Loading…
Task strategy may contribute to performance differences between monolinguals and bilinguals in cognitive control tasks: ERP evidence
A bilingual advantage in the efficiency of executive control in young adults has been demonstrated in many but not all studies. We aimed to test the efficiency of executive control in a lateralized version of the Attentional Network Task and to investigate accompanying ERP components. The performanc...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of neurolinguistics 2018-05, Vol.46, p.78-92 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-bd1321051c305defd6c350fcd107219edbdf04e261b34bc4146ed3a38b6442733 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-bd1321051c305defd6c350fcd107219edbdf04e261b34bc4146ed3a38b6442733 |
container_end_page | 92 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 78 |
container_title | Journal of neurolinguistics |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Kałamała, Patrycja Drożdżowicz, Anna Szewczyk, Jakub Marzecová, Anna Wodniecka, Zofia |
description | A bilingual advantage in the efficiency of executive control in young adults has been demonstrated in many but not all studies. We aimed to test the efficiency of executive control in a lateralized version of the Attentional Network Task and to investigate accompanying ERP components. The performance of young adult bilinguals who acquired their L2 relatively late but were balanced in proficiency and daily usage of L1 and L2 was compared with that of young adults who reported low proficiency and marginal daily usage of L2. Balanced bilinguals were more accurate in the incongruent condition and at the same time as fast as the control group across conditions. Interestingly, in comparison to the control group, the bilingual group demonstrated more enhanced response-locked negativities to both incorrect (ERN) and correct responses (CRN). The obtained pattern of results suggests that the groups may have differed in terms of task strategies. Bilinguals may have controlled their performance more effectively, which resulted in their better conflict resolution, as compared to the control group. In conclusion, we point to the importance of considering qualitative differences in task processing and strategy while studying group differences - an approach rarely considered in current research on executive functions in bilinguals.
•A bilingual advantage in executive control in the accuracy measure.•More enhanced amplitudes of ERN and CRN in the bilingual group.•Lack of hemispheric lateralization in executive control in the bilingual group.•Contribution of qualitative differences in task processing and strategy to performance differences. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.12.013 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2062638652</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0911604416301634</els_id><sourcerecordid>2062638652</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-bd1321051c305defd6c350fcd107219edbdf04e261b34bc4146ed3a38b6442733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFvEzEQhS0EUkPpf7DEeZcZ2-tsuUFVKFKlIlTO1q49G3lJ7GB7g3Lnh-M0CI49zYz05nt6jzGO0CKgfje3c6Alxa0Pm1YArlsULaB8wVbYr2XTQydeshVcIzYalLpgr3OeAaDrsVux349D_sFzSUOhzZHvhiO3MZTkx6UQL5HvKU0x7YZgiTs_TZSorpmPVH4RBb6L4cl7GbaZD8Hx0f87faiwTfDFH-iMjVteqmF-z2-_feV08O5Ee8NeTVVPV3_nJfv-6fbx5q65f_j85ebDfWOl0qUZHUqB0KGV0DmanLayg8k6hLXAa3Kjm0CR0DhKNVqFSpOTg-xHrZRYS3nJ3p65-xR_LpSLmeOSQrU0ArTQstedqKr-rLIp5pxoMvvkd0M6GgRz6tzM5n_n5tS5QWFq5_X14_mVaoqDp2Sy9aeEzieyxbjon4f8AeSvkvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2062638652</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Task strategy may contribute to performance differences between monolinguals and bilinguals in cognitive control tasks: ERP evidence</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Kałamała, Patrycja ; Drożdżowicz, Anna ; Szewczyk, Jakub ; Marzecová, Anna ; Wodniecka, Zofia</creator><creatorcontrib>Kałamała, Patrycja ; Drożdżowicz, Anna ; Szewczyk, Jakub ; Marzecová, Anna ; Wodniecka, Zofia</creatorcontrib><description>A bilingual advantage in the efficiency of executive control in young adults has been demonstrated in many but not all studies. We aimed to test the efficiency of executive control in a lateralized version of the Attentional Network Task and to investigate accompanying ERP components. The performance of young adult bilinguals who acquired their L2 relatively late but were balanced in proficiency and daily usage of L1 and L2 was compared with that of young adults who reported low proficiency and marginal daily usage of L2. Balanced bilinguals were more accurate in the incongruent condition and at the same time as fast as the control group across conditions. Interestingly, in comparison to the control group, the bilingual group demonstrated more enhanced response-locked negativities to both incorrect (ERN) and correct responses (CRN). The obtained pattern of results suggests that the groups may have differed in terms of task strategies. Bilinguals may have controlled their performance more effectively, which resulted in their better conflict resolution, as compared to the control group. In conclusion, we point to the importance of considering qualitative differences in task processing and strategy while studying group differences - an approach rarely considered in current research on executive functions in bilinguals.
•A bilingual advantage in executive control in the accuracy measure.•More enhanced amplitudes of ERN and CRN in the bilingual group.•Lack of hemispheric lateralization in executive control in the bilingual group.•Contribution of qualitative differences in task processing and strategy to performance differences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0911-6044</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-8052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.12.013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tokyo: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bilingualism ; Cognitive ability ; CRN ; ERN ; Event-related potentials ; Executive control ; Executive function ; Language proficiency ; LANT ; Monolingualism ; Second language learning ; Task strategy ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurolinguistics, 2018-05, Vol.46, p.78-92</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. May 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-bd1321051c305defd6c350fcd107219edbdf04e261b34bc4146ed3a38b6442733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-bd1321051c305defd6c350fcd107219edbdf04e261b34bc4146ed3a38b6442733</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4464-082X ; 0000-0002-2914-0766</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,31248</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kałamała, Patrycja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drożdżowicz, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szewczyk, Jakub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marzecová, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wodniecka, Zofia</creatorcontrib><title>Task strategy may contribute to performance differences between monolinguals and bilinguals in cognitive control tasks: ERP evidence</title><title>Journal of neurolinguistics</title><description>A bilingual advantage in the efficiency of executive control in young adults has been demonstrated in many but not all studies. We aimed to test the efficiency of executive control in a lateralized version of the Attentional Network Task and to investigate accompanying ERP components. The performance of young adult bilinguals who acquired their L2 relatively late but were balanced in proficiency and daily usage of L1 and L2 was compared with that of young adults who reported low proficiency and marginal daily usage of L2. Balanced bilinguals were more accurate in the incongruent condition and at the same time as fast as the control group across conditions. Interestingly, in comparison to the control group, the bilingual group demonstrated more enhanced response-locked negativities to both incorrect (ERN) and correct responses (CRN). The obtained pattern of results suggests that the groups may have differed in terms of task strategies. Bilinguals may have controlled their performance more effectively, which resulted in their better conflict resolution, as compared to the control group. In conclusion, we point to the importance of considering qualitative differences in task processing and strategy while studying group differences - an approach rarely considered in current research on executive functions in bilinguals.
•A bilingual advantage in executive control in the accuracy measure.•More enhanced amplitudes of ERN and CRN in the bilingual group.•Lack of hemispheric lateralization in executive control in the bilingual group.•Contribution of qualitative differences in task processing and strategy to performance differences.</description><subject>Bilingualism</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>CRN</subject><subject>ERN</subject><subject>Event-related potentials</subject><subject>Executive control</subject><subject>Executive function</subject><subject>Language proficiency</subject><subject>LANT</subject><subject>Monolingualism</subject><subject>Second language learning</subject><subject>Task strategy</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>0911-6044</issn><issn>1873-8052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEFvEzEQhS0EUkPpf7DEeZcZ2-tsuUFVKFKlIlTO1q49G3lJ7GB7g3Lnh-M0CI49zYz05nt6jzGO0CKgfje3c6Alxa0Pm1YArlsULaB8wVbYr2XTQydeshVcIzYalLpgr3OeAaDrsVux349D_sFzSUOhzZHvhiO3MZTkx6UQL5HvKU0x7YZgiTs_TZSorpmPVH4RBb6L4cl7GbaZD8Hx0f87faiwTfDFH-iMjVteqmF-z2-_feV08O5Ee8NeTVVPV3_nJfv-6fbx5q65f_j85ebDfWOl0qUZHUqB0KGV0DmanLayg8k6hLXAa3Kjm0CR0DhKNVqFSpOTg-xHrZRYS3nJ3p65-xR_LpSLmeOSQrU0ArTQstedqKr-rLIp5pxoMvvkd0M6GgRz6tzM5n_n5tS5QWFq5_X14_mVaoqDp2Sy9aeEzieyxbjon4f8AeSvkvQ</recordid><startdate>201805</startdate><enddate>201805</enddate><creator>Kałamała, Patrycja</creator><creator>Drożdżowicz, Anna</creator><creator>Szewczyk, Jakub</creator><creator>Marzecová, Anna</creator><creator>Wodniecka, Zofia</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7TK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4464-082X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2914-0766</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201805</creationdate><title>Task strategy may contribute to performance differences between