Loading…

GDI fuel sprays of light naphtha, PRF95 and gasoline using a piezoelectric injector under different ambient pressures

•Spray from a gasoline direct injection (GDI) piezoelectric fuel injector was tested.•Macroscopic spray characteristics were measured for light naphtha, PRF 95, and E10 gasoline.•Effects of ambient pressure were investigated and increasing ambient pressure leads to larger spray angle and shorter pen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Fuel (Guildford) 2018-07, Vol.223, p.294-311
Main Authors: Wu, Zengyang, Wang, Libing, Badra, Jihad A., Roberts, William L., Fang, Tiegang
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Spray from a gasoline direct injection (GDI) piezoelectric fuel injector was tested.•Macroscopic spray characteristics were measured for light naphtha, PRF 95, and E10 gasoline.•Effects of ambient pressure were investigated and increasing ambient pressure leads to larger spray angle and shorter penetration.•Minor differences among the three fuels are observed for the same ambient conditions. This study investigates fuel sprays of light naphtha (LN), primary reference fuel (PRF) and gasoline under different ambient pressures with an outwardly opening piezo gasoline direct injection (GDI) fuel injector. The tested gasoline fuel (regular grade with up to 10% ethanol, E10) was obtained by mixing fuels with AKI (the average of the research octane number (RON) and the motor octane number (MON)) of 87 from three local gas stations. Primary reference fuel (PRF) is commonly used as gasoline surrogate fuel and is blended by iso-octane and n-heptane. PRF95 is the blend of 95% iso-octane and 5% n-heptane by volume. LN fuel was provided by Saudi Aramco Oil Company. Five different ambient pressure conditions varied from 1 bar to 10 bar were tested. The spray was visualized by applying a Mie-scattering technique and a high-speed camera was employed to capture the spray images. The spray structure, spray angle, spray penetration length and spray front fluctuation were analyzed and compared among three fuels. Spray images show that a clear filamentary hollow-cone spray structure is formed for all three fuels at atmospheric conditions, and toroidal recirculation vortexes are observed at the downstream spray edges. A higher ambient pressure leads to a stronger vortex located closer to the injector outlet. Generally speaking, larger spray angles are found under higher ambient pressure conditions for all three fuels. Gasoline fuel always has the largest spray angle for each ambient pressure, while PRF95 has the smallest at most time. For each fuel, the spray front penetration length and spray front penetration velocity decrease with increasing ambient pressure. LN, PRF95 and gasoline show similar penetration length and velocity under the tested conditions. A two-stage spray front fluctuation pattern is observed for all three fuels. Stage one begins from the start of the injection and ends at 450–500 μs after the start of the injection trigger (ASOIT) with a slow fluctuation increase for all ambient conditions. After Stage one, the spray front fluctuation increases rapidly to
ISSN:0016-2361
1873-7153
DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2018.03.009