Loading…
Characterizing College Science Assessments: The Three-Dimensional Learning Assessment Protocol
Many calls to improve science education in college and university settings have focused on improving instructor pedagogy. Meanwhile, science education at the K-12 level is undergoing significant changes as a result of the emphasis on scientific and engineering practices, crosscutting concepts, and d...
Saved in:
Published in: | arXiv.org 2016-10 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Laverty, James T Underwood, Sonia M Matz, Rebecca L Posey, Lynmarie A Carmel, Justin H Caballero, Marcos D Fata-Hartley, Cori L Ebert-May, Diane Jardeleza, Sarah E Cooper, Melanie M |
description | Many calls to improve science education in college and university settings have focused on improving instructor pedagogy. Meanwhile, science education at the K-12 level is undergoing significant changes as a result of the emphasis on scientific and engineering practices, crosscutting concepts, and disciplinary core ideas. This framework of "three-dimensional learning" is based on the literature about how people learn science and how we can help students put their knowledge to use. Recently, similar changes are underway in higher education by incorporating three-dimensional learning into college science courses. As these transformations move forward, it will become important to assess three-dimensional learning both to align assessments with the learning environment, and to assess the extent of the transformations. In this paper we introduce the Three-Dimensional Learning Assessment Protocol (3D-LAP), which is designed to characterize and support the development of assessment tasks in biology, chemistry, and physics that align with transformation efforts. We describe the development process used by our interdisciplinary team, discuss the validity and reliability of the protocol, and provide evidence that the protocol can distinguish between assessments that have the potential to elicit evidence of three-dimensional learning and those that do not. |
doi_str_mv | 10.48550/arxiv.1604.07770 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2080900228</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2080900228</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a528-e61e0f2c761ea62c3da20fc09e099e21652785c6e3ff745fef4b5fa740d5184e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFT01Lw0AUXATBUvsDvAU8J768_Yy3Ej-hoGDOlnX7tt0Ss7qbivjrjSh4GAaGmWGGsbMaKmGkhAubPsNHVSsQFWit4YjNkPO6NALxhC1y3gMAKo1S8hl7bnc2WTdSCl9h2BZt7HvaUvHkAg2OimXOlPMrDWO-LLodTUhE5VWYpBziYPtiRTYNP9l_b_GY4hhd7E_Zsbd9psUfz1l3c921d-Xq4fa-Xa5KK9GUpGoCj05PbBU6vrEI3kFD0DSEtZKojXSKuPdaSE9evEhvtYCNrI0gPmfnv7VvKb4fKI_rfTykaVxeIxhopsNo-DenAVZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2080900228</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterizing College Science Assessments: The Three-Dimensional Learning Assessment Protocol</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Laverty, James T ; Underwood, Sonia M ; Matz, Rebecca L ; Posey, Lynmarie A ; Carmel, Justin H ; Caballero, Marcos D ; Fata-Hartley, Cori L ; Ebert-May, Diane ; Jardeleza, Sarah E ; Cooper, Melanie M</creator><creatorcontrib>Laverty, James T ; Underwood, Sonia M ; Matz, Rebecca L ; Posey, Lynmarie A ; Carmel, Justin H ; Caballero, Marcos D ; Fata-Hartley, Cori L ; Ebert-May, Diane ; Jardeleza, Sarah E ; Cooper, Melanie M</creatorcontrib><description>Many calls to improve science education in college and university settings have focused on improving instructor pedagogy. Meanwhile, science education at the K-12 level is undergoing significant changes as a result of the emphasis on scientific and engineering practices, crosscutting concepts, and disciplinary core ideas. This framework of "three-dimensional learning" is based on the literature about how people learn science and how we can help students put their knowledge to use. Recently, similar changes are underway in higher education by incorporating three-dimensional learning into college science courses. As these transformations move forward, it will become important to assess three-dimensional learning both to align assessments with the learning environment, and to assess the extent of the transformations. In this paper we introduce the Three-Dimensional Learning Assessment Protocol (3D-LAP), which is designed to characterize and support the development of assessment tasks in biology, chemistry, and physics that align with transformation efforts. We describe the development process used by our interdisciplinary team, discuss the validity and reliability of the protocol, and provide evidence that the protocol can distinguish between assessments that have the potential to elicit evidence of three-dimensional learning and those that do not.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1604.07770</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Assessments ; Colleges & universities ; Education ; Learning ; Organic chemistry ; Science education ; Transformations</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2016-10</ispartof><rights>2016. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2080900228?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,25753,27925,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Laverty, James T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Underwood, Sonia M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matz, Rebecca L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Posey, Lynmarie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmel, Justin H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caballero, Marcos D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fata-Hartley, Cori L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebert-May, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jardeleza, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Melanie M</creatorcontrib><title>Characterizing College Science Assessments: The Three-Dimensional Learning Assessment Protocol</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Many calls to improve science education in college and university settings have focused on improving instructor pedagogy. Meanwhile, science education at the K-12 level is undergoing significant changes as a result of the emphasis on scientific and engineering practices, crosscutting concepts, and disciplinary core ideas. This framework of "three-dimensional learning" is based on the literature about how people learn science and how we can help students put their knowledge to use. Recently, similar changes are underway in higher education by incorporating three-dimensional learning into college science courses. As these transformations move forward, it will become important to assess three-dimensional learning both to align assessments with the learning environment, and to assess the extent of the transformations. In this paper we introduce the Three-Dimensional Learning Assessment Protocol (3D-LAP), which is designed to characterize and support the development of assessment tasks in biology, chemistry, and physics that align with transformation efforts. We describe the development process used by our interdisciplinary team, discuss the validity and reliability of the protocol, and provide evidence that the protocol can distinguish between assessments that have the potential to elicit evidence of three-dimensional learning and those that do not.</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Science education</subject><subject>Transformations</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpFT01Lw0AUXATBUvsDvAU8J768_Yy3Ej-hoGDOlnX7tt0Ss7qbivjrjSh4GAaGmWGGsbMaKmGkhAubPsNHVSsQFWit4YjNkPO6NALxhC1y3gMAKo1S8hl7bnc2WTdSCl9h2BZt7HvaUvHkAg2OimXOlPMrDWO-LLodTUhE5VWYpBziYPtiRTYNP9l_b_GY4hhd7E_Zsbd9psUfz1l3c921d-Xq4fa-Xa5KK9GUpGoCj05PbBU6vrEI3kFD0DSEtZKojXSKuPdaSE9evEhvtYCNrI0gPmfnv7VvKb4fKI_rfTykaVxeIxhopsNo-DenAVZA</recordid><startdate>20161006</startdate><enddate>20161006</enddate><creator>Laverty, James T</creator><creator>Underwood, Sonia M</creator><creator>Matz, Rebecca L</creator><creator>Posey, Lynmarie A</creator><creator>Carmel, Justin H</creator><creator>Caballero, Marcos D</creator><creator>Fata-Hartley, Cori L</creator><creator>Ebert-May, Diane</creator><creator>Jardeleza, Sarah E</creator><creator>Cooper, Melanie M</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161006</creationdate><title>Characterizing College Science Assessments: The Three-Dimensional Learning Assessment Protocol</title><author>Laverty, James T ; Underwood, Sonia M ; Matz, Rebecca L ; Posey, Lynmarie A ; Carmel, Justin H ; Caballero, Marcos D ; Fata-Hartley, Cori L ; Ebert-May, Diane ; Jardeleza, Sarah E ; Cooper, Melanie M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a528-e61e0f2c761ea62c3da20fc09e099e21652785c6e3ff745fef4b5fa740d5184e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Science education</topic><topic>Transformations</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laverty, James T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Underwood, Sonia M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matz, Rebecca L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Posey, Lynmarie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmel, Justin H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caballero, Marcos D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fata-Hartley, Cori L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebert-May, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jardeleza, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Melanie M</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laverty, James T</au><au>Underwood, Sonia M</au><au>Matz, Rebecca L</au><au>Posey, Lynmarie A</au><au>Carmel, Justin H</au><au>Caballero, Marcos D</au><au>Fata-Hartley, Cori L</au><au>Ebert-May, Diane</au><au>Jardeleza, Sarah E</au><au>Cooper, Melanie M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterizing College Science Assessments: The Three-Dimensional Learning Assessment Protocol</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2016-10-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Many calls to improve science education in college and university settings have focused on improving instructor pedagogy. Meanwhile, science education at the K-12 level is undergoing significant changes as a result of the emphasis on scientific and engineering practices, crosscutting concepts, and disciplinary core ideas. This framework of "three-dimensional learning" is based on the literature about how people learn science and how we can help students put their knowledge to use. Recently, similar changes are underway in higher education by incorporating three-dimensional learning into college science courses. As these transformations move forward, it will become important to assess three-dimensional learning both to align assessments with the learning environment, and to assess the extent of the transformations. In this paper we introduce the Three-Dimensional Learning Assessment Protocol (3D-LAP), which is designed to characterize and support the development of assessment tasks in biology, chemistry, and physics that align with transformation efforts. We describe the development process used by our interdisciplinary team, discuss the validity and reliability of the protocol, and provide evidence that the protocol can distinguish between assessments that have the potential to elicit evidence of three-dimensional learning and those that do not.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.1604.07770</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2016-10 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2080900228 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) |
subjects | Assessments Colleges & universities Education Learning Organic chemistry Science education Transformations |
title | Characterizing College Science Assessments: The Three-Dimensional Learning Assessment Protocol |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T07%3A23%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterizing%20College%20Science%20Assessments:%20The%20Three-Dimensional%20Learning%20Assessment%20Protocol&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Laverty,%20James%20T&rft.date=2016-10-06&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.1604.07770&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2080900228%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a528-e61e0f2c761ea62c3da20fc09e099e21652785c6e3ff745fef4b5fa740d5184e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2080900228&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |