Loading…
Does expressing subjectivity in online reviews enhance persuasion?
Purpose People express subjectivity and objectivity in everyday communication, yet little is known about how such linguistic content affects persuasion in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM). Drawing on the congruity theory and the selectivity model, the present study proposes that the effectiveness of...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of consumer marketing 2018-06, Vol.35 (4), p.403-413 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-e26d6d5ca14de3ae13ef8b85baa7c5379f9cb2fb4230c82067b0b4bfb2ab9df63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-e26d6d5ca14de3ae13ef8b85baa7c5379f9cb2fb4230c82067b0b4bfb2ab9df63 |
container_end_page | 413 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 403 |
container_title | The Journal of consumer marketing |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Liu, Stephanie Q Ozanne, Marie Mattila, Anna S |
description | Purpose
People express subjectivity and objectivity in everyday communication, yet little is known about how such linguistic content affects persuasion in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM). Drawing on the congruity theory and the selectivity model, the present study proposes that the effectiveness of subjectivity/objectivity expressions in an online review is contingent on whether the consumption experience is primarily hedonic or utilitarian, and whether the decision maker is a male or female. Furthermore, this study aims to examine the psychological mechanism that underlies the proposed effects.
Design/methodology/approach
This research used an experimental design to test the hypotheses. Four versions of online review stimuli were created. Participants were asked to read the online reviews and to complete a survey.
Findings
The findings indicate that expressing subjectivity (vs objectivity) in online reviews effectively boosts men’s purchase intention in the hedonic context and women’s purchase intention in the utilitarian context. Furthermore, the mediation analysis reveals that perceived relevance of the review is the psychological mechanism explaining the joint effects of linguistic style, consumption type and gender on purchase intention.
Originality/value
This research is the first to examine expressing subjectivity (vs objectivity) as a persuasion strategy in online reviews. Findings of this research add to the growing literature on linguistic effects in eWOM. Furthermore, this research deepens the understanding of conversational norms for hedonic vs utilitarian consumption in consumer-generated content and gender differences in processing online reviews. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/JCM-02-2017-2109 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2087838233</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2087838233</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-e26d6d5ca14de3ae13ef8b85baa7c5379f9cb2fb4230c82067b0b4bfb2ab9df63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkDtPwzAURi0EEqWwM0ZiNr2283AmBOWtIhaYLdu5BlfFCXZS6L8nVVmQmO5yznelQ8gpg3PGQM4e508UOOXAKsoZ1HtkwqHglHGAfTKBSpRUVCU7JEcpLQEgr3k9IVfXLaYMv7uIKfnwlqXBLNH2fu37TeZD1oaVD5hFXHv8GsnwroPFrMOYBp18Gy6OyYHTq4Qnv3dKXm9vXub3dPF89zC_XFArCtlT5GVTNoXVLG9QaGQCnTSyMFpXthBV7WpruDM5F2Alh7IyYHLjDNemblwppuRst9vF9nPA1KtlO8QwvlQcZCWF5EKMFOwoG9uUIjrVRf-h40YxUNtSaiylgKttKbUtNSqznYIfGPWq-c_401b8AD6latM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2087838233</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does expressing subjectivity in online reviews enhance persuasion?</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><creator>Liu, Stephanie Q ; Ozanne, Marie ; Mattila, Anna S</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Stephanie Q ; Ozanne, Marie ; Mattila, Anna S</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
People express subjectivity and objectivity in everyday communication, yet little is known about how such linguistic content affects persuasion in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM). Drawing on the congruity theory and the selectivity model, the present study proposes that the effectiveness of subjectivity/objectivity expressions in an online review is contingent on whether the consumption experience is primarily hedonic or utilitarian, and whether the decision maker is a male or female. Furthermore, this study aims to examine the psychological mechanism that underlies the proposed effects.
Design/methodology/approach
This research used an experimental design to test the hypotheses. Four versions of online review stimuli were created. Participants were asked to read the online reviews and to complete a survey.
Findings
The findings indicate that expressing subjectivity (vs objectivity) in online reviews effectively boosts men’s purchase intention in the hedonic context and women’s purchase intention in the utilitarian context. Furthermore, the mediation analysis reveals that perceived relevance of the review is the psychological mechanism explaining the joint effects of linguistic style, consumption type and gender on purchase intention.
Originality/value
This research is the first to examine expressing subjectivity (vs objectivity) as a persuasion strategy in online reviews. Findings of this research add to the growing literature on linguistic effects in eWOM. Furthermore, this research deepens the understanding of conversational norms for hedonic vs utilitarian consumption in consumer-generated content and gender differences in processing online reviews.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0736-3761</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2052-1200</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/JCM-02-2017-2109</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Santa Barbara: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Consumer behavior ; Consumers ; Consumption ; Decision making ; Gender ; Language ; Linguistics ; Marketing ; Objectivity ; Perceptions ; Persuasion ; Purchase intention ; Restaurants ; Social networks ; Studies ; Subjectivity ; Target markets</subject><ispartof>The Journal of consumer marketing, 2018-06, Vol.35 (4), p.403-413</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-e26d6d5ca14de3ae13ef8b85baa7c5379f9cb2fb4230c82067b0b4bfb2ab9df63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-e26d6d5ca14de3ae13ef8b85baa7c5379f9cb2fb4230c82067b0b4bfb2ab9df63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2087838233/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2087838233?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Stephanie Q</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozanne, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattila, Anna S</creatorcontrib><title>Does expressing subjectivity in online reviews enhance persuasion?</title><title>The Journal of consumer marketing</title><description>Purpose
People express subjectivity and objectivity in everyday communication, yet little is known about how such linguistic content affects persuasion in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM). Drawing on the congruity theory and the selectivity model, the present study proposes that the effectiveness of subjectivity/objectivity expressions in an online review is contingent on whether the consumption experience is primarily hedonic or utilitarian, and whether the decision maker is a male or female. Furthermore, this study aims to examine the psychological mechanism that underlies the proposed effects.
