Development of Water Budget for Tailwater Recovery Systems in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley

AbstractUnsustainable groundwater use for agricultural irrigation has led to declining aquifer levels across the United States, necessitating implementation of water conservation practices. One conservation practice being implemented throughout the lower Mississippi River alluvial valley (LMAV) that...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering 2018-06, Vol.144 (6)
Main Authors: Omer, A. R, Dyer, J. L, Prince Czarnecki, J. M, Kröger, R, Allen, P. J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Alluvial valleys
Aquifers
Case Studies
Case Study
Conservation practices
Dimensions
Groundwater
Groundwater flow
Irrigation
Irrigation water
Mathematical analysis
Recovery
Rivers
Surface water
Tailwater
Volume transport
Water budget
Water conservation
Water depth
Water resources
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:AbstractUnsustainable groundwater use for agricultural irrigation has led to declining aquifer levels across the United States, necessitating implementation of water conservation practices. One conservation practice being implemented throughout the lower Mississippi River alluvial valley (LMAV) that collects and stores surface water for irrigation is a tailwater recovery (TWR) system. Accordingly, the overall objective of this study was to develop a water budget for TWR systems. Eight TWR systems were continuously monitored for water depth, allowing rates of water gain and loss to be quantified. Volumes of water movement were calculated based on change in water depth and system dimensions. Using water budgets derived from TWR systems the water volume was calculated and found to be gaining, except during months of irrigation. Extrapolating the water budget to all TWR systems shows a total offset of 15% of the annual groundwater deficit. Tailwater recovery system efficiencies show designs may be altered to improve the water savings and use of these systems.
ISSN:0733-9437
1943-4774
DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001302