Loading…

A Reassessment of urban structure and land-use patterns: distance to CBD or network-based? — Evidence from Chicago

Distance to the CBD and neighboring commercial employment (land-use) have been the core determinants of spatial-related production externalities for firms. In these models, travel time to work (firms) is the single most important factor for residential land-use allocation. New theories of complex ur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Regional science and urban economics 2018-05, Vol.70, p.215-228
Main Authors: Pan, Haozhi, Deal, Brian, Chen, Yan, Hewings, Geoffrey
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-ca0540a9e3483e8c7df924ccb738b931cd1aefe70b7160a9615580461a6f68993
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-ca0540a9e3483e8c7df924ccb738b931cd1aefe70b7160a9615580461a6f68993
container_end_page 228
container_issue
container_start_page 215
container_title Regional science and urban economics
container_volume 70
creator Pan, Haozhi
Deal, Brian
Chen, Yan
Hewings, Geoffrey
description Distance to the CBD and neighboring commercial employment (land-use) have been the core determinants of spatial-related production externalities for firms. In these models, travel time to work (firms) is the single most important factor for residential land-use allocation. New theories of complex urban systems (CUS), however, have begun to cast some doubt on the efficacy of the “distance to CBD” model. There is some evidence for example, that large urban systems might evolve with scale-free transportation networks. In this paper, we examine urban land-use data from the Chicago Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) to argue for a theoretical shift from a “distance to CBD” based prototype to one that considers the complexity inherent in urban systems structure. We use a Stochastic Greedy Algorithm to quantify connectivity and attractions to every land cell (30 × 30 m) to existing population and employment centers, Points of Interests (POIs), and highway and major roads. We measure the frequency of commercial and resident land-uses relative to these found attraction levels and develop algorithms that help explain the relations. Using these methods, we find that both CBD-driven and network-driven approaches are empirically valid for explaining current urban structures. We also find, however, that these relations change when temporal variables are considered. For example, we found that the land-use change in Chicago from 2001 to 2011 is an obvious deviation from the “distance to CBD” based urban growth assumption. Our results suggest that we should re-examine the core urban structure assumptions of spatial equilibrium models. •Residential and commercial land-uses in Chicago are distributed along networks.•Amenities are the most important determinants in household location choices.•Existing commercial activity shows spatial externalities to other commercial.•New commercial developments have different spatial externalities to existing ones.•Distance-based and trip-to-work based economic policies need reconsideration.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2018.04.009
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2089726956</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0166046217303472</els_id><sourcerecordid>2089726956</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-ca0540a9e3483e8c7df924ccb738b931cd1aefe70b7160a9615580461a6f68993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwBwvWCXZ-HLsbVNryI1VCQrC2HGdSEtq42E4ROw7BCTkJjsqCJZsZafS9N3oPoXNKYkoou2xjCyunm96WoE2cEMpjksWEiAM0orwQUZISfohGAWYRyVhyjE6cawkJhyQdIT_Fj6CcA-c20Hlsahy8VIedt732vQWsugqvw4h6B3irvAfbuQmuGudVpwF7g2fXc2ws7sC_G_salcpBdYW_P7_wYtdUMFC1NRs8e2m0WplTdFSrtYOz3z1GzzeLp9ldtHy4vZ9Nl5HOaOEjrUieESUgzXgKXBdVLZJM67JIeSlSqiuqoIaClAVlgWM0z3nISBWrGRciHaOLve_WmrcenJet6W0XXsqEcFEkTOQsUJM9pa1xzkItt7bZKPshKZFDy7KVf1uWQ8uSZDK0HMTzvRhCjl0DVgZuCFw1FrSXlWn-Y_MDfIuN8w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2089726956</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Reassessment of urban structure and land-use patterns: distance to CBD or network-based? — Evidence from Chicago</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Pan, Haozhi ; Deal, Brian ; Chen, Yan ; Hewings, Geoffrey</creator><creatorcontrib>Pan, Haozhi ; Deal, Brian ; Chen, Yan ; Hewings, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><description>Distance to the CBD and neighboring commercial employment (land-use) have been the core determinants of spatial-related production externalities for firms. In these models, travel time to work (firms) is the single most important factor for residential land-use allocation. New theories of complex urban systems (CUS), however, have begun to cast some doubt on the efficacy of the “distance to CBD” model. There is some evidence for example, that large urban systems might evolve with scale-free transportation networks. In this paper, we examine urban land-use data from the Chicago Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) to argue for a theoretical shift from a “distance to CBD” based prototype to one that considers the complexity inherent in urban systems structure. We use a Stochastic Greedy Algorithm to quantify connectivity and attractions to every land cell (30 × 30 m) to existing population and employment centers, Points of Interests (POIs), and highway and major roads. We measure the frequency of commercial and resident land-uses relative to these found attraction levels and develop algorithms that help explain the relations. Using these methods, we find that both CBD-driven and network-driven approaches are empirically valid for explaining current urban structures. We also find, however, that these relations change when temporal variables are considered. For example, we found that the land-use change in Chicago from 2001 to 2011 is an obvious deviation from the “distance to CBD” based urban growth assumption. Our results suggest that we should re-examine the core urban structure assumptions of spatial equilibrium models. •Residential and commercial land-uses in Chicago are distributed along networks.•Amenities are the most important determinants in household location choices.•Existing commercial activity shows spatial externalities to other commercial.•New commercial developments have different spatial externalities to existing ones.•Distance-based and trip-to-work based economic policies need reconsideration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0166-0462</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2308</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2018.04.009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; CBD ; Central business districts ; Complex urban system ; Deviation ; Efficacy ; Employment ; Equilibrium ; Externality ; Greedy algorithm ; Land ; Land use ; Metropolitan statistical areas ; Production externalities ; Scale-free networks ; Stochastic models ; Stochasticity ; Transportation ; Transportation networks ; Urban areas ; Urban growth ; Urban sprawl ; Urban structure ; Urban structures</subject><ispartof>Regional science and urban economics, 2018-05, Vol.70, p.215-228</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. May 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-ca0540a9e3483e8c7df924ccb738b931cd1aefe70b7160a9615580461a6f68993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-ca0540a9e3483e8c7df924ccb738b931cd1aefe70b7160a9615580461a6f68993</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9981-5474 ; 0000-0002-0709-632X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pan, Haozhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deal, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hewings, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><title>A Reassessment of urban structure and land-use patterns: distance to CBD or network-based? — Evidence from Chicago</title><title>Regional science and urban economics</title><description>Distance to the CBD and neighboring commercial employment (land-use) have been the core determinants of spatial-related production externalities for firms. In these models, travel time to work (firms) is the single most important factor for residential land-use allocation. New theories of complex urban systems (CUS), however, have begun to cast some doubt on the efficacy of the “distance to CBD” model. There is some evidence for example, that large urban systems might evolve with scale-free transportation networks. In this paper, we examine urban land-use data from the Chicago Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) to argue for a theoretical shift from a “distance to CBD” based prototype to one that considers the complexity inherent in urban systems structure. We use a Stochastic Greedy Algorithm to quantify connectivity and attractions to every land cell (30 × 30 m) to existing population and employment centers, Points of Interests (POIs), and highway and major roads. We measure the frequency of commercial and resident land-uses relative to these found attraction levels and develop algorithms that help explain the relations. Using these methods, we find that both CBD-driven and network-driven approaches are empirically valid for explaining current urban structures. We also find, however, that these relations change when temporal variables are considered. For example, we found that the land-use change in Chicago from 2001 to 2011 is an obvious deviation from the “distance to CBD” based urban growth assumption. Our results suggest that we should re-examine the core urban structure assumptions of spatial equilibrium models. •Residential and commercial land-uses in Chicago are distributed along networks.•Amenities are the most important determinants in household location choices.•Existing commercial activity shows spatial externalities to other commercial.•New commercial developments have different spatial externalities to existing ones.•Distance-based and trip-to-work based economic policies need reconsideration.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>CBD</subject><subject>Central business districts</subject><subject>Complex urban system</subject><subject>Deviation</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Externality</subject><subject>Greedy algorithm</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Metropolitan statistical areas</subject><subject>Production externalities</subject><subject>Scale-free networks</subject><subject>Stochastic models</subject><subject>Stochasticity</subject><subject>Transportation</subject><subject>Transportation networks</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban growth</subject><subject>Urban sprawl</subject><subject>Urban structure</subject><subject>Urban structures</subject><issn>0166-0462</issn><issn>1879-2308</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwBwvWCXZ-HLsbVNryI1VCQrC2HGdSEtq42E4ROw7BCTkJjsqCJZsZafS9N3oPoXNKYkoou2xjCyunm96WoE2cEMpjksWEiAM0orwQUZISfohGAWYRyVhyjE6cawkJhyQdIT_Fj6CcA-c20Hlsahy8VIedt732vQWsugqvw4h6B3irvAfbuQmuGudVpwF7g2fXc2ws7sC_G_salcpBdYW_P7_wYtdUMFC1NRs8e2m0WplTdFSrtYOz3z1GzzeLp9ldtHy4vZ9Nl5HOaOEjrUieESUgzXgKXBdVLZJM67JIeSlSqiuqoIaClAVlgWM0z3nISBWrGRciHaOLve_WmrcenJet6W0XXsqEcFEkTOQsUJM9pa1xzkItt7bZKPshKZFDy7KVf1uWQ8uSZDK0HMTzvRhCjl0DVgZuCFw1FrSXlWn-Y_MDfIuN8w</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Pan, Haozhi</creator><creator>Deal, Brian</creator><creator>Chen, Yan</creator><creator>Hewings, Geoffrey</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9981-5474</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0709-632X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>A