Loading…

Performance of soybean varieties differs according to yield class: a case study from Southern Brazil

Considering environmental conditions in the selection of soybean ( Glycine max L.) varieties is a key strategy in ensuring high crop yield. Recently, the new technology of multi-hybrid planters has been making it more practical for farmers to plant different varieties together. However, there remain...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Precision agriculture 2019-06, Vol.20 (3), p.520-540
Main Authors: Corassa, G. M., Santi, A. L., Amado, T. J. C., Reimche, G. B., Gaviraghi, R., Bisognin, M. B., Pires, J. L. F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-608a01133b18853c1d2ad2b023cb8b1e71b8a5f5d08215739fa1e61bb8719aff3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-608a01133b18853c1d2ad2b023cb8b1e71b8a5f5d08215739fa1e61bb8719aff3
container_end_page 540
container_issue 3
container_start_page 520
container_title Precision agriculture
container_volume 20
creator Corassa, G. M.
Santi, A. L.
Amado, T. J. C.
Reimche, G. B.
Gaviraghi, R.
Bisognin, M. B.
Pires, J. L. F.
description Considering environmental conditions in the selection of soybean ( Glycine max L.) varieties is a key strategy in ensuring high crop yield. Recently, the new technology of multi-hybrid planters has been making it more practical for farmers to plant different varieties together. However, there remains a gap in understanding how different varieties perform in terms of yield class; this knowledge is essential for technology adoption. The objectives of this study were to: (i) evaluate the agronomic performance of six soybean varieties at varying yield class (YC); (ii) quantify the economic return of within-field varieties arrangement; and (iii) propose guidelines for multi-variety soybean planting in Southern Brazil. The experimental design comprised a factorial split-plot set up in a randomized complete block design, with three YC [low (LY), medium (MY) and high yielding (HY)] and six varieties, replicated three times. The main findings were: (a) soybean variety performance differed according to YC; (b) the farmer-selected variety performed well for HY and MY; (c) varieties with high plant height (PH) should be placed in LY, where PH reduction and an increase in the number of pods and yield were recorded; (d) varieties with low PH should be placed in HY, avoiding excessive plant growth and yield penalty; (e) within-field variety arrangement increased yield by 2.10% and 11.50% and economic return by US$ 26 and 137 ha −1 for HY and LY, respectively. The results support the emergent concept of within-field multi-variety soybean planting in Southern Brazil.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11119-018-9595-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2086507434</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2086507434</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-608a01133b18853c1d2ad2b023cb8b1e71b8a5f5d08215739fa1e61bb8719aff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8Bz9VMsmlTb7r4BQsK6jnkc-3SbdakFeqvN0sFT85l5vA-M8yD0DmQSyCkukqQqy4IiKLmNS_IAZoBr1gBJYjDPDPBC0p5eYxOUtoQkqkFnSH74qIPcas643DwOIVRO9XhLxUb1zcuYdt472LCypgQbdOtcR_w2LjWYtOqlK6xwkYlh1M_2BH7GLb4NQz9h4sdvo3qu2lP0ZFXbXJnv32O3u_v3paPxer54Wl5syoM43VflEQoAsCYBiE4M2CpslQTyowWGlwFWijuuSWC7n-rvQJXgtaiglp5z-boYtq7i-FzcKmXmzDELp-UlIiSk2rBFjkFU8rEkFJ0Xu5is1VxlEDkXqacZMosU-5lSpIZOjEpZ7u1i3-b_4d-AFNAd2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2086507434</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance of soybean varieties differs according to yield class: a case study from Southern Brazil</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Corassa, G. M. ; Santi, A. L. ; Amado, T. J. C. ; Reimche, G. B. ; Gaviraghi, R. ; Bisognin, M. B. ; Pires, J. L. F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Corassa, G. M. ; Santi, A. L. ; Amado, T. J. C. ; Reimche, G. B. ; Gaviraghi, R. ; Bisognin, M. B. ; Pires, J. L. F.</creatorcontrib><description>Considering environmental conditions in the selection of soybean ( Glycine max L.) varieties is a key strategy in ensuring high crop yield. Recently, the new technology of multi-hybrid planters has been making it more practical for farmers to plant different varieties together. However, there remains a gap in understanding how different varieties perform in terms of yield class; this knowledge is essential for technology adoption. The objectives of this study were to: (i) evaluate the agronomic performance of six soybean varieties at varying yield class (YC); (ii) quantify the economic return of within-field varieties arrangement; and (iii) propose guidelines for multi-variety soybean planting in Southern Brazil. The experimental design comprised a factorial split-plot set up in a randomized complete block design, with three YC [low (LY), medium (MY) and high yielding (HY)] and six varieties, replicated three times. The main findings were: (a) soybean variety performance differed according to YC; (b) the farmer-selected variety performed well for HY and MY; (c) varieties with high plant height (PH) should be placed in LY, where PH reduction and an increase in the number of pods and yield were recorded; (d) varieties with low PH should be placed in HY, avoiding excessive plant growth and yield penalty; (e) within-field variety arrangement increased yield by 2.10% and 11.50% and economic return by US$ 26 and 137 ha −1 for HY and LY, respectively. The results support the emergent concept of within-field multi-variety soybean planting in Southern Brazil.