Cognitive complexity and the linguistic marking of coherence relations: A parallel corpus study

•The linguistic marking of coherence relations is influenced by cognitive complexity.•The systematicity in the marking of coherence relations is similar across languages.•Uses Cognitive approach to Coherence Relations to determine a relation's complexity.•Both relational and syntactic dependenc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of pragmatics 2017-11, Vol.121, p.113-131
Main Authors: Hoek, Jet, Zufferey, Sandrine, Evers-Vermeul, Jacqueline, Sanders, Ted J.M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cognition
Cognitive ability
Cognitive approach to Coherence Relations (CCR)
Cognitive complexity
Coherence relation
Complexity
Corpus analysis
Corpus linguistics
Discourse markers
Dutch language
English language
Expectedness
French language
German language
Implicitation
Implicitness
Linguistics
Parallel corpora
Spanish language
Syntax
Translation
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•The linguistic marking of coherence relations is influenced by cognitive complexity.•The systematicity in the marking of coherence relations is similar across languages.•Uses Cognitive approach to Coherence Relations to determine a relation's complexity.•Both relational and syntactic dependency appear to be related to relation type. Coherence relations can be made linguistically explicit by means of connectives (e.g., but, because) or cue phrases (e.g., on the other hand, which is why), but can also be left implicit and conveyed through the juxtaposition of two clauses or sentences. However, it seems that not all relations are equally easy to reconstruct when they are implicit. In this paper, we explore which features of coherence relations make them more, or less, likely to be conveyed implicitly. We adopt the assumption that expected relations are more often implicit than relations that are not expected, and propose to determine a relation's expectedness using the notion of cognitive complexity. We test our hypotheses by means of a parallel corpus study, in which we analyze the translations of explicit English coherence relations from the Europarl Direct corpus into four target languages: Dutch, German, French, and Spanish. We find that cognitive complexity indeed influences the linguistic marking of coherence relations, and that this does not vary between the languages in our corpus. In addition, we find that a relation's relational and syntactic dependency also influences its linguistic marking, but that these measures are not completely independent of relation type.
ISSN:0378-2166
1879-1387
DOI:10.1016/j.pragma.2017.10.010