Speech reporting in courtroom opening statements

•Investigates speech reporting in opening statements.•Identifies frequencies and functions of voices.•Shows that the monologic genre of the opening statement is highly heteroglossic and dialogic.•Explicates how lawyers negotiate different realities and make the opening statement argumentative. This...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of pragmatics 2017-10, Vol.119, p.1-14
Main Author: Chaemsaithong, Krisda
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Court hearings & proceedings
Courtroom discourse
Courts
Evidentiality
Function of reported speech
Genre
Legal arguments
Legal language
Linguistics
Monolog
Negotiation
Opening statement
Pragmatics
Speech
Speech reporting
Trial practice
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Investigates speech reporting in opening statements.•Identifies frequencies and functions of voices.•Shows that the monologic genre of the opening statement is highly heteroglossic and dialogic.•Explicates how lawyers negotiate different realities and make the opening statement argumentative. This investigation critically analyzes the practice of speech reporting in the monologic genre of the opening statement. Drawing on the opening statements of three high-profile trials, this study analyzes the form, function, and frequency of reported utterances that manifest within the opening statement. The findings reveal that the opening statement is a highly heteroglossic genre, and the inclusion of voices is pragmatically motivated, serving five functions: narrative, evidential, disaligning, contextualizing, and discourse organizing. Reanimation of voices not only enables lawyers to create and negotiate different realities but also contributes to making the opening statement essentially argumentative.
ISSN:0378-2166
1879-1387
DOI:10.1016/j.pragma.2017.08.003