Comparison between Two Materials for the Fabrication of Modified Design for Posterior Inlay.retained Fixed Dental Prosthesis: A Finite Element Study

Aims: This study was done to test materials to restore missing mandibular first molar with a new prosthetic design. Materials and Methods: Two three-dimensional finite element models were prepared, especially to simulate missing mandibular first molar. Models geometry was created on commercial engin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of international oral health 2018-03, Vol.10 (2), p.88-93
Main Authors: Yossef, Salah A, Galal, Rami M, Alqahtani, Waleed M S, Alluqmani, Abdullah A, Abdulsamad, Mohammad A, Alsharabi, Omar H, Smurqandi, Ezzat M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Chromium
Coatings
Cobalt
Dental implants
Dental restorative materials
Finite element analysis
Fractures
Mandible
Manufacturing
Mathematical models
Patients
Prostheses
Stress analysis
Systematic review
Teeth
Transplants & implants
Zirconia
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 93
container_issue 2
container_start_page 88
container_title Journal of international oral health
container_volume 10
creator Yossef, Salah A
Galal, Rami M
Alqahtani, Waleed M S
Alluqmani, Abdullah A
Abdulsamad, Mohammad A
Alsharabi, Omar H
Smurqandi, Ezzat M
description Aims: This study was done to test materials to restore missing mandibular first molar with a new prosthetic design. Materials and Methods: Two three-dimensional finite element models were prepared, especially to simulate missing mandibular first molar. Models geometry was created on commercial engineering computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing package and then transferred to ANSYS for the stress analysis. Posterior inlay-retained fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) was modeled as one piece and as multiple pieces containing metallic substructure, coating layer, and wings resin coating. The dental prosthesis materials tested in this study are full zirconia as one piece or first case study, in addition to chromium cobalt as a substructure, porcelain coating, and adhesive resin as wings coating to be the second case study. Results: Compressive load of 400N was applied on the buccal cusp, and resultant stresses were compared between the two models. Von Misses stress distributions in the two models showed safe values. The zirconia prosthesis showed less stresses. Conclusions: The two case studies showed two equivalent alternatives. Both cases are suitable for FDP manufacturing. Other factors such as lifetime and color matching may govern the dentist selection of material to be used.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/jioh.jioh_246_17
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2068853858</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2068853858</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20688538583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjcFKw0AQhhexYNHePQ54btwkm2TjTWqDHgqF9h62ZmImpLt1d0Pte_jAbksfwDnM_PB9P8PYY8wjEfP0uSfTRedVJyKv4-KGTXlZ5PO4KMvbay5EIu_YzLmeh8l5IkQ2Zb8Lsz8oS85o2KE_ImrYHg2slEdLanDQGgu-Q6jUztKn8hRM08LKNNQSNvCGjr70RVsbd26F9KEHdYosekU6OBX9XEzt1QBrG7QutNwLvAakySMsB9wHDBs_NqcHNmnDa5xd7z17qpbbxfv8YM33iM7XvRmtDqhOeC5llspMpv-z_gAatmCR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2068853858</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between Two Materials for the Fabrication of Modified Design for Posterior Inlay.retained Fixed Dental Prosthesis: A Finite Element Study</title><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals(OpenAccess)</source><creator>Yossef, Salah A ; Galal, Rami M ; Alqahtani, Waleed M S ; Alluqmani, Abdullah A ; Abdulsamad, Mohammad A ; Alsharabi, Omar H ; Smurqandi, Ezzat M</creator><creatorcontrib>Yossef, Salah A ; Galal, Rami M ; Alqahtani, Waleed M S ; Alluqmani, Abdullah A ; Abdulsamad, Mohammad A ; Alsharabi, Omar H ; Smurqandi, Ezzat M</creatorcontrib><description>Aims: This study was done to test materials to restore missing mandibular first molar with a new prosthetic design. Materials and Methods: Two three-dimensional finite element models were prepared, especially to simulate missing mandibular first molar. Models geometry was created on commercial engineering computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing package and then transferred to ANSYS for the stress analysis. Posterior inlay-retained fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) was modeled as one piece and as multiple pieces containing metallic substructure, coating layer, and wings resin coating. The dental prosthesis materials tested in this study are full zirconia as one piece or first case study, in addition to chromium cobalt as a substructure, porcelain coating, and adhesive resin as wings coating to be the second case study. Results: Compressive load of 400N was applied on the buccal cusp, and resultant stresses were compared between the two models. Von Misses stress distributions in the two models showed safe values. The zirconia prosthesis showed less stresses. Conclusions: The two case studies showed two equivalent alternatives. Both cases are suitable for FDP manufacturing. Other factors such as lifetime and color matching may govern the dentist selection of material to be used.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0976-7428</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0976-1799</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/jioh.jioh_246_17</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Mumbai: Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Chromium ; Coatings ; Cobalt ; Dental implants ; Dental restorative materials ; Finite element analysis ; Fractures ; Mandible ; Manufacturing ; Mathematical models ; Patients ; Prostheses ; Stress analysis ; Systematic review ; Teeth ; Transplants &amp; implants ; Zirconia</subject><ispartof>Journal of international oral health, 2018-03, Vol.10 (2), p.88-93</ispartof><rights>Copyright International Society of Preventive &amp; Community Dentistry Mar/Apr 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yossef, Salah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galal, Rami M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alqahtani, Waleed M S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alluqmani, Abdullah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdulsamad, Mohammad A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alsharabi, Omar H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smurqandi, Ezzat M</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between Two Materials for the Fabrication of Modified Design for Posterior Inlay.retained Fixed Dental Prosthesis: A Finite Element Study</title><title>Journal of international oral health</title><description>Aims: This study was done to test materials to restore missing mandibular first molar with a new prosthetic design. Materials and Methods: Two three-dimensional finite element models were prepared, especially to simulate missing mandibular first molar. Models geometry was created on commercial engineering computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing package and then transferred to ANSYS for the stress analysis. Posterior inlay-retained fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) was modeled as one piece and as multiple pieces containing metallic substructure, coating layer, and wings resin coating. The dental prosthesis materials tested in this study are full zirconia as one piece or first case study, in addition to chromium cobalt as a substructure, porcelain coating, and adhesive resin as wings coating to be the second case study. Results: Compressive load of 400N was applied on the buccal cusp, and resultant stresses were compared between the two models. Von Misses stress distributions in the two models showed safe values. The zirconia prosthesis showed less stresses. Conclusions: The two case studies showed two equivalent alternatives. Both cases are suitable for FDP manufacturing. Other factors such as lifetime and color matching may govern the dentist selection of material to be used.</description><subject>Chromium</subject><subject>Coatings</subject><subject>Cobalt</subject><subject>Dental implants</subject><subject>Dental restorative materials</subject><subject>Finite element analysis</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Mandible</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Stress analysis</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><subject>Zirconia</subject><issn>0976-7428</issn><issn>0976-1799</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjcFKw0AQhhexYNHePQ54btwkm2TjTWqDHgqF9h62ZmImpLt1d0Pte_jAbksfwDnM_PB9P8PYY8wjEfP0uSfTRedVJyKv4-KGTXlZ5PO4KMvbay5EIu_YzLmeh8l5IkQ2Zb8Lsz8oS85o2KE_ImrYHg2slEdLanDQGgu-Q6jUztKn8hRM08LKNNQSNvCGjr70RVsbd26F9KEHdYosekU6OBX9XEzt1QBrG7QutNwLvAakySMsB9wHDBs_NqcHNmnDa5xd7z17qpbbxfv8YM33iM7XvRmtDqhOeC5llspMpv-z_gAatmCR</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Yossef, Salah A</creator><creator>Galal, Rami M</creator><creator>Alqahtani, Waleed M S</creator><creator>Alluqmani, Abdullah A</creator><creator>Abdulsamad, Mohammad A</creator><creator>Alsharabi, Omar H</creator><creator>Smurqandi, Ezzat M</creator><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</general><scope>04Q</scope><scope>04T</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Comparison between Two Materials for the Fabrication of Modified Design for Posterior Inlay.retained Fixed Dental Prosthesis: A Finite Element Study</title><author>Yossef, Salah A ; Galal, Rami M ; Alqahtani, Waleed M S ; Alluqmani, Abdullah A ; Abdulsamad, Mohammad A ; Alsharabi, Omar H ; Smurqandi, Ezzat M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20688538583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Chromium</topic><topic>Coatings</topic><topic>Cobalt</topic><topic>Dental implants</topic><topic>Dental restorative materials</topic><topic>Finite element analysis</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Mandible</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Stress analysis</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><topic>Zirconia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yossef, Salah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galal, Rami M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alqahtani, Waleed M S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alluqmani, Abdullah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdulsamad, Mohammad A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alsharabi, Omar H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smurqandi, Ezzat M</creatorcontrib><collection>India Database</collection><collection>India Database: Health &amp; Medicine</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of international oral health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yossef, Salah A</au><au>Galal, Rami M</au><au>Alqahtani, Waleed M S</au><au>Alluqmani, Abdullah A</au><au>Abdulsamad, Mohammad A</au><au>Alsharabi, Omar H</au><au>Smurqandi, Ezzat M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between Two Materials for the Fabrication of Modified Design for Posterior Inlay.retained Fixed Dental Prosthesis: A Finite Element Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of international oral health</jtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>88</spage><epage>93</epage><pages>88-93</pages><issn>0976-7428</issn><eissn>0976-1799</eissn><abstract>Aims: This study was done to test materials to restore missing mandibular first molar with a new prosthetic design. Materials and Methods: Two three-dimensional finite element models were prepared, especially to simulate missing mandibular first molar. Models geometry was created on commercial engineering computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing package and then transferred to ANSYS for the stress analysis. Posterior inlay-retained fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) was modeled as one piece and as multiple pieces containing metallic substructure, coating layer, and wings resin coating. The dental prosthesis materials tested in this study are full zirconia as one piece or first case study, in addition to chromium cobalt as a substructure, porcelain coating, and adhesive resin as wings coating to be the second case study. Results: Compressive load of 400N was applied on the buccal cusp, and resultant stresses were compared between the two models. Von Misses stress distributions in the two models showed safe values. The zirconia prosthesis showed less stresses. Conclusions: The two case studies showed two equivalent alternatives. Both cases are suitable for FDP manufacturing. Other factors such as lifetime and color matching may govern the dentist selection of material to be used.</abstract><cop>Mumbai</cop><pub>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><doi>10.4103/jioh.jioh_246_17</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0976-7428
ispartof Journal of international oral health, 2018-03, Vol.10 (2), p.88-93
issn 0976-7428
0976-1799
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2068853858
source Medknow Open Access Medical Journals(OpenAccess)
subjects Chromium
Coatings
Cobalt
Dental implants
Dental restorative materials
Finite element analysis
Fractures
Mandible
Manufacturing
Mathematical models
Patients
Prostheses
Stress analysis
Systematic review
Teeth
Transplants & implants
Zirconia
title Comparison between Two Materials for the Fabrication of Modified Design for Posterior Inlay.retained Fixed Dental Prosthesis: A Finite Element Study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T09%3A05%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20Two%20Materials%20for%20the%20Fabrication%20of%20Modified%20Design%20for%20Posterior%20Inlay.retained%20Fixed%20Dental%20Prosthesis:%20A%20Finite%20Element%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20international%20oral%20health&rft.au=Yossef,%20Salah%20A&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=88&rft.epage=93&rft.pages=88-93&rft.issn=0976-7428&rft.eissn=0976-1799&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/jioh.jioh_246_17&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2068853858%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20688538583%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2068853858&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true