Loading…

Polar Topside Ionosphere During Geomagnetic Storms: Comparison of ISIS‐II With TDIM

Space weather deposits energy into the high polar latitudes, primarily via Joule heating that is associated with the Poynting flux electromagnetic energy flow between the magnetosphere and ionosphere. One way to observe this energy flow is to look at the ionospheric electron density profile (EDP), e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Radio science 2018-07, Vol.53 (7), p.906-920
Main Authors: Sojka, J. J., Rice, D., Eccles, V., David, M., Schunk, R. W., Benson, R. F., James, H. G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3447-7d2a8e3f42b49d13b150b9d9a313ad3f73847208a7580d3891e563d15cb2241e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3447-7d2a8e3f42b49d13b150b9d9a313ad3f73847208a7580d3891e563d15cb2241e3
container_end_page 920
container_issue 7
container_start_page 906
container_title Radio science
container_volume 53
creator Sojka, J. J.
Rice, D.
Eccles, V.
David, M.
Schunk, R. W.
Benson, R. F.
James, H. G.
description Space weather deposits energy into the high polar latitudes, primarily via Joule heating that is associated with the Poynting flux electromagnetic energy flow between the magnetosphere and ionosphere. One way to observe this energy flow is to look at the ionospheric electron density profile (EDP), especially that of the topside. The altitude location of the ionospheric peak provides additional information on the net field‐aligned vertical transport at high latitudes. To date, there have been few studies in which physics‐based ionospheric model storm simulations have been compared with topside EDPs. A rich database of high‐latitude topside ionograms obtained from polar orbiting satellites of the International Satellites for Ionospheric Studies (ISIS) program exists but has not been utilized in comparisons with physics‐based models. Of specific importance is that the Alouette/ISIS topside EDPs spanned the timeframe from 1962 to 1983, a period that experienced very large geomagnetic storms. We use a physics‐based ionospheric model, the Utah State University Time Dependent Ionospheric Model (TDIM), to simulate ionospheric EDPs for quiet and storm high‐latitude passes of ISIS‐II for two geomagnetic storms. This initial study finds that under quiet conditions there is good agreement between model and observations. During disturbed conditions, however, a large difference is seen between model and observations. The model limitation is probably associated with the inability of its topside boundary to replicate strong outflow conditions. As a result, modeling of the ionospheric outflows needs to be extended well into the magnetosphere, thereby moving the upper boundary much higher and requiring the use of polar wind models. Key Points The paper focuses on prestorm and main phase topside ionospheric response to a mild and a severe geomagnetic storm Simulations from an extensively used F region model, TDIM, are compared to ISIS‐II topside ionosphere observations Surprisingly, the TDIM is unable to simulate the observed storm response while satisfactorily simulating the prestorm topside
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2018RS006589
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2088305358</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2088305358</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3447-7d2a8e3f42b49d13b150b9d9a313ad3f73847208a7580d3891e563d15cb2241e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90L1OwzAUBWALgUQpbDyAJVYC13-JzYZaKJGKQE0r2CIncdpUTRzsVKgbj8Az8iQElYGJ6SzfuVc6CJ0TuCJA1TUFImcJQCikOkADojgPIqVeD9EAgMsgDIEfoxPv1wCEi5AP0OLZbrTDc9v6qjA4to317co4g8dbVzVLPDG21svGdFWOk8662t_gka1b7SpvG2xLHCdx8vXxGcf4pepWeD6OH0_RUak33pz95hAt7u_mo4dg-jSJR7fTIGecR0FUUC0NKznNuCoIy4iATBVKM8J0wcqISR5RkDoSEgomFTEiZAUReUYpJ4YN0cX-buvs29b4Ll3brWv6l2lfkwwEE7JXl3uVO-u9M2XauqrWbpcSSH-GS_8O13O65-_Vxuz-telsnFCIIGLfxoBtcw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2088305358</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Polar Topside Ionosphere During Geomagnetic Storms: Comparison of ISIS‐II With TDIM</title><source>Wiley</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><creator>Sojka, J. J. ; Rice, D. ; Eccles, V. ; David, M. ; Schunk, R. W. ; Benson, R. F. ; James, H. G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sojka, J. J. ; Rice, D. ; Eccles, V. ; David, M. ; Schunk, R. W. ; Benson, R. F. ; James, H. G.</creatorcontrib><description>Space weather deposits energy into the high polar latitudes, primarily via Joule heating that is associated with the Poynting flux electromagnetic energy flow between the magnetosphere and ionosphere. One way to observe this energy flow is to look at the ionospheric electron density profile (EDP), especially that of the topside. The altitude location of the ionospheric peak provides additional information on the net field‐aligned vertical transport at high latitudes. To date, there have been few studies in which physics‐based ionospheric model storm simulations have been compared with topside EDPs. A rich database of high‐latitude topside ionograms obtained from polar orbiting satellites of the International Satellites for Ionospheric Studies (ISIS) program exists but has not been utilized in comparisons with physics‐based models. Of specific importance is that the Alouette/ISIS topside EDPs spanned the timeframe from 1962 to 1983, a period that experienced very large geomagnetic storms. We use a physics‐based ionospheric model, the Utah State University Time Dependent Ionospheric Model (TDIM), to simulate ionospheric EDPs for quiet and storm high‐latitude passes of ISIS‐II for two geomagnetic storms. This initial study finds that under quiet conditions there is good agreement between model and observations. During disturbed conditions, however, a large difference is seen between model and observations. The model limitation is probably associated with the inability of its topside boundary to replicate strong outflow conditions. As a result, modeling of the ionospheric outflows needs to be extended well into the magnetosphere, thereby moving the upper boundary much higher and requiring the use of polar wind models. Key Points The paper focuses on prestorm and main phase topside ionospheric response to a mild and a severe geomagnetic storm Simulations from an extensively used F region model, TDIM, are compared to ISIS‐II topside ionosphere observations Surprisingly, the TDIM is unable to simulate the observed storm response while satisfactorily simulating the prestorm topside</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-6604</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-799X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2018RS006589</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Computer simulation ; Electron density ; Energy flow ; Geomagnetism ; Ionograms ; Ionosphere ; Ionospheric electron density ; Latitude ; Magnetic fields ; Magnetic storms ; Magnetospheres ; modeling comparison ; observations ; Ohmic dissipation ; Outflow ; Physics ; Polar orbiting satellites ; Resistance heating ; Storms ; Time dependence ; topside</subject><ispartof>Radio science, 2018-07, Vol.53 (7), p.906-920</ispartof><rights>2018. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3447-7d2a8e3f42b49d13b150b9d9a313ad3f73847208a7580d3891e563d15cb2241e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3447-7d2a8e3f42b49d13b150b9d9a313ad3f73847208a7580d3891e563d15cb2241e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7894-6785 ; 0000-0003-1570-6965 ; 0000-0002-3985-552X ; 0000-0002-3167-4783 ; 0000-0003-0791-1379 ; 0000-0001-8548-8225 ; 0000-0001-8137-0617</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2018RS006589$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2018RS006589$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11514,27924,27925,46468,46892</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sojka, J. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rice, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eccles, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schunk, R. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benson, R. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, H. G.</creatorcontrib><title>Polar Topside Ionosphere During Geomagnetic Storms: Comparison of ISIS‐II With TDIM</title><title>Radio science</title><description>Space weather deposits energy into the high polar latitudes, primarily via Joule heating that is associated with the Poynting flux electromagnetic energy flow between the magnetosphere and ionosphere. One way to observe this energy flow is to look at the ionospheric electron density profile (EDP), especially that of the topside. The altitude location of the ionospheric peak provides additional information on the net field‐aligned vertical transport at high latitudes. To date, there have been few studies in which physics‐based ionospheric model storm simulations have been compared with topside EDPs. A rich database of high‐latitude topside ionograms obtained from polar orbiting satellites of the International Satellites for Ionospheric Studies (ISIS) program exists but has not been utilized in comparisons with physics‐based models. Of specific importance is that the