Loading…

A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF GENOMIC RISK STRATIFICATION ASSAYS FOR COLON CANCER

OBJECTIVES: Multi-gene assays and microarray technologies are being used increasingly for risk stratification of stage II colon cancer patients to predict disease relapse and guide adjuvant therapy decisions. Our objective was to evaluate the outcomes and cost-effectiveness of using ColoPrint (Agend...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Value in health 2017-05, Vol.20 (5), p.A111
Main Authors: Chaudhari, VS, Issa, AM
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page A111
container_title Value in health
container_volume 20
creator Chaudhari, VS
Issa, AM
description OBJECTIVES: Multi-gene assays and microarray technologies are being used increasingly for risk stratification of stage II colon cancer patients to predict disease relapse and guide adjuvant therapy decisions. Our objective was to evaluate the outcomes and cost-effectiveness of using ColoPrint (Agendia Inc., Irvine, CA) as compared with Oncotype DX Colon Cancer Assay (Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City, CA) in the treatment of stage II colon cancer patients. METHODS: As part of a larger study to develop a Markov model, we conducted a review of the literature from January 2005 to December 2016 to assess data on risk classification; recurrence rates, transition probabilities, utilities and costs used for GEP assays in patients with stage II colon cancer. We investigated outcomes in three stages - no recurrence, recurrence, and death. For costs, we considered gene test costs; the costs of adjuvant chemotherapy, costs associated with adverse events and treatment, the cost of treating recurrence, and end-of-life care costs. RESULTS: A retrospective data analysis of 6,064 patients for both multigene assays in stage II or III colon cancer was conducted. We found that the recurrence score (RS) and microsatellite (MSI) status are the most reliable factors for prognosis of stage II colon cancer patients. For 5,307 patients using Oncotype DX, we found RS of 780 patients (14.69%) were in the low risk group, 990 patients (18.65%) in the intermediate risk group and 950 patients (17.90%) in the high-risk group. For 757 patients using ColoPrint, we found that the MSI status of 485 patients (64.06%) was in the low risk group and 272 patients were (35.93%) in the high-risk group. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-gene assays can predict the development of distant metastasis of patients with stage II colon cancer and may improve prognostic accuracy for safe therapeutic management of patients in treatment decisions about chemotherapy.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jval.2017.05.005
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2097658262</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2097658262</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20976582623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNissKwjAURIMo-PwBVxdcN94kptVlCKkGayNJEFyJC10U8VX1--3CD3Azc5gzhIwZUoYsnVa0-hwvlCPLKEqKKFukxySfJbNMiHbDuJgnApnskn5dV4iYCi57xCnwJnoXtkZHuzOgSlXsgw3gclia0m2sBm_DGkL0Ktrc6iZdCSoEtQ-QOw_aFc2gVamNH5LO-XipT6NfD8gkN1Gvkvvz9nif6tehur2f10YdOC6yVM55ysV_ry-RPD5H</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2097658262</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF GENOMIC RISK STRATIFICATION ASSAYS FOR COLON CANCER</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Chaudhari, VS ; Issa, AM</creator><creatorcontrib>Chaudhari, VS ; Issa, AM</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVES: Multi-gene assays and microarray technologies are being used increasingly for risk stratification of stage II colon cancer patients to predict disease relapse and guide adjuvant therapy decisions. Our objective was to evaluate the outcomes and cost-effectiveness of using ColoPrint (Agendia Inc., Irvine, CA) as compared with Oncotype DX Colon Cancer Assay (Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City, CA) in the treatment of stage II colon cancer patients. METHODS: As part of a larger study to develop a Markov model, we conducted a review of the literature from January 2005 to December 2016 to assess data on risk classification; recurrence rates, transition probabilities, utilities and costs used for GEP assays in patients with stage II colon cancer. We investigated outcomes in three stages - no recurrence, recurrence, and death. For costs, we considered gene test costs; the costs of adjuvant chemotherapy, costs associated with adverse events and treatment, the cost of treating recurrence, and end-of-life care costs. RESULTS: A retrospective data analysis of 6,064 patients for both multigene assays in stage II or III colon cancer was conducted. We found that the recurrence score (RS) and microsatellite (MSI) status are the most reliable factors for prognosis of stage II colon cancer patients. For 5,307 patients using Oncotype DX, we found RS of 780 patients (14.69%) were in the low risk group, 990 patients (18.65%) in the intermediate risk group and 950 patients (17.90%) in the high-risk group. For 757 patients using ColoPrint, we found that the MSI status of 485 patients (64.06%) was in the low risk group and 272 patients were (35.93%) in the high-risk group. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-gene assays can predict the development of distant metastasis of patients with stage II colon cancer and may improve prognostic accuracy for safe therapeutic management of patients in treatment decisions about chemotherapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-3015</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4733</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.05.005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrenceville: Elsevier Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Adjuvant therapy ; Bioassays ; Chemotherapy ; Classification ; Colon cancer ; Colorectal cancer ; Cost analysis ; Critical incidents ; Data processing ; Decision making ; DNA microarrays ; End of life decisions ; Genomics ; Health care expenditures ; High risk ; Literature reviews ; Medical prognosis ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Patients ; Recurrence ; Relapse ; Risk assessment ; Risk groups ; Stratification</subject><ispartof>Value in health, 2017-05, Vol.20 (5), p.A111</ispartof><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. May 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chaudhari, VS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Issa, AM</creatorcontrib><title>A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF GENOMIC RISK STRATIFICATION ASSAYS FOR COLON CANCER</title><title>Value in health</title><description>OBJECTIVES: Multi-gene assays and microarray technologies are being used increasingly for risk stratification of stage II colon cancer patients to predict disease relapse and guide adjuvant therapy decisions. Our objective was to evaluate the outcomes and cost-effectiveness of using ColoPrint (Agendia Inc., Irvine, CA) as compared with Oncotype DX Colon Cancer Assay (Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City, CA) in the treatment of stage II colon cancer patients. METHODS: As part of a larger study to develop a Markov model, we conducted a review of the literature from January 2005 to December 2016 to assess data on risk classification; recurrence rates, transition probabilities, utilities and costs used for GEP assays in patients with stage II colon cancer. We investigated outcomes in three stages - no recurrence, recurrence, and death. For costs, we considered gene test costs; the costs of adjuvant chemotherapy, costs associated with adverse events and treatment, the cost of treating recurrence, and end-of-life care costs. RESULTS: A retrospective data analysis of 6,064 patients for both multigene assays in stage II or III colon cancer was conducted. We found that the recurrence score (RS) and microsatellite (MSI) status are the most reliable factors for prognosis of stage II colon cancer patients. For 5,307 patients using Oncotype DX, we found RS of 780 patients (14.69%) were in the low risk group, 990 patients (18.65%) in the intermediate risk group and 950 patients (17.90%) in the high-risk group. For 757 patients using ColoPrint, we found that the MSI status of 485 patients (64.06%) was in the low risk group and 272 patients were (35.93%) in the high-risk group. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-gene assays can predict the development of distant metastasis of patients with stage II colon cancer and may improve prognostic accuracy for safe therapeutic management of patients in treatment decisions about chemotherapy.</description><subject>Adjuvant therapy</subject><subject>Bioassays</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Colon cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Critical incidents</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>DNA microarrays</subject><subject>End of life decisions</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>High risk</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Relapse</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk groups</subject><subject>Stratification</subject><issn>1098-3015</issn><issn>1524-4733</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNissKwjAURIMo-PwBVxdcN94kptVlCKkGayNJEFyJC10U8VX1--3CD3Azc5gzhIwZUoYsnVa0-hwvlCPLKEqKKFukxySfJbNMiHbDuJgnApnskn5dV4iYCi57xCnwJnoXtkZHuzOgSlXsgw3gclia0m2sBm_DGkL0Ktrc6iZdCSoEtQ-QOw_aFc2gVamNH5LO-XipT6NfD8gkN1Gvkvvz9nif6tehur2f10YdOC6yVM55ysV_ry-RPD5H</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Chaudhari, VS</creator><creator>Issa, AM</creator><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF GENOMIC RISK STRATIFICATION ASSAYS FOR COLON CANCER</title><author>Chaudhari, VS ; Issa, AM</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20976582623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adjuvant therapy</topic><topic>Bioassays</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Colon cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Critical incidents</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>DNA microarrays</topic><topic>End of life decisions</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>High risk</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Relapse</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk groups</topic><topic>Stratification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chaudhari, VS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Issa, AM</creatorcontrib><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Value in health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chaudhari, VS</au><au>Issa, AM</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF GENOMIC RISK STRATIFICATION ASSAYS FOR COLON CANCER</atitle><jtitle>Value in health</jtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>A111</spage><pages>A111-</pages><issn>1098-3015</issn><eissn>1524-4733</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVES: Multi-gene assays and microarray technologies are being used increasingly for risk stratification of stage II colon cancer patients to predict disease relapse and guide adjuvant therapy decisions. Our objective was to evaluate the outcomes and cost-effectiveness of using ColoPrint (Agendia Inc., Irvine, CA) as compared with Oncotype DX Colon Cancer Assay (Genomic Health Inc., Redwood City, CA) in the treatment of stage II colon cancer patients. METHODS: As part of a larger study to develop a Markov model, we conducted a review of the literature from January 2005 to December 2016 to assess data on risk classification; recurrence rates, transition probabilities, utilities and costs used for GEP assays in patients with stage II colon cancer. We investigated outcomes in three stages - no recurrence, recurrence, and death. For costs, we considered gene test costs; the costs of adjuvant chemotherapy, costs associated with adverse events and treatment, the cost of treating recurrence, and end-of-life care costs. RESULTS: A retrospective data analysis of 6,064 patients for both multigene assays in stage II or III colon cancer was conducted. We found that the recurrence score (RS) and microsatellite (MSI) status are the most reliable factors for prognosis of stage II colon cancer patients. For 5,307 patients using Oncotype DX, we found RS of 780 patients (14.69%) were in the low risk group, 990 patients (18.65%) in the intermediate risk group and 950 patients (17.90%) in the high-risk group. For 757 patients using ColoPrint, we found that the MSI status of 485 patients (64.06%) was in the low risk group and 272 patients were (35.93%) in the high-risk group. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-gene assays can predict the development of distant metastasis of patients with stage II colon cancer and may improve prognostic accuracy for safe therapeutic management of patients in treatment decisions about chemotherapy.</abstract><cop>Lawrenceville</cop><pub>Elsevier Science Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jval.2017.05.005</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1098-3015
ispartof Value in health, 2017-05, Vol.20 (5), p.A111
issn 1098-3015
1524-4733
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2097658262
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)
subjects Adjuvant therapy
Bioassays
Chemotherapy
Classification
Colon cancer
Colorectal cancer
Cost analysis
Critical incidents
Data processing
Decision making
DNA microarrays
End of life decisions
Genomics
Health care expenditures
High risk
Literature reviews
Medical prognosis
Metastases
Metastasis
Patients
Recurrence
Relapse
Risk assessment
Risk groups
Stratification
title A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF GENOMIC RISK STRATIFICATION ASSAYS FOR COLON CANCER
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T21%3A17%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20RETROSPECTIVE%20ANALYSIS%20OF%20GENOMIC%20RISK%20STRATIFICATION%20ASSAYS%20FOR%20COLON%20CANCER&rft.jtitle=Value%20in%20health&rft.au=Chaudhari,%20VS&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=A111&rft.pages=A111-&rft.issn=1098-3015&rft.eissn=1524-4733&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jval.2017.05.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2097658262%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20976582623%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2097658262&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true