Loading…

A review of interventions for the reduction of driving anger

•Describes and reviews empirical support for interventions for driving anger reduction.•Concludes there is beginning empirical support for cognitive, relaxation, behavioral, and combined interventions.•Concludes interventions are generally equivalent in effectiveness.•Outlines directions for future...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour Traffic psychology and behaviour, 2016-10, Vol.42, p.411-421
Main Author: Deffenbacher, Jerry L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-e2e45ea8327bc6ae0f282ef8b5775453d8de349ec6ca76a8da907d5e44dce1cf3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-e2e45ea8327bc6ae0f282ef8b5775453d8de349ec6ca76a8da907d5e44dce1cf3
container_end_page 421
container_issue
container_start_page 411
container_title Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour
container_volume 42
creator Deffenbacher, Jerry L.
description •Describes and reviews empirical support for interventions for driving anger reduction.•Concludes there is beginning empirical support for cognitive, relaxation, behavioral, and combined interventions.•Concludes interventions are generally equivalent in effectiveness.•Outlines directions for future research on helping angry drivers. This paper describes and reviews the efficacy of interventions to lower anger and aggression in angry drivers. The review suggests there is beginning empirical support for cognitive, relaxation, and behavioral interventions and their combinations. Thus, it suggests that therapeutic and prevention researchers and practitioners have a base of empirically supported interventions from which to develop and tailor interventions to specific populations. It also points to promising interventions (e.g., acceptance-based interventions) that may enhance intervention effectiveness. Anchoring the targeting of interventions to empirically established elements of the angry driver’s experience provides an empirical and logical basis from which to construct mediation analyses to assess if interventions effect change along theoretically specified vectors of change (e.g., does cognitive therapy lead to change in cognitive aspects of driving anger which, in turn, mediate change in other aspects of driving anger). The paper draws general conclusions regarding the status of outcome research on driving anger reduction and concludes with several recommendations for future research.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.trf.2015.10.024
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2090480809</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1369847815001758</els_id><sourcerecordid>2090480809</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-e2e45ea8327bc6ae0f282ef8b5775453d8de349ec6ca76a8da907d5e44dce1cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wNuC513zucmil1KsCgUveg5pMqlZdLcmacV_b5Z69jRf7zszPAhdE9wQTNrbvsnRNxQTUeoGU36CZkRJVgtB5GnJWdvVikt1ji5S6jHGnBI5Q_eLKsIhwHc1-ioMGeIBhhzGIVV-jFV-hzJ3ezu1JomL4RCGbWWGLcRLdObNR4KrvzhHb6uH1-VTvX55fF4u1rVlguUaKHABRjEqN7Y1gD1VFLzaCCkFF8wpB4x3YFtrZGuUMx2WTgDnzgKxns3RzXHvLo5fe0hZ9-M-DuWkprjDXGGFu6IiR5WNY0oRvN7F8GnijyZYT5B0rwskPUGaWgVS8dwdPVDeLxiiTjbAYMGFCDZrN4Z_3L9ktG9_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2090480809</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A review of interventions for the reduction of driving anger</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Deffenbacher, Jerry L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Deffenbacher, Jerry L.</creatorcontrib><description>•Describes and reviews empirical support for interventions for driving anger reduction.•Concludes there is beginning empirical support for cognitive, relaxation, behavioral, and combined interventions.•Concludes interventions are generally equivalent in effectiveness.•Outlines directions for future research on helping angry drivers. This paper describes and reviews the efficacy of interventions to lower anger and aggression in angry drivers. The review suggests there is beginning empirical support for cognitive, relaxation, and behavioral interventions and their combinations. Thus, it suggests that therapeutic and prevention researchers and practitioners have a base of empirically supported interventions from which to develop and tailor interventions to specific populations. It also points to promising interventions (e.g., acceptance-based interventions) that may enhance intervention effectiveness. Anchoring the targeting of interventions to empirically established elements of the angry driver’s experience provides an empirical and logical basis from which to construct mediation analyses to assess if interventions effect change along theoretically specified vectors of change (e.g., does cognitive therapy lead to change in cognitive aspects of driving anger which, in turn, mediate change in other aspects of driving anger). The paper draws general conclusions regarding the status of outcome research on driving anger reduction and concludes with several recommendations for future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1369-8478</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5517</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2015.10.024</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier India Pvt Ltd</publisher><subject>Aggressiveness ; Anchoring ; Anger ; Automobile drivers ; Automobile driving ; Behavior modification ; Behavioral intervention ; Cognitive intervention ; Driving anger reduction ; Empirical analysis ; Mindfulness intervention ; Reduction ; Relaxation intervention</subject><ispartof>Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour, 2016-10, Vol.42, p.411-421</ispartof><rights>2015</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-e2e45ea8327bc6ae0f282ef8b5775453d8de349ec6ca76a8da907d5e44dce1cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-e2e45ea8327bc6ae0f282ef8b5775453d8de349ec6ca76a8da907d5e44dce1cf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Deffenbacher, Jerry L.</creatorcontrib><title>A review of interventions for the reduction of driving anger</title><title>Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour</title><description>•Describes and reviews empirical support for interventions for driving anger reduction.•Concludes there is beginning empirical support for cognitive, relaxation, behavioral, and combined interventions.•Concludes interventions are generally equivalent in effectiveness.