Loading…
Auditor Reputation Building
This paper reports the results of an experimental economics study designed to examine reputation building by information verifiers (auditors). The results identify boundary conditions to reputation formation and supply insight into auditors' incentives to form reputations. Reputations form in a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of accounting research 2001-12, Vol.39 (3), p.599-617 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4470-2972be584da3c2dccc1bdf988662157ee18c51853c8782dd15ffced5fe4873783 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 617 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 599 |
container_title | Journal of accounting research |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Mayhew, Brian W. |
description | This paper reports the results of an experimental economics study designed to examine reputation building by information verifiers (auditors). The results identify boundary conditions to reputation formation and supply insight into auditors' incentives to form reputations. Reputations form in all sessions of treatments that supply nearly immediate rewards to participants who adopt reputation equilibrium strategies. In contrast, reputations form in less than half of the sessions of a treatment where participants have to maintain reputation equilibrium strategies for number of periods before the market rewards their effort. The results suggest the immediacy of rewards for adopting reputation strategies is a critical determinant of reputation formation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1475-679X.00030 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_206714746</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2672977</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2672977</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4470-2972be584da3c2dccc1bdf988662157ee18c51853c8782dd15ffced5fe4873783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1PwjAAxRujiYiePeiBeB_0u90RiaJCxIBG46UZbWc6kWG7Rfnv7Zzhai9N-t7vNe8BcIpgH8UzQFSwhIv0pQ8hJHAPdHYv-6ADIUaJpIwfgqMQimhJGUEdcDasjatK35vbTV1llSvXvcvarYxbvx2DgzxbBXvyd3fB0_XV4-gmmc7Gt6PhNNGUCpjgVOClZZKajGhstNZoafJUSs4xYsJaJDVDkhEthcTGIJbn2hqWWyoFEZJ0wUWbu_HlZ21DpYqy9uv4pcKQi1iD8mgatCbtyxC8zdXGu4_MbxWCqhlANXVVU1f9DhAJ2hJfbmW3_9nV3Ww4b7HzFitC3GWHYS5iURHlpJVdqOz3Ts78ewwjMfL5fqxep3CyeFhMVEp-AC9ec8s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>206714746</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Auditor Reputation Building</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Business Source Ultimate (EBSCOHost)</source><creator>Mayhew, Brian W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mayhew, Brian W.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reports the results of an experimental economics study designed to examine reputation building by information verifiers (auditors). The results identify boundary conditions to reputation formation and supply insight into auditors' incentives to form reputations. Reputations form in all sessions of treatments that supply nearly immediate rewards to participants who adopt reputation equilibrium strategies. In contrast, reputations form in less than half of the sessions of a treatment where participants have to maintain reputation equilibrium strategies for number of periods before the market rewards their effort. The results suggest the immediacy of rewards for adopting reputation strategies is a critical determinant of reputation formation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-679X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.00030</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JACRBR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, USA and Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Inc</publisher><subject>Audit quality ; Auditors ; Auditors opinions ; Audits ; Boundary conditions ; Equilibrium ; Experiments ; Financial investments ; Financial management ; Incentives ; Investment strategies ; Investors ; Management audits ; Market equilibrium ; Nash equilibrium ; Public image management ; Reputation ; Reputations ; Robots ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of accounting research, 2001-12, Vol.39 (3), p.599-617</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2001 University of Chicago on behalf of the Institute of Professional Accounting</rights><rights>University of Chicago on behalf of the Institute of Professional Accounting, 2001</rights><rights>Copyright Institute of Professional Accounting Dec 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4470-2972be584da3c2dccc1bdf988662157ee18c51853c8782dd15ffced5fe4873783</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2672977$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2672977$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,33202,58216,58449</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mayhew, Brian W.</creatorcontrib><title>Auditor Reputation Building</title><title>Journal of accounting research</title><description>This paper reports the results of an experimental economics study designed to examine reputation building by information verifiers (auditors). The results identify boundary conditions to reputation formation and supply insight into auditors' incentives to form reputations. Reputations form in all sessions of treatments that supply nearly immediate rewards to participants who adopt reputation equilibrium strategies. In contrast, reputations form in less than half of the sessions of a treatment where participants have to maintain reputation equilibrium strategies for number of periods before the market rewards their effort. The results suggest the immediacy of rewards for adopting reputation strategies is a critical determinant of reputation formation.