Loading…

Correlated Mixture Between Adiabatic and Isocurvature Fluctuations and Recent CMB Observations

This work presents a reduced chi^2_nu test to search for non-gaussian signals in the CMBR TT power spectrum of recent CMBR data, WMAP, ACBAR and CBI data sets, assuming a mixed density field including adiabatic and isocurvature fluctuations. We assume a skew positive mixed model with adiabatic infla...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:arXiv.org 2005-01
Main Authors: Andrade, Ana Paula A, Wuensche, Carlos Alexandre, Ribeiro, Andre Luis B
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This work presents a reduced chi^2_nu test to search for non-gaussian signals in the CMBR TT power spectrum of recent CMBR data, WMAP, ACBAR and CBI data sets, assuming a mixed density field including adiabatic and isocurvature fluctuations. We assume a skew positive mixed model with adiabatic inflation perturbations plus additional isocurvature perturbations possibly produced by topological defects. The joint probability distribution used in this context is a weighted combination of Gaussian and non-Gaussian random fields. Results from simulations of CMBR temperature for the mixed field show a distinct signature in CMB power spectrum for very small deviations (~ 0.1%) from a pure Gaussian field, and can be used as a direct test for the nature of primordial fluctuations. A reduced chi^2_nu test applied on the most recent CMBR observations reveals that an isocurvature fluctuations field is not ruled out and indeed permits a very good description for a flat geometry Lambda-CDM universe, chi^2_930 ~ 1.5, rather than the simple inflationary standard model with chi^2_930 ~ 2.3. This result may looks is particular discrepant with the reduced chi^2 of 1.07 obtained with the same model in Spergel et al. (2003) for temperature only, however, our work is restricted to a region of the parameter space that does not include the best fit model for TT only of Spergel et al. (2003).
ISSN:2331-8422
DOI:10.48550/arxiv.0501399