Design/methodology/approach
This research used an experimental design to test the hypotheses. Four versions of online review stimuli were created. Participants were asked to read the online reviews and to complete a survey.
Findings
The findings indicate that expressing subjectivity (vs objectivity) in online reviews effectively boosts men’s purchase intention in the hedonic context and women’s purchase intention in the utilitarian context. Furthermore, the mediation analysis reveals that perceived relevance of the review is the psychological mechanism explaining the joint effects of linguistic style, consumption type and gender on purchase intention.
Originality/value
This research is the first to examine expressing subjectivity (vs objectivity) as a persuasion strategy in online reviews. Findings of this research add to the growing literature on linguistic effects in eWOM. Furthermore, this research deepens the understanding of conversational norms for hedonic vs utilitarian consumption in consumer-generated content and gender differences in processing online reviews.</description><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Objectivity</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Persuasion</subject><subject>Purchase intention</subject><subject>Restaurants</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Subjectivity</subject><subject>Target markets</subject><issn>0736-3761</issn><issn>2052-1200</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNptkDtPwzAURi0EEqWwM0ZiNr2283AmBOWtIhaYLdu5BlfFCXZS6L8nVVmQmO5yznelQ8gpg3PGQM4e508UOOXAKsoZ1HtkwqHglHGAfTKBSpRUVCU7JEcpLQEgr3k9IVfXLaYMv7uIKfnwlqXBLNH2fu37TeZD1oaVD5hFXHv8GsnwroPFrMOYBp18Gy6OyYHTq4Qnv3dKXm9vXub3dPF89zC_XFArCtlT5GVTNoXVLG9QaGQCnTSyMFpXthBV7WpruDM5F2Alh7IyYHLjDNemblwppuRst9vF9nPA1KtlO8QwvlQcZCWF5EKMFOwoG9uUIjrVRf-h40YxUNtSaiylgKttKbUtNSqznYIfGPWq-c_401b8AD6latM</recordid><startdate>20180611</startdate><enddate>20180611</enddate><creator>Liu, Stephanie Q</creator><creator>Ozanne, Marie</creator><creator>Mattila, Anna S</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180611</creationdate><title>Does expressing subjectivity in online reviews enhance persuasion?</title><author>Liu, Stephanie Q ; Ozanne, Marie ; Mattila, Anna S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-e26d6d5ca14de3ae13ef8b85baa7c5379f9cb2fb4230c82067b0b4bfb2ab9df63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Objectivity</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Persuasion</topic><topic>Purchase intention</topic><topic>Restaurants</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Subjectivity</topic><topic>Target markets</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Stephanie Q</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozanne, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattila, Anna S</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of consumer marketing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Stephanie Q</au><au>Ozanne, Marie</au><au>Mattila, Anna S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does expressing subjectivity in online reviews enhance persuasion?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of consumer marketing</jtitle><date>2018-06-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>403</spage><epage>413</epage><pages>403-413</pages><issn>0736-3761</issn><eissn>2052-1200</eissn><abstract>Purpose
People express subjectivity and objectivity in everyday communication, yet little is known about how such linguistic content affects persuasion in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM). Drawing on the congruity theory and the selectivity model, the present study proposes that the effectiveness of subjectivity/objectivity expressions in an online review is contingent on whether the consumption experience is primarily hedonic or utilitarian, and whether the decision maker is a male or female. Furthermore, this study aims to examine the psychological mechanism that underlies the proposed effects.
Design/methodology/approach
This research used an experimental design to test the hypotheses. Four versions of online review stimuli were created. Participants were asked to read the online reviews and to complete a survey.
Findings
The findings indicate that expressing subjectivity (vs objectivity) in online reviews effectively boosts men’s purchase intention in the hedonic context and women’s purchase intention in the utilitarian context. Furthermore, the mediation analysis reveals that perceived relevance of the review is the psychological mechanism explaining the joint effects of linguistic style, consumption type and gender on purchase intention.
Originality/value
This research is the first to examine expressing subjectivity (vs objectivity) as a persuasion strategy in online reviews. Findings of this research add to the growing literature on linguistic effects in eWOM. Furthermore, this research deepens the understanding of conversational norms for hedonic vs utilitarian consumption in consumer-generated content and gender differences in processing online reviews.</abstract><cop>Santa Barbara</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/JCM-02-2017-2109</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0736-3761 |
ispartof | The Journal of consumer marketing, 2018-06, Vol.35 (4), p.403-413 |
issn | 0736-3761 2052-1200 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2087838233 |
source | ABI/INFORM global; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list) |
subjects | Consumer behavior Consumers Consumption Decision making Gender Language Linguistics Marketing Objectivity Perceptions Persuasion Purchase intention Restaurants Social networks Studies Subjectivity Target markets |
title | Does expressing subjectivity in online reviews enhance persuasion? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T23%3A20%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20expressing%20subjectivity%20in%20online%20reviews%20enhance%20persuasion?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20consumer%20marketing&rft.au=Liu,%20Stephanie%20Q&rft.date=2018-06-11&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=403&rft.epage=413&rft.pages=403-413&rft.issn=0736-3761&rft.eissn=2052-1200&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/JCM-02-2017-2109&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2087838233%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-e26d6d5ca14de3ae13ef8b85baa7c5379f9cb2fb4230c82067b0b4bfb2ab9df63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2087838233&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |