Loading…

Task strategy may contribute to performance differences between monolinguals and bilinguals in cognitive control tasks: ERP evidence

A bilingual advantage in the efficiency of executive control in young adults has been demonstrated in many but not all studies. We aimed to test the efficiency of executive control in a lateralized version of the Attentional Network Task and to investigate accompanying ERP components. The performanc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of neurolinguistics 2018-05, Vol.46, p.78-92
Main Authors: Kałamała, Patrycja, Drożdżowicz, Anna, Szewczyk, Jakub, Marzecová, Anna, Wodniecka, Zofia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-bd1321051c305defd6c350fcd107219edbdf04e261b34bc4146ed3a38b6442733
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-bd1321051c305defd6c350fcd107219edbdf04e261b34bc4146ed3a38b6442733
container_end_page 92
container_issue
container_start_page 78
container_title Journal of neurolinguistics
container_volume 46
creator Kałamała, Patrycja
Drożdżowicz, Anna
Szewczyk, Jakub
Marzecová, Anna
Wodniecka, Zofia
description A bilingual advantage in the efficiency of executive control in young adults has been demonstrated in many but not all studies. We aimed to test the efficiency of executive control in a lateralized version of the Attentional Network Task and to investigate accompanying ERP components. The performance of young adult bilinguals who acquired their L2 relatively late but were balanced in proficiency and daily usage of L1 and L2 was compared with that of young adults who reported low proficiency and marginal daily usage of L2. Balanced bilinguals were more accurate in the incongruent condition and at the same time as fast as the control group across conditions. Interestingly, in comparison to the control group, the bilingual group demonstrated more enhanced response-locked negativities to both incorrect (ERN) and correct responses (CRN). The obtained pattern of results suggests that the groups may have differed in terms of task strategies. Bilinguals may have controlled their performance more effectively, which resulted in their better conflict resolution, as compared to the control group. In conclusion, we point to the importance of considering qualitative differences in task processing and strategy while studying group differences - an approach rarely considered in current research on executive functions in bilinguals. •A bilingual advantage in executive control in the accuracy measure.•More enhanced amplitudes of ERN and CRN in the bilingual group.•Lack of hemispheric lateralization in executive control in the bilingual group.•Contribution of qualitative differences in task processing and strategy to performance differences.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.12.013
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2062638652</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0911604416301634</els_id><sourcerecordid>2062638652</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-bd1321051c305defd6c350fcd107219edbdf04e261b34bc4146ed3a38b6442733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFvEzEQhS0EUkPpf7DEeZcZ2-tsuUFVKFKlIlTO1q49G3lJ7GB7g3Lnh-M0CI49zYz05nt6jzGO0CKgfje3c6Alxa0Pm1YArlsULaB8wVbYr2XTQydeshVcIzYalLpgr3OeAaDrsVux349D_sFzSUOhzZHvhiO3MZTkx6UQL5HvKU0x7YZgiTs_TZSorpmPVH4RBb6L4cl7GbaZD8Hx0f87faiwTfDFH-iMjVteqmF-z2-_feV08O5Ee8NeTVVPV3_nJfv-6fbx5q65f_j85ebDfWOl0qUZHUqB0KGV0DmanLayg8k6hLXAa3Kjm0CR0DhKNVqFSpOTg-xHrZRYS3nJ3p65-xR_LpSLmeOSQrU0ArTQstedqKr-rLIp5pxoMvvkd0M6GgRz6tzM5n_n5tS5QWFq5_X14_mVaoqDp2Sy9aeEzieyxbjon4f8AeSvkvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2062638652</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Task strategy may contribute to performance differences between monolinguals and bilinguals in cognitive control tasks: ERP evidence</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Kałamała, Patrycja ; Drożdżowicz, Anna ; Szewczyk, Jakub ; Marzecová, Anna ; Wodniecka, Zofia</creator><creatorcontrib>Kałamała, Patrycja ; Drożdżowicz, Anna ; Szewczyk, Jakub ; Marzecová, Anna ; Wodniecka, Zofia</creatorcontrib><description>A bilingual advantage in the efficiency of executive control in young adults has been demonstrated in many but not all studies. We aimed to test the efficiency of executive control in a lateralized version of the Attentional Network Task and to investigate accompanying ERP components. The performance of young adult bilinguals who acquired their L2 relatively late but were balanced in proficiency and daily usage of L1 and L2 was compared with that of young adults who reported low proficiency and marginal daily usage of L2. Balanced bilinguals were more accurate in the incongruent condition and at the same time as fast as the control group across conditions. Interestingly, in comparison to the control group, the bilingual group demonstrated more enhanced response-locked negativities to both incorrect (ERN) and correct responses (CRN). The obtained pattern of results suggests that the groups may have differed in terms of task strategies. Bilinguals may have controlled their performance more effectively, which resulted in their better conflict resolution, as compared to the control group. In conclusion, we point to the importance of considering qualitative differences in task processing and strategy while studying group differences - an approach rarely considered in current research on executive functions in bilinguals. •A bilingual advantage in executive control in the accuracy measure.•More enhanced amplitudes of ERN and CRN in the bilingual group.•Lack of hemispheric lateralization in executive control in the bilingual group.•Contribution of qualitative differences in task processing and strategy to performance differences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0911-6044</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-8052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.12.013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tokyo: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bilingualism ; Cognitive ability ; CRN ; ERN ; Event-related potentials ; Executive control ; Executive function ; Language proficiency ; LANT ; Monolingualism ; Second language learning ; Task strategy ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurolinguistics, 2018-05, Vol.46, p.78-92</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. May 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-bd1321051c305defd6c350fcd107219edbdf04e261b34bc4146ed3a38b6442733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-bd1321051c305defd6c350fcd107219edbdf04e261b34bc4146ed3a38b6442733</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4464-082X ; 0000-0002-2914-0766</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,31248</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kałamała, Patrycja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drożdżowicz, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szewczyk, Jakub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marzecová, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wodniecka, Zofia</creatorcontrib><title>Task strategy may contribute to performance differences between monolinguals and bilinguals in cognitive control tasks: ERP evidence</title><title>Journal of neurolinguistics</title><description>A bilingual advantage in the efficiency of executive control in young adults has been demonstrated in many but not all studies. We aimed to test the efficiency of executive control in a lateralized version of the Attentional Network Task and to investigate accompanying ERP components. The performance of young adult bilinguals who acquired their L2 relatively late but were balanced in proficiency and daily usage of L1 and L2 was compared with that of young adults who reported low proficiency and marginal daily usage of L2. Balanced bilinguals were more accurate in the incongruent condition and at the same time as fast as the control group across conditions. Interestingly, in comparison to the control group, the bilingual group demonstrated more enhanced response-locked negativities to both incorrect (ERN) and correct responses (CRN). The obtained pattern of results suggests that the groups may have differed in terms of task strategies. Bilinguals may have controlled their performance more effectively, which resulted in their better conflict resolution, as compared to the control group. In conclusion, we point to the importance of considering qualitative differences in task processing and strategy while studying group differences - an approach rarely considered in current research on executive functions in bilinguals. •A bilingual advantage in executive control in the accuracy measure.•More enhanced amplitudes of ERN and CRN in the bilingual group.•Lack of hemispheric lateralization in executive control in the bilingual group.•Contribution of qualitative differences in task processing and strategy to performance differences.</description><subject>Bilingualism</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>CRN</subject><subject>ERN</subject><subject>Event-related potentials</subject><subject>Executive control</subject><subject>Executive function</subject><subject>Language proficiency</subject><subject>LANT</subject><subject>Monolingualism</subject><subject>Second language learning</subject><subject>Task strategy</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>0911-6044</issn><issn>1873-8052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEFvEzEQhS0EUkPpf7DEeZcZ2-tsuUFVKFKlIlTO1q49G3lJ7GB7g3Lnh-M0CI49zYz05nt6jzGO0CKgfje3c6Alxa0Pm1YArlsULaB8wVbYr2XTQydeshVcIzYalLpgr3OeAaDrsVux349D_sFzSUOhzZHvhiO3MZTkx6UQL5HvKU0x7YZgiTs_TZSorpmPVH4RBb6L4cl7GbaZD8Hx0f87faiwTfDFH-iMjVteqmF-z2-_feV08O5Ee8NeTVVPV3_nJfv-6fbx5q65f_j85ebDfWOl0qUZHUqB0KGV0DmanLayg8k6hLXAa3Kjm0CR0DhKNVqFSpOTg-xHrZRYS3nJ3p65-xR_LpSLmeOSQrU0ArTQstedqKr-rLIp5pxoMvvkd0M6GgRz6tzM5n_n5tS5QWFq5_X14_mVaoqDp2Sy9aeEzieyxbjon4f8AeSvkvQ</recordid><startdate>201805</startdate><enddate>201805</enddate><creator>Kałamała, Patrycja</creator><creator>Drożdżowicz, Anna</creator><creator>Szewczyk, Jakub</creator><creator>Marzecová, Anna</creator><creator>Wodniecka, Zofia</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7TK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4464-082X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2914-0766</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201805</creationdate><title>Task strategy may contribute to performance differences between monolinguals and bilinguals in cognitive control tasks: ERP evidence</title><author>Kałamała, Patrycja ; Drożdżowicz, Anna ; Szewczyk, Jakub ; Marzecová, Anna ; Wodniecka, Zofia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-bd1321051c305defd6c350fcd107219edbdf04e261b34bc4146ed3a38b6442733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bilingualism</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>CRN</topic><topic>ERN</topic><topic>Event-related potentials</topic><topic>Executive control</topic><topic>Executive function</topic><topic>Language proficiency</topic><topic>LANT</topic><topic>Monolingualism</topic><topic>Second language learning</topic><topic>Task strategy</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kałamała, Patrycja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drożdżowicz, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szewczyk, Jakub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marzecová, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wodniecka, Zofia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurolinguistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kałamała, Patrycja</au><au>Drożdżowicz, Anna</au><au>Szewczyk, Jakub</au><au>Marzecová, Anna</au><au>Wodniecka, Zofia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Task strategy may contribute to performance differences between monolinguals and bilinguals in cognitive control tasks: ERP evidence</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurolinguistics</jtitle><date>2018-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>46</volume><spage>78</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>78-92</pages><issn>0911-6044</issn><eissn>1873-8052</eissn><abstract>A bilingual advantage in the efficiency of executive control in young adults has been demonstrated in many but not all studies. We aimed to test the efficiency of executive control in a lateralized version of the Attentional Network Task and to investigate accompanying ERP components. The performance of young adult bilinguals who acquired their L2 relatively late but were balanced in proficiency and daily usage of L1 and L2 was compared with that of young adults who reported low proficiency and marginal daily usage of L2. Balanced bilinguals were more accurate in the incongruent condition and at the same time as fast as the control group across conditions. Interestingly, in comparison to the control group, the bilingual group demonstrated more enhanced response-locked negativities to both incorrect (ERN) and correct responses (CRN). The obtained pattern of results suggests that the groups may have differed in terms of task strategies. Bilinguals may have controlled their performance more effectively, which resulted in their better conflict resolution, as compared to the control group. In conclusion, we point to the importance of considering qualitative differences in task processing and strategy while studying group differences - an approach rarely considered in current research on executive functions in bilinguals. •A bilingual advantage in executive control in the accuracy measure.•More enhanced amplitudes of ERN and CRN in the bilingual group.•Lack of hemispheric lateralization in executive control in the bilingual group.•Contribution of qualitative differences in task processing and strategy to performance differences.</abstract><cop>Tokyo</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.12.013</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4464-082X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2914-0766</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0911-6044
ispartof Journal of neurolinguistics, 2018-05, Vol.46, p.78-92
issn 0911-6044
1873-8052
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2062638652
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
subjects Bilingualism
Cognitive ability
CRN
ERN
Event-related potentials
Executive control
Executive function
Language proficiency
LANT
Monolingualism
Second language learning
Task strategy
Young adults
title Task strategy may contribute to performance differences between monolinguals and bilinguals in cognitive control tasks: ERP evidence
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T04%3A25%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Task%20strategy%20may%20contribute%20to%20performance%20differences%20between%20monolinguals%20and%20bilinguals%20in%20cognitive%20control%20tasks:%20ERP%20evidence&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurolinguistics&rft.au=Ka%C5%82ama%C5%82a,%20Patrycja&rft.date=2018-05&rft.volume=46&rft.spage=78&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=78-92&rft.issn=0911-6044&rft.eissn=1873-8052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.12.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2062638652%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-bd1321051c305defd6c350fcd107219edbdf04e261b34bc4146ed3a38b6442733%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2062638652&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true