</description><subject>Audit quality</subject><subject>Auditors</subject><subject>Auditors opinions</subject><subject>Audits</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Financial investments</subject><subject>Financial management</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Investment strategies</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Management audits</subject><subject>Market equilibrium</subject><subject>Nash equilibrium</subject><subject>Public image management</subject><subject>Reputation</subject><subject>Reputations</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0021-8456</issn><issn>1475-679X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1PwjAAxRujiYiePeiBeB_0u90RiaJCxIBG46UZbWc6kWG7Rfnv7Zzhai9N-t7vNe8BcIpgH8UzQFSwhIv0pQ8hJHAPdHYv-6ADIUaJpIwfgqMQimhJGUEdcDasjatK35vbTV1llSvXvcvarYxbvx2DgzxbBXvyd3fB0_XV4-gmmc7Gt6PhNNGUCpjgVOClZZKajGhstNZoafJUSs4xYsJaJDVDkhEthcTGIJbn2hqWWyoFEZJ0wUWbu_HlZ21DpYqy9uv4pcKQi1iD8mgatCbtyxC8zdXGu4_MbxWCqhlANXVVU1f9DhAJ2hJfbmW3_9nV3Ww4b7HzFitC3GWHYS5iURHlpJVdqOz3Ts78ewwjMfL5fqxep3CyeFhMVEp-AC9ec8s</recordid><startdate>200112</startdate><enddate>200112</enddate><creator>Mayhew, Brian W.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishers Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishers</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200112</creationdate><title>Auditor Reputation Building</title><author>Mayhew, Brian W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4470-2972be584da3c2dccc1bdf988662157ee18c51853c8782dd15ffced5fe4873783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Audit quality</topic><topic>Auditors</topic><topic>Auditors opinions</topic><topic>Audits</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Financial investments</topic><topic>Financial management</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Investment strategies</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Management audits</topic><topic>Market equilibrium</topic><topic>Nash equilibrium</topic><topic>Public image management</topic><topic>Reputation</topic><topic>Reputations</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mayhew, Brian W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of accounting research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mayhew, Brian W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Auditor Reputation Building</atitle><jtitle>Journal of accounting research</jtitle><date>2001-12</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>599</spage><epage>617</epage><pages>599-617</pages><issn>0021-8456</issn><eissn>1475-679X</eissn><coden>JACRBR</coden><abstract>This paper reports the results of an experimental economics study designed to examine reputation building by information verifiers (auditors). The results identify boundary conditions to reputation formation and supply insight into auditors' incentives to form reputations. Reputations form in all sessions of treatments that supply nearly immediate rewards to participants who adopt reputation equilibrium strategies. In contrast, reputations form in less than half of the sessions of a treatment where participants have to maintain reputation equilibrium strategies for number of periods before the market rewards their effort. The results suggest the immediacy of rewards for adopting reputation strategies is a critical determinant of reputation formation.</abstract><cop>Boston, USA and Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishers Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/1475-679X.00030</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8456 |
ispartof | Journal of accounting research, 2001-12, Vol.39 (3), p.599-617 |
issn | 0021-8456 1475-679X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_206714746 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Business Source Ultimate (EBSCOHost) |
subjects | Audit quality Auditors Auditors opinions Audits Boundary conditions Equilibrium Experiments Financial investments Financial management Incentives Investment strategies Investors Management audits Market equilibrium Nash equilibrium Public image management Reputation Reputations Robots Studies |
title | Auditor Reputation Building |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T12%3A53%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Auditor%20Reputation%20Building&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20accounting%20research&rft.au=Mayhew,%20Brian%20W.&rft.date=2001-12&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=599&rft.epage=617&rft.pages=599-617&rft.issn=0021-8456&rft.eissn=1475-679X&rft.coden=JACRBR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1475-679X.00030&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2672977%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4470-2972be584da3c2dccc1bdf988662157ee18c51853c8782dd15ffced5fe4873783%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=206714746&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2672977&rfr_iscdi=true |