Loading…

A First Comparison of Kepler Planet Candidates in Single and Multiple Systems

In this letter we present an overview of the rich population of systems with multiple candidate transiting planets found in the first four months of Kepler data. The census of multiples includes 115 targets that show 2 candidate planets, 45 with 3, 8 with 4, and 1 each with 5 and 6, for a total of 1...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:arXiv.org 2011-03
Main Authors: Latham, David W, Rowe, Jason F, Quinn, Samuel N, Batalha, Natalie M, Borucki, William J, Brown, Timothy M, Bryson, Stephen T, Buchhave, Lars A, Caldwell, Douglas A, Carter, Joshua A, Christiansen, Jesse L, Ciardi, David R, Cochran, William D, Dunham, Edward W, Fabrycky, Daniel C, d, Eric B, Gautier, Thomas N, Gilliland, Ronald L, Holman, Matthew J, Howell, Steve B, Ibrahim, Khadeejah A, Isaacson, Howard, Basri, Gibor, Furesz, Gabor, Geary, John C, Jenkins, Jon M, Koch, David G, Lissauer, Jack J, Marcy, Geoffrey W, Quintana, Elisa V, Ragozzine, Darin, Sasselov, Dimitar D, Shporer, Avi, Steffen, Jason H, Welsh, William F, Wohler, Bill
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Latham, David W
Rowe, Jason F
Quinn, Samuel N
Batalha, Natalie M
Borucki, William J
Brown, Timothy M
Bryson, Stephen T
Buchhave, Lars A
Caldwell, Douglas A
Carter, Joshua A
Christiansen, Jesse L
Ciardi, David R
Cochran, William D
Dunham, Edward W
Fabrycky, Daniel C
d, Eric B
Gautier, Thomas N
Gilliland, Ronald L
Holman, Matthew J
Howell, Steve B
Ibrahim, Khadeejah A
Isaacson, Howard
Basri, Gibor
Furesz, Gabor
Geary, John C
Jenkins, Jon M
Koch, David G
Lissauer, Jack J
Marcy, Geoffrey W
Quintana, Elisa V
Ragozzine, Darin
Sasselov, Dimitar D
Shporer, Avi
Steffen, Jason H
Welsh, William F
Wohler, Bill
description In this letter we present an overview of the rich population of systems with multiple candidate transiting planets found in the first four months of Kepler data. The census of multiples includes 115 targets that show 2 candidate planets, 45 with 3, 8 with 4, and 1 each with 5 and 6, for a total of 170 systems with 408 candidates. When compared to the 827 systems with only one candidate, the multiples account for 17 percent of the total number of systems, and a third of all the planet candidates. We compare the characteristics of candidates found in multiples with those found in singles. False positives due to eclipsing binaries are much less common for the multiples, as expected. Singles and multiples are both dominated by planets smaller than Neptune; 69 +2/-3 percent for singles and 86 +2/-5 percent for multiples. This result, that systems with multiple transiting planets are less likely to include a transiting giant planet, suggests that close-in giant planets tend to disrupt the orbital inclinations of small planets in flat systems, or maybe even to prevent the formation of such systems in the first place.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.1103.3896
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2082053556</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2082053556</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a516-cd3b53f77b48f2f4e55487df0cc1927b860580d609a7cdcb14831ff068f4219a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjV1LwzAYhYMgOObuvQx43frm403Sy1GcihsK2_1I20QyurQmnei_t6BXB85zeA4hdwxKaRDhwabv8FUyBqIUplJXZMGFYIWRnN-QVc4nAOBKc0SxILs13YSUJ1oP59GmkIdIB09f3di7RN97G93MbOxCZyeXaYh0H-JH7-jc0d2ln8K8pPufPLlzviXX3vbZrf5zSQ6bx0P9XGzfnl7q9bawyFTRdqJB4bVupPHcS4coje48tC2ruG6MAjTQKaisbru2YdII5j0o4yVnlRVLcv-nHdPweXF5Op6GS4rz45GD4YACUYlfJopOTg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2082053556</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A First Comparison of Kepler Planet Candidates in Single and Multiple Systems</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Latham, David W ; Rowe, Jason F ; Quinn, Samuel N ; Batalha, Natalie M ; Borucki, William J ; Brown, Timothy M ; Bryson, Stephen T ; Buchhave, Lars A ; Caldwell, Douglas A ; Carter, Joshua A ; Christiansen, Jesse L ; Ciardi, David R ; Cochran, William D ; Dunham, Edward W ; Fabrycky, Daniel C ; d, Eric B ; Gautier, Thomas N ; Gilliland, Ronald L ; Holman, Matthew J ; Howell, Steve B ; Ibrahim, Khadeejah A ; Isaacson, Howard ; Basri, Gibor ; Furesz, Gabor ; Geary, John C ; Jenkins, Jon M ; Koch, David G ; Lissauer, Jack J ; Marcy, Geoffrey W ; Quintana, Elisa V ; Ragozzine, Darin ; Sasselov, Dimitar D ; Shporer, Avi ; Steffen, Jason H ; Welsh, William F ; Wohler, Bill</creator><creatorcontrib>Latham, David W ; Rowe, Jason F ; Quinn, Samuel N ; Batalha, Natalie M ; Borucki, William J ; Brown, Timothy M ; Bryson, Stephen T ; Buchhave, Lars A ; Caldwell, Douglas A ; Carter, Joshua A ; Christiansen, Jesse L ; Ciardi, David R ; Cochran, William D ; Dunham, Edward W ; Fabrycky, Daniel C ; d, Eric B ; Gautier, Thomas N ; Gilliland, Ronald L ; Holman, Matthew J ; Howell, Steve B ; Ibrahim, Khadeejah A ; Isaacson, Howard ; Basri, Gibor ; Furesz, Gabor ; Geary, John C ; Jenkins, Jon M ; Koch, David G ; Lissauer, Jack J ; Marcy, Geoffrey W ; Quintana, Elisa V ; Ragozzine, Darin ; Sasselov, Dimitar D ; Shporer, Avi ; Steffen, Jason H ; Welsh, William F ; Wohler, Bill</creatorcontrib><description>In this letter we present an overview of the rich population of systems with multiple candidate transiting planets found in the first four months of Kepler data. The census of multiples includes 115 targets that show 2 candidate planets, 45 with 3, 8 with 4, and 1 each with 5 and 6, for a total of 170 systems with 408 candidates. When compared to the 827 systems with only one candidate, the multiples account for 17 percent of the total number of systems, and a third of all the planet candidates. We compare the characteristics of candidates found in multiples with those found in singles. False positives due to eclipsing binaries are much less common for the multiples, as expected. Singles and multiples are both dominated by planets smaller than Neptune; 69 +2/-3 percent for singles and 86 +2/-5 percent for multiples. This result, that systems with multiple transiting planets are less likely to include a transiting giant planet, suggests that close-in giant planets tend to disrupt the orbital inclinations of small planets in flat systems, or maybe even to prevent the formation of such systems in the first place.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1103.3896</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Candidates ; Extrasolar planets ; Jupiter ; Planet detection ; Planet formation ; Planets ; Transit</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2011-03</ispartof><rights>2011. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2082053556?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>776,780,25731,27902,36989,44566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Latham, David W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowe, Jason F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Samuel N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batalha, Natalie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borucki, William J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Timothy M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryson, Stephen T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchhave, Lars A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caldwell, Douglas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Joshua A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christiansen, Jesse L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciardi, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochran, William D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunham, Edward W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabrycky, Daniel C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>d, Eric B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gautier, Thomas N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilliland, Ronald L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holman, Matthew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howell, Steve B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Khadeejah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isaacson, Howard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basri, Gibor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furesz, Gabor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geary, John C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Jon M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koch, David G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lissauer, Jack J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcy, Geoffrey W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintana, Elisa V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ragozzine, Darin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasselov, Dimitar D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shporer, Avi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steffen, Jason H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welsh, William F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wohler, Bill</creatorcontrib><title>A First Comparison of Kepler Planet Candidates in Single and Multiple Systems</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>In this letter we present an overview of the rich population of systems with multiple candidate transiting planets found in the first four months of Kepler data. The census of multiples includes 115 targets that show 2 candidate planets, 45 with 3, 8 with 4, and 1 each with 5 and 6, for a total of 170 systems with 408 candidates. When