Loading…

Auditor Reputation Building

This paper reports the results of an experimental economics study designed to examine reputation building by information verifiers (auditors). The results identify boundary conditions to reputation formation and supply insight into auditors' incentives to form reputations. Reputations form in a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of accounting research 2001-12, Vol.39 (3), p.599-617
Main Author: Mayhew, Brian W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4470-2972be584da3c2dccc1bdf988662157ee18c51853c8782dd15ffced5fe4873783
cites
container_end_page 617
container_issue 3
container_start_page 599
container_title Journal of accounting research
container_volume 39
creator Mayhew, Brian W.
description This paper reports the results of an experimental economics study designed to examine reputation building by information verifiers (auditors). The results identify boundary conditions to reputation formation and supply insight into auditors' incentives to form reputations. Reputations form in all sessions of treatments that supply nearly immediate rewards to participants who adopt reputation equilibrium strategies. In contrast, reputations form in less than half of the sessions of a treatment where participants have to maintain reputation equilibrium strategies for number of periods before the market rewards their effort. The results suggest the immediacy of rewards for adopting reputation strategies is a critical determinant of reputation formation.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1475-679X.00030
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_206714746</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2672977</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2672977</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4470-2972be584da3c2dccc1bdf988662157ee18c51853c8782dd15ffced5fe4873783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1PwjAAxRujiYiePeiBeB_0u90RiaJCxIBG46UZbWc6kWG7Rfnv7Zzhai9N-t7vNe8BcIpgH8UzQFSwhIv0pQ8hJHAPdHYv-6ADIUaJpIwfgqMQimhJGUEdcDasjatK35vbTV1llSvXvcvarYxbvx2DgzxbBXvyd3fB0_XV4-gmmc7Gt6PhNNGUCpjgVOClZZKajGhstNZoafJUSs4xYsJaJDVDkhEthcTGIJbn2hqWWyoFEZJ0wUWbu_HlZ21DpYqy9uv4pcKQi1iD8mgatCbtyxC8zdXGu4_MbxWCqhlANXVVU1f9DhAJ2hJfbmW3_9nV3Ww4b7HzFitC3GWHYS5iURHlpJVdqOz3Ts78ewwjMfL5fqxep3CyeFhMVEp-AC9ec8s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>206714746</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Auditor Reputation Building</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Business Source Ultimate (EBSCOHost)</source><creator>Mayhew, Brian W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mayhew, Brian W.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reports the results of an experimental economics study designed to examine reputation building by information verifiers (auditors). The results identify boundary conditions to reputation formation and supply insight into auditors' incentives to form reputations. Reputations form in all sessions of treatments that supply nearly immediate rewards to participants who adopt reputation equilibrium strategies. In contrast, reputations form in less than half of the sessions of a treatment where participants have to maintain reputation equilibrium strategies for number of periods before the market rewards their effort. The results suggest the immediacy of rewards for adopting reputation strategies is a critical determinant of reputation formation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-679X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.00030</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JACRBR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, USA and Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Inc</publisher><subject>Audit quality ; Auditors ; Auditors opinions ; Audits ; Boundary conditions ; Equilibrium ; Experiments ; Financial investments ; Financial management ; Incentives ; Investment strategies ; Investors ; Management audits ; Market equilibrium ; Nash equilibrium ; Public image management ; Reputation ; Reputations ; Robots ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of accounting research, 2001-12, Vol.39 (3), p.599-617</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2001 University of Chicago on behalf of the Institute of Professional Accounting</rights><rights>University of Chicago on behalf of the Institute of Professional Accounting, 2001</rights><rights>Copyright Institute of Professional Accounting Dec 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4470-2972be584da3c2dccc1bdf988662157ee18c51853c8782dd15ffced5fe4873783</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2672977$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2672977$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,33202,58216,58449</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mayhew, Brian W.</creatorcontrib><title>Auditor Reputation Building</title><title>Journal of accounting research</title><description>This paper reports the results of an experimental economics study designed to examine reputation building by information verifiers (auditors). The results identify boundary conditions to reputation formation and supply insight into auditors' incentives to form reputations. Reputations form in all sessions of treatments that supply nearly immediate rewards to participants who adopt reputation equilibrium strategies. In contrast, reputations form in less than half of the sessions of a treatment where participants have to maintain reputation equilibrium strategies for number of periods before the market rewards their effort. The results suggest the immediacy of rewards for adopting reputation strategies is a critical determinant of reputation formation.