Loading…

Verteilungswirkungen alternativer Konzepte zur Familienförderung

This article analyses for the first time distributive effects of family support implied in German income tax law for the different legal states of 1995, 2003, 2005 and for the so called "Karlsruher Entwurf" on the basis of single data sets from the 10% sample of the income tax statistics p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 2004-11, Vol.224 (6), p.696
Main Author: Maiterth, Ralf
Format: Article
Language:eng ; ger
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page 696
container_title Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik
container_volume 224
creator Maiterth, Ralf
description This article analyses for the first time distributive effects of family support implied in German income tax law for the different legal states of 1995, 2003, 2005 and for the so called "Karlsruher Entwurf" on the basis of single data sets from the 10% sample of the income tax statistics provided by the German Federal Statistical Office. Family support within the scope of the income splitting method induces a very inhomogeneous tax relief for married couples which increases with higher family incomes. About one third of the married couples do not or only very scarcely benefit from income splitting independent of the legal state. About one quarter of the entire national tax loss of approximately 30 billion euro p.a. due to the splitting method accounts for less than 7% of all married couples. In contrast to the varying income taxation of married couples child support is - except for the legal state of 1995 - widely independent of family income. Within the current national child support, which amounts to about 32 billion euro p.a. in 2003 and therefore nearly doubles the amount of 1995, the current child allowance is - according to amount - only marginal. The "Karlsruher Entwurf" solely grants direct monetary child benefits that amount to 49 billion euro and therefore offers the by far highest support of families with children. To substitute the current national child support for a family splitting of income for tax purposes would - accordant with the splitting of income between spouses - induce a very inhomogeneous child support. However, the national budget would be - on the other hand - burdened to a clearly lesser extent. A child support that combines family income splitting with child benefit would have impacts that are similar to the current national child support.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_208731453</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>777568761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2087314533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjYz0zUwsYxgYeA0MDAy1DUxMDLnYOAqLs4Cco0NjY05GRzDUotKUjNzSvPSi8szi7KBdGqeQmJOSWpRXmJJZllqkYJ3fl5VakFJqkJVaZGCW2JuZk5mal7a4W1FKalFQOU8DKxpiTnFqbxQmptByc01xNlDt6Aov7A0tbgkPiu_FGhYTnG8kYGFubGhiamxMVGKAB9QPKc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>208731453</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Verteilungswirkungen alternativer Konzepte zur Familienförderung</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><creator>Maiterth, Ralf</creator><creatorcontrib>Maiterth, Ralf</creatorcontrib><description>This article analyses for the first time distributive effects of family support implied in German income tax law for the different legal states of 1995, 2003, 2005 and for the so called "Karlsruher Entwurf" on the basis of single data sets from the 10% sample of the income tax statistics provided by the German Federal Statistical Office. Family support within the scope of the income splitting method induces a very inhomogeneous tax relief for married couples which increases with higher family incomes. About one third of the married couples do not or only very scarcely benefit from income splitting independent of the legal state. About one quarter of the entire national tax loss of approximately 30 billion euro p.a. due to the splitting method accounts for less than 7% of all married couples. In contrast to the varying income taxation of married couples child support is - except for the legal state of 1995 - widely independent of family income. Within the current national child support, which amounts to about 32 billion euro p.a. in 2003 and therefore nearly doubles the amount of 1995, the current child allowance is - according to amount - only marginal. The "Karlsruher Entwurf" solely grants direct monetary child benefits that amount to 49 billion euro and therefore offers the by far highest support of families with children. To substitute the current national child support for a family splitting of income for tax purposes would - accordant with the splitting of income between spouses - induce a very inhomogeneous child support. However, the national budget would be - on the other hand - burdened to a clearly lesser extent. A child support that combines family income splitting with child benefit would have impacts that are similar to the current national child support.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-4027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2366-049X</identifier><language>eng ; ger</language><publisher>Stuttgart: Walter de Gruyter GmbH</publisher><subject>Child support ; Couples ; Families &amp; family life ; Family income ; Income taxes ; Social support ; Statistical analysis ; Studies ; Taxation economics</subject><ispartof>Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 2004-11, Vol.224 (6), p.696</ispartof><rights>Copyright Lucius &amp; Lucius Verlagsgesellschaft mbH Nov 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/208731453/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/208731453?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,11675,12834,33210,36047,44350,74650</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maiterth, Ralf</creatorcontrib><title>Verteilungswirkungen alternativer Konzepte zur Familienförderung</title><title>Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik</title><description>This article analyses for the first time distributive effects of family support implied in German income tax law for the different legal states of 1995, 2003, 2005 and for the so called "Karlsruher Entwurf" on the basis of single data sets from the 10% sample of the income tax statistics provided by the German Federal Statistical Office. Family support within the scope of the income splitting method induces a very inhomogeneous tax relief for married couples which increases with higher family incomes. About one third of the married couples do not or only very scarcely benefit from income splitting independent of the legal state. About one quarter of the entire national tax loss of approximately 30 billion euro p.a. due to the splitting method accounts for less than 7% of all married couples. In contrast to the varying income taxation of married couples child support is - except for the legal state of 1995 - widely independent of family income. Within the current national child support, which amounts to about 32 billion euro p.a. in 2003 and therefore nearly doubles the amount of 1995, the current child allowance is - according to amount - only marginal. The "Karlsruher Entwurf" solely grants direct monetary child benefits that amount to 49 billion euro and therefore offers the by far highest support of families with children. To substitute the current national child support for a family splitting of income for tax purposes would - accordant with the splitting of income between spouses - induce a very inhomogeneous child support. However, the national budget would be - on the other hand - burdened to a clearly lesser extent. A child support that combines family income splitting with child benefit would have impacts that are similar to the current national child support.</description><subject>Child support</subject><subject>Couples</subject><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>Family income</subject><subject>Income taxes</subject><subject>Social support</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Taxation economics</subject><issn>0021-4027</issn><issn>2366-049X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjYz0zUwsYxgYeA0MDAy1DUxMDLnYOAqLs4Cco0NjY05GRzDUotKUjNzSvPSi8szi7KBdGqeQmJOSWpRXmJJZllqkYJ3fl5VakFJqkJVaZGCW2JuZk5mal7a4W1FKalFQOU8DKxpiTnFqbxQmptByc01xNlDt6Aov7A0tbgkPiu_FGhYTnG8kYGFubGhiamxMVGKAB9QPKc</recordid><startdate>20041101</startdate><enddate>20041101</enddate><creator>Maiterth, Ralf</creator><general>Walter de Gruyter GmbH</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041101</creationdate><title>Verteilungswirkungen alternativer Konzepte zur Familienförderung</title><author>Maiterth, Ralf</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2087314533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; ger</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Child support</topic><topic>Couples</topic><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>Family income</topic><topic>Income taxes</topic><topic>Social support</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Taxation economics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maiterth, Ralf</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maiterth, Ralf</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Verteilungswirkungen alternativer Konzepte zur Familienförderung</atitle><jtitle>Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik</jtitle><date>2004-11-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>224</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>696</spage><pages>696-</pages><issn>0021-4027</issn><eissn>2366-049X</eissn><abstract>This article analyses for the first time distributive effects of family support implied in German income tax law for the different legal states of 1995, 2003, 2005 and for the so called "Karlsruher Entwurf" on the basis of single data sets from the 10% sample of the income tax statistics provided by the German Federal Statistical Office. Family support within the scope of the income splitting method induces a very inhomogeneous tax relief for married couples which increases with higher family incomes. About one third of the married couples do not or only very scarcely benefit from income splitting independent of the legal state. About one quarter of the entire national tax loss of approximately 30 billion euro p.a. due to the splitting method accounts for less than 7% of all married couples. In contrast to the varying income taxation of married couples child support is - except for the legal state of 1995 - widely independent of family income. Within the current national child support, which amounts to about 32 billion euro p.a. in 2003 and therefore nearly doubles the amount of 1995, the current child allowance is - according to amount - only marginal. The "Karlsruher Entwurf" solely grants direct monetary child benefits that amount to 49 billion euro and therefore offers the by far highest support of families with children. To substitute the current national child support for a family splitting of income for tax purposes would - accordant with the splitting of income between spouses - induce a very inhomogeneous child support. However, the national budget would be - on the other hand - burdened to a clearly lesser extent. A child support that combines family income splitting with child benefit would have impacts that are similar to the current national child support.</abstract><cop>Stuttgart</cop><pub>Walter de Gruyter GmbH</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-4027
ispartof Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 2004-11, Vol.224 (6), p.696
issn 0021-4027
2366-049X
language eng ; ger
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_208731453
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; ABI/INFORM Global
subjects Child support
Couples
Families & family life
Family income
Income taxes
Social support
Statistical analysis
Studies
Taxation economics
title Verteilungswirkungen alternativer Konzepte zur Familienförderung
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T17%3A53%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Verteilungswirkungen%20alternativer%20Konzepte%20zur%20Familienf%C3%B6rderung&rft.jtitle=Jahrb%C3%BCcher%20f%C3%BCr%20National%C3%B6konomie%20und%20Statistik&rft.au=Maiterth,%20Ralf&rft.date=2004-11-01&rft.volume=224&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=696&rft.pages=696-&rft.issn=0021-4027&rft.eissn=2366-049X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E777568761%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2087314533%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=208731453&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true