Alouette/ISIS topside EDPs spanned the timeframe from 1962 to 1983, a period that experienced very large geomagnetic storms. We use a physics‐based ionospheric model, the Utah State University Time Dependent Ionospheric Model (TDIM), to simulate ionospheric EDPs for quiet and storm high‐latitude passes of ISIS‐II for two geomagnetic storms. This initial study finds that under quiet conditions there is good agreement between model and observations. During disturbed conditions, however, a large difference is seen between model and observations. The model limitation is probably associated with the inability of its topside boundary to replicate strong outflow conditions. As a result, modeling of the ionospheric outflows needs to be extended well into the magnetosphere, thereby moving the upper boundary much higher and requiring the use of polar wind models. Key Points The paper focuses on prestorm and main phase topside ionospheric response to a mild and a severe geomagnetic storm Simulations from an extensively used F region model, TDIM, are compared to ISIS‐II topside ionosphere observations Surprisingly, the TDIM is unable to simulate the observed storm response while satisfactorily simulating the prestorm topside</description><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Electron density</subject><subject>Energy flow</subject><subject>Geomagnetism</subject><subject>Ionograms</subject><subject>Ionosphere</subject><subject>Ionospheric electron density</subject><subject>Latitude</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Magnetic storms</subject><subject>Magnetospheres</subject><subject>modeling comparison</subject><subject>observations</subject><subject>Ohmic dissipation</subject><subject>Outflow</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Polar orbiting satellites</subject><subject>Resistance heating</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Time dependence</subject><subject>topside</subject><issn>0048-6604</issn><issn>1944-799X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90L1OwzAUBWALgUQpbDyAJVYC13-JzYZaKJGKQE0r2CIncdpUTRzsVKgbj8Az8iQElYGJ6SzfuVc6CJ0TuCJA1TUFImcJQCikOkADojgPIqVeD9EAgMsgDIEfoxPv1wCEi5AP0OLZbrTDc9v6qjA4to317co4g8dbVzVLPDG21svGdFWOk8662t_gka1b7SpvG2xLHCdx8vXxGcf4pepWeD6OH0_RUak33pz95hAt7u_mo4dg-jSJR7fTIGecR0FUUC0NKznNuCoIy4iATBVKM8J0wcqISR5RkDoSEgomFTEiZAUReUYpJ4YN0cX-buvs29b4Ll3brWv6l2lfkwwEE7JXl3uVO-u9M2XauqrWbpcSSH-GS_8O13O65-_Vxuz-telsnFCIIGLfxoBtcw</recordid><startdate>201807</startdate><enddate>201807</enddate><creator>Sojka, J. J.</creator><creator>Rice, D.</creator><creator>Eccles, V.</creator><creator>David, M.</creator><creator>Schunk, R. W.</creator><creator>Benson, R. F.</creator><creator>James, H. G.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7894-6785</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1570-6965</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3985-552X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3167-4783</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0791-1379</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8548-8225</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8137-0617</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201807</creationdate><title>Polar Topside Ionosphere During Geomagnetic Storms: Comparison of ISIS‐II With TDIM</title><author>Sojka, J. J. ; Rice, D. ; Eccles, V. ; David, M. ; Schunk, R. W. ; Benson, R. F. ; James, H. G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3447-7d2a8e3f42b49d13b150b9d9a313ad3f73847208a7580d3891e563d15cb2241e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Electron density</topic><topic>Energy flow</topic><topic>Geomagnetism</topic><topic>Ionograms</topic><topic>Ionosphere</topic><topic>Ionospheric electron density</topic><topic>Latitude</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Magnetic storms</topic><topic>Magnetospheres</topic><topic>modeling comparison</topic><topic>observations</topic><topic>Ohmic dissipation</topic><topic>Outflow</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Polar orbiting satellites</topic><topic>Resistance heating</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Time dependence</topic><topic>topside</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sojka, J. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rice, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eccles, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>David, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schunk, R. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benson, R. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, H. G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Radio science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sojka, J. J.</au><au>Rice, D.</au><au>Eccles, V.</au><au>David, M.</au><au>Schunk, R. W.</au><au>Benson, R. F.</au><au>James, H. G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Polar Topside Ionosphere During Geomagnetic Storms: Comparison of ISIS‐II With TDIM</atitle><jtitle>Radio science</jtitle><date>2018-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>906</spage><epage>920</epage><pages>906-920</pages><issn>0048-6604</issn><eissn>1944-799X</eissn><abstract>Space weather deposits energy into the high polar latitudes, primarily via Joule heating that is associated with the Poynting flux electromagnetic energy flow between the magnetosphere and ionosphere. One way to observe this energy flow is to look at the ionospheric electron density profile (EDP), especially that of the topside. The altitude location of the ionospheric peak provides additional information on the net field‐aligned vertical transport at high latitudes. To date, there have been few studies in which physics‐based ionospheric model storm simulations have been compared with topside EDPs. A rich database of high‐latitude topside ionograms obtained from polar orbiting satellites of the International Satellites for Ionospheric Studies (ISIS) program exists but has not been utilized in comparisons with physics‐based models. Of specific importance is that the Alouette/ISIS topside EDPs spanned the timeframe from 1962 to 1983, a period that experienced very large geomagnetic storms. We use a physics‐based ionospheric model, the Utah State University Time Dependent Ionospheric Model (TDIM), to simulate ionospheric EDPs for quiet and storm high‐latitude passes of ISIS‐II for two geomagnetic storms. This initial study finds that under quiet conditions there is good agreement between model and observations. During disturbed conditions, however, a large difference is seen between model and observations. The model limitation is probably associated with the inability of its topside boundary to replicate strong outflow conditions. As a result, modeling of the ionospheric outflows needs to be extended well into the magnetosphere, thereby moving the upper boundary much higher and requiring the use of polar wind models. Key Points The paper focuses on prestorm and main phase topside ionospheric response to a mild and a severe geomagnetic storm Simulations from an extensively used F region model, TDIM, are compared to ISIS‐II topside ionosphere observations Surprisingly, the TDIM is unable to simulate the observed storm response while satisfactorily simulating the prestorm topside</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2018RS006589</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7894-6785</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1570-6965</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3985-552X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3167-4783</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0791-1379</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8548-8225</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8137-0617</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-6604
ispartof Radio science, 2018-07, Vol.53 (7), p.906-920
issn 0048-6604
1944-799X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2088305358
source Wiley; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library
subjects Computer simulation
Electron density
Energy flow
Geomagnetism
Ionograms
Ionosphere
Ionospheric electron density
Latitude
Magnetic fields
Magnetic storms
Magnetospheres
modeling comparison
observations
Ohmic dissipation
Outflow
Physics
Polar orbiting satellites
Resistance heating
Storms
Time dependence
topside
title Polar Topside Ionosphere During Geomagnetic Storms: Comparison of ISIS‐II With TDIM
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T04%3A50%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Polar%20Topside%20Ionosphere%20During%20Geomagnetic%20Storms:%20Comparison%20of%20ISIS%E2%80%90II%20With%20TDIM&rft.jtitle=Radio%20science&rft.au=Sojka,%20J.%20J.&rft.date=2018-07&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=906&rft.epage=920&rft.pages=906-920&rft.issn=0048-6604&rft.eissn=1944-799X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2018RS006589&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2088305358%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3447-7d2a8e3f42b49d13b150b9d9a313ad3f73847208a7580d3891e563d15cb2241e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2088305358&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true