Loading…

Balancing Lexicographic Fairness and a Utilitarian Objective with Application to Kidney Exchange

Balancing fairness and efficiency in resource allocation is a classical economic and computational problem. The price of fairness measures the worst-case loss of economic efficiency when using an inefficient but fair allocation rule; for indivisible goods in many settings, this price is unacceptably...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:arXiv.org 2017-09
Main Authors: McElfresh, Duncan C, Dickerson, John P
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator McElfresh, Duncan C
Dickerson, John P
description Balancing fairness and efficiency in resource allocation is a classical economic and computational problem. The price of fairness measures the worst-case loss of economic efficiency when using an inefficient but fair allocation rule; for indivisible goods in many settings, this price is unacceptably high. One such setting is kidney exchange, where needy patients swap willing but incompatible kidney donors. In this work, we close an open problem regarding the theoretical price of fairness in modern kidney exchanges. We then propose a general hybrid fairness rule that balances a strict lexicographic preference ordering over classes of agents, and a utilitarian objective that maximizes economic efficiency. We develop a utility function for this rule that favors disadvantaged groups lexicographically; but if cost to overall efficiency becomes too high, it switches to a utilitarian objective. This rule has only one parameter which is proportional to a bound on the price of fairness, and can be adjusted by policymakers. We apply this rule to real data from a large kidney exchange and show that our hybrid rule produces more reliable outcomes than other fairness rules.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2076414182</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2076414182</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20764141823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyk0KwjAQQOEgCIp6hwHXQpvW6lalRVBwo-s6prGdEiY1iX-314UHcPUW3-uJoUySeLZMpRyIifdtFEUyW8j5PBmK8xoNsiKuYa9fpGztsGtIQYHkWHsPyBUgnAIZCugIGQ6XVqtADw1PCg2sus6QwkCWIVjYUcX6DflLNci1Hov-FY3Xk19HYlrkx8121jl7u2sfytbeHX-plNEiS-M0Xsrkv-sD7kJE1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2076414182</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Balancing Lexicographic Fairness and a Utilitarian Objective with Application to Kidney Exchange</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>McElfresh, Duncan C ; Dickerson, John P</creator><creatorcontrib>McElfresh, Duncan C ; Dickerson, John P</creatorcontrib><description>Balancing fairness and efficiency in resource allocation is a classical economic and computational problem. The price of fairness measures the worst-case loss of economic efficiency when using an inefficient but fair allocation rule; for indivisible goods in many settings, this price is unacceptably high. One such setting is kidney exchange, where needy patients swap willing but incompatible kidney donors. In this work, we close an open problem regarding the theoretical price of fairness in modern kidney exchanges. We then propose a general hybrid fairness rule that balances a strict lexicographic preference ordering over classes of agents, and a utilitarian objective that maximizes economic efficiency. We develop a utility function for this rule that favors disadvantaged groups lexicographically; but if cost to overall efficiency becomes too high, it switches to a utilitarian objective. This rule has only one parameter which is proportional to a bound on the price of fairness, and can be adjusted by policymakers. We apply this rule to real data from a large kidney exchange and show that our hybrid rule produces more reliable outcomes than other fairness rules.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Balancing ; Economics ; Efficiency ; Exchanging ; Kidneys ; Resource allocation ; Switches</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2017-09</ispartof><rights>2017. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2076414182?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,25752,37011,44589</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McElfresh, Duncan C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickerson, John P</creatorcontrib><title>Balancing Lexicographic Fairness and a Utilitarian Objective with Application to Kidney Exchange</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Balancing fairness and efficiency in resource allocation is a classical economic and computational problem. The price of fairness measures the worst-case loss of economic efficiency when using an inefficient but fair allocation rule; for indivisible goods in many settings, this price is unacceptably high. One such setting is kidney exchange, where needy patients swap willing but incompatible kidney donors. In this work, we close an open problem regarding the theoretical price of fairness in modern kidney exchanges. We then propose a general hybrid fairness rule that balances a strict lexicographic preference ordering over classes of agents, and a utilitarian objective that maximizes economic efficiency. We develop a utility function for this rule that favors disadvantaged groups lexicographically; but if cost to overall efficiency becomes too high, it switches to a utilitarian objective. This rule has only one parameter which is proportional to a bound on the price of fairness, and can be adjusted by policymakers. We apply this rule to real data from a large kidney exchange and show that our hybrid rule produces more reliable outcomes than other fairness rules.</description><subject>Balancing</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Exchanging</subject><subject>Kidneys</subject><subject>Resource allocation</subject><subject>Switches</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNyk0KwjAQQOEgCIp6hwHXQpvW6lalRVBwo-s6prGdEiY1iX-314UHcPUW3-uJoUySeLZMpRyIifdtFEUyW8j5PBmK8xoNsiKuYa9fpGztsGtIQYHkWHsPyBUgnAIZCugIGQ6XVqtADw1PCg2sus6QwkCWIVjYUcX6DflLNci1Hov-FY3Xk19HYlrkx8121jl7u2sfytbeHX-plNEiS-M0Xsrkv-sD7kJE1g</recordid><startdate>20170907</startdate><enddate>20170907</enddate><creator>McElfresh, Duncan C</creator><creator>Dickerson, John P</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170907</creationdate><title>Balancing Lexicographic Fairness and a Utilitarian Objective with Application to Kidney Exchange</title><author>McElfresh, Duncan C ; Dickerson, John P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20764141823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Balancing</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Exchanging</topic><topic>Kidneys</topic><topic>Resource allocation</topic><topic>Switches</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McElfresh, Duncan C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickerson, John P</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McElfresh, Duncan C</au><au>Dickerson, John P</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Balancing Lexicographic Fairness and a Utilitarian Objective with Application to Kidney Exchange</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2017-09-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Balancing fairness and efficiency in resource allocation is a classical economic and computational problem. The price of fairness measures the worst-case loss of economic efficiency when using an inefficient but fair allocation rule; for indivisible goods in many settings, this price is unacceptably high. One such setting is kidney exchange, where needy patients swap willing but incompatible kidney donors. In this work, we close an open problem regarding the theoretical price of fairness in modern kidney exchanges. We then propose a general hybrid fairness rule that balances a strict lexicographic preference ordering over classes of agents, and a utilitarian objective that maximizes economic efficiency. We develop a utility function for this rule that favors disadvantaged groups lexicographically; but if cost to overall efficiency becomes too high, it switches to a utilitarian objective. This rule has only one parameter which is proportional to a bound on the price of fairness, and can be adjusted by policymakers. We apply this rule to real data from a large kidney exchange and show that our hybrid rule produces more reliable outcomes than other fairness rules.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2017-09
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2076414182
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)
subjects Balancing
Economics
Efficiency
Exchanging
Kidneys
Resource allocation
Switches
title Balancing Lexicographic Fairness and a Utilitarian Objective with Application to Kidney Exchange
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T12%3A08%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Balancing%20Lexicographic%20Fairness%20and%20a%20Utilitarian%20Objective%20with%20Application%20to%20Kidney%20Exchange&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=McElfresh,%20Duncan%20C&rft.date=2017-09-07&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2076414182%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20764141823%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2076414182&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true