Loading…

The influence of a back support harness on spinal forces during sheep shearing

Previous research has classified the occupation of sheep shearing as heavy work where shearers flex their spine and hips for long periods of time, handle awkward loads and expend high amounts of energy. The aim of this research was to investigate the magnitude of spinal forces produced during the sh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ergonomics 2004-09, Vol.47 (11), p.1208-1225
Main Authors: Milosavljevic, Stephan, Carman, Allan B, Milburn, Peter D, Wilson, Barry D, Davidson, Peter L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-147c4a490d0a9ad8de5b36c80dbcdb76ef8a97d75613c13b13035ea5e354aef3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-147c4a490d0a9ad8de5b36c80dbcdb76ef8a97d75613c13b13035ea5e354aef3
container_end_page 1225
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1208
container_title Ergonomics
container_volume 47
creator Milosavljevic, Stephan
Carman, Allan B
Milburn, Peter D
Wilson, Barry D
Davidson, Peter L
description Previous research has classified the occupation of sheep shearing as heavy work where shearers flex their spine and hips for long periods of time, handle awkward loads and expend high amounts of energy. The aim of this research was to investigate the magnitude of spinal forces produced during the shearing phase of the work and to determine whether the use of a commercially available back support harness would reduce these forces. Following discussion on task complexity and risk of back injury with senior shearing instructors, three component tasks of the shearing phase were identified as posing high risk of injury and were prioritized for primary analysis. Although the dragging out of a sheep in preparation for shearing and an unexpected loss of animal control were also identified as being of high risk, technological and instrumentation difficulties precluded their analysis. Twelve experienced shearers were videotaped while shearing with and without the use of a back harness. Surface mounted retro-reflective markers placed on the trunk defined three linked segments: Pelvis, Lumbar and Head, Arms, and Upper Trunk (HAUT). A 3D, link segment, top down, inverse dynamics approach was used to describe the motion and to estimate forces involved during the identified tasks of shearing. The spinal force/time profiles of this sample of shearers demonstrated large compressive and shear forces for all three tasks that are close to the NIOSH and University of Waterloo action limits for compressive and shear forces respectively (McGill 1997 , Yingling and McGill 1999 , Marras 2000 ). The use of the back support harness reduced these forces by substantial and statistically significant amounts. This effect was consistent across all three tasks. The results of this study demonstrate the production of high levels of compressive and shear forces within the spine of shearers during the three shearing tasks studied and that the use of a back support harness can substantially reduce these forces. Therefore the use of a back harness may reduce the cumulative load on the spine during shearing thereby moderating damage to the articular structures. However it is not known whether the harness would protect the spine from a sudden or unexpected force.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00140130410001699155
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_208906979</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>726647441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-147c4a490d0a9ad8de5b36c80dbcdb76ef8a97d75613c13b13035ea5e354aef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9rGzEQxUVoiF233yAUUchxm5H1b9VLKSZNAyG5-L7MStp40_VqK-2S-ttHxi65GHIZzcDvPZ4eIZcMvjEo4RqACWAcBIO8KmOYlGdkzrhShSyF_kDme6TIjJmRjyk955Mzs7wgMya5hlLqOXlYbzxt-6abfG89DQ1FWqP9Q9M0DCGOdIOx9ynR0NM0tD12tAnR-kTdFNv-iaaN98N-4v78RM4b7JL_fHwXZP3rZr36Xdw_3t6tft4XVig9FkxoK1AYcIAGXem8rLmyJbjaulor35RotNNSMW4Zr_M3ufQoPZcCfcMX5OvBdojh7-TTWD2HKeZwqVpCaUAZbTIkDpCNIaXom2qI7RbjrmJQ7SusTlWYZV-O3lO99e5NdOwsA1dHAJPFronY2za9cQrEEnLgBflx4HK9IW7xJcTOVSPuuhD_i_g7Ub6_63BKWI3_Rv4KAbSesg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>208906979</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The influence of a back support harness on spinal forces during sheep shearing</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Milosavljevic, Stephan ; Carman, Allan B ; Milburn, Peter D ; Wilson, Barry D ; Davidson, Peter L</creator><creatorcontrib>Milosavljevic, Stephan ; Carman, Allan B ; Milburn, Peter D ; Wilson, Barry D ; Davidson, Peter L</creatorcontrib><description>Previous research has classified the occupation of sheep shearing as heavy work where shearers flex their spine and hips for long periods of time, handle awkward loads and expend high amounts of energy. The aim of this research was to investigate the magnitude of spinal forces produced during the shearing phase of the work and to determine whether the use of a commercially available back support harness would reduce these forces. Following discussion on task complexity and risk of back injury with senior shearing instructors, three component tasks of the shearing phase were identified as posing high risk of injury and were prioritized for primary analysis. Although the dragging out of a sheep in preparation for shearing and an unexpected loss of animal control were also identified as being of high risk, technological and instrumentation difficulties precluded their analysis. Twelve experienced shearers were videotaped while shearing with and without the use of a back harness. Surface mounted retro-reflective markers placed on the trunk defined three linked segments: Pelvis, Lumbar and Head, Arms, and Upper Trunk (HAUT). A 3D, link segment, top down, inverse dynamics approach was used to describe the motion and to estimate forces involved during the identified tasks of shearing. The spinal force/time profiles of this sample of shearers demonstrated large compressive and shear forces for all three tasks that are close to the NIOSH and University of Waterloo action limits for compressive and shear forces respectively (McGill 1997 , Yingling and McGill 1999 , Marras 2000 ). The use of the back support harness reduced these forces by substantial and statistically significant amounts. This effect was consistent across all three tasks. The results of this study demonstrate the production of high levels of compressive and shear forces within the spine of shearers during the three shearing tasks studied and that the use of a back support harness can substantially reduce these forces. Therefore the use of a back harness may reduce the cumulative load on the spine during shearing thereby moderating damage to the articular structures. However it is not known whether the harness would protect the spine from a sudden or unexpected force.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-0139</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1366-5847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00140130410001699155</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15370857</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ERGOAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Animal Husbandry - instrumentation ; Animals ; Applied physiology ; Back ; Back harness ; Biological and medical sciences ; Ergonomics ; Ergonomics. Work place. Occupational physiology ; Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology ; Humans ; Low Back Pain - prevention &amp; control ; Lumbosacral Region - physiology ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Motion ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; New Zealand ; Occupation force ; Occupational Exposure - prevention &amp; control ; Occupational hazards ; Orthotic Devices ; Posture ; Sheep ; Sheep shearing ; Spine ; Wool</subject><ispartof>Ergonomics, 2004-09, Vol.47 (11), p.1208-1225</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2004</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group Sep 15, 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-147c4a490d0a9ad8de5b36c80dbcdb76ef8a97d75613c13b13035ea5e354aef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-147c4a490d0a9ad8de5b36c80dbcdb76ef8a97d75613c13b13035ea5e354aef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16042030$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15370857$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Milosavljevic, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carman, Allan B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milburn, Peter D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Barry D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Peter L</creatorcontrib><title>The influence of a back support harness on spinal forces during sheep shearing</title><title>Ergonomics</title><addtitle>Ergonomics</addtitle><description>Previous research has classified the occupation of sheep shearing as heavy work where shearers flex their spine and hips for long periods of time, handle awkward loads and expend high amounts of energy. The aim of this research was to investigate the magnitude of spinal forces produced during the shearing phase of the work and to determine whether the use of a commercially available back support harness would reduce these forces. Following discussion on task complexity and risk of back injury with senior shearing instructors, three component tasks of the shearing phase were identified as posing high risk of injury and were prioritized for primary analysis. Although the dragging out of a sheep in preparation for shearing and an unexpected loss of animal control were also identified as being of high risk, technological and instrumentation difficulties precluded their analysis. Twelve experienced shearers were videotaped while shearing with and without the use of a back harness. Surface mounted retro-reflective markers placed on the trunk defined three linked segments: Pelvis, Lumbar and Head, Arms, and Upper Trunk (HAUT). A 3D, link segment, top down, inverse dynamics approach was used to describe the motion and to estimate forces involved during the identified tasks of shearing. The spinal force/time profiles of this sample of shearers demonstrated large compressive and shear forces for all three tasks that are close to the NIOSH and University of Waterloo action limits for compressive and shear forces respectively (McGill 1997 , Yingling and McGill 1999 , Marras 2000 ). The use of the back support harness reduced these forces by substantial and statistically significant amounts. This effect was consistent across all three tasks. The results of this study demonstrate the production of high levels of compressive and shear forces within the spine of shearers during the three shearing tasks studied and that the use of a back support harness can substantially reduce these forces. Therefore the use of a back harness may reduce the cumulative load on the spine during shearing thereby moderating damage to the articular structures. However it is not known whether the harness would protect the spine from a sudden or unexpected force.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Animal Husbandry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied physiology</subject><subject>Back</subject><subject>Back harness</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Ergonomics</subject><subject>Ergonomics. Work place. Occupational physiology</subject><subject>Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Lumbosacral Region - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>New Zealand</subject><subject>Occupation force</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Occupational hazards</subject><subject>Orthotic Devices</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>Sheep shearing</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Wool</subject><issn>0014-0139</issn><issn>1366-5847</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9rGzEQxUVoiF233yAUUchxm5H1b9VLKSZNAyG5-L7MStp40_VqK-2S-ttHxi65GHIZzcDvPZ4eIZcMvjEo4RqACWAcBIO8KmOYlGdkzrhShSyF_kDme6TIjJmRjyk955Mzs7wgMya5hlLqOXlYbzxt-6abfG89DQ1FWqP9Q9M0DCGOdIOx9ynR0NM0tD12tAnR-kTdFNv-iaaN98N-4v78RM4b7JL_fHwXZP3rZr36Xdw_3t6tft4XVig9FkxoK1AYcIAGXem8rLmyJbjaulor35RotNNSMW4Zr_M3ufQoPZcCfcMX5OvBdojh7-TTWD2HKeZwqVpCaUAZbTIkDpCNIaXom2qI7RbjrmJQ7SusTlWYZV-O3lO99e5NdOwsA1dHAJPFronY2za9cQrEEnLgBflx4HK9IW7xJcTOVSPuuhD_i_g7Ub6_63BKWI3_Rv4KAbSesg</recordid><startdate>20040915</startdate><enddate>20040915</enddate><creator>Milosavljevic, Stephan</creator><creator>Carman, Allan B</creator><creator>Milburn, Peter D</creator><creator>Wilson, Barry D</creator><creator>Davidson, Peter L</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis LLC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040915</creationdate><title>The influence of a back support harness on spinal forces during sheep shearing</title><author>Milosavljevic, Stephan ; Carman, Allan B ; Milburn, Peter D ; Wilson, Barry D ; Davidson, Peter L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-147c4a490d0a9ad8de5b36c80dbcdb76ef8a97d75613c13b13035ea5e354aef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Animal Husbandry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied physiology</topic><topic>Back</topic><topic>Back harness</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Ergonomics</topic><topic>Ergonomics. Work place. Occupational physiology</topic><topic>Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Lumbosacral Region - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic><topic>Occupation force</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Occupational hazards</topic><topic>Orthotic Devices</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>Sheep shearing</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Wool</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Milosavljevic, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carman, Allan B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milburn, Peter D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Barry D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Peter L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Milosavljevic, Stephan</au><au>Carman, Allan B</au><au>Milburn, Peter D</au><au>Wilson, Barry D</au><au>Davidson, Peter L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The influence of a back support harness on spinal forces during sheep shearing</atitle><jtitle>Ergonomics</jtitle><addtitle>Ergonomics</addtitle><date>2004-09-15</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1208</spage><epage>1225</epage><pages>1208-1225</pages><issn>0014-0139</issn><eissn>1366-5847</eissn><coden>ERGOAX</coden><abstract>Previous research has classified the occupation of sheep shearing as heavy work where shearers flex their spine and hips for long periods of time, handle awkward loads and expend high amounts of energy. The aim of this research was to investigate the magnitude of spinal forces produced during the shearing phase of the work and to determine whether the use of a commercially available back support harness would reduce these forces. Following discussion on task complexity and risk of back injury with senior shearing instructors, three component tasks of the shearing phase were identified as posing high risk of injury and were prioritized for primary analysis. Although the dragging out of a sheep in preparation for shearing and an unexpected loss of animal control were also identified as being of high risk, technological and instrumentation difficulties precluded their analysis. Twelve experienced shearers were videotaped while shearing with and without the use of a back harness. Surface mounted retro-reflective markers placed on the trunk defined three linked segments: Pelvis, Lumbar and Head, Arms, and Upper Trunk (HAUT). A 3D, link segment, top down, inverse dynamics approach was used to describe the motion and to estimate forces involved during the identified tasks of shearing. The spinal force/time profiles of this sample of shearers demonstrated large compressive and shear forces for all three tasks that are close to the NIOSH and University of Waterloo action limits for compressive and shear forces respectively (McGill 1997 , Yingling and McGill 1999 , Marras 2000 ). The use of the back support harness reduced these forces by substantial and statistically significant amounts. This effect was consistent across all three tasks. The results of this study demonstrate the production of high levels of compressive and shear forces within the spine of shearers during the three shearing tasks studied and that the use of a back support harness can substantially reduce these forces. Therefore the use of a back harness may reduce the cumulative load on the spine during shearing thereby moderating damage to the articular structures. However it is not known whether the harness would protect the spine from a sudden or unexpected force.</abstract><cop>London</cop><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</pub><pmid>15370857</pmid><doi>10.1080/00140130410001699155</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-0139
ispartof Ergonomics, 2004-09, Vol.47 (11), p.1208-1225
issn 0014-0139
1366-5847
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_208906979
source Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection
subjects Adult
Animal Husbandry - instrumentation
Animals
Applied physiology
Back
Back harness
Biological and medical sciences
Ergonomics
Ergonomics. Work place. Occupational physiology
Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology
Humans
Low Back Pain - prevention & control
Lumbosacral Region - physiology
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Motion
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
New Zealand
Occupation force
Occupational Exposure - prevention & control
Occupational hazards
Orthotic Devices
Posture
Sheep
Sheep shearing
Spine
Wool
title The influence of a back support harness on spinal forces during sheep shearing
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T08%3A34%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20influence%20of%20a%20back%20support%20harness%20on%20spinal%20forces%20during%20sheep%20shearing&rft.jtitle=Ergonomics&rft.au=Milosavljevic,%20Stephan&rft.date=2004-09-15&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1208&rft.epage=1225&rft.pages=1208-1225&rft.issn=0014-0139&rft.eissn=1366-5847&rft.coden=ERGOAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00140130410001699155&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E726647441%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-147c4a490d0a9ad8de5b36c80dbcdb76ef8a97d75613c13b13035ea5e354aef3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=208906979&rft_id=info:pmid/15370857&rfr_iscdi=true