Development of social sustainability assessment method and a comparative case study on assessing recycled construction materials

• Published in: The international journal of life cycle assessment 2018-08, Vol.23 (8), p.1654-1674
• Main Authors: Hossain, Md. Uzzal, Poon, Chi Sun, Dong, Ya Hong, Lo, Irene M. C., Cheng, Jack C. P.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aggregates; Case studies; Comparative studies; Construction; Construction materials; Construction methods; Earth and Environmental Science; Economic analysis; Economic impact; Energy policy; Environment; Environmental assessment; Environmental Chemistry; Environmental Economics; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology; Evaluation; Guidelines; Health; Indicators; Life cycle analysis; Life cycle assessment; Life cycle engineering; Life cycles; Materials selection; Occupational safety; Operations research; Organic chemistry; Performance assessment; Qualitative research; Recycled materials; Safety; Sensitivity analysis; Social responsibility; Social sustainability; Societal Lca; Sustainability; Sustainability reporting; Sustainable development; Toxicology; Waste materials; Water consumption
• ISSN: 0948-3349; 1614-7502
• DOI: 10.1007/s11367-017-1373-0

Purpose Sustainability analysis should include the assessment of the environmental, social, and economic impacts throughout the life cycle of a product. However, the social sustainability performance assessment is seldom carried out during materials selection due to its complex nature and the lack of a social life cycle assessment tool. This study presents a single score-based social life cycle assessment methodology, namely social sustainability grading model, for assessing and comparing the social sustainability performance of construction materials using a case study on recycled and natural construction materials. Methods The proposed method is developed based on the methodological framework provided by the United Nations Environment Programme / Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry guidelines published in 2009 and the methodological sheets published in 2013, the indicators and sustainability reporting guidelines provided by the Global Reporting Initiatives and ISO 26000 for social responsibility of products, and the indicators provided by the Hong Kong Business Environment Council Limited for construction sustainability. A twofold research approach is proposed in this model: the first one is the qualitative research based on expert interviews to identify, select, and prioritize the relevant subcategories and indicators, and the second one is the operational research based on the case-specific survey to collect the required data. A social sustainability index was proposed for the interpretation of the results effectively. A case study on construction materials was conducted to illustrate the implementation of the method using case-specific first-hand data. Results and discussion The major outcome of this study is the systematic development of a social sustainability assessment tool based on the established standards and guidelines. The case study showed that four subcategories are crucial social concerns for construction materials (i.e., health and safety issues of the materials, health and safety of workers, company’s commitment to sustainability, and company’s policies on energy and water consumption). Based on the sustainability index proposed, using recycled aggregates from locally generated waste materials scored higher (about 31–34%) social sustainability than using imported natural aggregates. In addition, recycled aggregates and natural aggregates achieved “sustainable” and “neutral” rating sustainability levels, respectively. Howeve