Loading…
Comparison of Sensitivity and Low Frequency Noise Contributions in GMR and TMR Spin Valve Sensors with a Vortex State Free Layer
Magnetoresistive spin valve sensors based on the giant- (GMR) and tunnelling- (TMR) magnetoresisitve effect with a flux-closed vortex state free layer design are compared by means of sensitivity and low frequency noise. The vortex state free layer enables high saturation fields with negligible hyste...
Saved in:
| Published in: | arXiv.org 2018-04 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | |
|---|---|
| cites | |
| container_end_page | |
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | arXiv.org |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Weitensfelder, Herbert Brueckl, Hubert Satz, Armin Pruegl, Klemens Zimmer, Juergen Luber, Sebastian Raberg, Wolfgang Abert, Claas Bruckner, Florian Bachleitner-Hofmann, Anton Windl, Roman Suess, Dieter |
| description | Magnetoresistive spin valve sensors based on the giant- (GMR) and tunnelling- (TMR) magnetoresisitve effect with a flux-closed vortex state free layer design are compared by means of sensitivity and low frequency noise. The vortex state free layer enables high saturation fields with negligible hysteresis, making it attractive for applications with a high dynamic range. The measured GMR devices comprise lower pink noise and better linearity in resistance but are less sensitive to external magnetic fields than TMR sensors. The results show a comparable detectivity at low frequencies and a better performance of the TMR minimum detectable field at frequencies in the white noise limit. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.48550/arxiv.1804.06940 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2072057377</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2072057377</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a527-c35b26d1c04c0f7171e617a1bbb6a3b74d1475083412b96a29bbda97b4c0926e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj0tLAzEYRYMgWGp_gLsPXE_NOzNLGWwVRgVbui3JTIopNalJ-tr50ztWVxcuh3O5CN0RPOalEPhBx6Pbj0mJ-RjLiuMrNKCMkaLklN6gUUprjDGVigrBBuinDl9bHV0KHsIKZtYnl93e5RNo30ETDjCJ9ntnfXuCt-CShTr4HJ3ZZRd8Audh-vpxged9zrZ9sdCbvb24QkxwcPkTNCxCzPYIs6yz_XVaaPTJxlt0vdKbZEf_OUTzydO8fi6a9-lL_dgUWlBVtEwYKjvSYt7ilSKKWEmUJsYYqZlRvCNcCVwyTqippKaVMZ2ulOnxikrLhuj-T7uNoX-T8nIddtH3i0uKFcVCMaXYGXryYL4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2072057377</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Sensitivity and Low Frequency Noise Contributions in GMR and TMR Spin Valve Sensors with a Vortex State Free Layer</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Weitensfelder, Herbert ; Brueckl, Hubert ; Satz, Armin ; Pruegl, Klemens ; Zimmer, Juergen ; Luber, Sebastian ; Raberg, Wolfgang ; Abert, Claas ; Bruckner, Florian ; Bachleitner-Hofmann, Anton ; Windl, Roman ; Suess, Dieter</creator><creatorcontrib>Weitensfelder, Herbert ; Brueckl, Hubert ; Satz, Armin ; Pruegl, Klemens ; Zimmer, Juergen ; Luber, Sebastian ; Raberg, Wolfgang ; Abert, Claas ; Bruckner, Florian ; Bachleitner-Hofmann, Anton ; Windl, Roman ; Suess, Dieter</creatorcontrib><description>Magnetoresistive spin valve sensors based on the giant- (GMR) and tunnelling- (TMR) magnetoresisitve effect with a flux-closed vortex state free layer design are compared by means of sensitivity and low frequency noise. The vortex state free layer enables high saturation fields with negligible hysteresis, making it attractive for applications with a high dynamic range. The measured GMR devices comprise lower pink noise and better linearity in resistance but are less sensitive to external magnetic fields than TMR sensors. The results show a comparable detectivity at low frequencies and a better performance of the TMR minimum detectable field at frequencies in the white noise limit.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1804.06940</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>LF noise ; Linearity ; Magnetoresistivity ; Noise ; Noise sensitivity ; Rangefinding ; Sensors ; Spin valves ; Vortices ; White noise</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2018-04</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2072057377?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,25753,27925,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weitensfelder, Herbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brueckl, Hubert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satz, Armin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pruegl, Klemens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmer, Juergen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luber, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raberg, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abert, Claas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruckner, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bachleitner-Hofmann, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windl, Roman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suess, Dieter</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Sensitivity and Low Frequency Noise Contributions in GMR and TMR Spin Valve Sensors with a Vortex State Free Layer</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Magnetoresistive spin valve sensors based on the giant- (GMR) and tunnelling- (TMR) magnetoresisitve effect with a flux-closed vortex state free layer design are compared by means of sensitivity and low frequency noise. The vortex state free layer enables high saturation fields with negligible hysteresis, making it attractive for applications with a high dynamic range. The measured GMR devices comprise lower pink noise and better linearity in resistance but are less sensitive to external magnetic fields than TMR sensors. The results show a comparable detectivity at low frequencies and a better performance of the TMR minimum detectable field at frequencies in the white noise limit.