compared to the 827 systems with only one candidate, the multiples account for 17 percent of the total number of systems, and a third of all the planet candidates. We compare the characteristics of candidates found in multiples with those found in singles. False positives due to eclipsing binaries are much less common for the multiples, as expected. Singles and multiples are both dominated by planets smaller than Neptune; 69 +2/-3 percent for singles and 86 +2/-5 percent for multiples. This result, that systems with multiple transiting planets are less likely to include a transiting giant planet, suggests that close-in giant planets tend to disrupt the orbital inclinations of small planets in flat systems, or maybe even to prevent the formation of such systems in the first place.</description><subject>Candidates</subject><subject>Extrasolar planets</subject><subject>Jupiter</subject><subject>Planet detection</subject><subject>Planet formation</subject><subject>Planets</subject><subject>Transit</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNotjV1LwzAYhYMgOObuvQx43frm403Sy1GcihsK2_1I20QyurQmnei_t6BXB85zeA4hdwxKaRDhwabv8FUyBqIUplJXZMGFYIWRnN-QVc4nAOBKc0SxILs13YSUJ1oP59GmkIdIB09f3di7RN97G93MbOxCZyeXaYh0H-JH7-jc0d2ln8K8pPufPLlzviXX3vbZrf5zSQ6bx0P9XGzfnl7q9bawyFTRdqJB4bVupPHcS4coje48tC2ruG6MAjTQKaisbru2YdII5j0o4yVnlRVLcv-nHdPweXF5Op6GS4rz45GD4YACUYlfJopOTg</recordid><startdate>20110320</startdate><enddate>20110320</enddate><creator>Latham, David W</creator><creator>Rowe, Jason F</creator><creator>Quinn, Samuel N</creator><creator>Batalha, Natalie M</creator><creator>Borucki, William J</creator><creator>Brown, Timothy M</creator><creator>Bryson, Stephen T</creator><creator>Buchhave, Lars A</creator><creator>Caldwell, Douglas A</creator><creator>Carter, Joshua A</creator><creator>Christiansen, Jesse L</creator><creator>Ciardi, David R</creator><creator>Cochran, William D</creator><creator>Dunham, Edward W</creator><creator>Fabrycky, Daniel C</creator><creator>d, Eric B</creator><creator>Gautier, Thomas N</creator><creator>Gilliland, Ronald L</creator><creator>Holman, Matthew J</creator><creator>Howell, Steve B</creator><creator>Ibrahim, Khadeejah A</creator><creator>Isaacson, Howard</creator><creator>Basri, Gibor</creator><creator>Furesz, Gabor</creator><creator>Geary, John C</creator><creator>Jenkins, Jon M</creator><creator>Koch, David G</creator><creator>Lissauer, Jack J</creator><creator>Marcy, Geoffrey W</creator><creator>Quintana, Elisa V</creator><creator>Ragozzine, Darin</creator><creator>Sasselov, Dimitar D</creator><creator>Shporer, Avi</creator><creator>Steffen, Jason H</creator><creator>Welsh, William F</creator><creator>Wohler, Bill</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110320</creationdate><title>A First Comparison of Kepler Planet Candidates in Single and Multiple Systems</title><author>Latham, David W ; Rowe, Jason F ; Quinn, Samuel N ; Batalha, Natalie M ; Borucki, William J ; Brown, Timothy M ; Bryson, Stephen T ; Buchhave, Lars A ; Caldwell, Douglas A ; Carter, Joshua A ; Christiansen, Jesse L ; Ciardi, David R ; Cochran, William D ; Dunham, Edward W ; Fabrycky, Daniel C ; d, Eric B ; Gautier, Thomas N ; Gilliland, Ronald L ; Holman, Matthew J ; Howell, Steve B ; Ibrahim, Khadeejah A ; Isaacson, Howard ; Basri, Gibor ; Furesz, Gabor ; Geary, John C ; Jenkins, Jon M ; Koch, David G ; Lissauer, Jack J ; Marcy, Geoffrey W ; Quintana, Elisa V ; Ragozzine, Darin ; Sasselov, Dimitar D ; Shporer, Avi ; Steffen, Jason H ; Welsh, William F ; Wohler, Bill</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a516-cd3b53f77b48f2f4e55487df0cc1927b860580d609a7cdcb14831ff068f4219a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Candidates</topic><topic>Extrasolar planets</topic><topic>Jupiter</topic><topic>Planet detection</topic><topic>Planet formation</topic><topic>Planets</topic><topic>Transit</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Latham, David W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowe, Jason F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Samuel N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batalha, Natalie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borucki, William J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Timothy M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryson, Stephen T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchhave, Lars A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caldwell, Douglas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, Joshua A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christiansen, Jesse L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciardi, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochran, William D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunham, Edward W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabrycky, Daniel C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>d, Eric B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gautier, Thomas N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilliland, Ronald L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holman, Matthew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howell, Steve B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Khadeejah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isaacson, Howard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basri, Gibor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furesz, Gabor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geary, John C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Jon M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koch, David G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lissauer, Jack J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcy, Geoffrey W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintana, Elisa V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ragozzine, Darin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasselov, Dimitar D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shporer, Avi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steffen, Jason H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welsh, William F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wohler, Bill</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Latham, David W</au><au>Rowe, Jason F</au><au>Quinn, Samuel N</au><au>Batalha, Natalie M</au><au>Borucki, William J</au><au>Brown, Timothy M</au><au>Bryson, Stephen T</au><au>Buchhave, Lars A</au><au>Caldwell, Douglas A</au><au>Carter, Joshua A</au><au>Christiansen, Jesse L</au><au>Ciardi, David R</au><au>Cochran, William D</au><au>Dunham, Edward W</au><au>Fabrycky, Daniel C</au><au>d, Eric B</au><au>Gautier, Thomas N</au><au>Gilliland, Ronald L</au><au>Holman, Matthew J</au><au>Howell, Steve B</au><au>Ibrahim, Khadeejah A</au><au>Isaacson, Howard</au><au>Basri, Gibor</au><au>Furesz, Gabor</au><au>Geary, John C</au><au>Jenkins, Jon M</au><au>Koch, David G</au><au>Lissauer, Jack J</au><au>Marcy, Geoffrey W</au><au>Quintana, Elisa V</au><au>Ragozzine, Darin</au><au>Sasselov, Dimitar D</au><au>Shporer, Avi</au><au>Steffen, Jason H</au><au>Welsh, William F</au><au>Wohler, Bill</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A First Comparison of Kepler Planet Candidates in Single and Multiple Systems</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2011-03-20</date><risdate>2011</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>In this letter we present an overview of the rich population of systems with multiple candidate transiting planets found in the first four months of Kepler data. The census of multiples includes 115 targets that show 2 candidate planets, 45 with 3, 8 with 4, and 1 each with 5 and 6, for a total of 170 systems with 408 candidates. When compared to the 827 systems with only one candidate, the multiples account for 17 percent of the total number of systems, and a third of all the planet candidates. We compare the characteristics of candidates found in multiples with those found in singles. False positives due to eclipsing binaries are much less common for the multiples, as expected. Singles and multiples are both dominated by planets smaller than Neptune; 69 +2/-3 percent for singles and 86 +2/-5 percent for multiples. This result, that systems with multiple transiting planets are less likely to include a transiting giant planet, suggests that close-in giant planets tend to disrupt the orbital inclinations of small planets in flat systems, or maybe even to prevent the formation of such systems in the first place.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.1103.3896</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2011-03
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2082053556
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Candidates
Extrasolar planets
Jupiter
Planet detection
Planet formation
Planets
Transit
title A First Comparison of Kepler Planet Candidates in Single and Multiple Systems
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T08%3A06%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20First%20Comparison%20of%20Kepler%20Planet%20Candidates%20in%20Single%20and%20Multiple%20Systems&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Latham,%20David%20W&rft.date=2011-03-20&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.1103.3896&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2082053556%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a516-cd3b53f77b48f2f4e55487df0cc1927b860580d609a7cdcb14831ff068f4219a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2082053556&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true