Loading…
The influence of a back support harness on spinal forces during sheep shearing
Previous research has classified the occupation of sheep shearing as heavy work where shearers flex their spine and hips for long periods of time, handle awkward loads and expend high amounts of energy. The aim of this research was to investigate the magnitude of spinal forces produced during the sh...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ergonomics 2004-09, Vol.47 (11), p.1208-1225 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-147c4a490d0a9ad8de5b36c80dbcdb76ef8a97d75613c13b13035ea5e354aef3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-147c4a490d0a9ad8de5b36c80dbcdb76ef8a97d75613c13b13035ea5e354aef3 |
container_end_page | 1225 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1208 |
container_title | Ergonomics |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Milosavljevic, Stephan Carman, Allan B Milburn, Peter D Wilson, Barry D Davidson, Peter L |
description | Previous research has classified the occupation of sheep shearing as heavy work where shearers flex their spine and hips for long periods of time, handle awkward loads and expend high amounts of energy. The aim of this research was to investigate the magnitude of spinal forces produced during the shearing phase of the work and to determine whether the use of a commercially available back support harness would reduce these forces. Following discussion on task complexity and risk of back injury with senior shearing instructors, three component tasks of the shearing phase were identified as posing high risk of injury and were prioritized for primary analysis. Although the dragging out of a sheep in preparation for shearing and an unexpected loss of animal control were also identified as being of high risk, technological and instrumentation difficulties precluded their analysis. Twelve experienced shearers were videotaped while shearing with and without the use of a back harness. Surface mounted retro-reflective markers placed on the trunk defined three linked segments: Pelvis, Lumbar and Head, Arms, and Upper Trunk (HAUT). A 3D, link segment, top down, inverse dynamics approach was used to describe the motion and to estimate forces involved during the identified tasks of shearing. The spinal force/time profiles of this sample of shearers demonstrated large compressive and shear forces for all three tasks that are close to the NIOSH and University of Waterloo action limits for compressive and shear forces respectively (McGill
1997
, Yingling and McGill
1999
, Marras
2000
). The use of the back support harness reduced these forces by substantial and statistically significant amounts. This effect was consistent across all three tasks. The results of this study demonstrate the production of high levels of compressive and shear forces within the spine of shearers during the three shearing tasks studied and that the use of a back support harness can substantially reduce these forces. Therefore the use of a back harness may reduce the cumulative load on the spine during shearing thereby moderating damage to the articular structures. However it is not known whether the harness would protect the spine from a sudden or unexpected force. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00140130410001699155 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_208906979</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>726647441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-147c4a490d0a9ad8de5b36c80dbcdb76ef8a97d75613c13b13035ea5e354aef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9rGzEQxUVoiF233yAUUchxm5H1b9VLKSZNAyG5-L7MStp40_VqK-2S-ttHxi65GHIZzcDvPZ4eIZcMvjEo4RqACWAcBIO8KmOYlGdkzrhShSyF_kDme6TIjJmRjyk955Mzs7wgMya5hlLqOXlYbzxt-6abfG89DQ1FWqP9Q9M0DCGOdIOx9ynR0NM0tD12tAnR-kTdFNv-iaaN98N-4v78RM4b7JL_fHwXZP3rZr36Xdw_3t6tft4XVig9FkxoK1AYcIAGXem8rLmyJbjaulor35RotNNSMW4Zr_M3ufQoPZcCfcMX5OvBdojh7-TTWD2HKeZwqVpCaUAZbTIkDpCNIaXom2qI7RbjrmJQ7SusTlWYZV-O3lO99e5NdOwsA1dHAJPFronY2za9cQrEEnLgBflx4HK9IW7xJcTOVSPuuhD_i_g7Ub6_63BKWI3_Rv4KAbSesg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>208906979</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The influence of a back support harness on spinal forces during sheep shearing</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Milosavljevic, Stephan ; Carman, Allan B ; Milburn, Peter D ; Wilson, Barry D ; Davidson, Peter L</creator><creatorcontrib>Milosavljevic, Stephan ; Carman, Allan B ; Milburn, Peter D ; Wilson, Barry D ; Davidson, Peter L</creatorcontrib><description>Previous research has classified the occupation of sheep shearing as heavy work where shearers flex their spine and hips for long periods of time, handle awkward loads and expend high amounts of energy. The aim of this research was to investigate the magnitude of spinal forces produced during the shearing phase of the work and to determine whether the use of a commercially available back support harness would reduce these forces. Following discussion on task complexity and risk of back injury with senior shearing instructors, three component tasks of the shearing phase were identified as posing high risk of injury and were prioritized for primary analysis. Although the dragging out of a sheep in preparation for shearing and an unexpected loss of animal control were also identified as being of high risk, technological and instrumentation difficulties precluded their analysis. Twelve experienced shearers were videotaped while shearing with and without the use of a back harness. Surface mounted retro-reflective markers placed on the trunk defined three linked segments: Pelvis, Lumbar and Head, Arms, and Upper Trunk (HAUT). A 3D, link segment, top down, inverse dynamics approach was used to describe the motion and to estimate forces involved during the identified tasks of shearing. The spinal force/time profiles of this sample of shearers demonstrated large compressive and shear forces for all three tasks that are close to the NIOSH and University of Waterloo action limits for compressive and shear forces respectively (McGill
1997
, Yingling and McGill
1999
, Marras
2000
). The use of the back support harness reduced these forces by substantial and statistically significant amounts. This effect was consistent across all three tasks. The results of this study demonstrate the production of high levels of compressive and shear forces within the spine of shearers during the three shearing tasks studied and that the use of a back support harness can substantially reduce these forces. Therefore the use of a back harness may reduce the cumulative load on the spine during shearing thereby moderating damage to the articular structures. However it is not known whether the harness would protect the spine from a sudden or unexpected force.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-0139</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1366-5847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00140130410001699155</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15370857</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ERGOAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Taylor & Francis Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Animal Husbandry - instrumentation ; Animals ; Applied physiology ; Back ; Back harness ; Biological and medical sciences ; Ergonomics ; Ergonomics. Work place. Occupational physiology ; Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology ; Humans ; Low Back Pain - prevention & control ; Lumbosacral Region - physiology ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Motion ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; New Zealand ; Occupation force ; Occupational Exposure - prevention & control ; Occupational hazards ; Orthotic Devices ; Posture ; Sheep ; Sheep shearing ; Spine ; Wool</subject><ispartof>Ergonomics, 2004-09, Vol.47 (11), p.1208-1225</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2004</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group Sep 15, 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-147c4a490d0a9ad8de5b36c80dbcdb76ef8a97d75613c13b13035ea5e354aef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-147c4a490d0a9ad8de5b36c80dbcdb76ef8a97d75613c13b13035ea5e354aef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16042030$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15370857$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Milosavljevic, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carman, Allan B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milburn, Peter D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Barry D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Peter L</creatorcontrib><title>The influence of a back support harness on spinal forces during sheep shearing</title><title>Ergonomics</title><addtitle>Ergonomics</addtitle><description>Previous research has classified the occupation of sheep shearing as heavy work where shearers flex their spine and hips for long periods of time, handle awkward loads and expend high amounts of energy. The aim of this research was to investigate the magnitude of spinal forces produced during the shearing phase of the work and to determine whether the use of a commercially available back support harness would reduce these forces. Following discussion on task complexity and risk of back injury with senior shearing instructors, three component tasks of the shearing phase were identified as posing high risk of injury and were prioritized for primary analysis. Although the dragging out of a sheep in preparation for shearing and an unexpected loss of animal control were also identified as being of high risk, technological and instrumentation difficulties precluded their analysis. Twelve experienced shearers were videotaped while shearing with and without the use of a back harness. Surface mounted retro-reflective markers placed on the trunk defined three linked segments: Pelvis, Lumbar and Head, Arms, and Upper Trunk (HAUT). A 3D, link segment, top down, inverse dynamics approach was used to describe the motion and to estimate forces involved during the identified tasks of shearing. The spinal force/time profiles of this sample of shearers demonstrated large compressive and shear forces for all three tasks that are close to the NIOSH and University of Waterloo action limits for compressive and shear forces respectively (McGill
1997
, Yingling and McGill
1999
, Marras
2000
). The use of the back support harness reduced these forces by substantial and statistically significant amounts. This effect was consistent across all three tasks. The results of this study demonstrate the production of high levels of compressive and shear forces within the spine of shearers during the three shearing tasks studied and that the use of a back support harness can substantially reduce these forces. Therefore the use of a back harness may reduce the cumulative load on the spine during shearing thereby moderating damage to the articular structures. However it is not known whether the harness would protect the spine from a sudden or unexpected force.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Animal Husbandry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied physiology</subject><subject>Back</subject><subject>Back harness</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Ergonomics</subject><subject>Ergonomics. Work place. Occupational physiology</subject><subject>Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - prevention & control</subject><subject>Lumbosacral Region - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>New Zealand</subject><subject>Occupation force</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - prevention & control</subject><subject>Occupational hazards</subject><subject>Orthotic Devices</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>Sheep shearing</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Wool</subject><issn>0014-0139</issn><issn>1366-5847</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9rGzEQxUVoiF233yAUUchxm5H1b9VLKSZNAyG5-L7MStp40_VqK-2S-ttHxi65GHIZzcDvPZ4eIZcMvjEo4RqACWAcBIO8KmOYlGdkzrhShSyF_kDme6TIjJmRjyk955Mzs7wgMya5hlLqOXlYbzxt-6abfG89DQ1FWqP9Q9M0DCGOdIOx9ynR0NM0tD12tAnR-kTdFNv-iaaN98N-4v78RM4b7JL_fHwXZP3rZr36Xdw_3t6tft4XVig9FkxoK1AYcIAGXem8rLmyJbjaulor35RotNNSMW4Zr_M3ufQoPZcCfcMX5OvBdojh7-TTWD2HKeZwqVpCaUAZbTIkDpCNIaXom2qI7RbjrmJQ7SusTlWYZV-O3lO99e5NdOwsA1dHAJPFronY2za9cQrEEnLgBflx4HK9IW7xJcTOVSPuuhD_i_g7Ub6_63BKWI3_Rv4KAbSesg</recordid><startdate>20040915</startdate><enddate>20040915</enddate><creator>Milosavljevic, Stephan</creator><creator>Carman, Allan B</creator><creator>Milburn, Peter D</creator><creator>Wilson, Barry D</creator><creator>Davidson, Peter L</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis LLC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040915</creationdate><title>The influence of a back support harness on spinal forces during sheep shearing</title><author>Milosavljevic, Stephan ; Carman, Allan B ; Milburn, Peter D ; Wilson, Barry D ; Davidson, Peter L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-147c4a490d0a9ad8de5b36c80dbcdb76ef8a97d75613c13b13035ea5e354aef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Animal Husbandry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied physiology</topic><topic>Back</topic><topic>Back harness</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Ergonomics</topic><topic>Ergonomics. Work place. Occupational physiology</topic><topic>Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - prevention & control</topic><topic>Lumbosacral Region - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic><topic>Occupation force</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - prevention & control</topic><topic>Occupational hazards</topic><topic>Orthotic Devices</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>Sheep shearing</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Wool</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Milosavljevic, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carman, Allan B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milburn, Peter D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Barry D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Peter L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Milosavljevic, Stephan</au><au>Carman, Allan B</au><au>Milburn, Peter D</au><au>Wilson, Barry D</au><au>Davidson, Peter L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The influence of a back support harness on spinal forces during sheep shearing</atitle><jtitle>Ergonomics</jtitle><addtitle>Ergonomics</addtitle><date>2004-09-15</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1208</spage><epage>1225</epage><pages>1208-1225</pages><issn>0014-0139</issn><eissn>1366-5847</eissn><coden>ERGOAX</coden><abstract>Previous research has classified the occupation of sheep shearing as heavy work where shearers flex their spine and hips for long periods of time, handle awkward loads and expend high amounts of energy. The aim of this research was to investigate the magnitude of spinal forces produced during the shearing phase of the work and to determine whether the use of a commercially available back support harness would reduce these forces. Following discussion on task complexity and risk of back injury with senior shearing instructors, three component tasks of the shearing phase were identified as posing high risk of injury and were prioritized for primary analysis. Although the dragging out of a sheep in preparation for shearing and an unexpected loss of animal control were also identified as being of high risk, technological and instrumentation difficulties precluded their analysis. Twelve experienced shearers were videotaped while shearing with and without the use of a back harness. Surface mounted retro-reflective markers placed on the trunk defined three linked segments: Pelvis, Lumbar and Head, Arms, and Upper Trunk (HAUT). A 3D, link segment, top down, inverse dynamics approach was used to describe the motion and to estimate forces involved during the identified tasks of shearing. The spinal force/time profiles of this sample of shearers demonstrated large compressive and shear forces for all three tasks that are close to the NIOSH and University of Waterloo action limits for compressive and shear forces respectively (McGill
1997
, Yingling and McGill
1999
, Marras
2000
). The use of the back support harness reduced these forces by substantial and statistically significant amounts. This effect was consistent across all three tasks. The results of this study demonstrate the production of high levels of compressive and shear forces within the spine of shearers during the three shearing tasks studied and that the use of a back support harness can substantially reduce these forces. Therefore the use of a back harness may reduce the cumulative load on the spine during shearing thereby moderating damage to the articular structures. However it is not known whether the harness would protect the spine from a sudden or unexpected force.</abstract><cop>London</cop><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Ltd</pub><pmid>15370857</pmid><doi>10.1080/00140130410001699155</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0014-0139 |
ispartof | Ergonomics, 2004-09, Vol.47 (11), p.1208-1225 |
issn | 0014-0139 1366-5847 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_208906979 |
source | Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection |
subjects | Adult Animal Husbandry - instrumentation Animals Applied physiology Back Back harness Biological and medical sciences Ergonomics Ergonomics. Work place. Occupational physiology Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology Humans Low Back Pain - prevention & control Lumbosacral Region - physiology Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Motion Muscle, Skeletal - physiology New Zealand Occupation force Occupational Exposure - prevention & control Occupational hazards Orthotic Devices Posture Sheep Sheep shearing Spine Wool |
title | The influence of a back support harness on spinal forces during sheep shearing |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T08%3A34%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20influence%20of%20a%20back%20support%20harness%20on%20spinal%20forces%20during%20sheep%20shearing&rft.jtitle=Ergonomics&rft.au=Milosavljevic,%20Stephan&rft.date=2004-09-15&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1208&rft.epage=1225&rft.pages=1208-1225&rft.issn=0014-0139&rft.eissn=1366-5847&rft.coden=ERGOAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00140130410001699155&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E726647441%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-147c4a490d0a9ad8de5b36c80dbcdb76ef8a97d75613c13b13035ea5e354aef3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=208906979&rft_id=info:pmid/15370857&rfr_iscdi=true |