Loading…
A Trajectory Calculus for Qualitative Spatial Reasoning Using Answer Set Programming
Spatial information is often expressed using qualitative terms such as natural language expressions instead of coordinates; reasoning over such terms has several practical applications, such as bus routes planning. Representing and reasoning on trajectories is a specific case of qualitative spatial...
Saved in:
Published in: | Theory and practice of logic programming 2018-07, Vol.18 (3-4), p.355-371 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-34b78a703eb5cc4b0bd56911cf37669765fc3f1a438a22ea273639a0e4339d693 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-34b78a703eb5cc4b0bd56911cf37669765fc3f1a438a22ea273639a0e4339d693 |
container_end_page | 371 |
container_issue | 3-4 |
container_start_page | 355 |
container_title | Theory and practice of logic programming |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | BARYANNIS, GEORGE TACHMAZIDIS, ILIAS BATSAKIS, SOTIRIS ANTONIOU, GRIGORIS ALVIANO, MARIO SELLIS, TIMOS TSAI, PEI-WEI |
description | Spatial information is often expressed using qualitative terms such as natural language expressions instead of coordinates; reasoning over such terms has several practical applications, such as bus routes planning. Representing and reasoning on trajectories is a specific case of qualitative spatial reasoning that focuses on moving objects and their paths. In this work, we propose two versions of a trajectory calculus based on the allowed properties over trajectories, where trajectories are defined as a sequence of non-overlapping regions of a partitioned map. More specifically, if a given trajectory is allowed to start and finish at the same region, 6 base relations are defined (TC-6). If a given trajectory should have different start and finish regions but cycles are allowed within, 10 base relations are defined (TC-10). Both versions of the calculus are implemented as ASP programs; we propose several different encodings, including a generalised program capable of encoding any qualitative calculus in ASP. All proposed encodings are experimentally evaluated using a real-world dataset. Experiment results show that the best performing implementation can scale up to an input of 250 trajectories for TC-6 and 150 trajectories for TC-10 for the problem of discovering a consistent configuration, a significant improvement compared to previous ASP implementations for similar qualitative spatial and temporal calculi. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S147106841800011X |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2086200528</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S147106841800011X</cupid><sourcerecordid>2086200528</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-34b78a703eb5cc4b0bd56911cf37669765fc3f1a438a22ea273639a0e4339d693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1Lw0AQXUTBWv0B3hY8R2d2k83mWIpfUPCjLXgLk-2mpOSj7iZK_71bLXgQL_OGN--9gcfYJcI1AqY3c4xTBKVj1ACA-HbERoFKIgkaj793jPb3U3bm_SZIlBTxiC0mfOFoY03fuR2fUm2GevC87Bx_GaiueuqrD8vn24BU81dLvmurds2Xfj8nrf-0js9tz59dt3bUNIE-Zycl1d5eHHDMlne3i-lDNHu6f5xOZpGRCvpIxkWqKQVpi8SYuIBilagM0ZQyVSpLVVIaWSLFUpMQlkQqlcwIbCxltlKZHLOrn9yt694H6_t80w2uDS9zAVoJgETooMIflXGd986W-dZVDbldjpDvy8v_lBc88uChpnDVam1_o_93fQHATHBE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2086200528</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Trajectory Calculus for Qualitative Spatial Reasoning Using Answer Set Programming</title><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>BARYANNIS, GEORGE ; TACHMAZIDIS, ILIAS ; BATSAKIS, SOTIRIS ; ANTONIOU, GRIGORIS ; ALVIANO, MARIO ; SELLIS, TIMOS ; TSAI, PEI-WEI</creator><creatorcontrib>BARYANNIS, GEORGE ; TACHMAZIDIS, ILIAS ; BATSAKIS, SOTIRIS ; ANTONIOU, GRIGORIS ; ALVIANO, MARIO ; SELLIS, TIMOS ; TSAI, PEI-WEI</creatorcontrib><description>Spatial information is often expressed using qualitative terms such as natural language expressions instead of coordinates; reasoning over such terms has several practical applications, such as bus routes planning. Representing and reasoning on trajectories is a specific case of qualitative spatial reasoning that focuses on moving objects and their paths. In this work, we propose two versions of a trajectory calculus based on the allowed properties over trajectories, where trajectories are defined as a sequence of non-overlapping regions of a partitioned map. More specifically, if a given trajectory is allowed to start and finish at the same region, 6 base relations are defined (TC-6). If a given trajectory should have different start and finish regions but cycles are allowed within, 10 base relations are defined (TC-10). Both versions of the calculus are implemented as ASP programs; we propose several different encodings, including a generalised program capable of encoding any qualitative calculus in ASP. All proposed encodings are experimentally evaluated using a real-world dataset. Experiment results show that the best performing implementation can scale up to an input of 250 trajectories for TC-6 and 150 trajectories for TC-10 for the problem of discovering a consistent configuration, a significant improvement compared to previous ASP implementations for similar qualitative spatial and temporal calculi.