Objectification, Masculinity, and Muscularity: A Test of Objectification Theory with Heterosexual Men

Objectification theory is increasingly used to explain the body image-related experiences of men because research indicates that men are at heightened risk for body image concerns because of sociocultural messages regarding appearance of the male body. Although researchers have explored body image c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sex roles 2019-04, Vol.80 (7-8), p.443-457
Main Authors: Davids, Christopher M., Watson, Laurel B., Gere, Madeline P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Body image
Gender roles
Gender Studies
Heterosexuality
Human body
Males
Masculinity
Medicine/Public Health
Men
Original Article
Psychology
Role conflict
Self Concept
Self image
Sex Role
Sex roles
Sexual Orientation
Sociocultural factors
Sociology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectification theory is increasingly used to explain the body image-related experiences of men because research indicates that men are at heightened risk for body image concerns because of sociocultural messages regarding appearance of the male body. Although researchers have explored body image concerns among men, it is important to understand various sociocultural correlates relating to their body image disturbances. Therefore, we introduced gender role conflict in the present study to better explain their drive for muscularity. Based on data from 473 heterosexual men in the United States, the proposed model demonstrated excellent data fit, although several of the paths were non-significant, suggesting mixed support for the utility of objectification theory in the context of men’s body image. Specifically, sexual objectification experiences did not uniquely predict self-objectification and body surveillance—key internalizing variables in the objectification theory framework—and these variables had multiple non-significant relationships with additional hypothesized variables. However, gender role conflict was significantly related to objectification theory variables, suggesting the importance of attending to this variable when understanding heterosexual men’s body image disturbances. A more parsimonious model—with non-significant paths removed—was also explored and demonstrated excellent data fit. Limitations, future areas of research, and practice implications are discussed.
ISSN:0360-0025
1573-2762
DOI:10.1007/s11199-018-0940-6