Managing Illegitimate Task Requests Through Explanation and Acknowledgment: A Discursive Leadership Approach

This study explored how discursive framing can mitigate an illegitimate task request—a request from a supervisor that extends beyond the appropriate parameters of the role. Using hypothetical vignettes in an experimental design, we examined how including an acknowledgment and/or explanation when mak...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Management communication quarterly 2018-08, Vol.32 (3), p.374-397
Main Authors: Minei, Elizabeth M., Eatough, Erin M., Cohen-Charash, Yochi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Illegitimacy
Leadership
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study explored how discursive framing can mitigate an illegitimate task request—a request from a supervisor that extends beyond the appropriate parameters of the role. Using hypothetical vignettes in an experimental design, we examined how including an acknowledgment and/or explanation when making an illegitimate task request mitigated perceptions of illegitimacy and anger. Results indicate that acknowledgments mitigated perceptions of illegitimacy whereas explanations mitigated anger. Furthermore, the combination of acknowledgments and explanations had the strongest effects on reducing perceived illegitimacy and anger. We conclude with practical recommendations.
ISSN:0893-3189
1552-6798
DOI:10.1177/0893318918755506