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-0684</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-3081</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S147106841800011X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Calculus ; Cognition & reasoning ; Mathematical programming ; Natural language (computers) ; Original Article ; Qualitative reasoning ; Reasoning ; Spatial data ; Trajectories</subject><ispartof>Theory and practice of logic programming, 2018-07, Vol.18 (3-4), p.355-371</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-34b78a703eb5cc4b0bd56911cf37669765fc3f1a438a22ea273639a0e4339d693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-34b78a703eb5cc4b0bd56911cf37669765fc3f1a438a22ea273639a0e4339d693</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2118-5812</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S147106841800011X/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,72960</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>BARYANNIS, GEORGE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TACHMAZIDIS, ILIAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BATSAKIS, SOTIRIS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ANTONIOU, GRIGORIS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALVIANO, MARIO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SELLIS, TIMOS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TSAI, PEI-WEI</creatorcontrib><title>A Trajectory Calculus for Qualitative Spatial Reasoning Using Answer Set Programming</title><title>Theory and practice of logic programming</title><addtitle>Theory and Practice of Logic Programming</addtitle><description>Spatial information is often expressed using qualitative terms such as natural language expressions instead of coordinates; reasoning over such terms has several practical applications, such as bus routes planning. Representing and reasoning on trajectories is a specific case of qualitative spatial reasoning that focuses on moving objects and their paths. In this work, we propose two versions of a trajectory calculus based on the allowed properties over trajectories, where trajectories are defined as a sequence of non-overlapping regions of a partitioned map. More specifically, if a given trajectory is allowed to start and finish at the same region, 6 base relations are defined (TC-6). If a given trajectory should have different start and finish regions but cycles are allowed within, 10 base relations are defined (TC-10). Both versions of the calculus are implemented as ASP programs; we propose several different encodings, including a generalised program capable of encoding any qualitative calculus in ASP. All proposed encodings are experimentally evaluated using a real-world dataset. Experiment results show that the best performing implementation can scale up to an input of 250 trajectories for TC-6 and 150 trajectories for TC-10 for the problem of discovering a consistent configuration, a significant improvement compared to previous ASP implementations for similar qualitative spatial and temporal calculi.</description><subject>Calculus</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Mathematical programming</subject><subject>Natural language (computers)</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Qualitative reasoning</subject><subject>Reasoning</subject><subject>Spatial data</subject><subject>Trajectories</subject><issn>1471-0684</issn><issn>1475-3081</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UE1Lw0AQXUTBWv0B3hY8R2d2k83mWIpfUPCjLXgLk-2mpOSj7iZK_71bLXgQL_OGN--9gcfYJcI1AqY3c4xTBKVj1ACA-HbERoFKIgkaj793jPb3U3bm_SZIlBTxiC0mfOFoY03fuR2fUm2GevC87Bx_GaiueuqrD8vn24BU81dLvmurds2Xfj8nrf-0js9tz59dt3bUNIE-Zycl1d5eHHDMlne3i-lDNHu6f5xOZpGRCvpIxkWqKQVpi8SYuIBilagM0ZQyVSpLVVIaWSLFUpMQlkQqlcwIbCxltlKZHLOrn9yt694H6_t80w2uDS9zAVoJgETooMIflXGd986W-dZVDbldjpDvy8v_lBc88uChpnDVam1_o_93fQHATHBE</recordid><startdate>20180701</startdate><enddate>20180701</enddate><creator>BARYANNIS, GEORGE</creator><creator>TACHMAZIDIS, ILIAS</creator><creator>BATSAKIS, SOTIRIS</creator><creator>ANTONIOU, GRIGORIS</creator><creator>ALVIANO, MARIO</creator><creator>SELLIS, TIMOS</creator><creator>TSAI, PEI-WEI</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2118-5812</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180701</creationdate><title>A Trajectory Calculus for Qualitative