•Outlines directions for future research on helping angry drivers. This paper describes and reviews the efficacy of interventions to lower anger and aggression in angry drivers. The review suggests there is beginning empirical support for cognitive, relaxation, and behavioral interventions and their combinations. Thus, it suggests that therapeutic and prevention researchers and practitioners have a base of empirically supported interventions from which to develop and tailor interventions to specific populations. It also points to promising interventions (e.g., acceptance-based interventions) that may enhance intervention effectiveness. Anchoring the targeting of interventions to empirically established elements of the angry driver’s experience provides an empirical and logical basis from which to construct mediation analyses to assess if interventions effect change along theoretically specified vectors of change (e.g., does cognitive therapy lead to change in cognitive aspects of driving anger which, in turn, mediate change in other aspects of driving anger). The paper draws general conclusions regarding the status of outcome research on driving anger reduction and concludes with several recommendations for future research.</description><subject>Aggressiveness</subject><subject>Anchoring</subject><subject>Anger</subject><subject>Automobile drivers</subject><subject>Automobile driving</subject><subject>Behavior modification</subject><subject>Behavioral intervention</subject><subject>Cognitive intervention</subject><subject>Driving anger reduction</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Mindfulness intervention</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Relaxation intervention</subject><issn>1369-8478</issn><issn>1873-5517</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wNuC513zucmil1KsCgUveg5pMqlZdLcmacV_b5Z69jRf7zszPAhdE9wQTNrbvsnRNxQTUeoGU36CZkRJVgtB5GnJWdvVikt1ji5S6jHGnBI5Q_eLKsIhwHc1-ioMGeIBhhzGIVV-jFV-hzJ3ezu1JomL4RCGbWWGLcRLdObNR4KrvzhHb6uH1-VTvX55fF4u1rVlguUaKHABRjEqN7Y1gD1VFLzaCCkFF8wpB4x3YFtrZGuUMx2WTgDnzgKxns3RzXHvLo5fe0hZ9-M-DuWkprjDXGGFu6IiR5WNY0oRvN7F8GnijyZYT5B0rwskPUGaWgVS8dwdPVDeLxiiTjbAYMGFCDZrN4Z_3L9ktG9_</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Deffenbacher, Jerry L.</creator><general>Elsevier India Pvt Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>A review of interventions for the reduction of driving anger</title><author>Deffenbacher, Jerry L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-e2e45ea8327bc6ae0f282ef8b5775453d8de349ec6ca76a8da907d5e44dce1cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aggressiveness</topic><topic>Anchoring</topic><topic>Anger</topic><topic>Automobile drivers</topic><topic>Automobile driving</topic><topic>Behavior modification</topic><topic>Behavioral intervention</topic><topic>Cognitive intervention</topic><topic>Driving anger reduction</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Mindfulness intervention</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Relaxation intervention</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Deffenbacher, Jerry L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Deffenbacher, Jerry L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A review of interventions for the reduction of driving anger</atitle><jtitle>Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour</jtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>42</volume><spage>411</spage><epage>421</epage><pages>411-421</pages><issn>1369-8478</issn><eissn>1873-5517</eissn><abstract>•Describes and reviews empirical support for interventions for driving anger reduction.•Concludes there is beginning empirical support for cognitive, relaxation, behavioral, and combined interventions.•Concludes interventions are generally equivalent in effectiveness.•Outlines directions for future research on helping angry drivers. This paper describes and reviews the efficacy of interventions to lower anger and aggression in angry drivers. The review suggests there is beginning empirical support for cognitive, relaxation, and behavioral interventions and their combinations. Thus, it suggests that therapeutic and prevention researchers and practitioners have a base of empirically supported interventions from which to develop and tailor interventions to specific populations. It also points to promising interventions (e.g., acceptance-based interventions) that may enhance intervention effectiveness. Anchoring the targeting of interventions to empirically established elements of the angry driver’s experience provides an empirical and logical basis from which to construct mediation analyses to assess if interventions effect change along theoretically specified vectors of change (e.g., does cognitive therapy lead to change in cognitive aspects of driving anger which, in turn, mediate change in other aspects of driving anger). The paper draws general conclusions regarding the status of outcome research on driving anger reduction and concludes with several recommendations for future research.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier India Pvt Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.trf.2015.10.024</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1369-8478
ispartof Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour, 2016-10, Vol.42, p.411-421
issn 1369-8478
1873-5517
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2090480809
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Aggressiveness
Anchoring
Anger
Automobile drivers
Automobile driving
Behavior modification
Behavioral intervention
Cognitive intervention
Driving anger reduction
Empirical analysis
Mindfulness intervention
Reduction
Relaxation intervention
title A review of interventions for the reduction of driving anger
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T10%3A02%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20review%20of%20interventions%20for%20the%20reduction%20of%20driving%20anger&rft.jtitle=Transportation%20research.%20Part%20F,%20Traffic%20psychology%20and%20behaviour&rft.au=Deffenbacher,%20Jerry%20L.&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=42&rft.spage=411&rft.epage=421&rft.pages=411-421&rft.issn=1369-8478&rft.eissn=1873-5517&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.trf.2015.10.024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2090480809%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-e2e45ea8327bc6ae0f282ef8b5775453d8de349ec6ca76a8da907d5e44dce1cf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2090480809&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true