Loading…

Constructing a Natural Language Inference Dataset using Generative Neural Networks

Natural Language Inference is an important task for Natural Language Understanding. It is concerned with classifying the logical relation between two sentences. In this paper, we propose several text generative neural networks for generating text hypothesis, which allows construction of new Natural...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:arXiv.org 2017-03
Main Authors: Starc, Janez, Mladenić, Dunja
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Starc, Janez
Mladenić, Dunja
description Natural Language Inference is an important task for Natural Language Understanding. It is concerned with classifying the logical relation between two sentences. In this paper, we propose several text generative neural networks for generating text hypothesis, which allows construction of new Natural Language Inference datasets. To evaluate the models, we propose a new metric -- the accuracy of the classifier trained on the generated dataset. The accuracy obtained by our best generative model is only 2.7% lower than the accuracy of the classifier trained on the original, human crafted dataset. Furthermore, the best generated dataset combined with the original dataset achieves the highest accuracy. The best model learns a mapping embedding for each training example. By comparing various metrics we show that datasets that obtain higher ROUGE or METEOR scores do not necessarily yield higher classification accuracies. We also provide analysis of what are the characteristics of a good dataset including the distinguishability of the generated datasets from the original one.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2075296068</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2075296068</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20752960683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNi8sKwjAQAIMgKNp_CHguxMQ-PNcnSA_ivSxlW1pLotmN_r4P_ABPc5iZkZhqY5ZxvtJ6IiKiXiml00wniZmKc-EssQ81d7aVIEvg4GGQJ7BtgBbl0Tbo0dYoN8BAyDLQJ92jRQ_cPVCW-F1K5KfzV5qLcQMDYfTjTCx220txiG_e3QMSV70L3r5VpVWW6HWq0tz8V70AC0Q_-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2075296068</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Constructing a Natural Language Inference Dataset using Generative Neural Networks</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Starc, Janez ; Mladenić, Dunja</creator><creatorcontrib>Starc, Janez ; Mladenić, Dunja</creatorcontrib><description>Natural Language Inference is an important task for Natural Language Understanding. It is concerned with classifying the logical relation between two sentences. In this paper, we propose several text generative neural networks for generating text hypothesis, which allows construction of new Natural Language Inference datasets. To evaluate the models, we propose a new metric -- the accuracy of the classifier trained on the generated dataset. The accuracy obtained by our best generative model is only 2.7% lower than the accuracy of the classifier trained on the original, human crafted dataset. Furthermore, the best generated dataset combined with the original dataset achieves the highest accuracy. The best model learns a mapping embedding for each training example. By comparing various metrics we show that datasets that obtain higher ROUGE or METEOR scores do not necessarily yield higher classification accuracies. We also provide analysis of what are the characteristics of a good dataset including the distinguishability of the generated datasets from the original one.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Classification ; Classifiers ; Datasets ; Inference ; Mapping ; Model accuracy ; Natural language ; Neural networks ; Sentences</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2017-03</ispartof><rights>2017. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2075296068?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,25753,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Starc, Janez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mladenić, Dunja</creatorcontrib><title>Constructing a Natural Language Inference Dataset using Generative Neural Networks</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Natural Language Inference is an important task for Natural Language Understanding. It is concerned with classifying the logical relation between two sentences. In this paper, we propose several text generative neural networks for generating text hypothesis, which allows construction of new Natural Language Inference datasets. To evaluate the models, we propose a new metric -- the accuracy of the classifier trained on the generated dataset. The accuracy obtained by our best generative model is only 2.7% lower than the accuracy of the classifier trained on the original, human crafted dataset. Furthermore, the best generated dataset combined with the original dataset achieves the highest accuracy. The best model learns a mapping embedding for each training example. By comparing various metrics we show that datasets that obtain higher ROUGE or METEOR scores do not necessarily yield higher classification accuracies. We also provide analysis of what are the characteristics of a good dataset including the distinguishability of the generated datasets from the original one.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Classifiers</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Inference</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Natural language</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Sentences</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNi8sKwjAQAIMgKNp_CHguxMQ-PNcnSA_ivSxlW1pLotmN_r4P_ABPc5iZkZhqY5ZxvtJ6IiKiXiml00wniZmKc-EssQ81d7aVIEvg4GGQJ7BtgBbl0Tbo0dYoN8BAyDLQJ92jRQ_cPVCW-F1K5KfzV5qLcQMDYfTjTCx220txiG_e3QMSV70L3r5VpVWW6HWq0tz8V70AC0Q_-Q</recordid><startdate>20170327</startdate><enddate>20170327</enddate><creator>Starc, Janez</creator><creator>Mladenić, Dunja</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170327</creationdate><title>Constructing a Natural Language Inference Dataset using Generative Neural Networks</title><author>Starc, Janez ; Mladenić, Dunja</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20752960683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Classifiers</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Inference</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Natural language</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Sentences</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Starc, Janez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mladenić, Dunja</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Starc, Janez</au><au>Mladenić, Dunja</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Constructing a Natural Language Inference Dataset using Generative Neural Networks</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2017-03-27</date><risdate>2017</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Natural Language Inference is an important task for Natural Language Understanding. It is concerned with classifying the logical relation between two sentences. In this paper, we propose several text generative neural networks for generating text hypothesis, which allows construction of new Natural Language Inference datasets. To evaluate the models, we propose a new metric -- the accuracy of the classifier trained on the generated dataset. The accuracy obtained by our best generative model is only 2.7% lower than the accuracy of the classifier trained on the original, human crafted dataset. Furthermore, the best generated dataset combined with the original dataset achieves the highest accuracy. The best model learns a mapping embedding for each training example. By comparing various metrics we show that datasets that obtain higher ROUGE or METEOR scores do not necessarily yield higher classification accuracies. We also provide analysis of what are the characteristics of a good dataset including the distinguishability of the generated datasets from the original one.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2017-03
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2075296068
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Accuracy
Classification
Classifiers
Datasets
Inference
Mapping
Model accuracy
Natural language
Neural networks
Sentences
title Constructing a Natural Language Inference Dataset using Generative Neural Networks
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T05%3A27%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Constructing%20a%20Natural%20Language%20Inference%20Dataset%20using%20Generative%20Neural%20Networks&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Starc,%20Janez&rft.date=2017-03-27&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2075296068%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20752960683%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2075296068&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true