</description><subject>Audit quality</subject><subject>Auditors</subject><subject>Auditors opinions</subject><subject>Audits</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Financial investments</subject><subject>Financial management</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Investment strategies</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Management audits</subject><subject>Market equilibrium</subject><subject>Nash equilibrium</subject><subject>Public image management</subject><subject>Reputation</subject><subject>Reputations</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0021-8456</issn><issn>1475-679X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1PwjAAxRujiYiePeiBeB_0u90RiaJCxIBG46UZbWc6kWG7Rfnv7Zzhai9N-t7vNe8BcIpgH8UzQFSwhIv0pQ8hJHAPdHYv-6ADIUaJpIwfgqMQimhJGUEdcDasjatK35vbTV1llSvXvcvarYxbvx2DgzxbBXvyd3fB0_XV4-gmmc7Gt6PhNNGUCpjgVOClZZKajGhstNZoafJUSs4xYsJaJDVDkhEthcTGIJbn2hqWWyoFEZJ0wUWbu_HlZ21DpYqy9uv4pcKQi1iD8mgatCbtyxC8zdXGu4_MbxWCqhlANXVVU1f9DhAJ2hJfbmW3_9nV3Ww4b7HzFitC3GWHYS5iURHlpJVdqOz3Ts78ewwjMfL5fqxep3CyeFhMVEp-AC9ec8s</recordid><startdate>200112</startdate><enddate>200112</enddate><creator>Mayhew, Brian W.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishers Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishers</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200112</creationdate><title>Auditor Reputation Building</title><author>Mayhew, Brian W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4470-2972be584da3c2dccc1bdf988662157ee18c51853c8782dd15ffced5fe4873783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Audit quality</topic><topic>Auditors</topic><topic>Auditors opinions</topic><topic>Audits</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Financial investments</topic><topic>Financial management</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Investment strategies</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Management audits</topic><topic>Market equilibrium</topic><topic>Nash equilibrium</topic><topic>Public image management</topic><topic>Reputation</topic><topic>Reputations</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mayhew, Brian W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of accounting research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mayhew, Brian W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Auditor Reputation Building</atitle><jtitle>Journal of accounting research</jtitle><date>2001-12</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>599</spage><epage>617</epage><pages>599-617</pages><issn>0021-8456</issn><eissn>1475-679X</eissn><coden>JACRBR</coden><abstract>This paper reports the results of an experimental economics study designed to examine reputation building by information verifiers (auditors). The results identify boundary conditions to reputation formation and supply insight into auditors' incentives to form reputations. Reputations form in all sessions of treatments that supply nearly immediate rewards to participants who adopt reputation equilibrium strategies. In contrast, reputations form in less than half of the sessions of a treatment where participants have to maintain reputation equilibrium strategies for number of periods before the market rewards their effort. The results suggest the immediacy of rewards for adopting reputation strategies is a critical determinant of reputation formation.</abstract><cop>Boston, USA and Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishers Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/1475-679X.00030</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8456
ispartof Journal of accounting research, 2001-12, Vol.39 (3), p.599-617
issn 0021-8456
1475-679X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_206714746
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Business Source Ultimate (EBSCOHost)
subjects Audit quality
Auditors
Auditors opinions
Audits
Boundary conditions
Equilibrium
Experiments
Financial investments
Financial management
Incentives
Investment strategies
Investors
Management audits
Market equilibrium
Nash equilibrium
Public image management
Reputation
Reputations
Robots
Studies
title Auditor Reputation Building
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T12%3A53%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Auditor%20Reputation%20Building&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20accounting%20research&rft.au=Mayhew,%20Brian%20W.&rft.date=2001-12&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=599&rft.epage=617&rft.pages=599-617&rft.issn=0021-8456&rft.eissn=1475-679X&rft.coden=JACRBR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1475-679X.00030&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2672977%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4470-2972be584da3c2dccc1bdf988662157ee18c51853c8782dd15ffced5fe4873783%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=206714746&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2672977&rfr_iscdi=true