Loading…
Is more always better? Risk trade-offs among internationalizing new ventures
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate how ventures manage the negative returns associated with higher levels of internationalization. Many new ventures are internationalizing to fully exploit new innovations and/or gain access to larger markets. Yet at some point the rising costs ass...
Saved in:
Published in: | European business review 2014-08, Vol.26 (5), p.406-420 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-4c0e1508fb30bafa758cb59defe4ec7104d02981e82c7f403ddb408ee3d6e2183 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-4c0e1508fb30bafa758cb59defe4ec7104d02981e82c7f403ddb408ee3d6e2183 |
container_end_page | 420 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 406 |
container_title | European business review |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Fernhaber, Stephanie A McDougall-Covin, Patricia P |
description | Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to investigate how ventures manage the negative returns associated with higher levels of internationalization. Many new ventures are internationalizing to fully exploit new innovations and/or gain access to larger markets. Yet at some point the rising costs associated with internationalization outweigh any benefits, resulting in an inverted U-shaped relationship between internationalization and performance.
Design/methodology/approach
– New ventures are theorized to better manage high levels of internationalization by limiting exposure to other sources of risk. This can be achieved by leveraging greater size and/or limiting simultaneous diversification efforts on product innovation. To test the hypotheses, a regression using Heckman selection was run using a sample of 210 US-based, publicly held ventures in high-technology industries.
Findings
– The results confirm that when higher levels of internationalization are coupled with either a low emphasis on product innovation or larger size, the negative returns are mitigated and actually become positive.
Research limitations/implications
– A key implication lies in recognizing the role of risk management for internationalizing ventures. Future research could benefit by testing for generalizability in other countries as well as among privately held ventures.
Practical implications
– To manage the trade-offs associated at higher levels of internationalization, ventures need to maintain a low emphasis on product innovation or meet a threshold in terms of size.
Originality/value
– The value of this research lies in better understanding how ventures are able to overcome rising costs at higher levels of internationalization. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/EBR-02-2013-0030 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2084948941</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2084948941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-4c0e1508fb30bafa758cb59defe4ec7104d02981e82c7f403ddb408ee3d6e2183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvHgNevKyd_UizOYmW-gEFoSh4WzbJrKQm2bqbWOpf75Z6UTwNzPze8OYNIecMrhgDNZnfLilwyoEJCiDggIxYliqaMcgOyQjyNKWpkK_H5CSEFUAUZWpEFo8haZ3HxDQbsw1JgX2P_jpZ1uE96b2pkDprQ2Ja170ldReHnelr15mm_qpjq8NN8oldP3gMp-TImibg2U8dk5e7-fPsgS6e7h9nNwtaiiztqSwBWQrKFgIKY020WRZpXqFFiWU0LCvguWKoeJlZCaKqCgkKUVRT5EyJMbnc71179zFg6HVbhxKbxnTohqBZxlTOczkVEb34g67cEE9oguagZC5VLlmkYE-V3oXg0eq1r1vjt5qB3sWrY7wauN7Fq3fxRslkL8EWvWmq_xS_HiK-Abqqez4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2084948941</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is more always better? Risk trade-offs among internationalizing new ventures</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><creator>Fernhaber, Stephanie A ; McDougall-Covin, Patricia P</creator><contributor>Svante Andersson, Dr</contributor><creatorcontrib>Fernhaber, Stephanie A ; McDougall-Covin, Patricia P ; Svante Andersson, Dr</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to investigate how ventures manage the negative returns associated with higher levels of internationalization. Many new ventures are internationalizing to fully exploit new innovations and/or gain access to larger markets. Yet at some point the rising costs associated with internationalization outweigh any benefits, resulting in an inverted U-shaped relationship between internationalization and performance.
Design/methodology/approach
– New ventures are theorized to better manage high levels of internationalization by limiting exposure to other sources of risk. This can be achieved by leveraging greater size and/or limiting simultaneous diversification efforts on product innovation. To test the hypotheses, a regression using Heckman selection was run using a sample of 210 US-based, publicly held ventures in high-technology industries.
Findings
– The results confirm that when higher levels of internationalization are coupled with either a low emphasis on product innovation or larger size, the negative returns are mitigated and actually become positive.
Research limitations/implications
– A key implication lies in recognizing the role of risk management for internationalizing ventures. Future research could benefit by testing for generalizability in other countries as well as among privately held ventures.
Practical implications
– To manage the trade-offs associated at higher levels of internationalization, ventures need to maintain a low emphasis on product innovation or meet a threshold in terms of size.
Originality/value
– The value of this research lies in better understanding how ventures are able to overcome rising costs at higher levels of internationalization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0955-534X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7107</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/EBR-02-2013-0030</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Advantages ; Business ; Competition ; Constraining ; Costs ; Entrepreneurship ; Gain ; Globalization ; Hypotheses ; Innovations ; International business ; International markets ; Liability ; Product development ; Product innovation ; Profitability ; R&D ; Regression ; Research & development ; Research & development expenditures ; Risk ; Small & medium sized enterprises-SME ; Strategy ; Studies ; Tradeoffs</subject><ispartof>European business review, 2014-08, Vol.26 (5), p.406-420</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-4c0e1508fb30bafa758cb59defe4ec7104d02981e82c7f403ddb408ee3d6e2183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-4c0e1508fb30bafa758cb59defe4ec7104d02981e82c7f403ddb408ee3d6e2183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2084948941/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2084948941?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,36061,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Svante Andersson, Dr</contributor><creatorcontrib>Fernhaber, Stephanie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDougall-Covin, Patricia P</creatorcontrib><title>Is more always better? Risk trade-offs among internationalizing new ventures</title><title>European business review</title><description>Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to investigate how ventures manage the negative returns associated with higher levels of internationalization. Many new ventures are internationalizing to fully exploit new innovations and/or gain access to larger markets. Yet at some point the rising costs associated with internationalization outweigh any benefits, resulting in an inverted U-shaped relationship between internationalization and performance.
Design/methodology/approach
– New ventures are theorized to better manage high levels of internationalization by limiting exposure to other sources of risk. This can be achieved by leveraging greater size and/or limiting simultaneous diversification efforts on product innovation. To test the hypotheses, a regression using Heckman selection was run using a sample of 210 US-based, publicly held ventures in high-technology industries.
Findings
– The results confirm that when higher levels of internationalization are coupled with either a low emphasis on product innovation or larger size, the negative returns are mitigated and actually become positive.
Research limitations/implications
– A key implication lies in recognizing the role of risk management for internationalizing ventures. Future research could benefit by testing for generalizability in other countries as well as among privately held ventures.
Practical implications
– To manage the trade-offs associated at higher levels of internationalization, ventures need to maintain a low emphasis on product innovation or meet a threshold in terms of size.
Originality/value
– The value of this research lies in better understanding how ventures are able to overcome rising costs at higher levels of internationalization.</description><subject>Advantages</subject><subject>Business</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Constraining</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Entrepreneurship</subject><subject>Gain</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>International business</subject><subject>International markets</subject><subject>Liability</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Product innovation</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Regression</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Research & development expenditures</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Small & medium sized enterprises-SME</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tradeoffs</subject><issn>0955-534X</issn><issn>1758-7107</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNptkc1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvHgNevKyd_UizOYmW-gEFoSh4WzbJrKQm2bqbWOpf75Z6UTwNzPze8OYNIecMrhgDNZnfLilwyoEJCiDggIxYliqaMcgOyQjyNKWpkK_H5CSEFUAUZWpEFo8haZ3HxDQbsw1JgX2P_jpZ1uE96b2pkDprQ2Ja170ldReHnelr15mm_qpjq8NN8oldP3gMp-TImibg2U8dk5e7-fPsgS6e7h9nNwtaiiztqSwBWQrKFgIKY020WRZpXqFFiWU0LCvguWKoeJlZCaKqCgkKUVRT5EyJMbnc71179zFg6HVbhxKbxnTohqBZxlTOczkVEb34g67cEE9oguagZC5VLlmkYE-V3oXg0eq1r1vjt5qB3sWrY7wauN7Fq3fxRslkL8EWvWmq_xS_HiK-Abqqez4</recordid><startdate>20140805</startdate><enddate>20140805</enddate><creator>Fernhaber, Stephanie A</creator><creator>McDougall-Covin, Patricia P</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0Q</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140805</creationdate><title>Is more always better? Risk trade-offs among internationalizing new ventures</title><author>Fernhaber, Stephanie A ; McDougall-Covin, Patricia P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-4c0e1508fb30bafa758cb59defe4ec7104d02981e82c7f403ddb408ee3d6e2183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Advantages</topic><topic>Business</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Constraining</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Entrepreneurship</topic><topic>Gain</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>International business</topic><topic>International markets</topic><topic>Liability</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Product innovation</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Regression</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Research & development expenditures</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Small & medium sized enterprises-SME</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tradeoffs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fernhaber, Stephanie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDougall-Covin, Patricia P</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>European Business Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>European business review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fernhaber, Stephanie A</au><au>McDougall-Covin, Patricia P</au><au>Svante Andersson, Dr</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is more always better? Risk trade-offs among internationalizing new ventures</atitle><jtitle>European business review</jtitle><date>2014-08-05</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>406</spage><epage>420</epage><pages>406-420</pages><issn>0955-534X</issn><eissn>1758-7107</eissn><abstract>Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to investigate how ventures manage the negative returns associated with higher levels of internationalization. Many new ventures are internationalizing to fully exploit new innovations and/or gain access to larger markets. Yet at some point the rising costs associated with internationalization outweigh any benefits, resulting in an inverted U-shaped relationship between internationalization and performance.
Design/methodology/approach
– New ventures are theorized to better manage high levels of internationalization by limiting exposure to other sources of risk. This can be achieved by leveraging greater size and/or limiting simultaneous diversification efforts on product innovation. To test the hypotheses, a regression using Heckman selection was run using a sample of 210 US-based, publicly held ventures in high-technology industries.
Findings
– The results confirm that when higher levels of internationalization are coupled with either a low emphasis on product innovation or larger size, the negative returns are mitigated and actually become positive.
Research limitations/implications
– A key implication lies in recognizing the role of risk management for internationalizing ventures. Future research could benefit by testing for generalizability in other countries as well as among privately held ventures.
Practical implications
– To manage the trade-offs associated at higher levels of internationalization, ventures need to maintain a low emphasis on product innovation or meet a threshold in terms of size.
Originality/value
– The value of this research lies in better understanding how ventures are able to overcome rising costs at higher levels of internationalization.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/EBR-02-2013-0030</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0955-534X |
ispartof | European business review, 2014-08, Vol.26 (5), p.406-420 |
issn | 0955-534X 1758-7107 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2084948941 |
source | ABI/INFORM Global; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list) |
subjects | Advantages Business Competition Constraining Costs Entrepreneurship Gain Globalization Hypotheses Innovations International business International markets Liability Product development Product innovation Profitability R&D Regression Research & development Research & development expenditures Risk Small & medium sized enterprises-SME Strategy Studies Tradeoffs |
title | Is more always better? Risk trade-offs among internationalizing new ventures |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T17%3A04%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20more%20always%20better?%20Risk%20trade-offs%20among%20internationalizing%20new%20ventures&rft.jtitle=European%20business%20review&rft.au=Fernhaber,%20Stephanie%20A&rft.date=2014-08-05&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=406&rft.epage=420&rft.pages=406-420&rft.issn=0955-534X&rft.eissn=1758-7107&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/EBR-02-2013-0030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2084948941%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-4c0e1508fb30bafa758cb59defe4ec7104d02981e82c7f403ddb408ee3d6e2183%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2084948941&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |