Franchising (& Distribution) Currents

[...] the court did not allow plaintiff to amend its complaint to allege that ExxonMobil violated the MFIL by failing to provide it "with a statement disclosing whether the [plaintiff] would receive an exclusive territory." [...] Atkins and Campbell could not have breached the purchase agr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Franchise law journal 2009-10, Vol.29 (2), p.113-131
Main Authors: Appleby, Bethany L., Einhorn, Robert M., Beyer, David A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Agreements
Antitrust
Arbitration
Breach of contract
Buses
Contract breaches
Defendants
Disputes
District courts
Evidence
Federal court decisions
Federal district courts
Fees
Franchise agreements
Franchisees
Franchises
Fraud
Gasoline
Injunctions
Noncompetition agreements
Petroleum
Pizza
Plaintiffs
Provisions
Public interest
State court decisions
State laws
Summary judgments
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:[...] the court did not allow plaintiff to amend its complaint to allege that ExxonMobil violated the MFIL by failing to provide it "with a statement disclosing whether the [plaintiff] would receive an exclusive territory." [...] Atkins and Campbell could not have breached the purchase agreement or the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing because they were not parties to the agreement.
ISSN:8756-7962
2163-2154