Loading…
Implications of Two Type Ia Supernova Populations for Cosmological Measurements
Recent work suggests that Type Ia supernovae (SNe) are composed of two distinct populations: prompt and delayed. By explicitly incorporating properties of host galaxies, it may be possible to target and eliminate systematic differences between these two putative populations. However, any resulting {...
Saved in:
Published in: | arXiv.org 2008-07 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Sarkar, Devdeep Amblard, Alexandre Cooray, Asantha Holz, Daniel E |
description | Recent work suggests that Type Ia supernovae (SNe) are composed of two distinct populations: prompt and delayed. By explicitly incorporating properties of host galaxies, it may be possible to target and eliminate systematic differences between these two putative populations. However, any resulting {\em post}-calibration shift in luminosity between the components will cause a redshift-dependent systematic shift in the Hubble diagram. Utilizing an existing sample of 192 SNe Ia, we find that the average luminosity difference between prompt and delayed SNe is constrained to be \((4.5 \pm 8.9)%\). If the absolute difference between the two populations is 0.025 mag, and this is ignored when fitting for cosmological parameters, then the dark energy equation of state (EOS) determined from a sample of 2300 SNe Ia is biased at \(\sim1\sigma\). By incorporating the possibility of a two-population systematic, this bias can be eliminated. However, assuming no prior on the strength of the two-population effect, the uncertainty in the best-fit EOS is increased by a factor of 2.5, when compared to the equivalent sample with no underlying two-population systematic. To avoid introducing a bias in the EOS parameters, or significantly degrading the measurement accuracy, it is necessary to control the post-calibration luminosity difference between prompt and delayed SN populations to better than 0.025 mag. |
doi_str_mv | 10.48550/arxiv.0806.3267 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2087515624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2087515624</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a514-58574ac6ea12806269d1bb2d5f0c533f5fb292b2451b9caf2a0d7014d2c1fe243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjktLxDAUhYMgOIyzdxlw3Xpzk9vHUoqPwsgIdj-kbSId2qYm7aj_3oKzOnD4zoOxOwGxyojgQfuf7hxDBkksMUmv2AalFFGmEG_YLoQTAKw-EskNO5TD1HeNnjs3Bu4sr74dr34nw0vNP5bJ-NGdNX9309JfIOs8L1wYXO8-12TP34wOizeDGedwy66t7oPZXXTLquenqniN9oeXsnjcR5qEiiijVOkmMVrg-hOTvBV1jS1ZaEhKS7bGHGtUJOq80RY1tCkI1WIjrEElt-z-v3by7msxYT6e3OLHdfGIkKUkKFmpP6GtUDw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2087515624</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implications of Two Type Ia Supernova Populations for Cosmological Measurements</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Sarkar, Devdeep ; Amblard, Alexandre ; Cooray, Asantha ; Holz, Daniel E</creator><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Devdeep ; Amblard, Alexandre ; Cooray, Asantha ; Holz, Daniel E</creatorcontrib><description>Recent work suggests that Type Ia supernovae (SNe) are composed of two distinct populations: prompt and delayed. By explicitly incorporating properties of host galaxies, it may be possible to target and eliminate systematic differences between these two putative populations. However, any resulting {\em post}-calibration shift in luminosity between the components will cause a redshift-dependent systematic shift in the Hubble diagram. Utilizing an existing sample of 192 SNe Ia, we find that the average luminosity difference between prompt and delayed SNe is constrained to be \((4.5 \pm 8.9)%\). If the absolute difference between the two populations is 0.025 mag, and this is ignored when fitting for cosmological parameters, then the dark energy equation of state (EOS) determined from a sample of 2300 SNe Ia is biased at \(\sim1\sigma\). By incorporating the possibility of a two-population systematic, this bias can be eliminated. However, assuming no prior on the strength of the two-population effect, the uncertainty in the best-fit EOS is increased by a factor of 2.5, when compared to the equivalent sample with no underlying two-population systematic. To avoid introducing a bias in the EOS parameters, or significantly degrading the measurement accuracy, it is necessary to control the post-calibration luminosity difference between prompt and delayed SN populations to better than 0.025 mag.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.0806.3267</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Bias ; Calibration ; Dark energy ; Equations of state ; Galaxies ; Hubble diagram ; Luminosity ; Parameters ; Populations ; Red shift ; Supernovae</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2008-07</ispartof><rights>2008. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2087515624?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,25753,27925,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Devdeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amblard, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooray, Asantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holz, Daniel E</creatorcontrib><title>Implications of Two Type Ia Supernova Populations for Cosmological Measurements</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Recent work suggests that Type Ia supernovae (SNe) are composed of two distinct populations: prompt and delayed. By explicitly incorporating properties of host galaxies, it may be possible to target and eliminate systematic differences between these two putative populations. However, any resulting {\em post}-calibration shift in luminosity between the components will cause a redshift-dependent systematic shift in the Hubble diagram. Utilizing an existing sample of 192 SNe Ia, we find that the average luminosity difference between prompt and delayed SNe is constrained to be \((4.5 \pm 8.9)%\). If the absolute difference between the two populations is 0.025 mag, and this is ignored when fitting for cosmological parameters, then the dark energy equation of state (EOS) determined from a sample of 2300 SNe Ia is biased at \(\sim1\sigma\). By incorporating the possibility of a two-population systematic, this bias can be eliminated. However, assuming no prior on the strength of the two-population effect, the uncertainty in the best-fit EOS is increased by a factor of 2.5, when compared to the equivalent sample with no underlying two-population systematic. To avoid introducing a bias in the EOS parameters, or significantly degrading the measurement accuracy, it is necessary to control the post-calibration luminosity difference between prompt and delayed SN populations to better than 0.025 mag.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Dark energy</subject><subject>Equations of state</subject><subject>Galaxies</subject><subject>Hubble diagram</subject><subject>Luminosity</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Red shift</subject><subject>Supernovae</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNotjktLxDAUhYMgOIyzdxlw3Xpzk9vHUoqPwsgIdj-kbSId2qYm7aj_3oKzOnD4zoOxOwGxyojgQfuf7hxDBkksMUmv2AalFFGmEG_YLoQTAKw-EskNO5TD1HeNnjs3Bu4sr74dr34nw0vNP5bJ-NGdNX9309JfIOs8L1wYXO8-12TP34wOizeDGedwy66t7oPZXXTLquenqniN9oeXsnjcR5qEiiijVOkmMVrg-hOTvBV1jS1ZaEhKS7bGHGtUJOq80RY1tCkI1WIjrEElt-z-v3by7msxYT6e3OLHdfGIkKUkKFmpP6GtUDw</recordid><startdate>20080721</startdate><enddate>20080721</enddate><creator>Sarkar, Devdeep</creator><creator>Amblard, Alexandre</creator><creator>Cooray, Asantha</creator><creator>Holz, Daniel E</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080721</creationdate><title>Implications of Two Type Ia Supernova Populations for Cosmological Measurements</title><author>Sarkar, Devdeep ; Amblard, Alexandre ; Cooray, Asantha ; Holz, Daniel E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a514-58574ac6ea12806269d1bb2d5f0c533f5fb292b2451b9caf2a0d7014d2c1fe243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Dark energy</topic><topic>Equations of state</topic><topic>Galaxies</topic><topic>Hubble diagram</topic><topic>Luminosity</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Red shift</topic><topic>Supernovae</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Devdeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amblard, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooray, Asantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holz, Daniel E</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sarkar, Devdeep</au><au>Amblard, Alexandre</au><au>Cooray, Asantha</au><au>Holz, Daniel E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implications of Two Type Ia Supernova Populations for Cosmological Measurements</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2008-07-21</date><risdate>2008</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Recent work suggests that Type Ia supernovae (SNe) are composed of two distinct populations: prompt and delayed. By explicitly incorporating properties of host galaxies, it may be possible to target and eliminate systematic differences between these two putative populations. However, any resulting {\em post}-calibration shift in luminosity between the components will cause a redshift-dependent systematic shift in the Hubble diagram. Utilizing an existing sample of 192 SNe Ia, we find that the average luminosity difference between prompt and delayed SNe is constrained to be \((4.5 \pm 8.9)%\). If the absolute difference between the two populations is 0.025 mag, and this is ignored when fitting for cosmological parameters, then the dark energy equation of state (EOS) determined from a sample of 2300 SNe Ia is biased at \(\sim1\sigma\). By incorporating the possibility of a two-population systematic, this bias can be eliminated. However, assuming no prior on the strength of the two-population effect, the uncertainty in the best-fit EOS is increased by a factor of 2.5, when compared to the equivalent sample with no underlying two-population systematic. To avoid introducing a bias in the EOS parameters, or significantly degrading the measurement accuracy, it is necessary to control the post-calibration luminosity difference between prompt and delayed SN populations to better than 0.025 mag.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.0806.3267</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2008-07 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2087515624 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Bias Calibration Dark energy Equations of state Galaxies Hubble diagram Luminosity Parameters Populations Red shift Supernovae |
title | Implications of Two Type Ia Supernova Populations for Cosmological Measurements |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T00%3A14%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implications%20of%20Two%20Type%20Ia%20Supernova%20Populations%20for%20Cosmological%20Measurements&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Sarkar,%20Devdeep&rft.date=2008-07-21&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.0806.3267&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2087515624%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a514-58574ac6ea12806269d1bb2d5f0c533f5fb292b2451b9caf2a0d7014d2c1fe243%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2087515624&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |