Role and Discipline Relationships in a Transdisciplinary Biomedical Team: Structuration, Values Override and Context Scaffolding

Though accepted that "team science" is needed to tackle and conquer the health problems that are plaguing our society significant empirical evidence of team mechanisms and functional dynamics is still lacking in abundance. Through grounded methods the relationship between scientific discip...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:arXiv.org 2013-08
Main Author: Lotrecchiano, Gaetano R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Consortia
Empirical analysis
Organizational aspects
Scaffolding
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Lotrecchiano, Gaetano R
description Though accepted that "team science" is needed to tackle and conquer the health problems that are plaguing our society significant empirical evidence of team mechanisms and functional dynamics is still lacking in abundance. Through grounded methods the relationship between scientific disciplines and team roles was observed in a United States National Institutes of Health-funded (NIH) research consortium. Interviews and the Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI) were employed.. Findings show strong role and discipline idiosyncrasies that when viewed separately provide different insights into team functioning and change receptivity. When considered simultaneously, value-latent characteristics emerged showing self-perceived contributions to the team. This micro/meso analysis suggests that individual participation in team level interactions can inform the structuration of roles and disciplines in an attempt to tackle macro level problems.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2086106806</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2086106806</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20861068063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjUuLwjAUhYMwYJnxP1xwqxBTrcWlL2YnaJmtXJpbvZImNUnF2c1PV3zsZ3UW5_vO6YhEpelomI-V6opeCCcppcqmajJJE_G3dYYArYYlh5Ibw5ZgSwYjOxuO3ARgCwiFRxv0G0H_C3N2NWku0UBBWM9gF31bxtY_1AH8oGkpwOZC3rN-fiycjXSNsCuxqpzRbA9f4qNCE6j3yk_RX6-Kxfew8e58H4j7k2u9vVd7JfNsJLNcZun_qBtPyVEN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2086106806</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Role and Discipline Relationships in a Transdisciplinary Biomedical Team: Structuration, Values Override and Context Scaffolding</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Lotrecchiano, Gaetano R</creator><creatorcontrib>Lotrecchiano, Gaetano R</creatorcontrib><description>Though accepted that "team science" is needed to tackle and conquer the health problems that are plaguing our society significant empirical evidence of team mechanisms and functional dynamics is still lacking in abundance. Through grounded methods the relationship between scientific disciplines and team roles was observed in a United States National Institutes of Health-funded (NIH) research consortium. Interviews and the Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI) were employed.. Findings show strong role and discipline idiosyncrasies that when viewed separately provide different insights into team functioning and change receptivity. When considered simultaneously, value-latent characteristics emerged showing self-perceived contributions to the team. This micro/meso analysis suggests that individual participation in team level interactions can inform the structuration of roles and disciplines in an attempt to tackle macro level problems.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Consortia ; Empirical analysis ; Organizational aspects ; Scaffolding</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2013-08</ispartof><rights>2013. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2086106806?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,25752,37011,44589</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lotrecchiano, Gaetano R</creatorcontrib><title>Role and Discipline Relationships in a Transdisciplinary Biomedical Team: Structuration, Values Override and Context Scaffolding</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Though accepted that "team science" is needed to tackle and conquer the health problems that are plaguing our society significant empirical evidence of team mechanisms and functional dynamics is still lacking in abundance. Through grounded methods the relationship between scientific disciplines and team roles was observed in a United States National Institutes of Health-funded (NIH) research consortium. Interviews and the Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI) were employed.. Findings show strong role and discipline idiosyncrasies that when viewed separately provide different insights into team functioning and change receptivity. When considered simultaneously, value-latent characteristics emerged showing self-perceived contributions to the team. This micro/meso analysis suggests that individual participation in team level interactions can inform the structuration of roles and disciplines in an attempt to tackle macro level problems.</description><subject>Consortia</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Organizational aspects</subject><subject>Scaffolding</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjUuLwjAUhYMwYJnxP1xwqxBTrcWlL2YnaJmtXJpbvZImNUnF2c1PV3zsZ3UW5_vO6YhEpelomI-V6opeCCcppcqmajJJE_G3dYYArYYlh5Ibw5ZgSwYjOxuO3ARgCwiFRxv0G0H_C3N2NWku0UBBWM9gF31bxtY_1AH8oGkpwOZC3rN-fiycjXSNsCuxqpzRbA9f4qNCE6j3yk_RX6-Kxfew8e58H4j7k2u9vVd7JfNsJLNcZun_qBtPyVEN</recordid><startdate>20130806</startdate><enddate>20130806</enddate><creator>Lotrecchiano, Gaetano R</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130806</creationdate><title>Role and Discipline Relationships in a Transdisciplinary Biomedical Team: Structuration, Values Override and Context Scaffolding</title><author>Lotrecchiano, Gaetano R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20861068063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Consortia</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Organizational aspects</topic><topic>Scaffolding</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lotrecchiano, Gaetano R</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lotrecchiano, Gaetano R</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Role and Discipline Relationships in a Transdisciplinary Biomedical Team: Structuration, Values Override and Context Scaffolding</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2013-08-06</date><risdate>2013</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Though accepted that "team science" is needed to tackle and conquer the health problems that are plaguing our society significant empirical evidence of team mechanisms and functional dynamics is still lacking in abundance. Through grounded methods the relationship between scientific disciplines and team roles was observed in a United States National Institutes of Health-funded (NIH) research consortium. Interviews and the Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI) were employed.. Findings show strong role and discipline idiosyncrasies that when viewed separately provide different insights into team functioning and change receptivity. When considered simultaneously, value-latent characteristics emerged showing self-perceived contributions to the team. This micro/meso analysis suggests that individual participation in team level interactions can inform the structuration of roles and disciplines in an attempt to tackle macro level problems.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2013-08
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2086106806
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Consortia
Empirical analysis
Organizational aspects
Scaffolding
title Role and Discipline Relationships in a Transdisciplinary Biomedical Team: Structuration, Values Override and Context Scaffolding
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T22%3A32%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Role%20and%20Discipline%20Relationships%20in%20a%20Transdisciplinary%20Biomedical%20Team:%20Structuration,%20Values%20Override%20and%20Context%20Scaffolding&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Lotrecchiano,%20Gaetano%20R&rft.date=2013-08-06&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2086106806%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20861068063%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2086106806&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true