</description><subject>LF noise</subject><subject>Linearity</subject><subject>Magnetoresistivity</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Noise sensitivity</subject><subject>Rangefinding</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Spin valves</subject><subject>Vortices</subject><subject>White noise</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNotj0tLAzEYRYMgWGp_gLsPXE_NOzNLGWwVRgVbui3JTIopNalJ-tr50ztWVxcuh3O5CN0RPOalEPhBx6Pbj0mJ-RjLiuMrNKCMkaLklN6gUUprjDGVigrBBuinDl9bHV0KHsIKZtYnl93e5RNo30ETDjCJ9ntnfXuCt-CShTr4HJ3ZZRd8Audh-vpxged9zrZ9sdCbvb24QkxwcPkTNCxCzPYIs6yz_XVaaPTJxlt0vdKbZEf_OUTzydO8fi6a9-lL_dgUWlBVtEwYKjvSYt7ilSKKWEmUJsYYqZlRvCNcCVwyTqippKaVMZ2ulOnxikrLhuj-T7uNoX-T8nIddtH3i0uKFcVCMaXYGXryYL4</recordid><startdate>20180418</startdate><enddate>20180418</enddate><creator>Weitensfelder, Herbert</creator><creator>Brueckl, Hubert</creator><creator>Satz, Armin</creator><creator>Pruegl, Klemens</creator><creator>Zimmer, Juergen</creator><creator>Luber, Sebastian</creator><creator>Raberg, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Abert, Claas</creator><creator>Bruckner, Florian</creator><creator>Bachleitner-Hofmann, Anton</creator><creator>Windl, Roman</creator><creator>Suess, Dieter</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180418</creationdate><title>Comparison of Sensitivity and Low Frequency Noise Contributions in GMR and TMR Spin Valve Sensors with a Vortex State Free Layer</title><author>Weitensfelder, Herbert ; Brueckl, Hubert ; Satz, Armin ; Pruegl, Klemens ; Zimmer, Juergen ; Luber, Sebastian ; Raberg, Wolfgang ; Abert, Claas ; Bruckner, Florian ; Bachleitner-Hofmann, Anton ; Windl, Roman ; Suess, Dieter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a527-c35b26d1c04c0f7171e617a1bbb6a3b74d1475083412b96a29bbda97b4c0926e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>LF noise</topic><topic>Linearity</topic><topic>Magnetoresistivity</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Noise sensitivity</topic><topic>Rangefinding</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Spin valves</topic><topic>Vortices</topic><topic>White noise</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weitensfelder, Herbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brueckl, Hubert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satz, Armin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pruegl, Klemens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmer, Juergen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luber, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raberg, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abert, Claas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruckner, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bachleitner-Hofmann, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windl, Roman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suess, Dieter</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weitensfelder, Herbert</au><au>Brueckl, Hubert</au><au>Satz, Armin</au><au>Pruegl, Klemens</au><au>Zimmer, Juergen</au><au>Luber, Sebastian</au><au>Raberg, Wolfgang</au><au>Abert, Claas</au><au>Bruckner, Florian</au><au>Bachleitner-Hofmann, Anton</au><au>Windl, Roman</au><au>Suess, Dieter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Sensitivity and Low Frequency Noise Contributions in GMR and TMR Spin Valve Sensors with a Vortex State Free Layer</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2018-04-18</date><risdate>2018</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Magnetoresistive spin valve sensors based on the giant- (GMR) and tunnelling- (TMR) magnetoresisitve effect with a flux-closed vortex state free layer design are compared by means of sensitivity and low frequency noise. The vortex state free layer enables high saturation fields with negligible hysteresis, making it attractive for applications with a high dynamic range. The measured GMR devices comprise lower pink noise and better linearity in resistance but are less sensitive to external magnetic fields than TMR sensors. The results show a comparable detectivity at low frequencies and a better performance of the TMR minimum detectable field at frequencies in the white noise limit.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.1804.06940</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
| ispartof | arXiv.org, 2018-04 |
| issn | 2331-8422 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2072057377 |
| source | Publicly Available Content Database |
| subjects | LF noise Linearity Magnetoresistivity Noise Noise sensitivity Rangefinding Sensors Spin valves Vortices White noise |
| title | Comparison of Sensitivity and Low Frequency Noise Contributions in GMR and TMR Spin Valve Sensors with a Vortex State Free Layer |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T09%3A42%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Sensitivity%20and%20Low%20Frequency%20Noise%20Contributions%20in%20GMR%20and%20TMR%20Spin%20Valve%20Sensors%20with%20a%20Vortex%20State%20Free%20Layer&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Weitensfelder,%20Herbert&rft.date=2018-04-18&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.1804.06940&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2072057377%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a527-c35b26d1c04c0f7171e617a1bbb6a3b74d1475083412b96a29bbda97b4c0926e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2072057377&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |