A Survey of the Current State of the Scientist-Practitioner Model in Applied Behavior Analysis

The scientist practitioner model (SPM) or “Boulder Model” emphasizes training in research methods and the application of research findings to solving clinical problems. Within the science of applied behavior analysis (ABA), the scientist-practitioner model (SPM) is an integral component of the field...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Education & treatment of children 2018-08, Vol.41 (3), p.277-298
Main Authors: Shawler, Lesley A., Blair, Bryan J., Harper, Jill M., Dorsey, Michael F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Allied Health Personnel
Applied behavior analysis
Author productivity
Behavior
Behavior Modification
Behavior Patterns
Behaviorism
Behaviorism (Psychology)
Behaviourism
Certification
Clinical psychologists
Educational Attainment
Evidence Based Practice
Graduate studies
Individual Characteristics
Intervention
Practice
Research Methodology
Research Skills
Scientists
Special Issue on the Scientist-Practitioner Model in Applied Behavior Analysis
Surveys
Trends
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The scientist practitioner model (SPM) or “Boulder Model” emphasizes training in research methods and the application of research findings to solving clinical problems. Within the science of applied behavior analysis (ABA), the scientist-practitioner model (SPM) is an integral component of the field. However, there are no data to report on the current state of the SPM within our field. A survey was administered among current Board Certified Behavior Analysts (BCBAs) to evaluate the current state of the SPM and research productivity. We also evaluated BCBA’s motivations for research involvement, the number of publications per respondent, and other important variables impacting research productivity. Overall, results indicate that the majority of respondents adhere to the SPM despite the lack of high research productivity. Suggestions on bridging the gap and possible future directions are discussed.
ISSN:0748-8491
1934-8924
1934-8924
DOI:10.1353/etc.2018.0014