129&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true