Point Contacts in Modeling Conducting 2D Planar Structures

Use of an optimization algorithm to improve performance of antennas and electromagnetic structures usually ends up in planar unusual shapes. Using rectangular conducting elements the proposed structures sometimes have connections with only one single point in common between two neighboring areas. Th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:arXiv.org 2015-04
Main Authors: Thiel, David V, Shahpari, Morteza, Hettenhausen, Jan, Lewis, Andrew
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Algorithms
Antenna radiation patterns
Chamfering
Computer simulation
Current distribution
Dipoles
Finite difference time domain method
Loop antennas
Mathematical models
Modelling
Optimization
Performance enhancement
Planar structures
Solvers
Two dimensional models
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Use of an optimization algorithm to improve performance of antennas and electromagnetic structures usually ends up in planar unusual shapes. Using rectangular conducting elements the proposed structures sometimes have connections with only one single point in common between two neighboring areas. The single point connections (point crossing) can affect the electromagnetic performance of the structure. In this letter, we illustrate the influence of point crossing on dipole and loop antennas using MoM, FDTD, and FEM solvers. Current distribution, radiation pattern, and impedance properties for different junctions are different. These solvers do not agree in the modeling of the point crossing junctions which is a warning about uncertainty in using such junctions. However, solvers agree that a negligible change in the junction would significantly change the antenna performance. We propose that one should consider both bridging and chamfering of the conflicting cells to find optimized structures. This reduces the simulation time by 40% using FDTD modeling, however no significant reduction is obtained using the MoM and FEM methods.
ISSN:2331-8422
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.1504.05944