Loading…
Abrasive size and load effects on the wear of a 19.9% chromium and 2.9% carbon cast iron
The effects of applied loads and abrasive sizes on the wear of a 2.9% carbon and 19.9% chromium martensitic white cast iron were investigated. Abrasive wear tests using a pin test on silica and garnet papers (ASTM G132) were carried out using three different abrasive average sizes: 67μm, 149μm and 1...
Saved in:
Published in: | Wear 2017-04, Vol.376-377, p.46-53 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-24e48c81c056a8da412a532d8bdd46819039afa1a818ed3031bd1e1cb54dac603 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-24e48c81c056a8da412a532d8bdd46819039afa1a818ed3031bd1e1cb54dac603 |
container_end_page | 53 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 46 |
container_title | Wear |
container_volume | 376-377 |
creator | Tozetti, K.D. Albertin, E. Scandian, C. |
description | The effects of applied loads and abrasive sizes on the wear of a 2.9% carbon and 19.9% chromium martensitic white cast iron were investigated. Abrasive wear tests using a pin test on silica and garnet papers (ASTM G132) were carried out using three different abrasive average sizes: 67μm, 149μm and 177μm and two applied normal load: 5N and 10N. A modified rubber wheel abrasion test (ASTM G65) was carried out using three abrasive average sizes - 90μm, 115μm and 170μm quartz sand - and three applied normal loads: 44N, 80N and 130N. The abrasive shape and the wear surface of the specimens were examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The worn surfaces topography was obtained with a Taylor Hobson 3-D surface analyser. In the pin test with silica paper, a change in the magnitude of the volume loss was observed as a result of increasing the applied load from 5N to 10N. In the rubber wheel abrasion tests the mass loss increased with the increase of particle size until a critical particle size was reached. In general, the mass loss increased with the increase of the applied load and the abrasive size. For the lower load and the smallest abrasive size wear grooves were observed only in the martensitic matrix while the carbides remained intact. With higher loads and larger abrasives, scratching was observed also in the carbides. A wear map is proposed with a ‘wear rate’ parameter developed in this work plotted against abrasive sizes.
•A methodology for construction an abrasive wear map for a martensitic high chromium cast iron is proposed.•A wear map was built, summarizing wear rates and wear mechanisms resulting from different testing methods and conditions.•In both type of wear tests, increases in the abrasive grain size and in the normal load caused increases in the wear rates. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.wear.2017.02.008 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2090533891</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0043164817302831</els_id><sourcerecordid>2090533891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-24e48c81c056a8da412a532d8bdd46819039afa1a818ed3031bd1e1cb54dac603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFNAPO46k-xus-ClFL-g4EXBW5hNsjSl3dRkW9Ff77b17GlgeJ_5eBi7RsgRsLpb5l-OYi4AJzmIHECdsBGqicxEOZmcshFAITOsCnXOLlJaAgDWZTViH9MmUvI7x5P_cZw6y1eBLHdt60yfeOh4v3B8P52HlhPHOq9vuVnEsPbb9QEQhw7FZggbSj33MXSX7KylVXJXf3XM3h8f3mbP2fz16WU2nWdGCtVnonCFMgoNlBUpSwUKKqWwqrG2qBTWIGtqCUmhclaCxMaiQ9OUhSVTgRyzm-PcTQyfW5d6vQzb2A0rtYAaSilVjUNKHFMmhpSia_Um-jXFb42g9wb1Uu9_1HuDGoQeDA7Q_RFyw_0776JOxrvOOOvjIEfb4P_DfwGaz3cP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2090533891</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Abrasive size and load effects on the wear of a 19.9% chromium and 2.9% carbon cast iron</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Tozetti, K.D. ; Albertin, E. ; Scandian, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tozetti, K.D. ; Albertin, E. ; Scandian, C.</creatorcontrib><description>The effects of applied loads and abrasive sizes on the wear of a 2.9% carbon and 19.9% chromium martensitic white cast iron were investigated. Abrasive wear tests using a pin test on silica and garnet papers (ASTM G132) were carried out using three different abrasive average sizes: 67μm, 149μm and 177μm and two applied normal load: 5N and 10N. A modified rubber wheel abrasion test (ASTM G65) was carried out using three abrasive average sizes - 90μm, 115μm and 170μm quartz sand - and three applied normal loads: 44N, 80N and 130N. The abrasive shape and the wear surface of the specimens were examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The worn surfaces topography was obtained with a Taylor Hobson 3-D surface analyser. In the pin test with silica paper, a change in the magnitude of the volume loss was observed as a result of increasing the applied load from 5N to 10N. In the rubber wheel abrasion tests the mass loss increased with the increase of particle size until a critical particle size was reached. In general, the mass loss increased with the increase of the applied load and the abrasive size. For the lower load and the smallest abrasive size wear grooves were observed only in the martensitic matrix while the carbides remained intact. With higher loads and larger abrasives, scratching was observed also in the carbides. A wear map is proposed with a ‘wear rate’ parameter developed in this work plotted against abrasive sizes.
•A methodology for construction an abrasive wear map for a martensitic high chromium cast iron is proposed.•A wear map was built, summarizing wear rates and wear mechanisms resulting from different testing methods and conditions.•In both type of wear tests, increases in the abrasive grain size and in the normal load caused increases in the wear rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1648</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2577</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2017.02.008</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Abrasion ; Abrasive size ; Abrasive wear ; Abrasive wear mechanisms ; Abrasive wheels ; Abrasives ; Carbides ; Carbon ; Cast iron ; Chromium ; Grooves ; Iron ; Load ; Loads (forces) ; Normal load ; Particle size ; Rubber ; Scratching ; Silicon dioxide ; Wear ; Wear map ; Wear rate ; Wear tests ; White cast iron</subject><ispartof>Wear, 2017-04, Vol.376-377, p.46-53</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Apr 15, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-24e48c81c056a8da412a532d8bdd46819039afa1a818ed3031bd1e1cb54dac603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-24e48c81c056a8da412a532d8bdd46819039afa1a818ed3031bd1e1cb54dac603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tozetti, K.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albertin, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scandian, C.</creatorcontrib><title>Abrasive size and load effects on the wear of a 19.9% chromium and 2.9% carbon cast iron</title><title>Wear</title><description>The effects of applied loads and abrasive sizes on the wear of a 2.9% carbon and 19.9% chromium martensitic white cast iron were investigated. Abrasive wear tests using a pin test on silica and garnet papers (ASTM G132) were carried out using three different abrasive average sizes: 67μm, 149μm and 177μm and two applied normal load: 5N and 10N. A modified rubber wheel abrasion test (ASTM G65) was carried out using three abrasive average sizes - 90μm, 115μm and 170μm quartz sand - and three applied normal loads: 44N, 80N and 130N. The abrasive shape and the wear surface of the specimens were examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The worn surfaces topography was obtained with a Taylor Hobson 3-D surface analyser. In the pin test with silica paper, a change in the magnitude of the volume loss was observed as a result of increasing the applied load from 5N to 10N. In the rubber wheel abrasion tests the mass loss increased with the increase of particle size until a critical particle size was reached. In general, the mass loss increased with the increase of the applied load and the abrasive size. For the lower load and the smallest abrasive size wear grooves were observed only in the martensitic matrix while the carbides remained intact. With higher loads and larger abrasives, scratching was observed also in the carbides. A wear map is proposed with a ‘wear rate’ parameter developed in this work plotted against abrasive sizes.
•A methodology for construction an abrasive wear map for a martensitic high chromium cast iron is proposed.•A wear map was built, summarizing wear rates and wear mechanisms resulting from different testing methods and conditions.•In both type of wear tests, increases in the abrasive grain size and in the normal load caused increases in the wear rates.</description><subject>Abrasion</subject><subject>Abrasive size</subject><subject>Abrasive wear</subject><subject>Abrasive wear mechanisms</subject><subject>Abrasive wheels</subject><subject>Abrasives</subject><subject>Carbides</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Cast iron</subject><subject>Chromium</subject><subject>Grooves</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Load</subject><subject>Loads (forces)</subject><subject>Normal load</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>Rubber</subject><subject>Scratching</subject><subject>Silicon dioxide</subject><subject>Wear</subject><subject>Wear map</subject><subject>Wear rate</subject><subject>Wear tests</subject><subject>White cast iron</subject><issn>0043-1648</issn><issn>1873-2577</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFNAPO46k-xus-ClFL-g4EXBW5hNsjSl3dRkW9Ff77b17GlgeJ_5eBi7RsgRsLpb5l-OYi4AJzmIHECdsBGqicxEOZmcshFAITOsCnXOLlJaAgDWZTViH9MmUvI7x5P_cZw6y1eBLHdt60yfeOh4v3B8P52HlhPHOq9vuVnEsPbb9QEQhw7FZggbSj33MXSX7KylVXJXf3XM3h8f3mbP2fz16WU2nWdGCtVnonCFMgoNlBUpSwUKKqWwqrG2qBTWIGtqCUmhclaCxMaiQ9OUhSVTgRyzm-PcTQyfW5d6vQzb2A0rtYAaSilVjUNKHFMmhpSia_Um-jXFb42g9wb1Uu9_1HuDGoQeDA7Q_RFyw_0776JOxrvOOOvjIEfb4P_DfwGaz3cP</recordid><startdate>20170415</startdate><enddate>20170415</enddate><creator>Tozetti, K.D.</creator><creator>Albertin, E.</creator><creator>Scandian, C.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170415</creationdate><title>Abrasive size and load effects on the wear of a 19.9% chromium and 2.9% carbon cast iron</title><author>Tozetti, K.D. ; Albertin, E. ; Scandian, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-24e48c81c056a8da412a532d8bdd46819039afa1a818ed3031bd1e1cb54dac603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Abrasion</topic><topic>Abrasive size</topic><topic>Abrasive wear</topic><topic>Abrasive wear mechanisms</topic><topic>Abrasive wheels</topic><topic>Abrasives</topic><topic>Carbides</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Cast iron</topic><topic>Chromium</topic><topic>Grooves</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Load</topic><topic>Loads (forces)</topic><topic>Normal load</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>Rubber</topic><topic>Scratching</topic><topic>Silicon dioxide</topic><topic>Wear</topic><topic>Wear map</topic><topic>Wear rate</topic><topic>Wear tests</topic><topic>White cast iron</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tozetti, K.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albertin, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scandian, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Wear</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tozetti, K.D.</au><au>Albertin, E.</au><au>Scandian, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Abrasive size and load effects on the wear of a 19.9% chromium and 2.9% carbon cast iron</atitle><jtitle>Wear</jtitle><date>2017-04-15</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>376-377</volume><spage>46</spage><epage>53</epage><pages>46-53</pages><issn>0043-1648</issn><eissn>1873-2577</eissn><abstract>The effects of applied loads and abrasive sizes on the wear of a 2.9% carbon and 19.9% chromium martensitic white cast iron were investigated. Abrasive wear tests using a pin test on silica and garnet papers (ASTM G132) were carried out using three different abrasive average sizes: 67μm, 149μm and 177μm and two applied normal load: 5N and 10N. A modified rubber wheel abrasion test (ASTM G65) was carried out using three abrasive average sizes - 90μm, 115μm and 170μm quartz sand - and three applied normal loads: 44N, 80N and 130N. The abrasive shape and the wear surface of the specimens were examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The worn surfaces topography was obtained with a Taylor Hobson 3-D surface analyser. In the pin test with silica paper, a change in the magnitude of the volume loss was observed as a result of increasing the applied load from 5N to 10N. In the rubber wheel abrasion tests the mass loss increased with the increase of particle size until a critical particle size was reached. In general, the mass loss increased with the increase of the applied load and the abrasive size. For the lower load and the smallest abrasive size wear grooves were observed only in the martensitic matrix while the carbides remained intact. With higher loads and larger abrasives, scratching was observed also in the carbides. A wear map is proposed with a ‘wear rate’ parameter developed in this work plotted against abrasive sizes.
•A methodology for construction an abrasive wear map for a martensitic high chromium cast iron is proposed.•A wear map was built, summarizing wear rates and wear mechanisms resulting from different testing methods and conditions.•In both type of wear tests, increases in the abrasive grain size and in the normal load caused increases in the wear rates.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.wear.2017.02.008</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1648 |
ispartof | Wear, 2017-04, Vol.376-377, p.46-53 |
issn | 0043-1648 1873-2577 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2090533891 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Abrasion Abrasive size Abrasive wear Abrasive wear mechanisms Abrasive wheels Abrasives Carbides Carbon Cast iron Chromium Grooves Iron Load Loads (forces) Normal load Particle size Rubber Scratching Silicon dioxide Wear Wear map Wear rate Wear tests White cast iron |
title | Abrasive size and load effects on the wear of a 19.9% chromium and 2.9% carbon cast iron |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T10%3A03%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Abrasive%20size%20and%20load%20effects%20on%20the%20wear%20of%20a%2019.9%25%20chromium%20and%202.9%25%20carbon%20cast%20iron&rft.jtitle=Wear&rft.au=Tozetti,%20K.D.&rft.date=2017-04-15&rft.volume=376-377&rft.spage=46&rft.epage=53&rft.pages=46-53&rft.issn=0043-1648&rft.eissn=1873-2577&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wear.2017.02.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2090533891%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-24e48c81c056a8da412a532d8bdd46819039afa1a818ed3031bd1e1cb54dac603%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2090533891&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |