Loading…
Treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia – Authors' Reply
Michael Niederman and colleagues raise concerns regarding our multicentre effort to implement American Thoracic Society (ATS) and Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines for treatment of health-care-associated, hospital-acquired, and ventilator-associated pneumonias.1 Specifically,...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Lancet infectious diseases 2011-10, Vol.11 (10), p.731-732 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Michael Niederman and colleagues raise concerns regarding our multicentre effort to implement American Thoracic Society (ATS) and Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines for treatment of health-care-associated, hospital-acquired, and ventilator-associated pneumonias.1 Specifically, in patients at risk for multidrug-resistant pathogens, we reported that empirical antibiotic therapy conforming to guidelines was associated with increased mortality unexplained by patients' acuity or chronic conditions. [...]among all empirically treated patients, the point estimate for mortality risk was higher with dual Gram-negative therapy than with non-compliant therapy. IMPACT-HAP's results argue for future studies addressing if and when dual Gram-negative therapy should be prescribed for patients with pneumonia patients at risk of multidrug-resistant pathogens. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1473-3099 1474-4457 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70265-1 |