Loading…
From Commentary to paribhāṣās: Kātyāyana and Patañjali vis-à-vis Vyāḍi
The present paper is targeted on three landmarks in the long story of the s’ development. Two of these landmarks descended from the earliest testimony of Vyākaraṇa meta-rules, i. e. those included in Pāṇini’s grammar (fifth–fourth century BCE), and one which has been handed down as the first indepen...
Saved in:
Published in: | Asiatische Studien 2018-08, Vol.72 (2), p.515-566 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The present paper is targeted on three landmarks in the long story of the
s’ development. Two of these landmarks descended from the earliest testimony of Vyākaraṇa meta-rules, i. e. those included in Pāṇini’s grammar (fifth–fourth century BCE), and one which has been handed down as the first independent collection of
s and attributed to Vyāḍi. In particular a shift is highlighted between Kātyāyaṇa’s (third century BCE) integrative approach (
) and Patañjali’s (second century BCE) recourse to implicit
s in the
as a powerful hermeneutical tool. A shift that helps in interpreting the need for a validation and collection of implicit pāṇinian
s as carried out by authors such as Vyāḍi. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0004-4717 2235-5871 |
DOI: | 10.1515/asia-2018-0013 |