Loading…
Radiological diagnosis alone risks overtreatment of benign disease in suspected gallbladder cancer: A word of caution in an era of radical surgery
BACKGROUND: Incidental gallbladder cancer (iGBC) is on the rise world over. This may be a good scenario as we get to treat GBC in early stages. However, there is a practice of diagnosing patients based on clinicoradiological findings alone and subjecting them to a radical surgical procedure. This ap...
Saved in:
Published in: | Indian journal of cancer 2017-10, Vol.54 (4), p.681-684 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c516g-3b563a2eb3c91c547fa701b7bf7483c5bae87b1ec304d18090415e2eff94ca943 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c516g-3b563a2eb3c91c547fa701b7bf7483c5bae87b1ec304d18090415e2eff94ca943 |
container_end_page | 684 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 681 |
container_title | Indian journal of cancer |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Patkar, Shraddha Shinde, Rajesh Kurunkar, Sagar Niyogi, Devayani Shetty, Nitin Ramadwar, Mukta Goel, Mahesh |
description | BACKGROUND: Incidental gallbladder cancer (iGBC) is on the rise world over. This may be a good scenario as we get to treat GBC in early stages. However, there is a practice of diagnosing patients based on clinicoradiological findings alone and subjecting them to a radical surgical procedure. This approach over-treats patient and has important implications for resource utilization. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 284 consecutive patients undergoing upfront surgery for suspected GBC from January 2010 to December 2016. The study cohort was divided into two groups, group A - benign (n = 138, 48.6%) and group B - malignant (n = 146, 51.4%). Both groups were compared with respect to demographic characteristics, tumor marker levels, clinicoradiological features, and perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: Approximately 48.6% patients with clinicoradiological suspicion of GBC turned out to be benign on final histology as confirmed on frozen section evaluation (FS). Only 2 patients who were reported benign on FS required revision surgery for malignancy in the final histopathology report. Demographic and clinicoradiological characteristics in both groups were comparable. However, there was a significant difference in blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and complications between the two groups (P < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Every other patient who presented to a tertiary cancer center with high index suspicion for malignancy, based on clinicoradiological findings, turned out to be benign on final histology. This emphasizes the fact that, as a norm, for radiologically suspected gallbladder malignancy, we need to have a confirmed histological diagnosis at least during surgery before proceeding to radical resection. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/ijc.IJC_516_17 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2083630628</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A549079498</galeid><sourcerecordid>A549079498</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516g-3b563a2eb3c91c547fa701b7bf7483c5bae87b1ec304d18090415e2eff94ca943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kk-LFDEQxRtxwXHXq-eA4K3HpJP-E08Ow6orCwuLgrdQna7uzUw6GZNuh_0afmLTrrIKIzkEiverqle8LHvJ6Fowyt-YnV5ffdqqklWK1U-yFZOyyUVdi6fZilIm85LKr8-y5zHuKC14IZpV9uMWOuOtH4wGSzoDg_PRRALWOyTBxH0k_juGKSBMI7qJ-J606MzgkjoiRCTGkTjHA-oJOzKAta2FrsNANDiN4S3ZkKMP3UJqmCfj3YKAIxhgKYa0wjI9zmHAcH-RnfVgI774_Z9nX95fft5-zK9vPlxtN9e5Tg6HnLdlxaHAlmvJdCnqHmrK2rrta9FwXbaATd0y1JyKjjVUUsFKLLDvpdAgBT_PXj30PQT_bcY4qZ2fg0sjVUEbXnFaFc2jKhlDZVzvpwB6NFGrTSkkraWQiyo_oRrQJYvLJXuTyv_o1yf06XU4Gn0SeP0XcIdgp7vo7a9rxpOddfAxBuzVIZgRwr1iVC05USkn6jEnCXj3ABy9nTDEvZ2PGNSI3d75438oVTVM_YkO_wkEVMep</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2083630628</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiological diagnosis alone risks overtreatment of benign disease in suspected gallbladder cancer: A word of caution in an era of radical surgery</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Patkar, Shraddha ; Shinde, Rajesh ; Kurunkar, Sagar ; Niyogi, Devayani ; Shetty, Nitin ; Ramadwar, Mukta ; Goel, Mahesh</creator><creatorcontrib>Patkar, Shraddha ; Shinde, Rajesh ; Kurunkar, Sagar ; Niyogi, Devayani ; Shetty, Nitin ; Ramadwar, Mukta ; Goel, Mahesh</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: Incidental gallbladder cancer (iGBC) is on the rise world over. This may be a good scenario as we get to treat GBC in early stages. However, there is a practice of diagnosing patients based on clinicoradiological findings alone and subjecting them to a radical surgical procedure. This approach over-treats patient and has important implications for resource utilization. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 284 consecutive patients undergoing upfront surgery for suspected GBC from January 2010 to December 2016. The study cohort was divided into two groups, group A - benign (n = 138, 48.6%) and group B - malignant (n = 146, 51.4%). Both groups were compared with respect to demographic characteristics, tumor marker levels, clinicoradiological features, and perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: Approximately 48.6% patients with clinicoradiological suspicion of GBC turned out to be benign on final histology as confirmed on frozen section evaluation (FS). Only 2 patients who were reported benign on FS required revision surgery for malignancy in the final histopathology report. Demographic and clinicoradiological characteristics in both groups were comparable. However, there was a significant difference in blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and complications between the two groups (P < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Every other patient who presented to a tertiary cancer center with high index suspicion for malignancy, based on clinicoradiological findings, turned out to be benign on final histology. This emphasizes the fact that, as a norm, for radiologically suspected gallbladder malignancy, we need to have a confirmed histological diagnosis at least during surgery before proceeding to radical resection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0019-509X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-4774</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_516_17</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Mumbai: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Biomarkers ; Cancer ; Care and treatment ; Cholecystectomy ; Diabetes ; Diagnosis ; Endoscopy ; Gallbladder ; Gallbladder cancer ; Histology ; Histopathology ; Medical imaging ; Patients ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of cancer, 2017-10, Vol.54 (4), p.681-684</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2017. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516g-3b563a2eb3c91c547fa701b7bf7483c5bae87b1ec304d18090415e2eff94ca943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516g-3b563a2eb3c91c547fa701b7bf7483c5bae87b1ec304d18090415e2eff94ca943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2083630628?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25751,27922,27923,37010,44588</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Patkar, Shraddha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinde, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurunkar, Sagar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niyogi, Devayani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shetty, Nitin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramadwar, Mukta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goel, Mahesh</creatorcontrib><title>Radiological diagnosis alone risks overtreatment of benign disease in suspected gallbladder cancer: A word of caution in an era of radical surgery</title><title>Indian journal of cancer</title><description>BACKGROUND: Incidental gallbladder cancer (iGBC) is on the rise world over. This may be a good scenario as we get to treat GBC in early stages. However, there is a practice of diagnosing patients based on clinicoradiological findings alone and subjecting them to a radical surgical procedure. This approach over-treats patient and has important implications for resource utilization. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 284 consecutive patients undergoing upfront surgery for suspected GBC from January 2010 to December 2016. The study cohort was divided into two groups, group A - benign (n = 138, 48.6%) and group B - malignant (n = 146, 51.4%). Both groups were compared with respect to demographic characteristics, tumor marker levels, clinicoradiological features, and perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: Approximately 48.6% patients with clinicoradiological suspicion of GBC turned out to be benign on final histology as confirmed on frozen section evaluation (FS). Only 2 patients who were reported benign on FS required revision surgery for malignancy in the final histopathology report. Demographic and clinicoradiological characteristics in both groups were comparable. However, there was a significant difference in blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and complications between the two groups (P < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Every other patient who presented to a tertiary cancer center with high index suspicion for malignancy, based on clinicoradiological findings, turned out to be benign on final histology. This emphasizes the fact that, as a norm, for radiologically suspected gallbladder malignancy, we need to have a confirmed histological diagnosis at least during surgery before proceeding to radical resection.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Gallbladder</subject><subject>Gallbladder cancer</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Histopathology</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0019-509X</issn><issn>1998-4774</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kk-LFDEQxRtxwXHXq-eA4K3HpJP-E08Ow6orCwuLgrdQna7uzUw6GZNuh_0afmLTrrIKIzkEiverqle8LHvJ6Fowyt-YnV5ffdqqklWK1U-yFZOyyUVdi6fZilIm85LKr8-y5zHuKC14IZpV9uMWOuOtH4wGSzoDg_PRRALWOyTBxH0k_juGKSBMI7qJ-J606MzgkjoiRCTGkTjHA-oJOzKAta2FrsNANDiN4S3ZkKMP3UJqmCfj3YKAIxhgKYa0wjI9zmHAcH-RnfVgI774_Z9nX95fft5-zK9vPlxtN9e5Tg6HnLdlxaHAlmvJdCnqHmrK2rrta9FwXbaATd0y1JyKjjVUUsFKLLDvpdAgBT_PXj30PQT_bcY4qZ2fg0sjVUEbXnFaFc2jKhlDZVzvpwB6NFGrTSkkraWQiyo_oRrQJYvLJXuTyv_o1yf06XU4Gn0SeP0XcIdgp7vo7a9rxpOddfAxBuzVIZgRwr1iVC05USkn6jEnCXj3ABy9nTDEvZ2PGNSI3d75438oVTVM_YkO_wkEVMep</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Patkar, Shraddha</creator><creator>Shinde, Rajesh</creator><creator>Kurunkar, Sagar</creator><creator>Niyogi, Devayani</creator><creator>Shetty, Nitin</creator><creator>Ramadwar, Mukta</creator><creator>Goel, Mahesh</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>Radiological diagnosis alone risks overtreatment of benign disease in suspected gallbladder cancer: A word of caution in an era of radical surgery</title><author>Patkar, Shraddha ; Shinde, Rajesh ; Kurunkar, Sagar ; Niyogi, Devayani ; Shetty, Nitin ; Ramadwar, Mukta ; Goel, Mahesh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c516g-3b563a2eb3c91c547fa701b7bf7483c5bae87b1ec304d18090415e2eff94ca943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Gallbladder</topic><topic>Gallbladder cancer</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Histopathology</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Patkar, Shraddha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinde, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurunkar, Sagar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niyogi, Devayani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shetty, Nitin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramadwar, Mukta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goel, Mahesh</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Patkar, Shraddha</au><au>Shinde, Rajesh</au><au>Kurunkar, Sagar</au><au>Niyogi, Devayani</au><au>Shetty, Nitin</au><au>Ramadwar, Mukta</au><au>Goel, Mahesh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiological diagnosis alone risks overtreatment of benign disease in suspected gallbladder cancer: A word of caution in an era of radical surgery</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of cancer</jtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>681</spage><epage>684</epage><pages>681-684</pages><issn>0019-509X</issn><eissn>1998-4774</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND: Incidental gallbladder cancer (iGBC) is on the rise world over. This may be a good scenario as we get to treat GBC in early stages. However, there is a practice of diagnosing patients based on clinicoradiological findings alone and subjecting them to a radical surgical procedure. This approach over-treats patient and has important implications for resource utilization. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 284 consecutive patients undergoing upfront surgery for suspected GBC from January 2010 to December 2016. The study cohort was divided into two groups, group A - benign (n = 138, 48.6%) and group B - malignant (n = 146, 51.4%). Both groups were compared with respect to demographic characteristics, tumor marker levels, clinicoradiological features, and perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: Approximately 48.6% patients with clinicoradiological suspicion of GBC turned out to be benign on final histology as confirmed on frozen section evaluation (FS). Only 2 patients who were reported benign on FS required revision surgery for malignancy in the final histopathology report. Demographic and clinicoradiological characteristics in both groups were comparable. However, there was a significant difference in blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and complications between the two groups (P < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Every other patient who presented to a tertiary cancer center with high index suspicion for malignancy, based on clinicoradiological findings, turned out to be benign on final histology. This emphasizes the fact that, as a norm, for radiologically suspected gallbladder malignancy, we need to have a confirmed histological diagnosis at least during surgery before proceeding to radical resection.</abstract><cop>Mumbai</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><doi>10.4103/ijc.IJC_516_17</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0019-509X |
ispartof | Indian journal of cancer, 2017-10, Vol.54 (4), p.681-684 |
issn | 0019-509X 1998-4774 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2083630628 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Abdomen Biomarkers Cancer Care and treatment Cholecystectomy Diabetes Diagnosis Endoscopy Gallbladder Gallbladder cancer Histology Histopathology Medical imaging Patients Surgery |
title | Radiological diagnosis alone risks overtreatment of benign disease in suspected gallbladder cancer: A word of caution in an era of radical surgery |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T06%3A14%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiological%20diagnosis%20alone%20risks%20overtreatment%20of%20benign%20disease%20in%20suspected%20gallbladder%20cancer:%20A%20word%20of%20caution%20in%20an%20era%20of%20radical%20surgery&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20cancer&rft.au=Patkar,%20Shraddha&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=681&rft.epage=684&rft.pages=681-684&rft.issn=0019-509X&rft.eissn=1998-4774&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/ijc.IJC_516_17&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA549079498%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c516g-3b563a2eb3c91c547fa701b7bf7483c5bae87b1ec304d18090415e2eff94ca943%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2083630628&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A549079498&rfr_iscdi=true |