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1385-2256</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1618</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11119-018-9595-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Agronomy ; Atmospheric Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Chemistry and Earth Sciences ; Computer Science ; Crop yield ; Design of experiments ; Economics ; Environmental conditions ; Experimental design ; Farmers ; Glycine max ; Life Sciences ; New technology ; Physics ; Plant growth ; Planting ; Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry ; Soil Science &amp; Conservation ; Soybeans ; Statistics for Engineering ; Technology adoption ; Technology utilization</subject><ispartof>Precision agriculture, 2019-06, Vol.20 (3), p.520-540</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Precision Agriculture is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-608a01133b18853c1d2ad2b023cb8b1e71b8a5f5d08215739fa1e61bb8719aff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-608a01133b18853c1d2ad2b023cb8b1e71b8a5f5d08215739fa1e61bb8719aff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2086507434/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2086507434?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11686,27922,27923,36058,44361,74665</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Corassa, G. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santi, A. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amado, T. J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reimche, G. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaviraghi, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bisognin, M. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pires, J. L. F.</creatorcontrib><title>Performance of soybean varieties differs according to yield class: a case study from Southern Brazil</title><title>Precision agriculture</title><addtitle>Precision Agric</addtitle><description>Considering environmental conditions in the selection of soybean ( Glycine max L.) varieties is a key strategy in ensuring high crop yield. Recently, the new technology of multi-hybrid planters has been making it more practical for farmers to plant different varieties together. However, there remains a gap in understanding how different varieties perform in terms of yield class; this knowledge is essential for technology adoption. The objectives of this study were to: (i) evaluate the agronomic performance of six soybean varieties at varying yield class (YC); (ii) quantify the economic return of within-field varieties arrangement; and (iii) propose guidelines for multi-variety soybean planting in Southern Brazil. The experimental design comprised a factorial split-plot set up in a randomized complete block design, with three YC [low (LY), medium (MY) and high yielding (HY)] and six varieties, replicated three times. The main findings were: (a) soybean variety performance differed according to YC; (b) the farmer-selected variety performed well for HY and MY; (c) varieties with high plant height (PH) should be placed in LY, where PH reduction and an increase in the number of pods and yield were recorded; (d) varieties with low PH should be placed in HY, avoiding excessive plant growth and yield penalty; (e) within-field variety arrangement increased yield by 2.10% and 11.50% and economic return by US$ 26 and 137 ha −1 for HY and LY, respectively. The results support the emergent concept of within-field multi-variety soybean planting in Southern Brazil.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agronomy</subject><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Chemistry and Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Design of experiments</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Experimental design</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Glycine max</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>New technology</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Planting</subject><subject>Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry</subject><subject>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Statistics for Engineering</subject><subject>Technology adoption</subject><subject>Technology utilization</subject><issn>1385-2256</issn><issn>1573-1618</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8Bz9VMsmlTb7r4BQsK6jnkc-3SbdakFeqvN0sFT85l5vA-M8yD0DmQSyCkukqQqy4IiKLmNS_IAZoBr1gBJYjDPDPBC0p5eYxOUtoQkqkFnSH74qIPcas643DwOIVRO9XhLxUb1zcuYdt472LCypgQbdOtcR_w2LjWYtOqlK6xwkYlh1M_2BH7GLb4NQz9h4sdvo3qu2lP0ZFXbXJnv32O3u_v3paPxer54Wl5syoM43VflEQoAsCYBiE4M2CpslQTyowWGlwFWijuuSWC7n-rvQJXgtaiglp5z-boYtq7i-FzcKmXmzDELp-UlIiSk2rBFjkFU8rEkFJ0Xu5is1VxlEDkXqacZMosU-5lSpIZOjEpZ7u1i3-b_4d-AFNAd2g</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Corassa, G. M.</creator><creator>Santi, A. L.</creator><creator>Amado, T. J. C.</creator><creator>Reimche, G. B.</creator><creator>Gaviraghi, R.</creator><creator>Bisognin, M. B.</creator><creator>Pires, J. L. F.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Performance of soybean varieties differs according to yield class: a case study from Southern Brazil</title><author>Corassa, G. M. ; Santi, A. L. ; Amado, T. J. C. ; Reimche, G. B. ; Gaviraghi, R. ; Bisognin, M. B. ; Pires, J. L. F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-608a01133b18853c1d2ad2b023cb8b1e71b8a5f5d08215739fa1e61bb8719aff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agronomy</topic><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Chemistry and Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Design of experiments</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Experimental design</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Glycine max</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>New technology</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Planting</topic><topic>Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry</topic><topic>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Statistics for Engineering</topic><topic>Technology adoption</topic><topic>Technology utilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Corassa, G. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santi, A. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amado, T. J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reimche, G. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaviraghi, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bisognin, M. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pires, J. L. F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI-INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Precision agriculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Corassa, G. M.</au><au>Santi, A. L.</au><au>Amado, T. J. C.</au><au>Reimche, G. B.</au><au>Gaviraghi, R.</au><au>Bisognin, M. B.</au><au>Pires, J. L. F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance of soybean varieties differs according to yield class: a case study from Southern Brazil</atitle><jtitle>Precision agriculture</jtitle><stitle>Precision Agric</stitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>520</spage><epage>540</epage><pages>520-540</pages><issn>1385-2256</issn><eissn>1573-1618</eissn><abstract>Considering environmental conditions in the selection of soybean ( Glycine max L.) varieties is a key strategy in ensuring high crop yield. Recently, the new technology of multi-hybrid planters has been making it more practical for farmers to plant different varieties together. However, there remains a gap in understanding how different varieties perform in terms of yield class; this knowledge is essential for technology adoption. The objectives of this study were to: (i) evaluate the agronomic performance of six soybean varieties at varying yield class (YC); (ii) quantify the economic return of within-field varieties arrangement; and (iii) propose guidelines for multi-variety soybean planting in Southern Brazil. The experimental design comprised a factorial split-plot set up in a randomized complete block design, with three YC [low (LY), medium (MY) and high yielding (HY)] and six varieties, replicated three times. The main findings were: (a) soybean variety performance differed according to YC; (b) the farmer-selected variety performed well for HY and MY; (c) varieties with high plant height (PH) should be placed in LY, where PH reduction and an increase in the number of pods and yield were recorded; (d) varieties with low PH should be placed in HY, avoiding excessive plant growth and yield penalty; (e) within-field variety arrangement increased yield by 2.10% and 11.50% and economic return by US$ 26 and 137 ha −1 for HY and LY, respectively. The results support the emergent concept of within-field multi-variety soybean planting in Southern Brazil.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11119-018-9595-0</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1385-2256
ispartof Precision agriculture, 2019-06, Vol.20 (3), p.520-540
issn 1385-2256
1573-1618
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2086507434
source ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); Springer Nature
subjects Agriculture
Agronomy
Atmospheric Sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Chemistry and Earth Sciences
Computer Science
Crop yield
Design of experiments
Economics
Environmental conditions
Experimental design
Farmers
Glycine max
Life Sciences
New technology
Physics
Plant growth
Planting
Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry
Soil Science & Conservation
Soybeans
Statistics for Engineering
Technology adoption
Technology utilization
title Performance of soybean varieties differs according to yield class: a case study from Southern Brazil
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T10%3A27%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20of%20soybean%20varieties%20differs%20according%20to%20yield%20class:%20a%20case%20study%20from%20Southern%20Brazil&rft.jtitle=Precision%20agriculture&rft.au=Corassa,%20G.%20M.&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=520&rft.epage=540&rft.pages=520-540&rft.issn=1385-2256&rft.eissn=1573-1618&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11119-018-9595-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2086507434%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-608a01133b18853c1d2ad2b023cb8b1e71b8a5f5d08215739fa1e61bb8719aff3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2086507434&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true