Spatial Reasoning Using Answer Set Programming</title><author>BARYANNIS, GEORGE ; TACHMAZIDIS, ILIAS ; BATSAKIS, SOTIRIS ; ANTONIOU, GRIGORIS ; ALVIANO, MARIO ; SELLIS, TIMOS ; TSAI, PEI-WEI</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-34b78a703eb5cc4b0bd56911cf37669765fc3f1a438a22ea273639a0e4339d693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Calculus</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Mathematical programming</topic><topic>Natural language (computers)</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Qualitative reasoning</topic><topic>Reasoning</topic><topic>Spatial data</topic><topic>Trajectories</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BARYANNIS, GEORGE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TACHMAZIDIS, ILIAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BATSAKIS, SOTIRIS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ANTONIOU, GRIGORIS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALVIANO, MARIO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SELLIS, TIMOS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TSAI, PEI-WEI</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Theory and practice of logic programming</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BARYANNIS, GEORGE</au><au>TACHMAZIDIS, ILIAS</au><au>BATSAKIS, SOTIRIS</au><au>ANTONIOU, GRIGORIS</au><au>ALVIANO, MARIO</au><au>SELLIS, TIMOS</au><au>TSAI, PEI-WEI</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Trajectory Calculus for Qualitative Spatial Reasoning Using Answer Set Programming</atitle><jtitle>Theory and practice of logic programming</jtitle><addtitle>Theory and Practice of Logic Programming</addtitle><date>2018-07-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>355</spage><epage>371</epage><pages>355-371</pages><issn>1471-0684</issn><eissn>1475-3081</eissn><abstract>Spatial information is often expressed using qualitative terms such as natural language expressions instead of coordinates; reasoning over such terms has several practical applications, such as bus routes planning. Representing and reasoning on trajectories is a specific case of qualitative spatial reasoning that focuses on moving objects and their paths. In this work, we propose two versions of a trajectory calculus based on the allowed properties over trajectories, where trajectories are defined as a sequence of non-overlapping regions of a partitioned map. More specifically, if a given trajectory is allowed to start and finish at the same region, 6 base relations are defined (TC-6). If a given trajectory should have different start and finish regions but cycles are allowed within, 10 base relations are defined (TC-10). Both versions of the calculus are implemented as ASP programs; we propose several different encodings, including a generalised program capable of encoding any qualitative calculus in ASP. All proposed encodings are experimentally evaluated using a real-world dataset. Experiment results show that the best performing implementation can scale up to an input of 250 trajectories for TC-6 and 150 trajectories for TC-10 for the problem of discovering a consistent configuration, a significant improvement compared to previous ASP implementations for similar qualitative spatial and temporal calculi.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S147106841800011X</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2118-5812</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-0684 |
ispartof | Theory and practice of logic programming, 2018-07, Vol.18 (3-4), p.355-371 |
issn | 1471-0684 1475-3081 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2086200528 |
source | Cambridge University Press |
subjects | Calculus Cognition & reasoning Mathematical programming Natural language (computers) Original Article Qualitative reasoning Reasoning Spatial data Trajectories |
title | A Trajectory Calculus for Qualitative Spatial Reasoning Using Answer Set Programming |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T09%3A27%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Trajectory%20Calculus%20for%20Qualitative%20Spatial%20Reasoning%20Using%20Answer%20Set%20Programming&rft.jtitle=Theory%20and%20practice%20of%20logic%20programming&rft.au=BARYANNIS,%20GEORGE&rft.date=2018-07-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=355&rft.epage=371&rft.pages=355-371&rft.issn=1471-0684&rft.eissn=1475-3081&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S147106841800011X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2086200528%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-34b78a703eb5cc4b0bd56911cf37669765fc3f1a438a22ea273639a0e4339d693%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2086200528&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S147106841800011X&rfr_iscdi=true |