Reassessment of urban structure and land-use patterns: distance to CBD or network-based? — Evidence from Chicago</title><author>Pan, Haozhi ; Deal, Brian ; Chen, Yan ; Hewings, Geoffrey</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-ca0540a9e3483e8c7df924ccb738b931cd1aefe70b7160a9615580461a6f68993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>CBD</topic><topic>Central business districts</topic><topic>Complex urban system</topic><topic>Deviation</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Externality</topic><topic>Greedy algorithm</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Metropolitan statistical areas</topic><topic>Production externalities</topic><topic>Scale-free networks</topic><topic>Stochastic models</topic><topic>Stochasticity</topic><topic>Transportation</topic><topic>Transportation networks</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban growth</topic><topic>Urban sprawl</topic><topic>Urban structure</topic><topic>Urban structures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pan, Haozhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deal, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hewings, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Regional science and urban economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pan, Haozhi</au><au>Deal, Brian</au><au>Chen, Yan</au><au>Hewings, Geoffrey</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Reassessment of urban structure and land-use patterns: distance to CBD or network-based? — Evidence from Chicago</atitle><jtitle>Regional science and urban economics</jtitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>70</volume><spage>215</spage><epage>228</epage><pages>215-228</pages><issn>0166-0462</issn><eissn>1879-2308</eissn><abstract>Distance to the CBD and neighboring commercial employment (land-use) have been the core determinants of spatial-related production externalities for firms. In these models, travel time to work (firms) is the single most important factor for residential land-use allocation. New theories of complex urban systems (CUS), however, have begun to cast some doubt on the efficacy of the “distance to CBD” model. There is some evidence for example, that large urban systems might evolve with scale-free transportation networks. In this paper, we examine urban land-use data from the Chicago Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) to argue for a theoretical shift from a “distance to CBD” based prototype to one that considers the complexity inherent in urban systems structure. We use a Stochastic Greedy Algorithm to quantify connectivity and attractions to every land cell (30 × 30 m) to existing population and employment centers, Points of Interests (POIs), and highway and major roads. We measure the frequency of commercial and resident land-uses relative to these found attraction levels and develop algorithms that help explain the relations. Using these methods, we find that both CBD-driven and network-driven approaches are empirically valid for explaining current urban structures. We also find, however, that these relations change when temporal variables are considered. For example, we found that the land-use change in Chicago from 2001 to 2011 is an obvious deviation from the “distance to CBD” based urban growth assumption. Our results suggest that we should re-examine the core urban structure assumptions of spatial equilibrium models. •Residential and commercial land-uses in Chicago are distributed along networks.•Amenities are the most important determinants in household location choices.•Existing commercial activity shows spatial externalities to other commercial.•New commercial developments have different spatial externalities to existing ones.•Distance-based and trip-to-work based economic policies need reconsideration.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2018.04.009</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9981-5474</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0709-632X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0166-0462
ispartof Regional science and urban economics, 2018-05, Vol.70, p.215-228
issn 0166-0462
1879-2308
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2089726956
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Algorithms
CBD
Central business districts
Complex urban system
Deviation
Efficacy
Employment
Equilibrium
Externality
Greedy algorithm
Land
Land use
Metropolitan statistical areas
Production externalities
Scale-free networks
Stochastic models
Stochasticity
Transportation
Transportation networks
Urban areas
Urban growth
Urban sprawl
Urban structure
Urban structures
title A Reassessment of urban structure and land-use patterns: distance to CBD or network-based? — Evidence from Chicago
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T05%3A39%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Reassessment%20of%20urban%20structure%20and%20land-use%20patterns:%20distance%20to%20CBD%20or%20network-based?%20%E2%80%94%20Evidence%20from%20Chicago&rft.jtitle=Regional%20science%20and%20urban%20economics&rft.au=Pan,%20Haozhi&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=70&rft.spage=215&rft.epage=228&rft.pages=215-228&rft.issn=0166-0462&rft.eissn=1879-2308&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2018.04.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2089726956%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-ca0540a9e3483e8c7df924ccb738b931cd1aefe70b7160a9615580461a6f68993%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2089726956&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true