Loading…

RESTORING PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: POLICING PROSECUTIONS WHEN PROSECUTORS PROSECUTE POLICE

Recent high-profile cases of police violence that have ended with nonindictments of the involved officers have increased public scrutiny of criminal justice systems' approach to police-suspects. This Comment focuses on the assertion made by many that local prosecutors cannot fairly prosecute th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Emory law journal 2018-01, Vol.67 (4), p.853-887
Main Author: Robertson, Caleb J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 887
container_issue 4
container_start_page 853
container_title Emory law journal
container_volume 67
creator Robertson, Caleb J
description Recent high-profile cases of police violence that have ended with nonindictments of the involved officers have increased public scrutiny of criminal justice systems' approach to police-suspects. This Comment focuses on the assertion made by many that local prosecutors cannot fairly prosecute their law enforcement counterparts because of unfair bias. This Comment puts to the side the issue of whether such bias actually exists and instead focuses on the perception that these biases exist, arguing that systemic changes are needed to address the appearance of injustice they cause. The perception of bias degrades the appearance of justice to the public and police alike, endangering the legitimacy of the legal system; for that reason, we ought to presumptively disqualify local prosecutors from handling cases involving police-suspects. Instead, an independent special prosecutor, an outsider appointed by the state attorney general, or a civilian review board should handle such cases.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2061494367</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2061494367</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20614943673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNi70KwjAYRYMoWH_eIeBcSNuQWjeNnzaiSUlS1Kk41KGI1Ubf36Li7HQv597TQV4YsMiPQnroIo-QhPqUxKyPBs5VhBA6ZYGHnAZjlRZyjbN8sRUccyVXYgmSAxYS2xQw12In5HyLN7mxouXmaCzsZjhTrfBWtTLAcyuUNHifgvwRpc2vw0eAEeqdTxdXjr85RJMVWJ76t6a-P0v3KKr62VzbqQgJC2hCIxZH_71ezcFCpQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2061494367</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>RESTORING PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: POLICING PROSECUTIONS WHEN PROSECUTORS PROSECUTE POLICE</title><source>Nexis UK</source><creator>Robertson, Caleb J</creator><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Caleb J</creatorcontrib><description>Recent high-profile cases of police violence that have ended with nonindictments of the involved officers have increased public scrutiny of criminal justice systems' approach to police-suspects. This Comment focuses on the assertion made by many that local prosecutors cannot fairly prosecute their law enforcement counterparts because of unfair bias. This Comment puts to the side the issue of whether such bias actually exists and instead focuses on the perception that these biases exist, arguing that systemic changes are needed to address the appearance of injustice they cause. The perception of bias degrades the appearance of justice to the public and police alike, endangering the legitimacy of the legal system; for that reason, we ought to presumptively disqualify local prosecutors from handling cases involving police-suspects. Instead, an independent special prosecutor, an outsider appointed by the state attorney general, or a civilian review board should handle such cases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-4076</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2163-324X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Atlanta: Emory University, School of Law</publisher><subject>African Americans ; Appointments &amp; personnel changes ; Arrests ; Bias ; Conflicts of interest ; Criminal investigations ; Disorderly conduct ; Fatalities ; Indictments ; Law enforcement ; Legitimacy ; Perceptions ; Police ; Prosecutions ; Race</subject><ispartof>Emory law journal, 2018-01, Vol.67 (4), p.853-887</ispartof><rights>Copyright Emory University, School of Law 2018</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Caleb J</creatorcontrib><title>RESTORING PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: POLICING PROSECUTIONS WHEN PROSECUTORS PROSECUTE POLICE</title><title>Emory law journal</title><description>Recent high-profile cases of police violence that have ended with nonindictments of the involved officers have increased public scrutiny of criminal justice systems' approach to police-suspects. This Comment focuses on the assertion made by many that local prosecutors cannot fairly prosecute their law enforcement counterparts because of unfair bias. This Comment puts to the side the issue of whether such bias actually exists and instead focuses on the perception that these biases exist, arguing that systemic changes are needed to address the appearance of injustice they cause. The perception of bias degrades the appearance of justice to the public and police alike, endangering the legitimacy of the legal system; for that reason, we ought to presumptively disqualify local prosecutors from handling cases involving police-suspects. Instead, an independent special prosecutor, an outsider appointed by the state attorney general, or a civilian review board should handle such cases.</description><subject>African Americans</subject><subject>Appointments &amp; personnel changes</subject><subject>Arrests</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Conflicts of interest</subject><subject>Criminal investigations</subject><subject>Disorderly conduct</subject><subject>Fatalities</subject><subject>Indictments</subject><subject>Law enforcement</subject><subject>Legitimacy</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Police</subject><subject>Prosecutions</subject><subject>Race</subject><issn>0094-4076</issn><issn>2163-324X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNi70KwjAYRYMoWH_eIeBcSNuQWjeNnzaiSUlS1Kk41KGI1Ubf36Li7HQv597TQV4YsMiPQnroIo-QhPqUxKyPBs5VhBA6ZYGHnAZjlRZyjbN8sRUccyVXYgmSAxYS2xQw12In5HyLN7mxouXmaCzsZjhTrfBWtTLAcyuUNHifgvwRpc2vw0eAEeqdTxdXjr85RJMVWJ76t6a-P0v3KKr62VzbqQgJC2hCIxZH_71ezcFCpQ</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Robertson, Caleb J</creator><general>Emory University, School of Law</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>RESTORING PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: POLICING PROSECUTIONS WHEN PROSECUTORS PROSECUTE POLICE</title><author>Robertson, Caleb J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20614943673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>African Americans</topic><topic>Appointments &amp; personnel changes</topic><topic>Arrests</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Conflicts of interest</topic><topic>Criminal investigations</topic><topic>Disorderly conduct</topic><topic>Fatalities</topic><topic>Indictments</topic><topic>Law enforcement</topic><topic>Legitimacy</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Police</topic><topic>Prosecutions</topic><topic>Race</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Caleb J</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Emory law journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Robertson, Caleb J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>RESTORING PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: POLICING PROSECUTIONS WHEN PROSECUTORS PROSECUTE POLICE</atitle><jtitle>Emory law journal</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>853</spage><epage>887</epage><pages>853-887</pages><issn>0094-4076</issn><eissn>2163-324X</eissn><abstract>Recent high-profile cases of police violence that have ended with nonindictments of the involved officers have increased public scrutiny of criminal justice systems' approach to police-suspects. This Comment focuses on the assertion made by many that local prosecutors cannot fairly prosecute their law enforcement counterparts because of unfair bias. This Comment puts to the side the issue of whether such bias actually exists and instead focuses on the perception that these biases exist, arguing that systemic changes are needed to address the appearance of injustice they cause. The perception of bias degrades the appearance of justice to the public and police alike, endangering the legitimacy of the legal system; for that reason, we ought to presumptively disqualify local prosecutors from handling cases involving police-suspects. Instead, an independent special prosecutor, an outsider appointed by the state attorney general, or a civilian review board should handle such cases.</abstract><cop>Atlanta</cop><pub>Emory University, School of Law</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-4076
ispartof Emory law journal, 2018-01, Vol.67 (4), p.853-887
issn 0094-4076
2163-324X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2061494367
source Nexis UK
subjects African Americans
Appointments & personnel changes
Arrests
Bias
Conflicts of interest
Criminal investigations
Disorderly conduct
Fatalities
Indictments
Law enforcement
Legitimacy
Perceptions
Police
Prosecutions
Race
title RESTORING PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: POLICING PROSECUTIONS WHEN PROSECUTORS PROSECUTE POLICE
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T21%3A18%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=RESTORING%20PUBLIC%20CONFIDENCE%20IN%20THE%20CRIMINAL%20JUSTICE%20SYSTEM:%20POLICING%20PROSECUTIONS%20WHEN%20PROSECUTORS%20PROSECUTE%20POLICE&rft.jtitle=Emory%20law%20journal&rft.au=Robertson,%20Caleb%20J&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=853&rft.epage=887&rft.pages=853-887&rft.issn=0094-4076&rft.eissn=2163-324X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2061494367%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20614943673%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2061494367&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true