monolinguals and bilinguals in cognitive control tasks: ERP evidence</title><author>Kałamała, Patrycja ; Drożdżowicz, Anna ; Szewczyk, Jakub ; Marzecová, Anna ; Wodniecka, Zofia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-bd1321051c305defd6c350fcd107219edbdf04e261b34bc4146ed3a38b6442733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bilingualism</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>CRN</topic><topic>ERN</topic><topic>Event-related potentials</topic><topic>Executive control</topic><topic>Executive function</topic><topic>Language proficiency</topic><topic>LANT</topic><topic>Monolingualism</topic><topic>Second language learning</topic><topic>Task strategy</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kałamała, Patrycja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drożdżowicz, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szewczyk, Jakub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marzecová, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wodniecka, Zofia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurolinguistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kałamała, Patrycja</au><au>Drożdżowicz, Anna</au><au>Szewczyk, Jakub</au><au>Marzecová, Anna</au><au>Wodniecka, Zofia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Task strategy may contribute to performance differences between monolinguals and bilinguals in cognitive control tasks: ERP evidence</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurolinguistics</jtitle><date>2018-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>46</volume><spage>78</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>78-92</pages><issn>0911-6044</issn><eissn>1873-8052</eissn><abstract>A bilingual advantage in the efficiency of executive control in young adults has been demonstrated in many but not all studies. We aimed to test the efficiency of executive control in a lateralized version of the Attentional Network Task and to investigate accompanying ERP components. The performance of young adult bilinguals who acquired their L2 relatively late but were balanced in proficiency and daily usage of L1 and L2 was compared with that of young adults who reported low proficiency and marginal daily usage of L2. Balanced bilinguals were more accurate in the incongruent condition and at the same time as fast as the control group across conditions. Interestingly, in comparison to the control group, the bilingual group demonstrated more enhanced response-locked negativities to both incorrect (ERN) and correct responses (CRN). The obtained pattern of results suggests that the groups may have differed in terms of task strategies. Bilinguals may have controlled their performance more effectively, which resulted in their better conflict resolution, as compared to the control group. In conclusion, we point to the importance of considering qualitative differences in task processing and strategy while studying group differences - an approach rarely considered in current research on executive functions in bilinguals.
•A bilingual advantage in executive control in the accuracy measure.•More enhanced amplitudes of ERN and CRN in the bilingual group.•Lack of hemispheric lateralization in executive control in the bilingual group.•Contribution of qualitative differences in task processing and strategy to performance differences.</abstract><cop>Tokyo</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.12.013</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4464-082X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2914-0766</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0911-6044 |
ispartof | Journal of neurolinguistics, 2018-05, Vol.46, p.78-92 |
issn | 0911-6044 1873-8052 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2062638652 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA) |
subjects | Bilingualism Cognitive ability CRN ERN Event-related potentials Executive control Executive function Language proficiency LANT Monolingualism Second language learning Task strategy Young adults |
title | Task strategy may contribute to performance differences between monolinguals and bilinguals in cognitive control tasks: ERP evidence |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T04%3A25%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Task%20strategy%20may%20contribute%20to%20performance%20differences%20between%20monolinguals%20and%20bilinguals%20in%20cognitive%20control%20tasks:%20ERP%20evidence&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurolinguistics&rft.au=Ka%C5%82ama%C5%82a,%20Patrycja&rft.date=2018-05&rft.volume=46&rft.spage=78&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=78-92&rft.issn=0911-6044&rft.eissn=1873-8052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.12.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2062638652%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-bd1321051c305defd6c350fcd107219edbdf04e261b34bc4146ed3a38b6442733%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2062638652&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |